Loading…

Sobre el discurso de Horkheimer al asumir la dirección del Instituto de Investigación Social

This paper analyses Horkheimer's speech when assuming the position of director of the Institute for Social Research, popularly known as the Frankfurt School. Our objective is to trace the type of social philosophy that the institute undertook and that distanced it from other disciplines of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cinta de moebio 2023-12 (78), p.196-208
Main Author: López-Pérez, Sheila
Format: Article
Language:por ; spa
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 208
container_issue 78
container_start_page 196
container_title Cinta de moebio
container_volume
creator López-Pérez, Sheila
description This paper analyses Horkheimer's speech when assuming the position of director of the Institute for Social Research, popularly known as the Frankfurt School. Our objective is to trace the type of social philosophy that the institute undertook and that distanced it from other disciplines of the time, among which were pure philosophy and sociology, incapable, in the eyes of the German, of clarifying social reality. We will go through his critique of the totality and his emphasis on the protection of individuality, as well as his denunciation of hyperspecialization in universities. Based on the latter, we will present the transdisciplinarity of academic disciplines as the only way capable of shedding light on a complex and interconnected world. Lastly, we will assess the relevance of social philosophy based on the two types of social philosophy that Horkheimer already glimpsed: that focused on the verum (on the verification of objective and rational facts) and that focused on the bonum (on the pursuit of the good, that is, to its realization through a transformative practice). We will defend the latter as the most useful version of social philosophy.
doi_str_mv 10.4067/S0717-554X2023000300196
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_dialn</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dialnet_primary_oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001692806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A782784690</galeid><scielo_id>S0717_554X2023000300196</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>A782784690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d2396-e316694cfe66973c74bd42c76c3ba9de0b06378377b409e2bb7853a6b2e42c233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUF1LwzAUDaLgnP4GAz53pkmbNODLGOoGA8FN8MmQpnczs20kaQV_lz_BP2ZYVQQfLvfrnHMvB6HzlEwywsXliohUJHmePVJCGSEkRir5ARr9Lg7_1MfoJIQdIXlBmByhp5UrPWCocWWD6X1wuAI8d_7lGWwDHusa69A31uNaR4wHY-znRxtRNV60obNd3-05i_YNYrvVw37ljNX1KTra6DrA2Xceo4eb6_Vsnizvbhez6TKpKJM8AZZyLjOzgZgEMyIrq4wawQ0rtayAlIQzUTAhyoxIoGUpipxpXlKIMMrYGF0NulU82kKnXr1ttH9XTlv1M-tb663baQVBTe_X0aqUS1pE6TGaDPRgLNRO7Vzv2_iv2pur_pkbCRcDYatrULbduM5r00QL1VQUVBQZl4R9AZyIe28</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sobre el discurso de Horkheimer al asumir la dirección del Instituto de Investigación Social</title><source>SciELO</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>López-Pérez, Sheila</creator><creatorcontrib>López-Pérez, Sheila</creatorcontrib><description>This paper analyses Horkheimer's speech when assuming the position of director of the Institute for Social Research, popularly known as the Frankfurt School. Our objective is to trace the type of social philosophy that the institute undertook and that distanced it from other disciplines of the time, among which were pure philosophy and sociology, incapable, in the eyes of the German, of clarifying social reality. We will go through his critique of the totality and his emphasis on the protection of individuality, as well as his denunciation of hyperspecialization in universities. Based on the latter, we will present the transdisciplinarity of academic disciplines as the only way capable of shedding light on a complex and interconnected world. Lastly, we will assess the relevance of social philosophy based on the two types of social philosophy that Horkheimer already glimpsed: that focused on the verum (on the verification of objective and rational facts) and that focused on the bonum (on the pursuit of the good, that is, to its realization through a transformative practice). We will defend the latter as the most useful version of social philosophy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0717-554X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0717-554X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4067/S0717-554X2023000300196</identifier><language>por ; spa</language><publisher>Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales</publisher><subject>escuela de Frankfurt ; filosofía social ; Frankfurt School ; Horkheimer, Max ; individual ; individuo ; PHILOSOPHY ; sistema ; social philosophy ; system ; transdisciplinariedad ; transdisciplinarity</subject><ispartof>Cinta de moebio, 2023-12 (78), p.196-208</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><rights>LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,24151,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>López-Pérez, Sheila</creatorcontrib><title>Sobre el discurso de Horkheimer al asumir la dirección del Instituto de Investigación Social</title><title>Cinta de moebio</title><addtitle>Cinta moebio</addtitle><description>This paper analyses Horkheimer's speech when assuming the position of director of the Institute for Social Research, popularly known as the Frankfurt School. Our objective is to trace the type of social philosophy that the institute undertook and that distanced it from other disciplines of the time, among which were pure philosophy and sociology, incapable, in the eyes of the German, of clarifying social reality. We will go through his critique of the totality and his emphasis on the protection of individuality, as well as his denunciation of hyperspecialization in universities. Based on the latter, we will present the transdisciplinarity of academic disciplines as the only way capable of shedding light on a complex and interconnected world. Lastly, we will assess the relevance of social philosophy based on the two types of social philosophy that Horkheimer already glimpsed: that focused on the verum (on the verification of objective and rational facts) and that focused on the bonum (on the pursuit of the good, that is, to its realization through a transformative practice). We will defend the latter as the most useful version of social philosophy.</description><subject>escuela de Frankfurt</subject><subject>filosofía social</subject><subject>Frankfurt School</subject><subject>Horkheimer, Max</subject><subject>individual</subject><subject>individuo</subject><subject>PHILOSOPHY</subject><subject>sistema</subject><subject>social philosophy</subject><subject>system</subject><subject>transdisciplinariedad</subject><subject>transdisciplinarity</subject><issn>0717-554X</issn><issn>0717-554X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplUF1LwzAUDaLgnP4GAz53pkmbNODLGOoGA8FN8MmQpnczs20kaQV_lz_BP2ZYVQQfLvfrnHMvB6HzlEwywsXliohUJHmePVJCGSEkRir5ARr9Lg7_1MfoJIQdIXlBmByhp5UrPWCocWWD6X1wuAI8d_7lGWwDHusa69A31uNaR4wHY-znRxtRNV60obNd3-05i_YNYrvVw37ljNX1KTra6DrA2Xceo4eb6_Vsnizvbhez6TKpKJM8AZZyLjOzgZgEMyIrq4wawQ0rtayAlIQzUTAhyoxIoGUpipxpXlKIMMrYGF0NulU82kKnXr1ttH9XTlv1M-tb663baQVBTe_X0aqUS1pE6TGaDPRgLNRO7Vzv2_iv2pur_pkbCRcDYatrULbduM5r00QL1VQUVBQZl4R9AZyIe28</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>López-Pérez, Sheila</creator><general>Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales</general><general>Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales</general><scope>INF</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>AGMXS</scope><scope>FKZ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Sobre el discurso de Horkheimer al asumir la dirección del Instituto de Investigación Social</title><author>López-Pérez, Sheila</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d2396-e316694cfe66973c74bd42c76c3ba9de0b06378377b409e2bb7853a6b2e42c233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por ; spa</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>escuela de Frankfurt</topic><topic>filosofía social</topic><topic>Frankfurt School</topic><topic>Horkheimer, Max</topic><topic>individual</topic><topic>individuo</topic><topic>PHILOSOPHY</topic><topic>sistema</topic><topic>social philosophy</topic><topic>system</topic><topic>transdisciplinariedad</topic><topic>transdisciplinarity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>López-Pérez, Sheila</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: Informe Academico</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>Dialnet (Open Access Full Text)</collection><collection>Dialnet</collection><jtitle>Cinta de moebio</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>López-Pérez, Sheila</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sobre el discurso de Horkheimer al asumir la dirección del Instituto de Investigación Social</atitle><jtitle>Cinta de moebio</jtitle><addtitle>Cinta moebio</addtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><issue>78</issue><spage>196</spage><epage>208</epage><pages>196-208</pages><issn>0717-554X</issn><eissn>0717-554X</eissn><abstract>This paper analyses Horkheimer's speech when assuming the position of director of the Institute for Social Research, popularly known as the Frankfurt School. Our objective is to trace the type of social philosophy that the institute undertook and that distanced it from other disciplines of the time, among which were pure philosophy and sociology, incapable, in the eyes of the German, of clarifying social reality. We will go through his critique of the totality and his emphasis on the protection of individuality, as well as his denunciation of hyperspecialization in universities. Based on the latter, we will present the transdisciplinarity of academic disciplines as the only way capable of shedding light on a complex and interconnected world. Lastly, we will assess the relevance of social philosophy based on the two types of social philosophy that Horkheimer already glimpsed: that focused on the verum (on the verification of objective and rational facts) and that focused on the bonum (on the pursuit of the good, that is, to its realization through a transformative practice). We will defend the latter as the most useful version of social philosophy.</abstract><pub>Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales</pub><doi>10.4067/S0717-554X2023000300196</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0717-554X
ispartof Cinta de moebio, 2023-12 (78), p.196-208
issn 0717-554X
0717-554X
language por ; spa
recordid cdi_dialnet_primary_oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001692806
source SciELO; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects escuela de Frankfurt
filosofía social
Frankfurt School
Horkheimer, Max
individual
individuo
PHILOSOPHY
sistema
social philosophy
system
transdisciplinariedad
transdisciplinarity
title Sobre el discurso de Horkheimer al asumir la dirección del Instituto de Investigación Social
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A13%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_dialn&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sobre%20el%20discurso%20de%20Horkheimer%20al%20asumir%20la%20direcci%C3%B3n%20del%20Instituto%20de%20Investigaci%C3%B3n%20Social&rft.jtitle=Cinta%20de%20moebio&rft.au=L%C3%B3pez-P%C3%A9rez,%20Sheila&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.issue=78&rft.spage=196&rft.epage=208&rft.pages=196-208&rft.issn=0717-554X&rft.eissn=0717-554X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4067/S0717-554X2023000300196&rft_dat=%3Cgale_dialn%3EA782784690%3C/gale_dialn%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d2396-e316694cfe66973c74bd42c76c3ba9de0b06378377b409e2bb7853a6b2e42c233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A782784690&rft_scielo_id=S0717_554X2023000300196&rfr_iscdi=true