Loading…

Effects of hindgut acidosis on production, metabolism, and inflammatory biomarkers in feed-restricted lactating dairy cows

Study objectives were to evaluate the effects of hindgut acidosis (HGA) on production, metabolism, and inflammation in feed-restricted (FR) dairy cows. Twelve rumen-cannulated cows were enrolled in a study with 3 experimental periods (P). During P1 (5 d), baseline data were collected. During P2 (2 d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of dairy science 2023-04, Vol.106 (4), p.2890-2903
Main Authors: Abeyta, M.A., Horst, E.A., Goetz, B.M., Mayorga, E.J., Rodriguez-Jimenez, S., Caratzu, M., Baumgard, L.H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Study objectives were to evaluate the effects of hindgut acidosis (HGA) on production, metabolism, and inflammation in feed-restricted (FR) dairy cows. Twelve rumen-cannulated cows were enrolled in a study with 3 experimental periods (P). During P1 (5 d), baseline data were collected. During P2 (2 d), all cows were FR to 40% of their baseline feed intake. During P3 (4 d), cows remained FR and were assigned to 1 of 2 abomasal infusion treatments: (1) control (FR-CON; 6 L of H2O/d; n = 6) or (2) starch (FR-ST; 4 kg of corn starch + 6 L of H2O/d; n = 6). Respective treatments were partitioned into 4 equal doses (1 kg of corn starch/infusion) and were abomasally infused daily at 0000, 0600, 1200, and 1800 h. All 3 P were analyzed independently and the effects of treatment, time, and treatment × time were assessed using PROC MIXED, and P1 and P2 data were analyzed using the treatments cows were destined to be assigned to during P3. Hallmark production and metabolic responses to feed restriction were observed in both treatments, including decreased milk yield (39%) and energy-corrected milk (32%), circulating glucose (12%), insulin (71%), and increased circulating nonesterified fatty acids (3.2-fold) throughout both P2 and P3, relative to P1. However, despite a marked reduction in fecal pH (0.96 units), the aforementioned metrics were unaltered by HGA. During P3, starch infusions increased circulating β-hydroxybutyrate, with the most pronounced increase occurring on d 2 (81% relative to FR-CON). Further, feed restriction decreased blood urea nitrogen during P2 (17% relative to P1) in both treatments, and this was exacerbated by starch infusions during P3 (31% decrease relative to FR-CON). In contrast to our hypothesis, neither feed restriction nor HGA increased circulating acute-phase proteins (serum amyloid A and lipopolysaccharide binding protein) relative to P1 or FR-CON, respectively. Thus, despite marked reductions in fecal pH, prior feed restriction did not appear to increase the susceptibility to HGA.
ISSN:0022-0302
1525-3198
DOI:10.3168/jds.2022-22689