Loading…
Fitness of Echinochloa crusgalli var. mitis biotypes susceptible and resistant to imazapyr + imazapic herbicide
The continuous use of herbicides with the same mechanism of action has caused the selection of resistant weed biotype that may present differences in fitness when compared with susceptible biotype. The objective of the present study was to identify and distinguish the fitness of barnyardgrass biotyp...
Saved in:
Published in: | Comunicata Scientiae 2018-10, Vol.9 (4), p.737-747 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3110-d3f41b7521dac0db6213c042c1797b2b6eb296df8aa3a8febac019cc958e1bca3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 747 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 737 |
container_title | Comunicata Scientiae |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Bonow, Joice Fernanda Lübke Lamego, Fabiane Pinto Andres, André Nogueira, Eduardo |
description | The continuous use of herbicides with the same mechanism of action has caused the selection of resistant weed biotype that may present differences in fitness when compared with susceptible biotype. The objective of the present study was to identify and distinguish the fitness of barnyardgrass biotypes resistant and susceptible to imazapyr + imazapic herbicide under controlled and noncompetitive conditions. For that, there were used barnyardgrass biotype susceptible (ECH1 and ECH38) and resistant (ECH14 and ECH44) to ALS inhibitors, collected at Pelotas/RS and Rio Grande/RS cities, respectively, in experiment installed in a greenhouse in a completely randomized experimental design during the months from October to December 2015. The biotype were evaluated during the period of 15 to 120 days after the emergence related to plant height, foliar area, shoot dry matter mass and root dry matter mass. The results showed insignificant differences between the biotypes during the development of the plants. The susceptible biotype ECH44 showed a higher number of panicles per plant and seeds along with the resistant ECH1. There is variability among Echinochloa crusgalli var. mitis biotypes resistant and susceptible to ALS inhibitors, indicating an absence in fitness penalty caused by resistance when cultivated without the selection of pressure (herbicide). |
doi_str_mv | 10.14295/cs.v9i4.2720 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_dialn</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dialnet_primary_oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001310615</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2166931156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3110-d3f41b7521dac0db6213c042c1797b2b6eb296df8aa3a8febac019cc958e1bca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UU1LxDAQLaKgqEfvAY_SNZO06Qa8iPgFgiB6DkmaurPUpmZSYf31VledyzyG92Ye84riBPgCKqHrc0-LD43VQjSC7xQHApqmrEHK3R-sSs0bvV8cE635XFIrqOCgiDeYh0DEYseu_QqH6Fd9tMyniV5t3yP7sGnB3jAjMYcxb8ZAjCbyYczo-sDs0LIUCCnbIbMcGb7ZTztuEjv7hejZKiSHHttwVOx1tqdw_NsPi5eb6-eru_Lh8fb-6vKh9BKAl63sKnBNLaC1nrdOCZCeV8JDoxsnnApOaNV2S2ulXXbBzSzQ3ut6GcB5Kw-Li-3eFm0_hGzGNJtJGxMtmr_ZNGDCuLYmkLl8ep7fAhK4gnqWn27lY4rvU6Bs1nFKw-zYCFBKzyZrNbPKLcunSJRC938FuPlJxXgy36mY71TkF6CigtY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2166931156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fitness of Echinochloa crusgalli var. mitis biotypes susceptible and resistant to imazapyr + imazapic herbicide</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Bonow, Joice Fernanda Lübke ; Lamego, Fabiane Pinto ; Andres, André ; Nogueira, Eduardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Bonow, Joice Fernanda Lübke ; Lamego, Fabiane Pinto ; Andres, André ; Nogueira, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><description>The continuous use of herbicides with the same mechanism of action has caused the selection of resistant weed biotype that may present differences in fitness when compared with susceptible biotype. The objective of the present study was to identify and distinguish the fitness of barnyardgrass biotypes resistant and susceptible to imazapyr + imazapic herbicide under controlled and noncompetitive conditions. For that, there were used barnyardgrass biotype susceptible (ECH1 and ECH38) and resistant (ECH14 and ECH44) to ALS inhibitors, collected at Pelotas/RS and Rio Grande/RS cities, respectively, in experiment installed in a greenhouse in a completely randomized experimental design during the months from October to December 2015. The biotype were evaluated during the period of 15 to 120 days after the emergence related to plant height, foliar area, shoot dry matter mass and root dry matter mass. The results showed insignificant differences between the biotypes during the development of the plants. The susceptible biotype ECH44 showed a higher number of panicles per plant and seeds along with the resistant ECH1. There is variability among Echinochloa crusgalli var. mitis biotypes resistant and susceptible to ALS inhibitors, indicating an absence in fitness penalty caused by resistance when cultivated without the selection of pressure (herbicide).</description><identifier>ISSN: 2176-9079</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2179-9079</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2177-5133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2177-5133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14295/cs.v9i4.2720</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bom Jesus: Comunicata Scientiae</publisher><subject>Biotypes ; Design of experiments ; Dry matter ; Echinochloa ; Echinochloa crus-galli ; Enzymes ; Experimental design ; Experiments ; Fitness ; Grasses ; Herbicides ; Inhibitors ; Mutation ; Plants (botany) ; Rice ; Seeds ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Comunicata Scientiae, 2018-10, Vol.9 (4), p.737-747</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3110-d3f41b7521dac0db6213c042c1797b2b6eb296df8aa3a8febac019cc958e1bca3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2166931156/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2166931156?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25732,27903,27904,36991,44569,74872</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bonow, Joice Fernanda Lübke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamego, Fabiane Pinto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andres, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueira, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><title>Fitness of Echinochloa crusgalli var. mitis biotypes susceptible and resistant to imazapyr + imazapic herbicide</title><title>Comunicata Scientiae</title><description>The continuous use of herbicides with the same mechanism of action has caused the selection of resistant weed biotype that may present differences in fitness when compared with susceptible biotype. The objective of the present study was to identify and distinguish the fitness of barnyardgrass biotypes resistant and susceptible to imazapyr + imazapic herbicide under controlled and noncompetitive conditions. For that, there were used barnyardgrass biotype susceptible (ECH1 and ECH38) and resistant (ECH14 and ECH44) to ALS inhibitors, collected at Pelotas/RS and Rio Grande/RS cities, respectively, in experiment installed in a greenhouse in a completely randomized experimental design during the months from October to December 2015. The biotype were evaluated during the period of 15 to 120 days after the emergence related to plant height, foliar area, shoot dry matter mass and root dry matter mass. The results showed insignificant differences between the biotypes during the development of the plants. The susceptible biotype ECH44 showed a higher number of panicles per plant and seeds along with the resistant ECH1. There is variability among Echinochloa crusgalli var. mitis biotypes resistant and susceptible to ALS inhibitors, indicating an absence in fitness penalty caused by resistance when cultivated without the selection of pressure (herbicide).</description><subject>Biotypes</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Echinochloa</subject><subject>Echinochloa crus-galli</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Inhibitors</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>2176-9079</issn><issn>2179-9079</issn><issn>2177-5133</issn><issn>2177-5133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UU1LxDAQLaKgqEfvAY_SNZO06Qa8iPgFgiB6DkmaurPUpmZSYf31VledyzyG92Ye84riBPgCKqHrc0-LD43VQjSC7xQHApqmrEHK3R-sSs0bvV8cE635XFIrqOCgiDeYh0DEYseu_QqH6Fd9tMyniV5t3yP7sGnB3jAjMYcxb8ZAjCbyYczo-sDs0LIUCCnbIbMcGb7ZTztuEjv7hejZKiSHHttwVOx1tqdw_NsPi5eb6-eru_Lh8fb-6vKh9BKAl63sKnBNLaC1nrdOCZCeV8JDoxsnnApOaNV2S2ulXXbBzSzQ3ut6GcB5Kw-Li-3eFm0_hGzGNJtJGxMtmr_ZNGDCuLYmkLl8ep7fAhK4gnqWn27lY4rvU6Bs1nFKw-zYCFBKzyZrNbPKLcunSJRC938FuPlJxXgy36mY71TkF6CigtY</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Bonow, Joice Fernanda Lübke</creator><creator>Lamego, Fabiane Pinto</creator><creator>Andres, André</creator><creator>Nogueira, Eduardo</creator><general>Comunicata Scientiae</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>AGMXS</scope><scope>FKZ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Fitness of Echinochloa