Loading…

Modelling of airborne EM anomalies with magnetic and electric dipoles buried in a layered earth

An automated algorithm is described that selects and models spatially discrete anomalies in airborne EM (AEM) data sets. For anomalies to be selected they have to be wide enough to have their origin in the subsurface and narrow enough to be caused by a discrete conductor. After determining backgroun...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Exploration geophysics (Melbourne) 2006-01, Vol.37 (3), p.254-260
Main Authors: Sattel, Daniel, Reid, James
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-b1dff70401beed5e62071e8d04f404baa5eff989647896b3d7cc2b82b9e16e473
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-b1dff70401beed5e62071e8d04f404baa5eff989647896b3d7cc2b82b9e16e473
container_end_page 260
container_issue 3
container_start_page 254
container_title Exploration geophysics (Melbourne)
container_volume 37
creator Sattel, Daniel
Reid, James
description An automated algorithm is described that selects and models spatially discrete anomalies in airborne EM (AEM) data sets. For anomalies to be selected they have to be wide enough to have their origin in the subsurface and narrow enough to be caused by a discrete conductor. After determining background conductivity models with layered-earth inversions from the EM data, identified EM anomalies are modelled with magnetic and electric dipoles buried inside a layered earth. Magnetic dipoles are appropriate models for discrete, sheet-like conductors inside a resistive host, i.e., in scenarios where vortex currents dominate, whereas electric dipoles are expected to model well elongated structures excited by current channelling. The model parameters determined from each data segment include, for magnetic dipole solutions: the target conductor position, depth, dip, size, and conductance; and for electric dipoles: the position and depth. The method is fully automated with the dipole start models being determined by curve matching from digital look-up tables. Results from synthetic data indicate the efficiency and reliability of the method. The technique was applied to TEMPEST and GEOTEM data acquired across the Bull Creek prospect, Queensland and Harmony deposit, W.A., respectively. The algorithm provides a sensible description of both mineralisations. Other anomalies are interpreted as being caused by shallow structures channelling current, discrete conductors beneath the overburden, and the lateral heterogeneity of the overburden. Exploration Geophysics 37(3) 254 - 260  doi:10.1071/EG06254
doi_str_mv 10.1071/EG06254
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_csiro</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_csiro_primary_EG06254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20989850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-b1dff70401beed5e62071e8d04f404baa5eff989647896b3d7cc2b82b9e16e473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PAyEQxYnRxFqNX8ADJz2twgL752iaWk1svOiZwDK0mN2lAo3224tpozcvM3nzfjPJG4QuKbmlpKZ38wWpSsGP0IQ2jBe1YOwYTUhDy4K1jThFZzG-EyIEZ9UEyaU30PduXGFvsXJB-zACni-xGv2gegcRf7q0xoNajZBcl-cGQw9dClkYt_F9RvQ2ODDYjVjhXu0gZAEqpPU5OrGqj3Bx6FP09jB_nT0Wzy-Lp9n9c6FYKVKhqbG2JpxQDWAEVGWOAo0h3HLCtVICrG2btuJ1LpqZuutK3ZS6BVoBr9kUXe_vboL_2EJMcnCxy8nUCH4bZUnydiNIBm_2YBd8jAGs3AQ3qLCTlMifB8rDAzN5dSCjC_4X-7PxP7ZMX4l9A3oRd4k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20989850</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modelling of airborne EM anomalies with magnetic and electric dipoles buried in a layered earth</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Sattel, Daniel ; Reid, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Sattel, Daniel ; Reid, James</creatorcontrib><description>An automated algorithm is described that selects and models spatially discrete anomalies in airborne EM (AEM) data sets. For anomalies to be selected they have to be wide enough to have their origin in the subsurface and narrow enough to be caused by a discrete conductor. After determining background conductivity models with layered-earth inversions from the EM data, identified EM anomalies are modelled with magnetic and electric dipoles buried inside a layered earth. Magnetic dipoles are appropriate models for discrete, sheet-like conductors inside a resistive host, i.e., in scenarios where vortex currents dominate, whereas electric dipoles are expected to model well elongated structures excited by current channelling. The model parameters determined from each data segment include, for magnetic dipole solutions: the target conductor position, depth, dip, size, and conductance; and for electric dipoles: the position and depth. The method is fully automated with the dipole start models being determined by curve matching from digital look-up tables. Results from synthetic data indicate the efficiency and reliability of the method. The technique was applied to TEMPEST and GEOTEM data acquired across the Bull Creek prospect, Queensland and Harmony deposit, W.A., respectively. The algorithm provides a sensible description of both mineralisations. Other anomalies are interpreted as being caused by shallow structures channelling current, discrete conductors beneath the overburden, and the lateral heterogeneity of the overburden. Exploration Geophysics 37(3) 254 - 260  doi:10.1071/EG06254</description><identifier>ISSN: 0812-3985</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1834-7533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1071/EG06254</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Exploration geophysics (Melbourne), 2006-01, Vol.37 (3), p.254-260</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-b1dff70401beed5e62071e8d04f404baa5eff989647896b3d7cc2b82b9e16e473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-b1dff70401beed5e62071e8d04f404baa5eff989647896b3d7cc2b82b9e16e473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sattel, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, James</creatorcontrib><title>Modelling of airborne EM anomalies with magnetic and electric dipoles buried in a layered earth</title><title>Exploration geophysics (Melbourne)</title><description>An automated algorithm is described that selects and models spatially discrete anomalies in airborne EM (AEM) data sets. For anomalies to be selected they have to be wide enough to have their origin in the subsurface and narrow enough to be caused by a discrete conductor. After determining background conductivity models with layered-earth inversions from the EM data, identified EM anomalies are modelled with magnetic and electric dipoles buried inside a layered earth. Magnetic dipoles are appropriate models for discrete, sheet-like conductors inside a resistive host, i.e., in scenarios where vortex currents dominate, whereas electric dipoles are expected to model well elongated structures excited by current channelling. The model parameters determined from each data segment include, for magnetic dipole solutions: the target conductor position, depth, dip, size, and conductance; and for electric dipoles: the position and depth. The method is fully automated with the dipole start models being determined by curve matching from digital look-up tables. Results from synthetic data indicate the efficiency and reliability of the method. The technique was applied to TEMPEST and GEOTEM data acquired across the Bull Creek prospect, Queensland and Harmony deposit, W.A., respectively. The algorithm provides a sensible description of both mineralisations. Other anomalies are interpreted as being caused by shallow structures channelling current, discrete conductors beneath the overburden, and the lateral heterogeneity of the overburden. Exploration Geophysics 37(3) 254 - 260  doi:10.1071/EG06254</description><issn>0812-3985</issn><issn>1834-7533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9PAyEQxYnRxFqNX8ADJz2twgL752iaWk1svOiZwDK0mN2lAo3224tpozcvM3nzfjPJG4QuKbmlpKZ38wWpSsGP0IQ2jBe1YOwYTUhDy4K1jThFZzG-EyIEZ9UEyaU30PduXGFvsXJB-zACni-xGv2gegcRf7q0xoNajZBcl-cGQw9dClkYt_F9RvQ2ODDYjVjhXu0gZAEqpPU5OrGqj3Bx6FP09jB_nT0Wzy-Lp9n9c6FYKVKhqbG2JpxQDWAEVGWOAo0h3HLCtVICrG2btuJ1LpqZuutK3ZS6BVoBr9kUXe_vboL_2EJMcnCxy8nUCH4bZUnydiNIBm_2YBd8jAGs3AQ3qLCTlMifB8rDAzN5dSCjC_4X-7PxP7ZMX4l9A3oRd4k</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Sattel, Daniel</creator><creator>Reid, James</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Modelling of airborne EM anomalies with magnetic and electric dipoles buried in a layered earth</title><author>Sattel, Daniel ; Reid, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-b1dff70401beed5e62071e8d04f404baa5eff989647896b3d7cc2b82b9e16e473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sattel, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, James</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Exploration geophysics (Melbourne)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sattel, Daniel</au><au>Reid, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modelling of airborne EM anomalies with magnetic and electric dipoles buried in a layered earth</atitle><jtitle>Exploration geophysics (Melbourne)</jtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>254</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>254-260</pages><issn>0812-3985</issn><eissn>1834-7533</eissn><abstract>An automated algorithm is described that selects and models spatially discrete anomalies in airborne EM (AEM) data sets. For anomalies to be selected they have to be wide enough to have their origin in the subsurface and narrow enough to be caused by a discrete conductor. After determining background conductivity models with layered-earth inversions from the EM data, identified EM anomalies are modelled with magnetic and electric dipoles buried inside a layered earth. Magnetic dipoles are appropriate models for discrete, sheet-like conductors inside a resistive host, i.e., in scenarios where vortex currents dominate, whereas electric dipoles are expected to model well elongated structures excited by current channelling. The model parameters determined from each data segment include, for magnetic dipole solutions: the target conductor position, depth, dip, size, and conductance; and for electric dipoles: the position and depth. The method is fully automated with the dipole start models being determined by curve matching from digital look-up tables. Results from synthetic data indicate the efficiency and reliability of the method. The technique was applied to TEMPEST and GEOTEM data acquired across the Bull Creek prospect, Queensland and Harmony deposit, W.A., respectively. The algorithm provides a sensible description of both mineralisations. Other anomalies are interpreted as being caused by shallow structures channelling current, discrete conductors beneath the overburden, and the lateral heterogeneity of the overburden. Exploration Geophysics 37(3) 254 - 260  doi:10.1071/EG06254</abstract><doi>10.1071/EG06254</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0812-3985
ispartof Exploration geophysics (Melbourne), 2006-01, Vol.37 (3), p.254-260
issn 0812-3985
1834-7533
language eng
recordid cdi_csiro_primary_EG06254
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
title Modelling of airborne EM anomalies with magnetic and electric dipoles buried in a layered earth
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T11%3A00%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_csiro&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modelling%20of%20airborne%20EM%20anomalies%20with%20magnetic%20and%20electric%20dipoles%20buried%20in%20a%20layered%20earth&rft.jtitle=Exploration%20geophysics%20(Melbourne)&rft.au=Sattel,%20Daniel&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=254&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=254-260&rft.issn=0812-3985&rft.eissn=1834-7533&rft_id=info:doi/10.1071/EG06254&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_csiro%3E20989850%3C/proquest_csiro%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-b1dff70401beed5e62071e8d04f404baa5eff989647896b3d7cc2b82b9e16e473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20989850&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true