Loading…

Comparison of Four Different DNA Isolation Methods from MGIT Culture for Long-Read Whole Genome Sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global health challenge, particularly due to drug resistance and limitations in rapid diagnosis. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), especially long-read whole genome sequencing (WGS), shows promise for rapidly detecting TB and drug resistance, but it requires h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Jundishapur journal of microbiology 2024-11, Vol.17 (9)
Main Authors: Arslan, Nazlı, Demiray-Gurbuz, Ebru, Ozkutuk, Nuri, Esen, Nuran, Özkütük, Ayşe Aydan
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global health challenge, particularly due to drug resistance and limitations in rapid diagnosis. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), especially long-read whole genome sequencing (WGS), shows promise for rapidly detecting TB and drug resistance, but it requires high-quality DNA, which is difficult to extract from Mycobacterium tuberculosis due to its complex cell wall. Objectives: This study evaluated four DNA isolation methods for extracting pure DNA from M. tuberculosis, aiming to standardize protocols for long-read WGS. Methods: Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37RV colonies were grown in BACTEC MGIT liquid medium. Two pellets were prepared as the initial material for the DNA extraction protocol: Pellets from 1 mL McFarland 2 suspensions and all growing colonies from two MGIT liquid cultures. Four DNA extraction methods were used: The cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method, GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit, Quick-DNA Fecal/Soil Microbe Kit, and Genematrix Tissue/Bacterial DNA Purification Kit, with some modifications. DNA quality was assessed based on concentration, purity, and integrity. Results: Among the tested methods, the Quick-DNA Fecal/Soil Kit yielded approximately 85 ng/mL of DNA and a purity of 1.9 at 260/280 nm from the colonial pellet of two MGIT tubes. However, lower intact DNA [DNA integrity number (DIN) ~ 6.8] was obtained with this kit. The CTAB method provided the highest intact DNA (DIN ~ 9.5), although the purity of the DNA was not sufficient. Conclusions: Based on three repetitions of McF-2 and colonial pellet extractions, the Quick-DNA Fecal/Soil Kit yielded the highest DNA quantity and purity but showed lower integrity compared to other methods, indicating the need for adjustments. A pellet from two MGIT cultures (~ 100 µL) is suitable for long-read WGS with this kit. However, a larger sample size is required to generalize these findings. For effective long-read sequencing of M. tuberculosis, DNA extraction protocols must be optimized to balance yield, fragment size, and purity for accurate sequencing and drug resistance analysis.
ISSN:2008-3645
2008-4161
DOI:10.5812/jjm-148070