Loading…
Ocular Reduction in EEG Signals Based on Adaptive Filtering, Regression and Blind Source Separation
Quantitative electroencephalographic (EEG) analysis is very useful for diagnosing dysfunctional neural states and for evaluating drug effects on the brain, among others. However, the bidirectional contamination between electrooculographic (EOG) and cerebral activities can mislead and induce wrong co...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of biomedical engineering 2009, Vol.37 (1), p.176-191 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-b3fda2c2e4ed7aba304a68735e5660c21a4a50f12c945de5044899cd5eda86673 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-b3fda2c2e4ed7aba304a68735e5660c21a4a50f12c945de5044899cd5eda86673 |
container_end_page | 191 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 176 |
container_title | Annals of biomedical engineering |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Romero, S Mañanas, M. A Barbanoj, M. J |
description | Quantitative electroencephalographic (EEG) analysis is very useful for diagnosing dysfunctional neural states and for evaluating drug effects on the brain, among others. However, the bidirectional contamination between electrooculographic (EOG) and cerebral activities can mislead and induce wrong conclusions from EEG recordings. Different methods for ocular reduction have been developed but only few studies have shown an objective evaluation of their performance. For this purpose, the following approaches were evaluated with simulated data: regression analysis, adaptive filtering, and blind source separation (BSS). In the first two, filtered versions were also taken into account by filtering EOG references in order to reduce the cancellation of cerebral high frequency components in EEG data. Performance of these methods was quantitatively evaluated by level of similarity, agreement and errors in spectral variables both between sources and corrected EEG recordings. Topographic distributions showed that errors were located at anterior sites and especially in frontopolar and lateral-frontal regions. In addition, these errors were higher in theta and especially delta band. In general, filtered versions of time-domain regression and of adaptive filtering with RLS algorithm provided a very effective ocular reduction. However, BSS based on second order statistics showed the highest similarity indexes and the lowest errors in spectral variables. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10439-008-9589-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_csuc_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_csuc_recercat_oai_recercat_cat_2072_187753</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2226791021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-b3fda2c2e4ed7aba304a68735e5660c21a4a50f12c945de5044899cd5eda86673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUk1v1DAUjBCILoUfwAUiDnAh8PxtH9tqW5AqVWLp2fLaLytX2WSxk0r8exxlpUUcysG2bM3Me543VfWWwBcCoL5mApyZBkA3RmjTyGfVigjFGiO1fF6tAAw00kh-Vr3K-QGAEM3Ey-qMaKMFF2xV-Ts_dS7VPzBMfoxDX8e-Xq9v6k3c9a7L9aXLGOryfhHcYYyPWF_HbsQU-93nwtolzHmmuT7Ul10s-2aYksd6gweX3Cz5unrRFil8czzPq_vr9c-rb83t3c33q4vbxgtOxmbL2uCop8gxKLd1DLiTWjGBQkrwlDjuBLSEesNFQAGca2N8EBicllKx84osuj5P3ib0mLwb7eDi6TIvCopaopUSrHA-LZxDGn5NmEe7j9lj17kehylbVWySihhZkB-fRJYOqAYN_wUywaA0Tgvwwz_Ah2Ld7LrVlGghNcBfn0pDzglbe0hx79JvS8DOKbBLCmxJgZ1TYOdW3x2Fp-0ew4lxHHsB0AWQD_MgMZ0qP6X6fiG1brBul2K29xsKhAEpFgnF2R8oQ8Qt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821856800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ocular Reduction in EEG Signals Based on Adaptive Filtering, Regression and Blind Source Separation</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Romero, S ; Mañanas, M. A ; Barbanoj, M. J</creator><creatorcontrib>Romero, S ; Mañanas, M. A ; Barbanoj, M. J</creatorcontrib><description>Quantitative electroencephalographic (EEG) analysis is very useful for diagnosing dysfunctional neural states and for evaluating drug effects on the brain, among others. However, the bidirectional contamination between electrooculographic (EOG) and cerebral activities can mislead and induce wrong conclusions from EEG recordings. Different methods for ocular reduction have been developed but only few studies have shown an objective evaluation of their performance. For this purpose, the following approaches were evaluated with simulated data: regression analysis, adaptive filtering, and blind source separation (BSS). In the first two, filtered versions were also taken into account by filtering EOG references in order to reduce the cancellation of cerebral high frequency components in EEG data. Performance of these methods was quantitatively evaluated by level of similarity, agreement and errors in spectral variables both between sources and corrected EEG recordings. Topographic distributions showed that errors were located at anterior sites and especially in frontopolar and lateral-frontal regions. In addition, these errors were higher in theta and especially delta band. In general, filtered versions of time-domain regression and of adaptive filtering with RLS algorithm provided a very effective ocular reduction. However, BSS based on second order statistics showed the highest similarity indexes and the lowest errors in spectral variables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-6964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-9686</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10439-008-9589-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18985453</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Boston : Springer US</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Biochemistry ; Biological and Medical Physics ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Biomedicine ; Biophysics ; Ciències de la salut ; Ciències de la visió ; Classical Mechanics ; Computer Simulation ; Electroencefalografia ; Electroencephalography ; Electroencephalography - methods ; Electrooculography ; Electrooculography - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Regression Analysis ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Young Adult ; Àrees temàtiques de la UPC ; Òptica aplicada</subject><ispartof>Annals of biomedical engineering, 2009, Vol.37 (1), p.176-191</ispartof><rights>Biomedical Engineering Society 2008</rights><rights>Biomedical Engineering Society 2009</rights><rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</a></rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-b3fda2c2e4ed7aba304a68735e5660c21a4a50f12c945de5044899cd5eda86673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-b3fda2c2e4ed7aba304a68735e5660c21a4a50f12c945de5044899cd5eda86673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18985453$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romero, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mañanas, M. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbanoj, M. J</creatorcontrib><title>Ocular Reduction in EEG Signals Based on Adaptive Filtering, Regression and Blind Source Separation</title><title>Annals of biomedical engineering</title><addtitle>Ann Biomed Eng</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Biomed Eng</addtitle><description>Quantitative electroencephalographic (EEG) analysis is very useful for diagnosing dysfunctional neural states and for evaluating drug effects on the brain, among others. However, the bidirectional contamination between electrooculographic (EOG) and cerebral activities can mislead and induce wrong conclusions from EEG recordings. Different methods for ocular reduction have been developed but only few studies have shown an objective evaluation of their performance. For this purpose, the following approaches were evaluated with simulated data: regression analysis, adaptive filtering, and blind source separation (BSS). In the first two, filtered versions were also taken into account by filtering EOG references in order to reduce the cancellation of cerebral high frequency components in EEG data. Performance of these methods was quantitatively evaluated by level of similarity, agreement and errors in spectral variables both between sources and corrected EEG recordings. Topographic distributions showed that errors were located at anterior sites and especially in frontopolar and lateral-frontal regions. In addition, these errors were higher in theta and especially delta band. In general, filtered versions of time-domain regression and of adaptive filtering with RLS algorithm provided a very effective ocular reduction. However, BSS based on second order statistics showed the highest similarity indexes and the lowest errors in spectral variables.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and Medical Physics</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Ciències de la salut</subject><subject>Ciències de la visió</subject><subject>Classical Mechanics</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Electroencefalografia</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - methods</subject><subject>Electrooculography</subject><subject>Electrooculography - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Àrees temàtiques de la UPC</subject><subject>Òptica aplicada</subject><issn>0090-6964</issn><issn>1573-9686</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUk1v1DAUjBCILoUfwAUiDnAh8PxtH9tqW5AqVWLp2fLaLytX2WSxk0r8exxlpUUcysG2bM3Me543VfWWwBcCoL5mApyZBkA3RmjTyGfVigjFGiO1fF6tAAw00kh-Vr3K-QGAEM3Ey-qMaKMFF2xV-Ts_dS7VPzBMfoxDX8e-Xq9v6k3c9a7L9aXLGOryfhHcYYyPWF_HbsQU-93nwtolzHmmuT7Ul10s-2aYksd6gweX3Cz5unrRFil8czzPq_vr9c-rb83t3c33q4vbxgtOxmbL2uCop8gxKLd1DLiTWjGBQkrwlDjuBLSEesNFQAGca2N8EBicllKx84osuj5P3ib0mLwb7eDi6TIvCopaopUSrHA-LZxDGn5NmEe7j9lj17kehylbVWySihhZkB-fRJYOqAYN_wUywaA0Tgvwwz_Ah2Ld7LrVlGghNcBfn0pDzglbe0hx79JvS8DOKbBLCmxJgZ1TYOdW3x2Fp-0ew4lxHHsB0AWQD_MgMZ0qP6X6fiG1brBul2K29xsKhAEpFgnF2R8oQ8Qt</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Romero, S</creator><creator>Mañanas, M. A</creator><creator>Barbanoj, M. J</creator><general>Boston : Springer US</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>XX2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>Ocular Reduction in EEG Signals Based on Adaptive Filtering, Regression and Blind Source Separation</title><author>Romero, S ; Mañanas, M. A ; Barbanoj, M. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-b3fda2c2e4ed7aba304a68735e5660c21a4a50f12c945de5044899cd5eda86673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and Medical Physics</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Ciències de la salut</topic><topic>Ciències de la visió</topic><topic>Classical Mechanics</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Electroencefalografia</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - methods</topic><topic>Electrooculography</topic><topic>Electrooculography - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Àrees temàtiques de la UPC</topic><topic>Òptica aplicada</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romero, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mañanas, M. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbanoj, M. J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Recercat</collection><jtitle>Annals of biomedical engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romero, S</au><au>Mañanas, M. A</au><au>Barbanoj, M. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ocular Reduction in EEG Signals Based on Adaptive Filtering, Regression and Blind Source Separation</atitle><jtitle>Annals of biomedical engineering</jtitle><stitle>Ann Biomed Eng</stitle><addtitle>Ann Biomed Eng</addtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>176-191</pages><issn>0090-6964</issn><eissn>1573-9686</eissn><abstract>Quantitative electroencephalographic (EEG) analysis is very useful for diagnosing dysfunctional neural states and for evaluating drug effects on the brain, among others. However, the bidirectional contamination between electrooculographic (EOG) and cerebral activities can mislead and induce wrong conclusions from EEG recordings. Different methods for ocular reduction have been developed but only few studies have shown an objective evaluation of their performance. For this purpose, the following approaches were evaluated with simulated data: regression analysis, adaptive filtering, and blind source separation (BSS). In the first two, filtered versions were also taken into account by filtering EOG references in order to reduce the cancellation of cerebral high frequency components in EEG data. Performance of these methods was quantitatively evaluated by level of similarity, agreement and errors in spectral variables both between sources and corrected EEG recordings. Topographic distributions showed that errors were located at anterior sites and especially in frontopolar and lateral-frontal regions. In addition, these errors were higher in theta and especially delta band. In general, filtered versions of time-domain regression and of adaptive filtering with RLS algorithm provided a very effective ocular reduction. However, BSS based on second order statistics showed the highest similarity indexes and the lowest errors in spectral variables.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Boston : Springer US</pub><pmid>18985453</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10439-008-9589-6</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-6964 |
ispartof | Annals of biomedical engineering, 2009, Vol.37 (1), p.176-191 |
issn | 0090-6964 1573-9686 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_csuc_recercat_oai_recercat_cat_2072_187753 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Algorithms Biochemistry Biological and Medical Physics Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Biomedicine Biophysics Ciències de la salut Ciències de la visió Classical Mechanics Computer Simulation Electroencefalografia Electroencephalography Electroencephalography - methods Electrooculography Electrooculography - methods Female Humans Male Regression Analysis Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted Young Adult Àrees temàtiques de la UPC Òptica aplicada |
title | Ocular Reduction in EEG Signals Based on Adaptive Filtering, Regression and Blind Source Separation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T00%3A30%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_csuc_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ocular%20Reduction%20in%20EEG%20Signals%20Based%20on%20Adaptive%20Filtering,%20Regression%20and%20Blind%20Source%20Separation&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20biomedical%20engineering&rft.au=Romero,%20S&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=176-191&rft.issn=0090-6964&rft.eissn=1573-9686&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10439-008-9589-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_csuc_%3E2226791021%3C/proquest_csuc_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-b3fda2c2e4ed7aba304a68735e5660c21a4a50f12c945de5044899cd5eda86673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821856800&rft_id=info:pmid/18985453&rfr_iscdi=true |