How few countries will do? Comparative survey analysis from a Bayesian perspective

Meuleman and Billiet (2009) have carried out a simulation study aimed at the question how many countries are needed for accurate multilevel SEM estimation in comparative studies. The authors concluded that a sample of 50 to 100 countries is needed for accurate estimation. Recently, Bayesian estimati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Survey research methods 2012-01, Vol.6 (2)
Main Authors: Joop J.C.M. Hox, Rens van de Schoot, Suzette Matthijsse
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bayesian estimation
cross-national research
Multilevel SEM
sample size
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Meuleman and Billiet (2009) have carried out a simulation study aimed at the question how many countries are needed for accurate multilevel SEM estimation in comparative studies. The authors concluded that a sample of 50 to 100 countries is needed for accurate estimation. Recently, Bayesian estimation methods have been introduced in structural equation modeling which should work well with much lower sample sizes. The current study reanalyzes the simulation of Meuleman and Billiet using Bayesian estimation to find the lowest number of countries needed when conducting multilevel SEM. The main result of our simulations is that a sample of about 20 countries is sufficient for accurate Bayesian estimation, which makes multilevel SEM practicable for the number of countries commonly available in large scale comparative surveys.
ISSN:1864-3361
DOI:10.18148/srm/2012.v6i2.5033