Loading…

Hedge Markers: A Study of Politeness and Gender in Media Interaction

The study aims at analyzing politeness and gender around the postponement of election discourse in the Rosi Talk Show (RTS). This qualitative study applies a pragmatic approach that investigates hedge markers (HM). Data were collected from the utterances of nine participants using basic tapping, fre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of society, culture & language culture & language, 2023-09, Vol.11 (3), p.226-241
Main Authors: Aini, Nurul, Djatmika, Djatmika, Sumarlam, Sumarlam, Kristina, Diah
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 241
container_issue 3
container_start_page 226
container_title International journal of society, culture & language
container_volume 11
creator Aini, Nurul
Djatmika, Djatmika
Sumarlam, Sumarlam
Kristina, Diah
description The study aims at analyzing politeness and gender around the postponement of election discourse in the Rosi Talk Show (RTS). This qualitative study applies a pragmatic approach that investigates hedge markers (HM). Data were collected from the utterances of nine participants using basic tapping, free-flowing listening, and note-taking. The results indicated several findings. First, academics (males) represented hedge markers with assertive acts of expressing an opinion. However, the practitioner (female) tended to use directive acts of questioning. Second, academics and practitioners (males) often used hedges for quality maxims. While the practitioner (female) often used hedges with question tags. Third, the function of HM showed performative hedges as hesitation and meta-comments; particles to emphasize questions, soften act, and give flexibility; adverbial clauses to show cause-effect and conditions; hedges to quality maxims to show hesitation, raise objections, minimize criticism, and other corrections; hedges to relevance maxims as allegation and hesitation; and hedges in politeness as indifference, rejection, and avoidance.
doi_str_mv 10.22034/ijscl.2023.2002556.3035
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_011a0a06ad4e48bca4db5745bdccb031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_011a0a06ad4e48bca4db5745bdccb031</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2869068831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d164t-d3abc7e0eaeee3ef4ac58a0f0922947388ccee5d8ec63247a8067f0ee011300c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjk9Lw0AQxRdBsNR-hwXPqZP9l423UrUWWhTUc5jsTsrGmNTd9NBvb7C-wxt4vPnxGOM5LIUAqe5Dm1y3FCDkZCC0NksJUl-xmZCizITI4YYtUmphUlmAtmbGHl_IH4jvMX5RTA98xd_Hkz_zoeFvQxdG6ikljr3nG-o9RR56vicfkG_7kSK6MQz9LbtusEu0-L9z9vn89LF-yXavm-16tct8btSYeYm1KwgIiUhSo9Bpi9BAKUSpCmmtc0TaW3JGClWgBVM0QAR5LgGcnLPthesHbKtjDN8Yz9WAofoLhnioMI7BdVRNLwgIBr0iZWuHyte6ULr2ztUg84l1d2Ed4_BzojRW7XCK_TS_EtaUYKydWr8CSmZ3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869068831</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hedge Markers: A Study of Politeness and Gender in Media Interaction</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><source>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</source><creator>Aini, Nurul ; Djatmika, Djatmika ; Sumarlam, Sumarlam ; Kristina, Diah</creator><creatorcontrib>Aini, Nurul ; Djatmika, Djatmika ; Sumarlam, Sumarlam ; Kristina, Diah</creatorcontrib><description>The study aims at analyzing politeness and gender around the postponement of election discourse in the Rosi Talk Show (RTS). This qualitative study applies a pragmatic approach that investigates hedge markers (HM). Data were collected from the utterances of nine participants using basic tapping, free-flowing listening, and note-taking. The results indicated several findings. First, academics (males) represented hedge markers with assertive acts of expressing an opinion. However, the practitioner (female) tended to use directive acts of questioning. Second, academics and practitioners (males) often used hedges for quality maxims. While the practitioner (female) often used hedges with question tags. Third, the function of HM showed performative hedges as hesitation and meta-comments; particles to emphasize questions, soften act, and give flexibility; adverbial clauses to show cause-effect and conditions; hedges to quality maxims to show hesitation, raise objections, minimize criticism, and other corrections; hedges to relevance maxims as allegation and hesitation; and hedges in politeness as indifference, rejection, and avoidance.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2329-2210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.22034/ijscl.2023.2002556.3035</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Raleigh: International Journal of Society, Culture and Language</publisher><subject>Adverbials ; Apathy ; Criticism ; Females ; Function words ; Gender ; hedge markers ; Hedges ; Language ; Linguistics ; Males ; Note taking ; Pessimism ; Politeness ; political issues ; Political power ; Politicians ; Politics ; Pragmatics ; Qualitative research ; rosi talk show ; Speech ; speech act ; Tag questions ; Talk shows ; Verbal communication</subject><ispartof>International journal of society, culture &amp; language, 2023-09, Vol.11 (3), p.226-241</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://www.ijscl.net/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2869068831?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12824,12840,25731,27901,27902,34752,36989,38493,43871,44176,44566,62634,62635,62650</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aini, Nurul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djatmika, Djatmika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumarlam, Sumarlam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristina, Diah</creatorcontrib><title>Hedge Markers: A Study of Politeness and Gender in Media Interaction</title><title>International journal of society, culture &amp; language</title><description>The study aims at analyzing politeness and gender around the postponement of election discourse in the Rosi Talk Show (RTS). This qualitative study applies a pragmatic approach that investigates hedge markers (HM). Data were collected from the utterances of nine participants using basic tapping, free-flowing listening, and note-taking. The results indicated several findings. First, academics (males) represented hedge markers with assertive acts of expressing an opinion. However, the practitioner (female) tended to use directive acts of questioning. Second, academics and practitioners (males) often used hedges for quality maxims. While the practitioner (female) often used hedges with question tags. Third, the function of HM showed performative hedges as hesitation and meta-comments; particles to emphasize questions, soften act, and give flexibility; adverbial clauses to show cause-effect and conditions; hedges to quality maxims to show hesitation, raise objections, minimize criticism, and other corrections; hedges to relevance maxims as allegation and hesitation; and hedges in politeness as indifference, rejection, and avoidance.</description><subject>Adverbials</subject><subject>Apathy</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Function words</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>hedge markers</subject><subject>Hedges</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Note taking</subject><subject>Pessimism</subject><subject>Politeness</subject><subject>political issues</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Politicians</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Pragmatics</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>rosi talk show</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>speech act</subject><subject>Tag questions</subject><subject>Talk shows</subject><subject>Verbal communication</subject><issn>2329-2210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNotjk9Lw0AQxRdBsNR-hwXPqZP9l423UrUWWhTUc5jsTsrGmNTd9NBvb7C-wxt4vPnxGOM5LIUAqe5Dm1y3FCDkZCC0NksJUl-xmZCizITI4YYtUmphUlmAtmbGHl_IH4jvMX5RTA98xd_Hkz_zoeFvQxdG6ikljr3nG-o9RR56vicfkG_7kSK6MQz9LbtusEu0-L9z9vn89LF-yXavm-16tct8btSYeYm1KwgIiUhSo9Bpi9BAKUSpCmmtc0TaW3JGClWgBVM0QAR5LgGcnLPthesHbKtjDN8Yz9WAofoLhnioMI7BdVRNLwgIBr0iZWuHyte6ULr2ztUg84l1d2Ed4_BzojRW7XCK_TS_EtaUYKydWr8CSmZ3</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Aini, Nurul</creator><creator>Djatmika, Djatmika</creator><creator>Sumarlam, Sumarlam</creator><creator>Kristina, Diah</creator><general>International Journal of Society, Culture and Language</general><scope>7UB</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Hedge Markers: A Study of Politeness and Gender in Media Interaction</title><author>Aini, Nurul ; Djatmika, Djatmika ; Sumarlam, Sumarlam ; Kristina, Diah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d164t-d3abc7e0eaeee3ef4ac58a0f0922947388ccee5d8ec63247a8067f0ee011300c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adverbials</topic><topic>Apathy</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Function words</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>hedge markers</topic><topic>Hedges</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Note taking</topic><topic>Pessimism</topic><topic>Politeness</topic><topic>political issues</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Politicians</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Pragmatics</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>rosi talk show</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>speech act</topic><topic>Tag questions</topic><topic>Talk shows</topic><topic>Verbal communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aini, Nurul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djatmika, Djatmika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumarlam, Sumarlam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristina, Diah</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International journal of society, culture &amp; language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aini, Nurul</au><au>Djatmika, Djatmika</au><au>Sumarlam, Sumarlam</au><au>Kristina, Diah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hedge Markers: A Study of Politeness and Gender in Media Interaction</atitle><jtitle>International journal of society, culture &amp; language</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>241</epage><pages>226-241</pages><eissn>2329-2210</eissn><abstract>The study aims at analyzing politeness and gender around the postponement of election discourse in the Rosi Talk Show (RTS). This qualitative study applies a pragmatic approach that investigates hedge markers (HM). Data were collected from the utterances of nine participants using basic tapping, free-flowing listening, and note-taking. The results indicated several findings. First, academics (males) represented hedge markers with assertive acts of expressing an opinion. However, the practitioner (female) tended to use directive acts of questioning. Second, academics and practitioners (males) often used hedges for quality maxims. While the practitioner (female) often used hedges with question tags. Third, the function of HM showed performative hedges as hesitation and meta-comments; particles to emphasize questions, soften act, and give flexibility; adverbial clauses to show cause-effect and conditions; hedges to quality maxims to show hesitation, raise objections, minimize criticism, and other corrections; hedges to relevance maxims as allegation and hesitation; and hedges in politeness as indifference, rejection, and avoidance.</abstract><cop>Raleigh</cop><pub>International Journal of Society, Culture and Language</pub><doi>10.22034/ijscl.2023.2002556.3035</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2329-2210
ispartof International journal of society, culture & language, 2023-09, Vol.11 (3), p.226-241
issn 2329-2210
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_011a0a06ad4e48bca4db5745bdccb031
source Publicly Available Content Database; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; ProQuest One Literature; Coronavirus Research Database; Art, Design & Architecture Collection
subjects Adverbials
Apathy
Criticism
Females
Function words
Gender
hedge markers
Hedges
Language
Linguistics
Males
Note taking
Pessimism
Politeness
political issues
Political power
Politicians
Politics
Pragmatics
Qualitative research
rosi talk show
Speech
speech act
Tag questions
Talk shows
Verbal communication
title Hedge Markers: A Study of Politeness and Gender in Media Interaction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A13%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hedge%20Markers:%20A%20Study%20of%20Politeness%20and%20Gender%20in%20Media%20Interaction&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20society,%20culture%20&%20language&rft.au=Aini,%20Nurul&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=241&rft.pages=226-241&rft.eissn=2329-2210&rft_id=info:doi/10.22034/ijscl.2023.2002556.3035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2869068831%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d164t-d3abc7e0eaeee3ef4ac58a0f0922947388ccee5d8ec63247a8067f0ee011300c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869068831&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true