Loading…
Hedge Markers: A Study of Politeness and Gender in Media Interaction
The study aims at analyzing politeness and gender around the postponement of election discourse in the Rosi Talk Show (RTS). This qualitative study applies a pragmatic approach that investigates hedge markers (HM). Data were collected from the utterances of nine participants using basic tapping, fre...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of society, culture & language culture & language, 2023-09, Vol.11 (3), p.226-241 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 241 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 226 |
container_title | International journal of society, culture & language |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Aini, Nurul Djatmika, Djatmika Sumarlam, Sumarlam Kristina, Diah |
description | The study aims at analyzing politeness and gender around the postponement of election discourse in the Rosi Talk Show (RTS). This qualitative study applies a pragmatic approach that investigates hedge markers (HM). Data were collected from the utterances of nine participants using basic tapping, free-flowing listening, and note-taking. The results indicated several findings. First, academics (males) represented hedge markers with assertive acts of expressing an opinion. However, the practitioner (female) tended to use directive acts of questioning. Second, academics and practitioners (males) often used hedges for quality maxims. While the practitioner (female) often used hedges with question tags. Third, the function of HM showed performative hedges as hesitation and meta-comments; particles to emphasize questions, soften act, and give flexibility; adverbial clauses to show cause-effect and conditions; hedges to quality maxims to show hesitation, raise objections, minimize criticism, and other corrections; hedges to relevance maxims as allegation and hesitation; and hedges in politeness as indifference, rejection, and avoidance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.22034/ijscl.2023.2002556.3035 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_011a0a06ad4e48bca4db5745bdccb031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_011a0a06ad4e48bca4db5745bdccb031</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2869068831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d164t-d3abc7e0eaeee3ef4ac58a0f0922947388ccee5d8ec63247a8067f0ee011300c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjk9Lw0AQxRdBsNR-hwXPqZP9l423UrUWWhTUc5jsTsrGmNTd9NBvb7C-wxt4vPnxGOM5LIUAqe5Dm1y3FCDkZCC0NksJUl-xmZCizITI4YYtUmphUlmAtmbGHl_IH4jvMX5RTA98xd_Hkz_zoeFvQxdG6ikljr3nG-o9RR56vicfkG_7kSK6MQz9LbtusEu0-L9z9vn89LF-yXavm-16tct8btSYeYm1KwgIiUhSo9Bpi9BAKUSpCmmtc0TaW3JGClWgBVM0QAR5LgGcnLPthesHbKtjDN8Yz9WAofoLhnioMI7BdVRNLwgIBr0iZWuHyte6ULr2ztUg84l1d2Ed4_BzojRW7XCK_TS_EtaUYKydWr8CSmZ3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869068831</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hedge Markers: A Study of Politeness and Gender in Media Interaction</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><source>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</source><creator>Aini, Nurul ; Djatmika, Djatmika ; Sumarlam, Sumarlam ; Kristina, Diah</creator><creatorcontrib>Aini, Nurul ; Djatmika, Djatmika ; Sumarlam, Sumarlam ; Kristina, Diah</creatorcontrib><description>The study aims at analyzing politeness and gender around the postponement of election discourse in the Rosi Talk Show (RTS). This qualitative study applies a pragmatic approach that investigates hedge markers (HM). Data were collected from the utterances of nine participants using basic tapping, free-flowing listening, and note-taking. The results indicated several findings. First, academics (males) represented hedge markers with assertive acts of expressing an opinion. However, the practitioner (female) tended to use directive acts of questioning. Second, academics and practitioners (males) often used hedges for quality maxims. While the practitioner (female) often used hedges with question tags. Third, the function of HM showed performative hedges as hesitation and meta-comments; particles to emphasize questions, soften act, and give flexibility; adverbial clauses to show cause-effect and conditions; hedges to quality maxims to show hesitation, raise objections, minimize criticism, and other corrections; hedges to relevance maxims as allegation and hesitation; and hedges in politeness as indifference, rejection, and avoidance.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2329-2210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.22034/ijscl.2023.2002556.3035</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Raleigh: International Journal of Society, Culture and Language</publisher><subject>Adverbials ; Apathy ; Criticism ; Females ; Function words ; Gender ; hedge markers ; Hedges ; Language ; Linguistics ; Males ; Note taking ; Pessimism ; Politeness ; political issues ; Political power ; Politicians ; Politics ; Pragmatics ; Qualitative research ; rosi talk show ; Speech ; speech act ; Tag questions ; Talk shows ; Verbal communication</subject><ispartof>International journal of society, culture & language, 2023-09, Vol.11 (3), p.226-241</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://www.ijscl.net/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2869068831?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12824,12840,25731,27901,27902,34752,36989,38493,43871,44176,44566,62634,62635,62650</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aini, Nurul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djatmika, Djatmika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumarlam, Sumarlam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristina, Diah</creatorcontrib><title>Hedge Markers: A Study of Politeness and Gender in Media Interaction</title><title>International journal of society, culture & language</title><description>The study aims at analyzing politeness and gender around the postponement of election discourse in the Rosi Talk Show (RTS). This qualitative study applies a pragmatic approach that investigates hedge markers (HM). Data were collected from the utterances of nine participants using basic tapping, free-flowing listening, and note-taking. The results indicated several findings. First, academics (males) represented hedge markers with assertive acts of expressing an opinion. However, the practitioner (female) tended to use directive acts of questioning. Second, academics and practitioners (males) often used hedges for quality maxims. While the practitioner (female) often used hedges with question tags. Third, the function of HM showed performative hedges as hesitation and meta-comments; particles to emphasize questions, soften act, and give flexibility; adverbial clauses to show cause-effect and conditions; hedges to quality maxims to show hesitation, raise objections, minimize criticism, and other corrections; hedges to relevance maxims as allegation and hesitation; and hedges in politeness as indifference, rejection, and avoidance.</description><subject>Adverbials</subject><subject>Apathy</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Function words</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>hedge markers</subject><subject>Hedges</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Note taking</subject><subject>Pessimism</subject><subject>Politeness</subject><subject>political issues</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Politicians</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Pragmatics</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>rosi talk show</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>speech act</subject><subject>Tag questions</subject><subject>Talk shows</subject><subject>Verbal communication</subject><issn>2329-2210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNotjk9Lw0AQxRdBsNR-hwXPqZP9l423UrUWWhTUc5jsTsrGmNTd9NBvb7C-wxt4vPnxGOM5LIUAqe5Dm1y3FCDkZCC0NksJUl-xmZCizITI4YYtUmphUlmAtmbGHl_IH4jvMX5RTA98xd_Hkz_zoeFvQxdG6ikljr3nG-o9RR56vicfkG_7kSK6MQz9LbtusEu0-L9z9vn89LF-yXavm-16tct8btSYeYm1KwgIiUhSo9Bpi9BAKUSpCmmtc0TaW3JGClWgBVM0QAR5LgGcnLPthesHbKtjDN8Yz9WAofoLhnioMI7BdVRNLwgIBr0iZWuHyte6ULr2ztUg84l1d2Ed4_BzojRW7XCK_TS_EtaUYKydWr8CSmZ3</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Aini, Nurul</creator><creator>Djatmika, Djatmika</creator><creator>Sumarlam, Sumarlam</creator><creator>Kristina, Diah</creator><general>International Journal of Society, Culture and Language</general><scope>7UB</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Hedge Markers: A Study of Politeness and Gender in Media Interaction</title><author>Aini, Nurul ; Djatmika, Djatmika ; Sumarlam, Sumarlam ; Kristina, Diah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d164t-d3abc7e0eaeee3ef4ac58a0f0922947388ccee5d8ec63247a8067f0ee011300c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adverbials</topic><topic>Apathy</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Function words</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>hedge markers</topic><topic>Hedges</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Note taking</topic><topic>Pessimism</topic><topic>Politeness</topic><topic>political issues</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Politicians</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Pragmatics</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>rosi talk show</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>speech act</topic><topic>Tag questions</topic><topic>Talk shows</topic><topic>Verbal communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aini, Nurul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djatmika, Djatmika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumarlam, Sumarlam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristina, Diah</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International journal of society, culture & language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aini, Nurul</au><au>Djatmika, Djatmika</au><au>Sumarlam, Sumarlam</au><au>Kristina, Diah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hedge Markers: A Study of Politeness and Gender in Media Interaction</atitle><jtitle>International journal of society, culture & language</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>241</epage><pages>226-241</pages><eissn>2329-2210</eissn><abstract>The study aims at analyzing politeness and gender around the postponement of election discourse in the Rosi Talk Show (RTS). This qualitative study applies a pragmatic approach that investigates hedge markers (HM). Data were collected from the utterances of nine participants using basic tapping, free-flowing listening, and note-taking. The results indicated several findings. First, academics (males) represented hedge markers with assertive acts of expressing an opinion. However, the practitioner (female) tended to use directive acts of questioning. Second, academics and practitioners (males) often used hedges for quality maxims. While the practitioner (female) often used hedges with question tags. Third, the function of HM showed performative hedges as hesitation and meta-comments; particles to emphasize questions, soften act, and give flexibility; adverbial clauses to show cause-effect and conditions; hedges to quality maxims to show hesitation, raise objections, minimize criticism, and other corrections; hedges to relevance maxims as allegation and hesitation; and hedges in politeness as indifference, rejection, and avoidance.</abstract><cop>Raleigh</cop><pub>International Journal of Society, Culture and Language</pub><doi>10.22034/ijscl.2023.2002556.3035</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2329-2210 |
ispartof | International journal of society, culture & language, 2023-09, Vol.11 (3), p.226-241 |
issn | 2329-2210 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_011a0a06ad4e48bca4db5745bdccb031 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; ProQuest One Literature; Coronavirus Research Database; Art, Design & Architecture Collection |
subjects | Adverbials Apathy Criticism Females Function words Gender hedge markers Hedges Language Linguistics Males Note taking Pessimism Politeness political issues Political power Politicians Politics Pragmatics Qualitative research rosi talk show Speech speech act Tag questions Talk shows Verbal communication |
title | Hedge Markers: A Study of Politeness and Gender in Media Interaction |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A13%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hedge%20Markers:%20A%20Study%20of%20Politeness%20and%20Gender%20in%20Media%20Interaction&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20society,%20culture%20&%20language&rft.au=Aini,%20Nurul&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=241&rft.pages=226-241&rft.eissn=2329-2210&rft_id=info:doi/10.22034/ijscl.2023.2002556.3035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2869068831%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d164t-d3abc7e0eaeee3ef4ac58a0f0922947388ccee5d8ec63247a8067f0ee011300c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869068831&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |