Loading…
Is audio a mandatory component of multimedia distraction for reduction of pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients? A split-mouth crossover randomized controlled clinical trial
Background: Control of pain, fear, and anxiety of pediatric dental patients is a common concern for the parents and dental clinicians. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of audiovisual distraction (AVD) and mute-video distraction (MVD) for reduction of pain and anxiety of pediatric dental pati...
Saved in:
Published in: | Dental research journal 2022-01, Vol.19 (1), p.10-10 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572r-6ab439808ae4f3246bb1d0bf45a848ec9b6ea9e5cc320c099e2f3d7df733c9bb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572r-6ab439808ae4f3246bb1d0bf45a848ec9b6ea9e5cc320c099e2f3d7df733c9bb3 |
container_end_page | 10 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 10 |
container_title | Dental research journal |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Jafarimofrad, Sara Sarlak, Hamid Nourmohammadi, Shima |
description | Background: Control of pain, fear, and anxiety of pediatric dental patients is a common concern for the parents and dental clinicians. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of audiovisual distraction (AVD) and mute-video distraction (MVD) for reduction of pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients.
Materials and Methods: This randomized split-mouth crossover clinical trial evaluated 60 systemically healthy children between 4 and 7 years requiring bilateral pulpotomy of primary maxillary first molars. The samples were randomly divided into 6 groups based on the distraction technique and sequence of its receipt: (I) control-AVD, (II) AVD-control, (III) control-MVD, (IV) MVD-control, (V) AVD-MVD, and (VI) MVD-AVD and were treated. The severity of pain and anxiety of patients during anesthetic injection was measured using physiological (pulse rate [PR]), sound, eyes, and motor (SEM) and faces pain rating (FPR) scales. Data were compared between Groups 1 and 2, 3 and 4, and 5 and 6 using crossover clinical trial analysis (P = 0.05).
Results: The increase in PR and the mean FPR and SEM scales during anesthetic injection was significantly smaller in AVD than MVD (P < 0.05). No significant difference was noted between MVD and control technique regarding PR and mean FPR or SEM (P = 1.00).
Conclusion: It appears that MVD has no significant efficacy for reduction of pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients. AVD, however, can effectively decrease the pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients during anesthetic injection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/1735-3327.336695 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_00639e49a0504f5a8b077312520611f9</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A691506476</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_00639e49a0504f5a8b077312520611f9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A691506476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572r-6ab439808ae4f3246bb1d0bf45a848ec9b6ea9e5cc320c099e2f3d7df733c9bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptk0uP0zAUhSMEYsrAnhWyhITYpDh-JPEGVI14VKrEBtaW4zitO05cbGeG8r_4f9y0M0OLUBTF8T33c3J8nGUvCzxnBabviorynFJSzSktS8EfZTOCcZ1jwvnjbPZQvsiexbjFuCxEwZ9mF5RTXDNaz7Lfy4jU2FqPFOrV0Krkwx5p3-_8YIaEfIf60SXbm9Yq1NqYgtLJ-gF1PqBg2vH4BrqdsgMCBNw_rUn7w9zUloLVqAWaciBKFkbxA1qguHM25b0f0wbp4GP0NwaYgPC9_WVa-IwhBe_cNHR2sBoAAFPuefakUy6aF3fPy-z7p4_frr7kq6-fl1eLVa55RUJeqoZRUeNaGdZRwsqmKVrcdIyrmtVGi6Y0ShiuNSVYYyEM6WhbtV1FKRQbepktj9zWq63cBdursJdeWXmY8GEtVUhWOyPBXCoMEwpzzDpYoMFVRQvCCbhedAJY74-s3diAmxpcCMqdQc8rg93Itb-RtSCVqGoAvL0DBP9jNDHJ3kZtnFOD8WOUpGQFLxgRBKSv_5Fu_RgGsApUhDNGKSv-qtYKfsAOnZ82d4LKRQlBwSWrSlDN_6OCqzW9hR0ynYX5s4Y3Jw0bo1zaRO_GKSfxXIiPwsPmB9M9mFFgOeVbTgGWU4DlMd_Q8urUxIeG-0CDYHUU3HqXTIjXbrw1QYL2evC3Z-D8BDwVllEeToJU8v4k0D9sPBEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2625443341</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is audio a mandatory component of multimedia distraction for reduction of pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients? A split-mouth crossover randomized controlled clinical trial</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Jafarimofrad, Sara ; Sarlak, Hamid ; Nourmohammadi, Shima</creator><creatorcontrib>Jafarimofrad, Sara ; Sarlak, Hamid ; Nourmohammadi, Shima</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Control of pain, fear, and anxiety of pediatric dental patients is a common concern for the parents and dental clinicians. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of audiovisual distraction (AVD) and mute-video distraction (MVD) for reduction of pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients.
Materials and Methods: This randomized split-mouth crossover clinical trial evaluated 60 systemically healthy children between 4 and 7 years requiring bilateral pulpotomy of primary maxillary first molars. The samples were randomly divided into 6 groups based on the distraction technique and sequence of its receipt: (I) control-AVD, (II) AVD-control, (III) control-MVD, (IV) MVD-control, (V) AVD-MVD, and (VI) MVD-AVD and were treated. The severity of pain and anxiety of patients during anesthetic injection was measured using physiological (pulse rate [PR]), sound, eyes, and motor (SEM) and faces pain rating (FPR) scales. Data were compared between Groups 1 and 2, 3 and 4, and 5 and 6 using crossover clinical trial analysis (P = 0.05).
Results: The increase in PR and the mean FPR and SEM scales during anesthetic injection was significantly smaller in AVD than MVD (P < 0.05). No significant difference was noted between MVD and control technique regarding PR and mean FPR or SEM (P = 1.00).
Conclusion: It appears that MVD has no significant efficacy for reduction of pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients. AVD, however, can effectively decrease the pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients during anesthetic injection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1735-3327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2008-0255</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.336695</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35308438</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Iran: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; audiovisual media ; behavior control ; Care and treatment ; Clinical trials ; dental anxiety ; distraction ; Injection ; Molars ; Mouth ; Original ; Pain ; pain perception ; Patients ; pediatric dentistry ; Pediatrics ; Sensory integration</subject><ispartof>Dental research journal, 2022-01, Vol.19 (1), p.10-10</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2022 Dental Research Journal.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2022 Dental Research Journal 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572r-6ab439808ae4f3246bb1d0bf45a848ec9b6ea9e5cc320c099e2f3d7df733c9bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572r-6ab439808ae4f3246bb1d0bf45a848ec9b6ea9e5cc320c099e2f3d7df733c9bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8927978/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8927978/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35308438$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jafarimofrad, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarlak, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nourmohammadi, Shima</creatorcontrib><title>Is audio a mandatory component of multimedia distraction for reduction of pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients? A split-mouth crossover randomized controlled clinical trial</title><title>Dental research journal</title><addtitle>Dent Res J (Isfahan)</addtitle><description>Background: Control of pain, fear, and anxiety of pediatric dental patients is a common concern for the parents and dental clinicians. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of audiovisual distraction (AVD) and mute-video distraction (MVD) for reduction of pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients.
Materials and Methods: This randomized split-mouth crossover clinical trial evaluated 60 systemically healthy children between 4 and 7 years requiring bilateral pulpotomy of primary maxillary first molars. The samples were randomly divided into 6 groups based on the distraction technique and sequence of its receipt: (I) control-AVD, (II) AVD-control, (III) control-MVD, (IV) MVD-control, (V) AVD-MVD, and (VI) MVD-AVD and were treated. The severity of pain and anxiety of patients during anesthetic injection was measured using physiological (pulse rate [PR]), sound, eyes, and motor (SEM) and faces pain rating (FPR) scales. Data were compared between Groups 1 and 2, 3 and 4, and 5 and 6 using crossover clinical trial analysis (P = 0.05).
Results: The increase in PR and the mean FPR and SEM scales during anesthetic injection was significantly smaller in AVD than MVD (P < 0.05). No significant difference was noted between MVD and control technique regarding PR and mean FPR or SEM (P = 1.00).
Conclusion: It appears that MVD has no significant efficacy for reduction of pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients. AVD, however, can effectively decrease the pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients during anesthetic injection.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>audiovisual media</subject><subject>behavior control</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>dental anxiety</subject><subject>distraction</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Molars</subject><subject>Mouth</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>pain perception</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>pediatric dentistry</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Sensory integration</subject><issn>1735-3327</issn><issn>2008-0255</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptk0uP0zAUhSMEYsrAnhWyhITYpDh-JPEGVI14VKrEBtaW4zitO05cbGeG8r_4f9y0M0OLUBTF8T33c3J8nGUvCzxnBabviorynFJSzSktS8EfZTOCcZ1jwvnjbPZQvsiexbjFuCxEwZ9mF5RTXDNaz7Lfy4jU2FqPFOrV0Krkwx5p3-_8YIaEfIf60SXbm9Yq1NqYgtLJ-gF1PqBg2vH4BrqdsgMCBNw_rUn7w9zUloLVqAWaciBKFkbxA1qguHM25b0f0wbp4GP0NwaYgPC9_WVa-IwhBe_cNHR2sBoAAFPuefakUy6aF3fPy-z7p4_frr7kq6-fl1eLVa55RUJeqoZRUeNaGdZRwsqmKVrcdIyrmtVGi6Y0ShiuNSVYYyEM6WhbtV1FKRQbepktj9zWq63cBdursJdeWXmY8GEtVUhWOyPBXCoMEwpzzDpYoMFVRQvCCbhedAJY74-s3diAmxpcCMqdQc8rg93Itb-RtSCVqGoAvL0DBP9jNDHJ3kZtnFOD8WOUpGQFLxgRBKSv_5Fu_RgGsApUhDNGKSv-qtYKfsAOnZ82d4LKRQlBwSWrSlDN_6OCqzW9hR0ynYX5s4Y3Jw0bo1zaRO_GKSfxXIiPwsPmB9M9mFFgOeVbTgGWU4DlMd_Q8urUxIeG-0CDYHUU3HqXTIjXbrw1QYL2evC3Z-D8BDwVllEeToJU8v4k0D9sPBEQ</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Jafarimofrad, Sara</creator><creator>Sarlak, Hamid</creator><creator>Nourmohammadi, Shima</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Is audio a mandatory component of multimedia distraction for reduction of pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients? A split-mouth crossover randomized controlled clinical trial</title><author>Jafarimofrad, Sara ; Sarlak, Hamid ; Nourmohammadi, Shima</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572r-6ab439808ae4f3246bb1d0bf45a848ec9b6ea9e5cc320c099e2f3d7df733c9bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>audiovisual media</topic><topic>behavior control</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>dental anxiety</topic><topic>distraction</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Molars</topic><topic>Mouth</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>pain perception</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>pediatric dentistry</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Sensory integration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jafarimofrad, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarlak, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nourmohammadi, Shima</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Dental research journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jafarimofrad, Sara</au><au>Sarlak, Hamid</au><au>Nourmohammadi, Shima</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is audio a mandatory component of multimedia distraction for reduction of pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients? A split-mouth crossover randomized controlled clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Dental research journal</jtitle><addtitle>Dent Res J (Isfahan)</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>10</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>10-10</pages><issn>1735-3327</issn><eissn>2008-0255</eissn><abstract>Background: Control of pain, fear, and anxiety of pediatric dental patients is a common concern for the parents and dental clinicians. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of audiovisual distraction (AVD) and mute-video distraction (MVD) for reduction of pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients.
Materials and Methods: This randomized split-mouth crossover clinical trial evaluated 60 systemically healthy children between 4 and 7 years requiring bilateral pulpotomy of primary maxillary first molars. The samples were randomly divided into 6 groups based on the distraction technique and sequence of its receipt: (I) control-AVD, (II) AVD-control, (III) control-MVD, (IV) MVD-control, (V) AVD-MVD, and (VI) MVD-AVD and were treated. The severity of pain and anxiety of patients during anesthetic injection was measured using physiological (pulse rate [PR]), sound, eyes, and motor (SEM) and faces pain rating (FPR) scales. Data were compared between Groups 1 and 2, 3 and 4, and 5 and 6 using crossover clinical trial analysis (P = 0.05).
Results: The increase in PR and the mean FPR and SEM scales during anesthetic injection was significantly smaller in AVD than MVD (P < 0.05). No significant difference was noted between MVD and control technique regarding PR and mean FPR or SEM (P = 1.00).
Conclusion: It appears that MVD has no significant efficacy for reduction of pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients. AVD, however, can effectively decrease the pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients during anesthetic injection.</abstract><cop>Iran</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>35308438</pmid><doi>10.4103/1735-3327.336695</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1735-3327 |
ispartof | Dental research journal, 2022-01, Vol.19 (1), p.10-10 |
issn | 1735-3327 2008-0255 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_00639e49a0504f5a8b077312520611f9 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Anxiety audiovisual media behavior control Care and treatment Clinical trials dental anxiety distraction Injection Molars Mouth Original Pain pain perception Patients pediatric dentistry Pediatrics Sensory integration |
title | Is audio a mandatory component of multimedia distraction for reduction of pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients? A split-mouth crossover randomized controlled clinical trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T23%3A25%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20audio%20a%20mandatory%20component%20of%20multimedia%20distraction%20for%20reduction%20of%20pain%20and%20anxiety%20of%20pediatric%20dental%20patients?%20A%20split-mouth%20crossover%20randomized%20controlled%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Dental%20research%20journal&rft.au=Jafarimofrad,%20Sara&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=10&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=10-10&rft.issn=1735-3327&rft.eissn=2008-0255&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/1735-3327.336695&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA691506476%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572r-6ab439808ae4f3246bb1d0bf45a848ec9b6ea9e5cc320c099e2f3d7df733c9bb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2625443341&rft_id=info:pmid/35308438&rft_galeid=A691506476&rfr_iscdi=true |