Loading…

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Simultaneous vs Staged Bilateral Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Single-Center Comparative Cohort Study

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: The utilization of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has increased over the past decade to include bilateral TAAs. The risk-benefit profiles of simultaneous versus staged joint arthroplasty continues to be debated in the literature. There...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Foot & ankle orthopaedics 2022-11, Vol.7 (4)
Main Authors: Fletcher, Amanda N., Johnson, Lindsey G., Easley, Mark E., Nunley, James A., DeOrio, James K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Foot & ankle orthopaedics
container_volume 7
creator Fletcher, Amanda N.
Johnson, Lindsey G.
Easley, Mark E.
Nunley, James A.
DeOrio, James K.
description Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: The utilization of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has increased over the past decade to include bilateral TAAs. The risk-benefit profiles of simultaneous versus staged joint arthroplasty continues to be debated in the literature. There are limited case series reporting outcomes after bilateral TAA with no previous comparison of simultaneous versus staged TAA. It is important to study patients with bilateral pathology as they represent a unique population often with a differing arthritis etiology and an overall more debilitating condition. Thus, we aim to compare bilateral simultaneous versus staged TAAs including perioperative complications and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods: We performed a comparative cohort study of patients who underwent primary TAA from 2007 to 2019 at a single academic center. Inclusion criteria were primary bilateral TAA performed in simultaneous or staged fashion in patients over 18 years of age. Exclusion criteria were patients with less than two-years follow-up and those with previous tibiotalar arthrodesis or infection. Patient demographics, comorbidities, perioperative complications, and PROMs were collected. PROMs included preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) bother and function sub-scores. Bivariate tests of significance were used to compare variables between the two cohorts. Results: Fifty patients were included with an average clinical follow-up was 52.2 (+-27.3; range 24-109) months. The mean time between staged TAA surgeries was 17.5 months (+-20.1, range 3-74). The mean age was 64.3 (+-10.6, range 21-76) years with 32 (64.0%) men. Many patients had primary osteoarthritis (n=28, 56.0%). Both cohorts experienced improvement in all PROMs at one year, which were maintained at final follow-up with no significant between-group differences (p >0.05). There were no differences in perioperative complication rates with similar overall complications (22.0% vs. 24.0%; p=0.7788) and reoperations (6.0% vs 5.0%; p=0.7354) between the simultaneous and staged cohorts, respectively. The two-year and five-year reoperation-free survival were 96.0% and 90.0% for the staged cohort and 94.0% and 88.0% for the simultaneous cohort, respectively (p=0.4612) Both cohorts had 100
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2473011421S00661
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_003c7300eff64d9fb8a75b761c174d0e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2473011421S00661</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_003c7300eff64d9fb8a75b761c174d0e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2758565451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2701-ce638e41dd5e309ceea89b571ba40ff3169a035b2f950e1512000be0b741a0f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ksFu1DAQhiMEElXbO0dLnAPjJI4TDkhLBLRSpR62nC3HGe96SezFdlbad-nD4pAKKBIX2xr__zee8WTZGwrvKOX8fVHxEiitCroFqGv6IrtYQvkSe_nX-XV2HcIBAChnbds0F9lj56aj9CY4S5wmcY-kG401So7kfo7KTRiItANZdGMKR-NsWKRbM81jlBbdHMgpkG2UOxzIJzPKiD7ZH1xM68Z-H5FsfNx7dxxliOcPZJPMdjdi3qFNWrK-IaFPKbvbOx8TbR7OV9krLceA10_7Zfbty-eH7ia_u_96223uclVwoLnCumywosPAsIRWIcqm7RmnvaxA65LWrYSS9YVuGSBltEgd6BF6XlEJuiwvs9uVOzh5EEdvJunPwkkjfgWc3wnpo1EjCoBSpV4Dal1XQ6v7RnLW85oqyqsBMLE-rqzj3E84qFRhasYz6PMba_Zi506irVnLeZUAb58A3v2YMURxcLO3qX5RcNawmlWMJhWsKuVdCB717wwUxDIT4t-ZSJZ8tYT0UX-g_9X_BAa-uMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2758565451</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Simultaneous vs Staged Bilateral Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Single-Center Comparative Cohort Study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>SAGE Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Fletcher, Amanda N. ; Johnson, Lindsey G. ; Easley, Mark E. ; Nunley, James A. ; DeOrio, James K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, Amanda N. ; Johnson, Lindsey G. ; Easley, Mark E. ; Nunley, James A. ; DeOrio, James K.</creatorcontrib><description>Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: The utilization of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has increased over the past decade to include bilateral TAAs. The risk-benefit profiles of simultaneous versus staged joint arthroplasty continues to be debated in the literature. There are limited case series reporting outcomes after bilateral TAA with no previous comparison of simultaneous versus staged TAA. It is important to study patients with bilateral pathology as they represent a unique population often with a differing arthritis etiology and an overall more debilitating condition. Thus, we aim to compare bilateral simultaneous versus staged TAAs including perioperative complications and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods: We performed a comparative cohort study of patients who underwent primary TAA from 2007 to 2019 at a single academic center. Inclusion criteria were primary bilateral TAA performed in simultaneous or staged fashion in patients over 18 years of age. Exclusion criteria were patients with less than two-years follow-up and those with previous tibiotalar arthrodesis or infection. Patient demographics, comorbidities, perioperative complications, and PROMs were collected. PROMs included preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) bother and function sub-scores. Bivariate tests of significance were used to compare variables between the two cohorts. Results: Fifty patients were included with an average clinical follow-up was 52.2 (+-27.3; range 24-109) months. The mean time between staged TAA surgeries was 17.5 months (+-20.1, range 3-74). The mean age was 64.3 (+-10.6, range 21-76) years with 32 (64.0%) men. Many patients had primary osteoarthritis (n=28, 56.0%). Both cohorts experienced improvement in all PROMs at one year, which were maintained at final follow-up with no significant between-group differences (p &gt;0.05). There were no differences in perioperative complication rates with similar overall complications (22.0% vs. 24.0%; p=0.7788) and reoperations (6.0% vs 5.0%; p=0.7354) between the simultaneous and staged cohorts, respectively. The two-year and five-year reoperation-free survival were 96.0% and 90.0% for the staged cohort and 94.0% and 88.0% for the simultaneous cohort, respectively (p=0.4612) Both cohorts had 100% failure-free survival up to eight-years postoperative. One patient in the simultaneous cohort required metal component revision at eight years postoperative. Conclusion: The results of bilateral simultaneous TAA, including patient reported outcomes, perioperative complications, and component survival are comparable to patients undergoing staged TAA. When performed under surgeon expertise in appropriately selected patients, we advocate that simultaneous bilateral TAA is a safe and effective method for the treatment of bilateral end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Potential benefits of simultaneous TAA warranting further investigation include decreased anesthesia events, surgery time, tourniquet time, length of hospitalization, recovery and rehabilitation time, and overall cost. Future investigations will include dedicated analyses of radiographic outcomes and cost comparisons between these two cohorts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2473-0114</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-0114</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2473011421S00661</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Ankle ; Arthritis ; Cohort analysis ; Joint surgery ; Osteoarthritis ; Patients</subject><ispartof>Foot &amp; ankle orthopaedics, 2022-11, Vol.7 (4)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022 2022 American Orthopaedic Foot &amp; Ankle Society, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9659774/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2758565451?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21966,25753,27853,27924,27925,37012,44590,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, Amanda N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Lindsey G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Easley, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunley, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeOrio, James K.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Simultaneous vs Staged Bilateral Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Single-Center Comparative Cohort Study</title><title>Foot &amp; ankle orthopaedics</title><description>Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: The utilization of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has increased over the past decade to include bilateral TAAs. The risk-benefit profiles of simultaneous versus staged joint arthroplasty continues to be debated in the literature. There are limited case series reporting outcomes after bilateral TAA with no previous comparison of simultaneous versus staged TAA. It is important to study patients with bilateral pathology as they represent a unique population often with a differing arthritis etiology and an overall more debilitating condition. Thus, we aim to compare bilateral simultaneous versus staged TAAs including perioperative complications and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods: We performed a comparative cohort study of patients who underwent primary TAA from 2007 to 2019 at a single academic center. Inclusion criteria were primary bilateral TAA performed in simultaneous or staged fashion in patients over 18 years of age. Exclusion criteria were patients with less than two-years follow-up and those with previous tibiotalar arthrodesis or infection. Patient demographics, comorbidities, perioperative complications, and PROMs were collected. PROMs included preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) bother and function sub-scores. Bivariate tests of significance were used to compare variables between the two cohorts. Results: Fifty patients were included with an average clinical follow-up was 52.2 (+-27.3; range 24-109) months. The mean time between staged TAA surgeries was 17.5 months (+-20.1, range 3-74). The mean age was 64.3 (+-10.6, range 21-76) years with 32 (64.0%) men. Many patients had primary osteoarthritis (n=28, 56.0%). Both cohorts experienced improvement in all PROMs at one year, which were maintained at final follow-up with no significant between-group differences (p &gt;0.05). There were no differences in perioperative complication rates with similar overall complications (22.0% vs. 24.0%; p=0.7788) and reoperations (6.0% vs 5.0%; p=0.7354) between the simultaneous and staged cohorts, respectively. The two-year and five-year reoperation-free survival were 96.0% and 90.0% for the staged cohort and 94.0% and 88.0% for the simultaneous cohort, respectively (p=0.4612) Both cohorts had 100% failure-free survival up to eight-years postoperative. One patient in the simultaneous cohort required metal component revision at eight years postoperative. Conclusion: The results of bilateral simultaneous TAA, including patient reported outcomes, perioperative complications, and component survival are comparable to patients undergoing staged TAA. When performed under surgeon expertise in appropriately selected patients, we advocate that simultaneous bilateral TAA is a safe and effective method for the treatment of bilateral end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Potential benefits of simultaneous TAA warranting further investigation include decreased anesthesia events, surgery time, tourniquet time, length of hospitalization, recovery and rehabilitation time, and overall cost. Future investigations will include dedicated analyses of radiographic outcomes and cost comparisons between these two cohorts.</description><subject>Ankle</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><issn>2473-0114</issn><issn>2473-0114</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ksFu1DAQhiMEElXbO0dLnAPjJI4TDkhLBLRSpR62nC3HGe96SezFdlbad-nD4pAKKBIX2xr__zee8WTZGwrvKOX8fVHxEiitCroFqGv6IrtYQvkSe_nX-XV2HcIBAChnbds0F9lj56aj9CY4S5wmcY-kG401So7kfo7KTRiItANZdGMKR-NsWKRbM81jlBbdHMgpkG2UOxzIJzPKiD7ZH1xM68Z-H5FsfNx7dxxliOcPZJPMdjdi3qFNWrK-IaFPKbvbOx8TbR7OV9krLceA10_7Zfbty-eH7ia_u_96223uclVwoLnCumywosPAsIRWIcqm7RmnvaxA65LWrYSS9YVuGSBltEgd6BF6XlEJuiwvs9uVOzh5EEdvJunPwkkjfgWc3wnpo1EjCoBSpV4Dal1XQ6v7RnLW85oqyqsBMLE-rqzj3E84qFRhasYz6PMba_Zi506irVnLeZUAb58A3v2YMURxcLO3qX5RcNawmlWMJhWsKuVdCB717wwUxDIT4t-ZSJZ8tYT0UX-g_9X_BAa-uMw</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Fletcher, Amanda N.</creator><creator>Johnson, Lindsey G.</creator><creator>Easley, Mark E.</creator><creator>Nunley, James A.</creator><creator>DeOrio, James K.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Simultaneous vs Staged Bilateral Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Single-Center Comparative Cohort Study</title><author>Fletcher, Amanda N. ; Johnson, Lindsey G. ; Easley, Mark E. ; Nunley, James A. ; DeOrio, James K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2701-ce638e41dd5e309ceea89b571ba40ff3169a035b2f950e1512000be0b741a0f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ankle</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, Amanda N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Lindsey G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Easley, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunley, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeOrio, James K.</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Foot &amp; ankle orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fletcher, Amanda N.</au><au>Johnson, Lindsey G.</au><au>Easley, Mark E.</au><au>Nunley, James A.</au><au>DeOrio, James K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Simultaneous vs Staged Bilateral Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Single-Center Comparative Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>Foot &amp; ankle orthopaedics</jtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>2473-0114</issn><eissn>2473-0114</eissn><abstract>Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: The utilization of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has increased over the past decade to include bilateral TAAs. The risk-benefit profiles of simultaneous versus staged joint arthroplasty continues to be debated in the literature. There are limited case series reporting outcomes after bilateral TAA with no previous comparison of simultaneous versus staged TAA. It is important to study patients with bilateral pathology as they represent a unique population often with a differing arthritis etiology and an overall more debilitating condition. Thus, we aim to compare bilateral simultaneous versus staged TAAs including perioperative complications and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods: We performed a comparative cohort study of patients who underwent primary TAA from 2007 to 2019 at a single academic center. Inclusion criteria were primary bilateral TAA performed in simultaneous or staged fashion in patients over 18 years of age. Exclusion criteria were patients with less than two-years follow-up and those with previous tibiotalar arthrodesis or infection. Patient demographics, comorbidities, perioperative complications, and PROMs were collected. PROMs included preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) bother and function sub-scores. Bivariate tests of significance were used to compare variables between the two cohorts. Results: Fifty patients were included with an average clinical follow-up was 52.2 (+-27.3; range 24-109) months. The mean time between staged TAA surgeries was 17.5 months (+-20.1, range 3-74). The mean age was 64.3 (+-10.6, range 21-76) years with 32 (64.0%) men. Many patients had primary osteoarthritis (n=28, 56.0%). Both cohorts experienced improvement in all PROMs at one year, which were maintained at final follow-up with no significant between-group differences (p &gt;0.05). There were no differences in perioperative complication rates with similar overall complications (22.0% vs. 24.0%; p=0.7788) and reoperations (6.0% vs 5.0%; p=0.7354) between the simultaneous and staged cohorts, respectively. The two-year and five-year reoperation-free survival were 96.0% and 90.0% for the staged cohort and 94.0% and 88.0% for the simultaneous cohort, respectively (p=0.4612) Both cohorts had 100% failure-free survival up to eight-years postoperative. One patient in the simultaneous cohort required metal component revision at eight years postoperative. Conclusion: The results of bilateral simultaneous TAA, including patient reported outcomes, perioperative complications, and component survival are comparable to patients undergoing staged TAA. When performed under surgeon expertise in appropriately selected patients, we advocate that simultaneous bilateral TAA is a safe and effective method for the treatment of bilateral end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Potential benefits of simultaneous TAA warranting further investigation include decreased anesthesia events, surgery time, tourniquet time, length of hospitalization, recovery and rehabilitation time, and overall cost. Future investigations will include dedicated analyses of radiographic outcomes and cost comparisons between these two cohorts.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/2473011421S00661</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2473-0114
ispartof Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2022-11, Vol.7 (4)
issn 2473-0114
2473-0114
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_003c7300eff64d9fb8a75b761c174d0e
source Publicly Available Content Database; SAGE Open Access Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Ankle
Arthritis
Cohort analysis
Joint surgery
Osteoarthritis
Patients
title Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Simultaneous vs Staged Bilateral Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Single-Center Comparative Cohort Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A59%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Clinical%20Outcomes%20and%20Complications%20of%20Simultaneous%20vs%20Staged%20Bilateral%20Total%20Ankle%20Arthroplasty:%20A%20Single-Center%20Comparative%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=Foot%20&%20ankle%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Fletcher,%20Amanda%20N.&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=2473-0114&rft.eissn=2473-0114&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2473011421S00661&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2758565451%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2701-ce638e41dd5e309ceea89b571ba40ff3169a035b2f950e1512000be0b741a0f33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2758565451&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2473011421S00661&rfr_iscdi=true