Loading…
Research on a Decision Prediction Method Based on Causal Inference and a Multi-Expert FTOPJUDGE Mechanism
Legal judgement prediction (LJP) is a crucial part of legal AI, and its goal is to predict the outcome of a case based on the information in the description of criminal facts. This paper proposes a decision prediction method based on causal inference and a multi-expert FTOPJUDGE mechanism. First, a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Mathematics (Basel) 2022-07, Vol.10 (13), p.2281 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-d0d18ead4f41e6fe3ffae4634d8eb2b516c00edd39ecd58c17868206bd545bb63 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 2281 |
container_title | Mathematics (Basel) |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Zhao, Qiang Guo, Rundong Feng, Xiaowei Hu, Weifeng Zhao, Siwen Wang, Zihan Li, Yujun Cao, Yewen |
description | Legal judgement prediction (LJP) is a crucial part of legal AI, and its goal is to predict the outcome of a case based on the information in the description of criminal facts. This paper proposes a decision prediction method based on causal inference and a multi-expert FTOPJUDGE mechanism. First, a causal inference algorithm was adopted to process unstructured text. This process did not require very much manual intervention to better mine the information in the text. Then, a neural network dedicated to each task was set up, and a neural network that simultaneously served multiple tasks was also set up. Finally, the pre-trained language model Lawformer was used to provide knowledge for downstream tasks. By using the public data set CAIL2018 and comparing it with current mainstream decision prediction models, it was shown that the model significantly improved the performance of downstream tasks and achieved great improvements in multiple indicators. Through ablation experiments, the effectiveness and rationality of each module of the proposed model were verified. The method proposed in this study achieved reasonably good performance in legal judgment prediction, which provides a promising solution for legal judgment prediction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/math10132281 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_002d365ecdc9491590a24ac008448057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_002d365ecdc9491590a24ac008448057</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2686049218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-d0d18ead4f41e6fe3ffae4634d8eb2b516c00edd39ecd58c17868206bd545bb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1PwzAMhisEEhPsxg-oxJVCvpqlR9gXQ5s2oe0cuYnLMm3tSDoJ_j0ZQ2i--JX9-rElJ8kdJY-cF-RpB-2aEsoZU_Qi6TDGelkvNi7P9HXSDWFDYhSUK1F0EveOAcGbddrUKaQDNC64KBcerTPtUc6wXTc2fYGA9ujqwyHANp3UFXqsDaZQ2zg6O2xblw2_9ujbdLScL95Wg_EwTps11C7sbpOrCrYBu3_5JlmNhsv-azadjyf952lmOBNtZomlCsGKSlCUFfKqAhSSC6uwZGVOpSEEreUFGpsrQ3tKKkZkaXORl6XkN8nkxLUNbPTeux34b92A07-Fxn9o8K0zW9SEMMtlHkGmEAXNCwJMQOQrIRTJe5F1f2LtffN5wNDqTXPwdTxfM6kkEQWjKroeTi7jmxA8Vv9bKdHH3-jz3_AfgC9_8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2686049218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Research on a Decision Prediction Method Based on Causal Inference and a Multi-Expert FTOPJUDGE Mechanism</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Zhao, Qiang ; Guo, Rundong ; Feng, Xiaowei ; Hu, Weifeng ; Zhao, Siwen ; Wang, Zihan ; Li, Yujun ; Cao, Yewen</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Qiang ; Guo, Rundong ; Feng, Xiaowei ; Hu, Weifeng ; Zhao, Siwen ; Wang, Zihan ; Li, Yujun ; Cao, Yewen</creatorcontrib><description>Legal judgement prediction (LJP) is a crucial part of legal AI, and its goal is to predict the outcome of a case based on the information in the description of criminal facts. This paper proposes a decision prediction method based on causal inference and a multi-expert FTOPJUDGE mechanism. First, a causal inference algorithm was adopted to process unstructured text. This process did not require very much manual intervention to better mine the information in the text. Then, a neural network dedicated to each task was set up, and a neural network that simultaneously served multiple tasks was also set up. Finally, the pre-trained language model Lawformer was used to provide knowledge for downstream tasks. By using the public data set CAIL2018 and comparing it with current mainstream decision prediction models, it was shown that the model significantly improved the performance of downstream tasks and achieved great improvements in multiple indicators. Through ablation experiments, the effectiveness and rationality of each module of the proposed model were verified. The method proposed in this study achieved reasonably good performance in legal judgment prediction, which provides a promising solution for legal judgment prediction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-7390</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-7390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/math10132281</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Ablation ; Algorithms ; Artificial intelligence ; causal inference ; Crime ; data pre-training ; Datasets ; Deep learning ; deep neural network ; Inference ; Language ; legal judgment prediction ; Legal research ; Machine learning ; multi-task learning ; Natural language ; Neural networks ; Prediction models ; Unstructured data</subject><ispartof>Mathematics (Basel), 2022-07, Vol.10 (13), p.2281</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-d0d18ead4f41e6fe3ffae4634d8eb2b516c00edd39ecd58c17868206bd545bb63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6923-0080</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2686049218/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2686049218?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,75096</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Rundong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Xiaowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Weifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Siwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yujun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yewen</creatorcontrib><title>Research on a Decision Prediction Method Based on Causal Inference and a Multi-Expert FTOPJUDGE Mechanism</title><title>Mathematics (Basel)</title><description>Legal judgement prediction (LJP) is a crucial part of legal AI, and its goal is to predict the outcome of a case based on the information in the description of criminal facts. This paper proposes a decision prediction method based on causal inference and a multi-expert FTOPJUDGE mechanism. First, a causal inference algorithm was adopted to process unstructured text. This process did not require very much manual intervention to better mine the information in the text. Then, a neural network dedicated to each task was set up, and a neural network that simultaneously served multiple tasks was also set up. Finally, the pre-trained language model Lawformer was used to provide knowledge for downstream tasks. By using the public data set CAIL2018 and comparing it with current mainstream decision prediction models, it was shown that the model significantly improved the performance of downstream tasks and achieved great improvements in multiple indicators. Through ablation experiments, the effectiveness and rationality of each module of the proposed model were verified. The method proposed in this study achieved reasonably good performance in legal judgment prediction, which provides a promising solution for legal judgment prediction.</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>causal inference</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>data pre-training</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>deep neural network</subject><subject>Inference</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>legal judgment prediction</subject><subject>Legal research</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>multi-task learning</subject><subject>Natural language</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Unstructured data</subject><issn>2227-7390</issn><issn>2227-7390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU1PwzAMhisEEhPsxg-oxJVCvpqlR9gXQ5s2oe0cuYnLMm3tSDoJ_j0ZQ2i--JX9-rElJ8kdJY-cF-RpB-2aEsoZU_Qi6TDGelkvNi7P9HXSDWFDYhSUK1F0EveOAcGbddrUKaQDNC64KBcerTPtUc6wXTc2fYGA9ujqwyHANp3UFXqsDaZQ2zg6O2xblw2_9ujbdLScL95Wg_EwTps11C7sbpOrCrYBu3_5JlmNhsv-azadjyf952lmOBNtZomlCsGKSlCUFfKqAhSSC6uwZGVOpSEEreUFGpsrQ3tKKkZkaXORl6XkN8nkxLUNbPTeux34b92A07-Fxn9o8K0zW9SEMMtlHkGmEAXNCwJMQOQrIRTJe5F1f2LtffN5wNDqTXPwdTxfM6kkEQWjKroeTi7jmxA8Vv9bKdHH3-jz3_AfgC9_8w</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Zhao, Qiang</creator><creator>Guo, Rundong</creator><creator>Feng, Xiaowei</creator><creator>Hu, Weifeng</creator><creator>Zhao, Siwen</creator><creator>Wang, Zihan</creator><creator>Li, Yujun</creator><creator>Cao, Yewen</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6923-0080</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Research on a Decision Prediction Method Based on Causal Inference and a Multi-Expert FTOPJUDGE Mechanism</title><author>Zhao, Qiang ; Guo, Rundong ; Feng, Xiaowei ; Hu, Weifeng ; Zhao, Siwen ; Wang, Zihan ; Li, Yujun ; Cao, Yewen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-d0d18ead4f41e6fe3ffae4634d8eb2b516c00edd39ecd58c17868206bd545bb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>causal inference</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>data pre-training</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>deep neural network</topic><topic>Inference</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>legal judgment prediction</topic><topic>Legal research</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>multi-task learning</topic><topic>Natural language</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Unstructured data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Rundong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Xiaowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Weifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Siwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yujun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yewen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Mathematics (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Qiang</au><au>Guo, Rundong</au><au>Feng, Xiaowei</au><au>Hu, Weifeng</au><au>Zhao, Siwen</au><au>Wang, Zihan</au><au>Li, Yujun</au><au>Cao, Yewen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Research on a Decision Prediction Method Based on Causal Inference and a Multi-Expert FTOPJUDGE Mechanism</atitle><jtitle>Mathematics (Basel)</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>2281</spage><pages>2281-</pages><issn>2227-7390</issn><eissn>2227-7390</eissn><abstract>Legal judgement prediction (LJP) is a crucial part of legal AI, and its goal is to predict the outcome of a case based on the information in the description of criminal facts. This paper proposes a decision prediction method based on causal inference and a multi-expert FTOPJUDGE mechanism. First, a causal inference algorithm was adopted to process unstructured text. This process did not require very much manual intervention to better mine the information in the text. Then, a neural network dedicated to each task was set up, and a neural network that simultaneously served multiple tasks was also set up. Finally, the pre-trained language model Lawformer was used to provide knowledge for downstream tasks. By using the public data set CAIL2018 and comparing it with current mainstream decision prediction models, it was shown that the model significantly improved the performance of downstream tasks and achieved great improvements in multiple indicators. Through ablation experiments, the effectiveness and rationality of each module of the proposed model were verified. The method proposed in this study achieved reasonably good performance in legal judgment prediction, which provides a promising solution for legal judgment prediction.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/math10132281</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6923-0080</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2227-7390 |
ispartof | Mathematics (Basel), 2022-07, Vol.10 (13), p.2281 |
issn | 2227-7390 2227-7390 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_002d365ecdc9491590a24ac008448057 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Ablation Algorithms Artificial intelligence causal inference Crime data pre-training Datasets Deep learning deep neural network Inference Language legal judgment prediction Legal research Machine learning multi-task learning Natural language Neural networks Prediction models Unstructured data |
title | Research on a Decision Prediction Method Based on Causal Inference and a Multi-Expert FTOPJUDGE Mechanism |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T18%3A18%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Research%20on%20a%20Decision%20Prediction%20Method%20Based%20on%20Causal%20Inference%20and%20a%20Multi-Expert%20FTOPJUDGE%20Mechanism&rft.jtitle=Mathematics%20(Basel)&rft.au=Zhao,%20Qiang&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=2281&rft.pages=2281-&rft.issn=2227-7390&rft.eissn=2227-7390&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/math10132281&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2686049218%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-d0d18ead4f41e6fe3ffae4634d8eb2b516c00edd39ecd58c17868206bd545bb63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2686049218&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |