Loading…
Salinity and Water Stress Effects on Biomass Production in Different Arundo donax L. Clones
Perennial rhizomatous grasses are regarded as leading energy crops due to their environmental benefits and their suitability to regions with adverse conditions. In this paper, two different experiments were carried out in order to study the salinity ( S ) and water stress ( WS ) effects on biomass p...
Saved in:
Published in: | Bioenergy research 2015-12, Vol.8 (4), p.1461-1479 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-3e1191fefeafb0222b2cc0249d17dff5d55e4ead090ef384b50b99b61ea41c203 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-3e1191fefeafb0222b2cc0249d17dff5d55e4ead090ef384b50b99b61ea41c203 |
container_end_page | 1479 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1461 |
container_title | Bioenergy research |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Sánchez, E. Scordia, D. Lino, G. Arias, C. Cosentino, S. L. Nogués, S. |
description | Perennial rhizomatous grasses are regarded as leading energy crops due to their environmental benefits and their suitability to regions with adverse conditions. In this paper, two different experiments were carried out in order to study the salinity (
S
) and water stress (
WS
) effects on biomass production in giant reed (
Arundo donax
L.). In Experiment 1, eight clones of giant reed were subjected to four salinity (
S
) and water stress (
WS
) treatments: (1) well watered with non-saline solution, (2) water stress with non-saline solution, (3) well watered with saline solution and 4) water stress with saline solution. In Experiment 2, five clones of giant reed were subjected to increasing
S
levels in two locations: University of Catania (UNICT-Italy) (1) well watered with non-saline solution and (2) well watered with mild saline solution; and University of Barcelona (UB-Spain) (3) well watered with non-saline solution and (4) well watered with severe saline solution. Photosynthetic and physiological parameters as well as biomass production were measured in these plants. According to our data, giant reed seems to be more tolerant to
S
than
WS
. Both stresses mainly affected stomatal closure to prevent dehydration of the plant, eventually decreasing the photosynthetic rate. The differential performance of the giant reed clones was ranked according to their tolerance to
S
and
WS
by using the Stress Susceptibility Index. ‘Agrigento’ was the most
WS
resistant clone and ‘Martinensis’ was the most
S
resistant. ‘Martinensis’ and ‘Piccoplant’ were found to be the most suitable clones for growing under both stress conditions. Moreover, ‘Fondachello’, ‘Cefalú’ and ‘Licata’ were the most resistant clones to increasing
S
levels. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12155-015-9652-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_csuc_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_csuc_recercat_oai_recercat_cat_2072_262447</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A712240611</galeid><sourcerecordid>A712240611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-3e1191fefeafb0222b2cc0249d17dff5d55e4ead090ef384b50b99b61ea41c203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl9rFDEUxQexYK1-AN8Cvvgya-6dZP48rmutwoJCW3zwIWQyNyVlNqlJBtpvb5atVkWhhJDk8juXm8OpqlfAV8B59zYBgpQ1B1kPrcS6f1Idw9AMNaDAp7_ujXhWPU_pmvOWCz4cV9_O9ey8y3dM-4l91ZkiO8-RUmKn1pLJiQXP3rmw06X0JYZpMdmVkvPsvStEJJ_ZOi5-CmwKXt-y7Ypt5uApvaiOrJ4Tvbw_T6rLD6cXm4_19vPZp816WxvZQq4bAhjAkiVtR46IIxrDUQwTdJO1cpKSBOmJD5xs04tR8nEYxhZICzDIm5MKDn1NWoyKZCganVXQ7uGx38g7VNiiEF3RvDlobmL4vlDKaueSoXnWnsKSFHRdX2Yp8CNQWcxv2w4L-vov9Dos0ZfPF6pB2YieNw_UlZ5JOW9Djtrsm6p1B4iCtwCFWv2DKmuinTPFX-tK_Q_BTxtiSCmSVTfR7XS8U8DVPiTqEBJVQqL2IVF90eBBkwrrryj-NvB_RT8Agl67nw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1732534803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Salinity and Water Stress Effects on Biomass Production in Different Arundo donax L. Clones</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Sánchez, E. ; Scordia, D. ; Lino, G. ; Arias, C. ; Cosentino, S. L. ; Nogués, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, E. ; Scordia, D. ; Lino, G. ; Arias, C. ; Cosentino, S. L. ; Nogués, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Perennial rhizomatous grasses are regarded as leading energy crops due to their environmental benefits and their suitability to regions with adverse conditions. In this paper, two different experiments were carried out in order to study the salinity (
S
) and water stress (
WS
) effects on biomass production in giant reed (
Arundo donax
L.). In Experiment 1, eight clones of giant reed were subjected to four salinity (
S
) and water stress (
WS
) treatments: (1) well watered with non-saline solution, (2) water stress with non-saline solution, (3) well watered with saline solution and 4) water stress with saline solution. In Experiment 2, five clones of giant reed were subjected to increasing
S
levels in two locations: University of Catania (UNICT-Italy) (1) well watered with non-saline solution and (2) well watered with mild saline solution; and University of Barcelona (UB-Spain) (3) well watered with non-saline solution and (4) well watered with severe saline solution. Photosynthetic and physiological parameters as well as biomass production were measured in these plants. According to our data, giant reed seems to be more tolerant to
S
than
WS
. Both stresses mainly affected stomatal closure to prevent dehydration of the plant, eventually decreasing the photosynthetic rate. The differential performance of the giant reed clones was ranked according to their tolerance to
S
and
WS
by using the Stress Susceptibility Index. ‘Agrigento’ was the most
WS
resistant clone and ‘Martinensis’ was the most
S
resistant. ‘Martinensis’ and ‘Piccoplant’ were found to be the most suitable clones for growing under both stress conditions. Moreover, ‘Fondachello’, ‘Cefalú’ and ‘Licata’ were the most resistant clones to increasing
S
levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-1234</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12155-015-9652-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Alternative energy sources ; Aquatic resources ; Arundo donax ; Biomass ; Biomass energy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Climate change ; Cloning ; Crops ; Dehydration ; Efecte de l'estrès sobre les plantes ; Effect of stress on plants ; Energia de la biomassa ; Energy consumption ; Energy crops ; Energy resources ; Flowers & plants ; Gramínies ; Grasses ; Land use ; Leaves ; Life Sciences ; Morphology ; Photosynthesis ; Physiological aspects ; Physiology ; Plant Breeding/Biotechnology ; Plant Ecology ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Plant growth ; Plant Sciences ; Plants (organisms) ; Reeds ; Saline solutions ; Salinitat ; Salinity ; Stress response ; Stresses ; Studies ; Tolerances ; Transgenic plants ; Water ; Water stress ; Wood Science & Technology</subject><ispartof>Bioenergy research, 2015-12, Vol.8 (4), p.1461-1479</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><rights>(c) Springer Verlag, 2015 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-3e1191fefeafb0222b2cc0249d17dff5d55e4ead090ef384b50b99b61ea41c203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-3e1191fefeafb0222b2cc0249d17dff5d55e4ead090ef384b50b99b61ea41c203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1732534803/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1732534803?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scordia, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lino, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arias, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosentino, S. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogués, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Salinity and Water Stress Effects on Biomass Production in Different Arundo donax L. Clones</title><title>Bioenergy research</title><addtitle>Bioenerg. Res</addtitle><description>Perennial rhizomatous grasses are regarded as leading energy crops due to their environmental benefits and their suitability to regions with adverse conditions. In this paper, two different experiments were carried out in order to study the salinity (
S
) and water stress (
WS
) effects on biomass production in giant reed (
Arundo donax
L.). In Experiment 1, eight clones of giant reed were subjected to four salinity (
S
) and water stress (
WS
) treatments: (1) well watered with non-saline solution, (2) water stress with non-saline solution, (3) well watered with saline solution and 4) water stress with saline solution. In Experiment 2, five clones of giant reed were subjected to increasing
S
levels in two locations: University of Catania (UNICT-Italy) (1) well watered with non-saline solution and (2) well watered with mild saline solution; and University of Barcelona (UB-Spain) (3) well watered with non-saline solution and (4) well watered with severe saline solution. Photosynthetic and physiological parameters as well as biomass production were measured in these plants. According to our data, giant reed seems to be more tolerant to
S
than
WS
. Both stresses mainly affected stomatal closure to prevent dehydration of the plant, eventually decreasing the photosynthetic rate. The differential performance of the giant reed clones was ranked according to their tolerance to
S
and
WS
by using the Stress Susceptibility Index. ‘Agrigento’ was the most
WS
resistant clone and ‘Martinensis’ was the most
S
resistant. ‘Martinensis’ and ‘Piccoplant’ were found to be the most suitable clones for growing under both stress conditions. Moreover, ‘Fondachello’, ‘Cefalú’ and ‘Licata’ were the most resistant clones to increasing
S
levels.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Aquatic resources</subject><subject>Arundo donax</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass energy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Cloning</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Dehydration</subject><subject>Efecte de l'estrès sobre les plantes</subject><subject>Effect of stress on plants</subject><subject>Energia de la biomassa</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy crops</subject><subject>Energy resources</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Gramínies</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Breeding/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plants (organisms)</subject><subject>Reeds</subject><subject>Saline solutions</subject><subject>Salinitat</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Stress response</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tolerances</subject><subject>Transgenic plants</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water stress</subject><subject>Wood Science & Technology</subject><issn>1939-1234</issn><issn>1939-1242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl9rFDEUxQexYK1-AN8Cvvgya-6dZP48rmutwoJCW3zwIWQyNyVlNqlJBtpvb5atVkWhhJDk8juXm8OpqlfAV8B59zYBgpQ1B1kPrcS6f1Idw9AMNaDAp7_ujXhWPU_pmvOWCz4cV9_O9ey8y3dM-4l91ZkiO8-RUmKn1pLJiQXP3rmw06X0JYZpMdmVkvPsvStEJJ_ZOi5-CmwKXt-y7Ypt5uApvaiOrJ4Tvbw_T6rLD6cXm4_19vPZp816WxvZQq4bAhjAkiVtR46IIxrDUQwTdJO1cpKSBOmJD5xs04tR8nEYxhZICzDIm5MKDn1NWoyKZCganVXQ7uGx38g7VNiiEF3RvDlobmL4vlDKaueSoXnWnsKSFHRdX2Yp8CNQWcxv2w4L-vov9Dos0ZfPF6pB2YieNw_UlZ5JOW9Djtrsm6p1B4iCtwCFWv2DKmuinTPFX-tK_Q_BTxtiSCmSVTfR7XS8U8DVPiTqEBJVQqL2IVF90eBBkwrrryj-NvB_RT8Agl67nw</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Sánchez, E.</creator><creator>Scordia, D.</creator><creator>Lino, G.</creator><creator>Arias, C.</creator><creator>Cosentino, S. L.</creator><creator>Nogués, S.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>XX2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Salinity and Water Stress Effects on Biomass Production in Different Arundo donax L. Clones</title><author>Sánchez, E. ; Scordia, D. ; Lino, G. ; Arias, C. ; Cosentino, S. L. ; Nogués, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-3e1191fefeafb0222b2cc0249d17dff5d55e4ead090ef384b50b99b61ea41c203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Aquatic resources</topic><topic>Arundo donax</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass energy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Cloning</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Dehydration</topic><topic>Efecte de l'estrès sobre les plantes</topic><topic>Effect of stress on plants</topic><topic>Energia de la biomassa</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy crops</topic><topic>Energy resources</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Gramínies</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Breeding/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plants (organisms)</topic><topic>Reeds</topic><topic>Saline solutions</topic><topic>Salinitat</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Stress response</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tolerances</topic><topic>Transgenic plants</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water stress</topic><topic>Wood Science & Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scordia, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lino, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arias, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosentino, S. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogués, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Recercat</collection><jtitle>Bioenergy research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sánchez, E.</au><au>Scordia, D.</au><au>Lino, G.</au><au>Arias, C.</au><au>Cosentino, S. L.</au><au>Nogués, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Salinity and Water Stress Effects on Biomass Production in Different Arundo donax L. Clones</atitle><jtitle>Bioenergy research</jtitle><stitle>Bioenerg. Res</stitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1461</spage><epage>1479</epage><pages>1461-1479</pages><issn>1939-1234</issn><eissn>1939-1242</eissn><abstract>Perennial rhizomatous grasses are regarded as leading energy crops due to their environmental benefits and their suitability to regions with adverse conditions. In this paper, two different experiments were carried out in order to study the salinity (
S
) and water stress (
WS
) effects on biomass production in giant reed (
Arundo donax
L.). In Experiment 1, eight clones of giant reed were subjected to four salinity (
S
) and water stress (
WS
) treatments: (1) well watered with non-saline solution, (2) water stress with non-saline solution, (3) well watered with saline solution and 4) water stress with saline solution. In Experiment 2, five clones of giant reed were subjected to increasing
S
levels in two locations: University of Catania (UNICT-Italy) (1) well watered with non-saline solution and (2) well watered with mild saline solution; and University of Barcelona (UB-Spain) (3) well watered with non-saline solution and (4) well watered with severe saline solution. Photosynthetic and physiological parameters as well as biomass production were measured in these plants. According to our data, giant reed seems to be more tolerant to
S
than
WS
. Both stresses mainly affected stomatal closure to prevent dehydration of the plant, eventually decreasing the photosynthetic rate. The differential performance of the giant reed clones was ranked according to their tolerance to
S
and
WS
by using the Stress Susceptibility Index. ‘Agrigento’ was the most
WS
resistant clone and ‘Martinensis’ was the most
S
resistant. ‘Martinensis’ and ‘Piccoplant’ were found to be the most suitable clones for growing under both stress conditions. Moreover, ‘Fondachello’, ‘Cefalú’ and ‘Licata’ were the most resistant clones to increasing
S
levels.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12155-015-9652-8</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1939-1234 |
ispartof | Bioenergy research, 2015-12, Vol.8 (4), p.1461-1479 |
issn | 1939-1234 1939-1242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_csuc_recercat_oai_recercat_cat_2072_262447 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Link |
subjects | Agriculture Alternative energy sources Aquatic resources Arundo donax Biomass Biomass energy Biomedical and Life Sciences Climate change Cloning Crops Dehydration Efecte de l'estrès sobre les plantes Effect of stress on plants Energia de la biomassa Energy consumption Energy crops Energy resources Flowers & plants Gramínies Grasses Land use Leaves Life Sciences Morphology Photosynthesis Physiological aspects Physiology Plant Breeding/Biotechnology Plant Ecology Plant Genetics and Genomics Plant growth Plant Sciences Plants (organisms) Reeds Saline solutions Salinitat Salinity Stress response Stresses Studies Tolerances Transgenic plants Water Water stress Wood Science & Technology |
title | Salinity and Water Stress Effects on Biomass Production in Different Arundo donax L. Clones |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A35%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_csuc_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Salinity%20and%20Water%20Stress%20Effects%20on%20Biomass%20Production%20in%20Different%20Arundo%20donax%20L.%20Clones&rft.jtitle=Bioenergy%20research&rft.au=S%C3%A1nchez,%20E.&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1461&rft.epage=1479&rft.pages=1461-1479&rft.issn=1939-1234&rft.eissn=1939-1242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12155-015-9652-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_csuc_%3EA712240611%3C/gale_csuc_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-3e1191fefeafb0222b2cc0249d17dff5d55e4ead090ef384b50b99b61ea41c203%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1732534803&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A712240611&rfr_iscdi=true |