crusgalli var. mitis biotypes susceptible and resistant to imazapyr + imazapic herbicide</title><author>Bonow, Joice Fernanda Lübke ; Lamego, Fabiane Pinto ; Andres, André ; Nogueira, Eduardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3110-d3f41b7521dac0db6213c042c1797b2b6eb296df8aa3a8febac019cc958e1bca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biotypes</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Echinochloa</topic><topic>Echinochloa crus-galli</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Inhibitors</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bonow, Joice Fernanda Lübke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamego, Fabiane Pinto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andres, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueira, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America & Iberia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Dialnet (Open Access Full Text)</collection><collection>Dialnet</collection><jtitle>Comunicata Scientiae</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bonow, Joice Fernanda Lübke</au><au>Lamego, Fabiane Pinto</au><au>Andres, André</au><au>Nogueira, Eduardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fitness of Echinochloa crusgalli var. mitis biotypes susceptible and resistant to imazapyr + imazapic herbicide</atitle><jtitle>Comunicata Scientiae</jtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>737</spage><epage>747</epage><pages>737-747</pages><issn>2176-9079</issn><issn>2179-9079</issn><issn>2177-5133</issn><eissn>2177-5133</eissn><abstract>The continuous use of herbicides with the same mechanism of action has caused the selection of resistant weed biotype that may present differences in fitness when compared with susceptible biotype. The objective of the present study was to identify and distinguish the fitness of barnyardgrass biotypes resistant and susceptible to imazapyr + imazapic herbicide under controlled and noncompetitive conditions. For that, there were used barnyardgrass biotype susceptible (ECH1 and ECH38) and resistant (ECH14 and ECH44) to ALS inhibitors, collected at Pelotas/RS and Rio Grande/RS cities, respectively, in experiment installed in a greenhouse in a completely randomized experimental design during the months from October to December 2015. The biotype were evaluated during the period of 15 to 120 days after the emergence related to plant height, foliar area, shoot dry matter mass and root dry matter mass. The results showed insignificant differences between the biotypes during the development of the plants. The susceptible biotype ECH44 showed a higher number of panicles per plant and seeds along with the resistant ECH1. There is variability among Echinochloa crusgalli var. mitis biotypes resistant and susceptible to ALS inhibitors, indicating an absence in fitness penalty caused by resistance when cultivated without the selection of pressure (herbicide).</abstract><cop>Bom Jesus</cop><pub>Comunicata Scientiae</pub><doi>10.14295/cs.v9i4.2720</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2176-9079 |
ispartof | Comunicata Scientiae, 2018-10, Vol.9 (4), p.737-747 |
issn | 2176-9079 2179-9079 2177-5133 2177-5133 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dialnet_primary_oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001310615 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Biotypes Design of experiments Dry matter Echinochloa Echinochloa crus-galli Enzymes Experimental design Experiments Fitness Grasses Herbicides Inhibitors Mutation Plants (botany) Rice Seeds Weeds |
title | Fitness of Echinochloa crusgalli var. mitis biotypes susceptible and resistant to imazapyr + imazapic herbicide |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A40%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_dialn&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fitness%20of%20Echinochloa%20crusgalli%20var.%20mitis%20biotypes%20susceptible%20and%20resistant%20to%20imazapyr%20+%20imazapic%20herbicide&rft.jtitle=Comunicata%20Scientiae&rft.au=Bonow,%20Joice%20Fernanda%20L%C3%BCbke&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=737&rft.epage=747&rft.pages=737-747&rft.issn=2176-9079&rft.eissn=2177-5133&rft_id=info:doi/10.14295/cs.v9i4.2720&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_dialn%3E2166931156%3C/proquest_dialn%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3110-d3f41b7521dac0db6213c042c1797b2b6eb296df8aa3a8febac019cc958e1bca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2166931156&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |