How can Small Sided Game training methods (3 vs 3 and 6 vs 6) and VO2max affect basic soccer skills?

• Published in: Retos (Madrid) 2024 (52), p.550-557
• Main Authors: Firdaus, Firdaus, Suryadi, Didi, Arifan, Ikhwanul, Prabowo, Trisnar Adi, Paramitha, Sandey Tantra, Suganda, Mikkey Anggara, Yati, Yati, Aryadi, Dedi, Yudi, Alex Aldha, Nusri, Ardi, Faridah, Eva, Sari, Suci Nanda
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 1579-1726; 1988-2041; 1988-2041
• DOI: 10.47197/RETOS.V52.102427

Study purpose. Mastering the fundamentals of soccer is essential for skill development. Therefore, employing effective training techniques becomes crucial to enhance these fundamental soccer skills. This study aims to discern: (1) Variations in the impact of the 3 vs. 3 small-sided game method compared to the 6 vs. 6 small-sided game method on fundamental soccer skills; (2) Disparities in the impact of high and low VO2max levels on fundamental soccer skills; and (3) The repercussions of the interaction between the 3 vs. 3 small-sided game method and the 6 vs. 6 small-sided game method in conjunction with VO2max levels (high and low). Materials and Methods. A 2 x 2 factorial design was used for this experimental study methodology. 24 athletes, including 12 from the Sports Talent School (STS) West Sumatra football academy and 12 from the Indonesia Muda Soccer School, served as the research subjects. The Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Level 1 test is the tool used to measure VO2max. The "David Lee" competence test has been adopted as the yardstick for gauging fundamental soccer abilities. Two-way ANOVA was the method of data analysis employed, with a significance level of 0.05. Results. The study's findings are outlined as follows: (1) Indicated by a significance value of (p=0.009