Loading…
Comparison between Ni–Rh/gadolinia doped ceria catalysts in reforming of propane for anode implementations in intermediate solid oxide fuel cells
Steam and autothermal reforming of propane over Ni–Rh/GDC catalysts prepared by coprecipitation and by Pechini method were investigated in the temperature range 873–1073 K. The weight ratio for Ni, Rh and Ce 0.8Gd 0.2O 2 (45:5:50) and the operating temperatures were chosen in order to gain propaedeu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of power sources 2010-01, Vol.195 (2), p.649-661 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-e1e2dd6894d56fb9399beed8cdbf033343df93d0c57d41bc4c95dbf6237c3623 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-e1e2dd6894d56fb9399beed8cdbf033343df93d0c57d41bc4c95dbf6237c3623 |
container_end_page | 661 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 649 |
container_title | Journal of power sources |
container_volume | 195 |
creator | Boaro, M. Modafferi, V. Pappacena, A. Llorca, J. Baglio, V. Frusteri, F. Frontera, P. Trovarelli, A. Antonucci, P.L. |
description | Steam and autothermal reforming of propane over Ni–Rh/GDC catalysts prepared by coprecipitation and by Pechini method were investigated in the temperature range 873–1073
K. The weight ratio for Ni, Rh and Ce
0.8Gd
0.2O
2 (45:5:50) and the operating temperatures were chosen in order to gain propaedeutical information on fuel reactivity under typical intermediate solid oxide fuel cell (IT-SOFC) operating conditions.
The Pechini synthesis allows to obtain catalysts with lower surface area, smaller nickel crystallites and a bimodal distribution of rhodium in comparison to the coprecipitation method. Despite the different methods of synthesis lead to catalysts with different morphological and structural properties, the activity of catalysts is quite similar.
At reaction temperature higher than 973
K, under both steam reforming (SR) and autothermal reforming (ATR), the catalysts show high propane conversion and syngas (H
2
+
CO) productivity.
Deactivation of catalysts was observed at 873 and 973
K under SR conditions due to coke formation.
In ATR, coke formation was almost completely depressed and the catalysts resulted to be very stable even at low reaction temperature (873
K). In SR coke formation occurs with higher rate on the catalyst having higher Ni dispersion, probably since propane cracking reaction is the pre-eminent phenomenon in promoting coke formation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.006 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_csuc_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_csuc_recercat_oai_recercat_cat_2072_189108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378775309013251</els_id><sourcerecordid>34847912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-e1e2dd6894d56fb9399beed8cdbf033343df93d0c57d41bc4c95dbf6237c3623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUctuFDEQHCGQWAK_gHyB207a9jxvoBWQSBFIKHfLY_cEr2bswfaQ5MY_5A_5EnrZBY452G7bVd1dXUXxmkPJgTfn-3K_hNsU1lgKgL6ErgRonhQb3rVyK9q6flpsQLbdtm1r-bx4kdIeADhvYVM87MK86OhS8GzAfIvo2Wf36-fD12_nN9qGyXmnmQ0LWmYwUmx01tN9yok5zyKOIc7O37AwsiWGRXtk9MS0DxaZm5cJZ_RZZxf8H4bzGeOM1umMLFF-y8KdI-y44kQlpim9LJ6Nekr46nSeFdcfP1zvLrZXXz5d7t5fbU1VNXmLHIW1TddXtm7GoZd9PyDazthhBCllJe3YSwumbm3FB1OZvqavRsjWSNrPCn5Ma9JqVESSR9pU0O7_5bAEtELxrufQEeftkUNav6-YsppdOjRNusOalKy6qu25eBQoKFstBSdgc-oihpRonmqJbtbxXnFQB3_VXv31Vx38VdAp8peIb04VdDJ6GqP2xqV_bCGA9wA14d4dcUij_OEwqmQcekMWkMysbHCPlfoNM_7EYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21085321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between Ni–Rh/gadolinia doped ceria catalysts in reforming of propane for anode implementations in intermediate solid oxide fuel cells</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Boaro, M. ; Modafferi, V. ; Pappacena, A. ; Llorca, J. ; Baglio, V. ; Frusteri, F. ; Frontera, P. ; Trovarelli, A. ; Antonucci, P.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boaro, M. ; Modafferi, V. ; Pappacena, A. ; Llorca, J. ; Baglio, V. ; Frusteri, F. ; Frontera, P. ; Trovarelli, A. ; Antonucci, P.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Steam and autothermal reforming of propane over Ni–Rh/GDC catalysts prepared by coprecipitation and by Pechini method were investigated in the temperature range 873–1073
K. The weight ratio for Ni, Rh and Ce
0.8Gd
0.2O
2 (45:5:50) and the operating temperatures were chosen in order to gain propaedeutical information on fuel reactivity under typical intermediate solid oxide fuel cell (IT-SOFC) operating conditions.
The Pechini synthesis allows to obtain catalysts with lower surface area, smaller nickel crystallites and a bimodal distribution of rhodium in comparison to the coprecipitation method. Despite the different methods of synthesis lead to catalysts with different morphological and structural properties, the activity of catalysts is quite similar.
At reaction temperature higher than 973
K, under both steam reforming (SR) and autothermal reforming (ATR), the catalysts show high propane conversion and syngas (H
2
+
CO) productivity.
Deactivation of catalysts was observed at 873 and 973
K under SR conditions due to coke formation.
In ATR, coke formation was almost completely depressed and the catalysts resulted to be very stable even at low reaction temperature (873
K). In SR coke formation occurs with higher rate on the catalyst having higher Ni dispersion, probably since propane cracking reaction is the pre-eminent phenomenon in promoting coke formation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-7753</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.006</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSODZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Biocombustibles ; Catalitzadors ; Catalysts ; Energies ; Energy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Enginyeria química ; Equipments for energy generation and conversion: thermal, electrical, mechanical energy, etc ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fuel cells ; Hidrogen com a combustible ; Hydrogen as fuel ; Hydrogen production ; Ni–Rh/GDC catalyst ; Propane reforming ; Química del medi ambient ; Recursos energètics renovables ; SOFC ; Àrees temàtiques de la UPC</subject><ispartof>Journal of power sources, 2010-01, Vol.195 (2), p.649-661</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</a></rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-e1e2dd6894d56fb9399beed8cdbf033343df93d0c57d41bc4c95dbf6237c3623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-e1e2dd6894d56fb9399beed8cdbf033343df93d0c57d41bc4c95dbf6237c3623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22019005$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boaro, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modafferi, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pappacena, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llorca, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baglio, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frusteri, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frontera, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trovarelli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonucci, P.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between Ni–Rh/gadolinia doped ceria catalysts in reforming of propane for anode implementations in intermediate solid oxide fuel cells</title><title>Journal of power sources</title><description>Steam and autothermal reforming of propane over Ni–Rh/GDC catalysts prepared by coprecipitation and by Pechini method were investigated in the temperature range 873–1073
K. The weight ratio for Ni, Rh and Ce
0.8Gd
0.2O
2 (45:5:50) and the operating temperatures were chosen in order to gain propaedeutical information on fuel reactivity under typical intermediate solid oxide fuel cell (IT-SOFC) operating conditions.
The Pechini synthesis allows to obtain catalysts with lower surface area, smaller nickel crystallites and a bimodal distribution of rhodium in comparison to the coprecipitation method. Despite the different methods of synthesis lead to catalysts with different morphological and structural properties, the activity of catalysts is quite similar.
At reaction temperature higher than 973
K, under both steam reforming (SR) and autothermal reforming (ATR), the catalysts show high propane conversion and syngas (H
2
+
CO) productivity.
Deactivation of catalysts was observed at 873 and 973
K under SR conditions due to coke formation.
In ATR, coke formation was almost completely depressed and the catalysts resulted to be very stable even at low reaction temperature (873
K). In SR coke formation occurs with higher rate on the catalyst having higher Ni dispersion, probably since propane cracking reaction is the pre-eminent phenomenon in promoting coke formation.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biocombustibles</subject><subject>Catalitzadors</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>Energies</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Enginyeria química</subject><subject>Equipments for energy generation and conversion: thermal, electrical, mechanical energy, etc</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fuel cells</subject><subject>Hidrogen com a combustible</subject><subject>Hydrogen as fuel</subject><subject>Hydrogen production</subject><subject>Ni–Rh/GDC catalyst</subject><subject>Propane reforming</subject><subject>Química del medi ambient</subject><subject>Recursos energètics renovables</subject><subject>SOFC</subject><subject>Àrees temàtiques de la UPC</subject><issn>0378-7753</issn><issn>1873-2755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUctuFDEQHCGQWAK_gHyB207a9jxvoBWQSBFIKHfLY_cEr2bswfaQ5MY_5A_5EnrZBY452G7bVd1dXUXxmkPJgTfn-3K_hNsU1lgKgL6ErgRonhQb3rVyK9q6flpsQLbdtm1r-bx4kdIeADhvYVM87MK86OhS8GzAfIvo2Wf36-fD12_nN9qGyXmnmQ0LWmYwUmx01tN9yok5zyKOIc7O37AwsiWGRXtk9MS0DxaZm5cJZ_RZZxf8H4bzGeOM1umMLFF-y8KdI-y44kQlpim9LJ6Nekr46nSeFdcfP1zvLrZXXz5d7t5fbU1VNXmLHIW1TddXtm7GoZd9PyDazthhBCllJe3YSwumbm3FB1OZvqavRsjWSNrPCn5Ma9JqVESSR9pU0O7_5bAEtELxrufQEeftkUNav6-YsppdOjRNusOalKy6qu25eBQoKFstBSdgc-oihpRonmqJbtbxXnFQB3_VXv31Vx38VdAp8peIb04VdDJ6GqP2xqV_bCGA9wA14d4dcUij_OEwqmQcekMWkMysbHCPlfoNM_7EYA</recordid><startdate>20100115</startdate><enddate>20100115</enddate><creator>Boaro, M.</creator><creator>Modafferi, V.</creator><creator>Pappacena, A.</creator><creator>Llorca, J.</creator><creator>Baglio, V.</creator><creator>Frusteri, F.</creator><creator>Frontera, P.</creator><creator>Trovarelli, A.</creator><creator>Antonucci, P.L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>XX2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100115</creationdate><title>Comparison between Ni–Rh/gadolinia doped ceria catalysts in reforming of propane for anode implementations in intermediate solid oxide fuel cells</title><author>Boaro, M. ; Modafferi, V. ; Pappacena, A. ; Llorca, J. ; Baglio, V. ; Frusteri, F. ; Frontera, P. ; Trovarelli, A. ; Antonucci, P.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-e1e2dd6894d56fb9399beed8cdbf033343df93d0c57d41bc4c95dbf6237c3623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biocombustibles</topic><topic>Catalitzadors</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>Energies</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Enginyeria química</topic><topic>Equipments for energy generation and conversion: thermal, electrical, mechanical energy, etc</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fuel cells</topic><topic>Hidrogen com a combustible</topic><topic>Hydrogen as fuel</topic><topic>Hydrogen production</topic><topic>Ni–Rh/GDC catalyst</topic><topic>Propane reforming</topic><topic>Química del medi ambient</topic><topic>Recursos energètics renovables</topic><topic>SOFC</topic><topic>Àrees temàtiques de la UPC</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boaro, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modafferi, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pappacena, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llorca, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baglio, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frusteri, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frontera, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trovarelli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonucci, P.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Recercat</collection><jtitle>Journal of power sources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boaro, M.</au><au>Modafferi, V.</au><au>Pappacena, A.</au><au>Llorca, J.</au><au>Baglio, V.</au><au>Frusteri, F.</au><au>Frontera, P.</au><au>Trovarelli, A.</au><au>Antonucci, P.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between Ni–Rh/gadolinia doped ceria catalysts in reforming of propane for anode implementations in intermediate solid oxide fuel cells</atitle><jtitle>Journal of power sources</jtitle><date>2010-01-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>195</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>649</spage><epage>661</epage><pages>649-661</pages><issn>0378-7753</issn><eissn>1873-2755</eissn><coden>JPSODZ</coden><abstract>Steam and autothermal reforming of propane over Ni–Rh/GDC catalysts prepared by coprecipitation and by Pechini method were investigated in the temperature range 873–1073
K. The weight ratio for Ni, Rh and Ce
0.8Gd
0.2O
2 (45:5:50) and the operating temperatures were chosen in order to gain propaedeutical information on fuel reactivity under typical intermediate solid oxide fuel cell (IT-SOFC) operating conditions.
The Pechini synthesis allows to obtain catalysts with lower surface area, smaller nickel crystallites and a bimodal distribution of rhodium in comparison to the coprecipitation method. Despite the different methods of synthesis lead to catalysts with different morphological and structural properties, the activity of catalysts is quite similar.
At reaction temperature higher than 973
K, under both steam reforming (SR) and autothermal reforming (ATR), the catalysts show high propane conversion and syngas (H
2
+
CO) productivity.
Deactivation of catalysts was observed at 873 and 973
K under SR conditions due to coke formation.
In ATR, coke formation was almost completely depressed and the catalysts resulted to be very stable even at low reaction temperature (873
K). In SR coke formation occurs with higher rate on the catalyst having higher Ni dispersion, probably since propane cracking reaction is the pre-eminent phenomenon in promoting coke formation.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.006</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-7753 |
ispartof | Journal of power sources, 2010-01, Vol.195 (2), p.649-661 |
issn | 0378-7753 1873-2755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_csuc_recercat_oai_recercat_cat_2072_189108 |
source | Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Applied sciences Biocombustibles Catalitzadors Catalysts Energies Energy Energy. Thermal use of fuels Enginyeria química Equipments for energy generation and conversion: thermal, electrical, mechanical energy, etc Exact sciences and technology Fuel cells Hidrogen com a combustible Hydrogen as fuel Hydrogen production Ni–Rh/GDC catalyst Propane reforming Química del medi ambient Recursos energètics renovables SOFC Àrees temàtiques de la UPC |
title | Comparison between Ni–Rh/gadolinia doped ceria catalysts in reforming of propane for anode implementations in intermediate solid oxide fuel cells |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T08%3A12%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_csuc_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20Ni%E2%80%93Rh/gadolinia%20doped%20ceria%20catalysts%20in%20reforming%20of%20propane%20for%20anode%20implementations%20in%20intermediate%20solid%20oxide%20fuel%20cells&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20power%20sources&rft.au=Boaro,%20M.&rft.date=2010-01-15&rft.volume=195&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=649&rft.epage=661&rft.pages=649-661&rft.issn=0378-7753&rft.eissn=1873-2755&rft.coden=JPSODZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_csuc_%3E34847912%3C/proquest_csuc_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-e1e2dd6894d56fb9399beed8cdbf033343df93d0c57d41bc4c95dbf6237c3623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21085321&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |