Loading…
Protocol of the process evaluation of cluster randomised control trial for estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to increase care home staff influenza vaccination rates compared to usual practice (FluCare)
Background Influenza (flu) vaccination rates in UK care home staff are extremely low. Less than 40% of staff in care homes are vaccinated for influenza (flu), presenting risks to the health of frail residents and potential staff absence from cross-infection. Staff often do not perceive a need for va...
Saved in:
Published in: | Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine 2023-09, Vol.24 (1), p.587-587, Article 587 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-6dafc935cc34fe3a6e06ddc448d17a446c30b119240e82572f0114aaee3dc1b83 |
container_end_page | 587 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 587 |
container_title | Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Birt, Linda Katangwe-Chigamba, Thando Scott, Sion Wright, David J Wagner, Adam P Sims, Erika Bion, Veronica Seeley, Carys Alsaif, Faisal Clarke, Allan Griffiths, Alys Jones, Liz Bryant, Alison Patel, Amrish |
description | Background Influenza (flu) vaccination rates in UK care home staff are extremely low. Less than 40% of staff in care homes are vaccinated for influenza (flu), presenting risks to the health of frail residents and potential staff absence from cross-infection. Staff often do not perceive a need for vaccination and are unaware they are entitled to free flu vaccination. The FluCare study, a cluster randomised control trial (RCT), uses behavioural interventions to address barriers. Videos, posters, and leaflets are intended to raise awareness of flu vaccination benefits and debunk myths. On-site staff vaccination clinics increase accessibility. Financial incentives to care homes for improved vaccination rates and regular monitoring influence the environment. This paper outlines the planned process evaluation which will describe the intervention's mechanisms of action, explain any changes in outcomes, identify local adaptations, and inform design of the implementation phase. Methods/design A mixed method process evaluation to inform the interpretation of trial findings. Objectives * Describe the intervention as delivered in terms of dose and fidelity, including adaptations and variations across care homes. * Explore the effects of individual intervention components on primary outcomes. * Investigate the mechanisms of impact. * Describe the perceived effectiveness of relevant intervention components (including videos, leaflets, posters, and flu clinics) from participant perspectives (care home manager, care home staff, flu clinic providers). * Describe the characteristics of care homes and participants to assess reach. A purposive sample of twenty care homes (ten in the intervention arm, ten in the control arm) for inclusion in the process evaluation. Data will include (1) study records including care home site profiles, (2) responses to a mechanism of action questionnaire, and (3) semi-structured interviews with care home staff and clinic providers. Quantitative data will be descriptively reported. Interview data will be thematically analysed and then categories mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Discussion Adopting this systematic and comprehensive process evaluation approach will help ensure data is captured on all aspects of the trial, enabling a full understanding of the intervention implementation and RCT findings. Trial registration ISRCTN ISRCTN22729870. Registered on 24 August 2022. Keywords: Residential homes, Nursing homes, Care homes, Long-t |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13063-023-07613-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_00a8e73bf3b443e3aea0c879d0519f74</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A765487735</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_00a8e73bf3b443e3aea0c879d0519f74</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A765487735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-6dafc935cc34fe3a6e06ddc448d17a446c30b119240e82572f0114aaee3dc1b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk2P0zAQjRCIXQp_gJMlLsshix1_pSe0qlhYaSU4wNmaOuM2VRoX26mA_82dabsCilBkJZl578145lXVS8GvhWjNmywkN7LmDR1rhKz1o-pSWKVr0wj9-K_vi-pZzhvOlZxL9bS6kNYK3Zjmsvr5KcUSfRxYDKyske1S9Jgzwz0ME5Q-joeMH6ZcMLEEYxe3fcaO-TiWRLySehhYiIlhLv2WKOPqqIQhoC_9HseDHhGJkkt9HiZtoPh2N-A31o9UgxLHqiXSv08IGZmHhGwdt8hygRAoEYYJxx_A9uB9P576TFAwH8UI3h0EpjxRb7sEVNAju7odpgXlXj-vngQYMr54eM-qL7fvPi8-1Pcf398tbu5rr-ZNqU0Hwc-l9l6qgBIMctN1Xqm2ExaUMl7ypRDzRnFsG22bwIVQAIiy82LZyll1d9LtImzcLtF40ncXoXfHQEwrB4laG9BxDi1auQxyqZSkYgjct3becS3mwSrSenvS2k3LLXaexpRgOBM9z4z92q3i3gmuuRR0ZtXVg0KKXyfalqNNehwGGDFO2TWt0ba1xliCvvoHuolTGmlWR5RQjZbyD2oFdANaSqTC_iDqbqzRqrVWakJd_wdFT4fbnlyEoaf4GaE5EXyKOScMvy8puDs4352c78j57uh8p-UvMe_7Sw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2865142533</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Protocol of the process evaluation of cluster randomised control trial for estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to increase care home staff influenza vaccination rates compared to usual practice (FluCare)</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Birt, Linda ; Katangwe-Chigamba, Thando ; Scott, Sion ; Wright, David J ; Wagner, Adam P ; Sims, Erika ; Bion, Veronica ; Seeley, Carys ; Alsaif, Faisal ; Clarke, Allan ; Griffiths, Alys ; Jones, Liz ; Bryant, Alison ; Patel, Amrish</creator><creatorcontrib>Birt, Linda ; Katangwe-Chigamba, Thando ; Scott, Sion ; Wright, David J ; Wagner, Adam P ; Sims, Erika ; Bion, Veronica ; Seeley, Carys ; Alsaif, Faisal ; Clarke, Allan ; Griffiths, Alys ; Jones, Liz ; Bryant, Alison ; Patel, Amrish</creatorcontrib><description>Background Influenza (flu) vaccination rates in UK care home staff are extremely low. Less than 40% of staff in care homes are vaccinated for influenza (flu), presenting risks to the health of frail residents and potential staff absence from cross-infection. Staff often do not perceive a need for vaccination and are unaware they are entitled to free flu vaccination. The FluCare study, a cluster randomised control trial (RCT), uses behavioural interventions to address barriers. Videos, posters, and leaflets are intended to raise awareness of flu vaccination benefits and debunk myths. On-site staff vaccination clinics increase accessibility. Financial incentives to care homes for improved vaccination rates and regular monitoring influence the environment. This paper outlines the planned process evaluation which will describe the intervention's mechanisms of action, explain any changes in outcomes, identify local adaptations, and inform design of the implementation phase. Methods/design A mixed method process evaluation to inform the interpretation of trial findings. Objectives * Describe the intervention as delivered in terms of dose and fidelity, including adaptations and variations across care homes. * Explore the effects of individual intervention components on primary outcomes. * Investigate the mechanisms of impact. * Describe the perceived effectiveness of relevant intervention components (including videos, leaflets, posters, and flu clinics) from participant perspectives (care home manager, care home staff, flu clinic providers). * Describe the characteristics of care homes and participants to assess reach. A purposive sample of twenty care homes (ten in the intervention arm, ten in the control arm) for inclusion in the process evaluation. Data will include (1) study records including care home site profiles, (2) responses to a mechanism of action questionnaire, and (3) semi-structured interviews with care home staff and clinic providers. Quantitative data will be descriptively reported. Interview data will be thematically analysed and then categories mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Discussion Adopting this systematic and comprehensive process evaluation approach will help ensure data is captured on all aspects of the trial, enabling a full understanding of the intervention implementation and RCT findings. Trial registration ISRCTN ISRCTN22729870. Registered on 24 August 2022. Keywords: Residential homes, Nursing homes, Care homes, Long-term care facilities, Influenza vaccination, Staff, Employees</description><identifier>ISSN: 1745-6215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07613-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37715262</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Care homes ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Data collection ; Dosage and administration ; Drug stores ; Feasibility studies ; Health aspects ; Immunization ; Influenza ; Influenza vaccination ; Influenza vaccines ; Intervention ; Long-term care facilities ; Medical personnel ; Nursing homes ; Pharmacy ; Residential homes ; Seasons ; Staff ; Study Protocol ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine, 2023-09, Vol.24 (1), p.587-587, Article 587</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-6dafc935cc34fe3a6e06ddc448d17a446c30b119240e82572f0114aaee3dc1b83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4527-4414</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2865142533?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2865142533?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,36990,38493,43871,53766,53768,74382</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Birt, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katangwe-Chigamba, Thando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Sion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Adam P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sims, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bion, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seeley, Carys</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsaif, Faisal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, Alys</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Liz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryant, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Amrish</creatorcontrib><title>Protocol of the process evaluation of cluster randomised control trial for estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to increase care home staff influenza vaccination rates compared to usual practice (FluCare)</title><title>Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine</title><description>Background Influenza (flu) vaccination rates in UK care home staff are extremely low. Less than 40% of staff in care homes are vaccinated for influenza (flu), presenting risks to the health of frail residents and potential staff absence from cross-infection. Staff often do not perceive a need for vaccination and are unaware they are entitled to free flu vaccination. The FluCare study, a cluster randomised control trial (RCT), uses behavioural interventions to address barriers. Videos, posters, and leaflets are intended to raise awareness of flu vaccination benefits and debunk myths. On-site staff vaccination clinics increase accessibility. Financial incentives to care homes for improved vaccination rates and regular monitoring influence the environment. This paper outlines the planned process evaluation which will describe the intervention's mechanisms of action, explain any changes in outcomes, identify local adaptations, and inform design of the implementation phase. Methods/design A mixed method process evaluation to inform the interpretation of trial findings. Objectives * Describe the intervention as delivered in terms of dose and fidelity, including adaptations and variations across care homes. * Explore the effects of individual intervention components on primary outcomes. * Investigate the mechanisms of impact. * Describe the perceived effectiveness of relevant intervention components (including videos, leaflets, posters, and flu clinics) from participant perspectives (care home manager, care home staff, flu clinic providers). * Describe the characteristics of care homes and participants to assess reach. A purposive sample of twenty care homes (ten in the intervention arm, ten in the control arm) for inclusion in the process evaluation. Data will include (1) study records including care home site profiles, (2) responses to a mechanism of action questionnaire, and (3) semi-structured interviews with care home staff and clinic providers. Quantitative data will be descriptively reported. Interview data will be thematically analysed and then categories mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Discussion Adopting this systematic and comprehensive process evaluation approach will help ensure data is captured on all aspects of the trial, enabling a full understanding of the intervention implementation and RCT findings. Trial registration ISRCTN ISRCTN22729870. Registered on 24 August 2022. Keywords: Residential homes, Nursing homes, Care homes, Long-term care facilities, Influenza vaccination, Staff, Employees</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Care homes</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Drug stores</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Influenza vaccination</subject><subject>Influenza vaccines</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Long-term care facilities</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Residential homes</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Staff</subject><subject>Study Protocol</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>1745-6215</issn><issn>1745-6215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk2P0zAQjRCIXQp_gJMlLsshix1_pSe0qlhYaSU4wNmaOuM2VRoX26mA_82dabsCilBkJZl578145lXVS8GvhWjNmywkN7LmDR1rhKz1o-pSWKVr0wj9-K_vi-pZzhvOlZxL9bS6kNYK3Zjmsvr5KcUSfRxYDKyske1S9Jgzwz0ME5Q-joeMH6ZcMLEEYxe3fcaO-TiWRLySehhYiIlhLv2WKOPqqIQhoC_9HseDHhGJkkt9HiZtoPh2N-A31o9UgxLHqiXSv08IGZmHhGwdt8hygRAoEYYJxx_A9uB9P576TFAwH8UI3h0EpjxRb7sEVNAju7odpgXlXj-vngQYMr54eM-qL7fvPi8-1Pcf398tbu5rr-ZNqU0Hwc-l9l6qgBIMctN1Xqm2ExaUMl7ypRDzRnFsG22bwIVQAIiy82LZyll1d9LtImzcLtF40ncXoXfHQEwrB4laG9BxDi1auQxyqZSkYgjct3becS3mwSrSenvS2k3LLXaexpRgOBM9z4z92q3i3gmuuRR0ZtXVg0KKXyfalqNNehwGGDFO2TWt0ba1xliCvvoHuolTGmlWR5RQjZbyD2oFdANaSqTC_iDqbqzRqrVWakJd_wdFT4fbnlyEoaf4GaE5EXyKOScMvy8puDs4352c78j57uh8p-UvMe_7Sw</recordid><startdate>20230915</startdate><enddate>20230915</enddate><creator>Birt, Linda</creator><creator>Katangwe-Chigamba, Thando</creator><creator>Scott, Sion</creator><creator>Wright, David J</creator><creator>Wagner, Adam P</creator><creator>Sims, Erika</creator><creator>Bion, Veronica</creator><creator>Seeley, Carys</creator><creator>Alsaif, Faisal</creator><creator>Clarke, Allan</creator><creator>Griffiths, Alys</creator><creator>Jones, Liz</creator><creator>Bryant, Alison</creator><creator>Patel, Amrish</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4527-4414</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230915</creationdate><title>Protocol of the process evaluation of cluster randomised control trial for estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to increase care home staff influenza vaccination rates compared to usual practice (FluCare)</title><author>Birt, Linda ; Katangwe-Chigamba, Thando ; Scott, Sion ; Wright, David J ; Wagner, Adam P ; Sims, Erika ; Bion, Veronica ; Seeley, Carys ; Alsaif, Faisal ; Clarke, Allan ; Griffiths, Alys ; Jones, Liz ; Bryant, Alison ; Patel, Amrish</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-6dafc935cc34fe3a6e06ddc448d17a446c30b119240e82572f0114aaee3dc1b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Care homes</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Drug stores</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Influenza vaccination</topic><topic>Influenza vaccines</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Long-term care facilities</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Residential homes</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Staff</topic><topic>Study Protocol</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Birt, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katangwe-Chigamba, Thando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Sion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Adam P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sims, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bion, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seeley, Carys</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsaif, Faisal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, Alys</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Liz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryant, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Amrish</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Birt, Linda</au><au>Katangwe-Chigamba, Thando</au><au>Scott, Sion</au><au>Wright, David J</au><au>Wagner, Adam P</au><au>Sims, Erika</au><au>Bion, Veronica</au><au>Seeley, Carys</au><au>Alsaif, Faisal</au><au>Clarke, Allan</au><au>Griffiths, Alys</au><au>Jones, Liz</au><au>Bryant, Alison</au><au>Patel, Amrish</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Protocol of the process evaluation of cluster randomised control trial for estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to increase care home staff influenza vaccination rates compared to usual practice (FluCare)</atitle><jtitle>Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine</jtitle><date>2023-09-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>587</spage><epage>587</epage><pages>587-587</pages><artnum>587</artnum><issn>1745-6215</issn><eissn>1745-6215</eissn><abstract>Background Influenza (flu) vaccination rates in UK care home staff are extremely low. Less than 40% of staff in care homes are vaccinated for influenza (flu), presenting risks to the health of frail residents and potential staff absence from cross-infection. Staff often do not perceive a need for vaccination and are unaware they are entitled to free flu vaccination. The FluCare study, a cluster randomised control trial (RCT), uses behavioural interventions to address barriers. Videos, posters, and leaflets are intended to raise awareness of flu vaccination benefits and debunk myths. On-site staff vaccination clinics increase accessibility. Financial incentives to care homes for improved vaccination rates and regular monitoring influence the environment. This paper outlines the planned process evaluation which will describe the intervention's mechanisms of action, explain any changes in outcomes, identify local adaptations, and inform design of the implementation phase. Methods/design A mixed method process evaluation to inform the interpretation of trial findings. Objectives * Describe the intervention as delivered in terms of dose and fidelity, including adaptations and variations across care homes. * Explore the effects of individual intervention components on primary outcomes. * Investigate the mechanisms of impact. * Describe the perceived effectiveness of relevant intervention components (including videos, leaflets, posters, and flu clinics) from participant perspectives (care home manager, care home staff, flu clinic providers). * Describe the characteristics of care homes and participants to assess reach. A purposive sample of twenty care homes (ten in the intervention arm, ten in the control arm) for inclusion in the process evaluation. Data will include (1) study records including care home site profiles, (2) responses to a mechanism of action questionnaire, and (3) semi-structured interviews with care home staff and clinic providers. Quantitative data will be descriptively reported. Interview data will be thematically analysed and then categories mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Discussion Adopting this systematic and comprehensive process evaluation approach will help ensure data is captured on all aspects of the trial, enabling a full understanding of the intervention implementation and RCT findings. Trial registration ISRCTN ISRCTN22729870. Registered on 24 August 2022. Keywords: Residential homes, Nursing homes, Care homes, Long-term care facilities, Influenza vaccination, Staff, Employees</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>37715262</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13063-023-07613-5</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4527-4414</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1745-6215 |
ispartof | Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine, 2023-09, Vol.24 (1), p.587-587, Article 587 |
issn | 1745-6215 1745-6215 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_00a8e73bf3b443e3aea0c879d0519f74 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Access to information Care homes COVID-19 vaccines Data collection Dosage and administration Drug stores Feasibility studies Health aspects Immunization Influenza Influenza vaccination Influenza vaccines Intervention Long-term care facilities Medical personnel Nursing homes Pharmacy Residential homes Seasons Staff Study Protocol Testing |
title | Protocol of the process evaluation of cluster randomised control trial for estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to increase care home staff influenza vaccination rates compared to usual practice (FluCare) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T23%3A18%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Protocol%20of%20the%20process%20evaluation%20of%20cluster%20randomised%20control%20trial%20for%20estimating%20the%20effectiveness%20and%20cost-effectiveness%20of%20a%20complex%20intervention%20to%20increase%20care%20home%20staff%20influenza%20vaccination%20rates%20compared%20to%20usual%20practice%20(FluCare)&rft.jtitle=Current%20controlled%20trials%20in%20cardiovascular%20medicine&rft.au=Birt,%20Linda&rft.date=2023-09-15&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=587&rft.epage=587&rft.pages=587-587&rft.artnum=587&rft.issn=1745-6215&rft.eissn=1745-6215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13063-023-07613-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA765487735%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-6dafc935cc34fe3a6e06ddc448d17a446c30b119240e82572f0114aaee3dc1b83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2865142533&rft_id=info:pmid/37715262&rft_galeid=A765487735&rfr_iscdi=true |