Loading…
on my mind: The Conceptual Chicken and the Procedural Egg
One lesson we learned early on in child psychology courses is that learning progresses from the concrete to the semiconcrete, or representational, and finally to the abstract or symbolic level. At first glance, this seems to be not only logical but also a given fact of life. This vision of learning...
Saved in:
Published in: | Mathematics teaching in the middle school 2010-11, Vol.16 (4), p.196-198 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | One lesson we learned early on in child psychology courses is that learning progresses from the concrete to the semiconcrete, or representational, and finally to the abstract or symbolic level. At first glance, this seems to be not only logical but also a given fact of life. This vision of learning is a linear progression. When applied to mathematics, this learning theory leads to the assumption that the use of manipulatives and hands-on learning experiences should precede procedural symbol manipulation. It also leads to the belief that using manipulatives can ensure understanding of more abstract representations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1072-0839 2328-5486 |
DOI: | 10.5951/MTMS.16.4.0196 |