Loading…

Evaluating Southern Ocean biological production in two ocean biogeochemical models on daily to seasonal timescales using satellite chlorophyll and O2 / Ar observations

We assess the ability of ocean biogeochemical models to represent seasonal structures in biomass and net community production (NCP) in the Southern Ocean. Two models are compared to observations on daily to seasonal timescales in four different sections of the region. We use daily satellite fields o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biogeosciences 2015-02, Vol.12 (3), p.681-695
Main Authors: Jonsson, B F, Doney, S, Dunne, J, Bender, M L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 695
container_issue 3
container_start_page 681
container_title Biogeosciences
container_volume 12
creator Jonsson, B F
Doney, S
Dunne, J
Bender, M L
description We assess the ability of ocean biogeochemical models to represent seasonal structures in biomass and net community production (NCP) in the Southern Ocean. Two models are compared to observations on daily to seasonal timescales in four different sections of the region. We use daily satellite fields of chlorophyll (Chl) as a proxy for biomass and in situ observations of O2 and Ar supersaturation (δO2 / Ar) to estimate NCP. δO2 / Ar is converted to the flux of biologically generated O2 from sea to air (O2 bioflux). All data are aggregated to a climatological year with a daily resolution. To account for potential regional differences within the Southern Ocean, we conduct separate analyses of sections south of South Africa, around the Drake Passage, south of Australia, and south of New Zealand. We find that the models simulate the upper range of Chl concentrations well, underestimate spring levels significantly, and show differences in skill between early and late parts of the growing season. While there is a great deal of scatter in the bioflux observations in general, the four sectors each have distinct patterns that the models pick up. Neither model exhibits a significant distinction between the Australian and New Zealand sectors and between the Drake Passage and African sectors. South of 60° S, the models fail to predict the observed extent of biological O2 undersaturation. We suggest that this shortcoming may be due either to problems with the ecosystem dynamics or problems with the vertical transport of oxygen.
doi_str_mv 10.5194/bg-12-681-2015
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_01204840e0bb459f8c09af765e3ecc48</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_01204840e0bb459f8c09af765e3ecc48</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3581740101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d197t-7d31aebc66834e62e7b06b66d1bd00bc06b3b6ed08f6f0a4a98c21ef41c1eb9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhiMEEqVw5WyJC5dQO3Ec51hVpVSqtAfgHI3tSdYrJ7PYTtH-Iv4m3hY4cJqvR--rmamq94J_6sQgr8xci6ZWWtQNF92L6kL0jaql0MPLf3nPX1dvUjpw3mquu4vq1-0jhA2yX2f2lba8x7iynUVYmfEUaPYWAjtGcpvNnlbmV5Z_EqO_yIxk97g8YQs5DIkVyoEPJ5aJJYREa5llv2AqECa2pbNbgowh-IzM7gNFOu5PITBYHds17IpdR0YmYXyEs216W72aICR89ydeVt8_3367-VI_7O7ub64faieGPte9awWgsUrpVqJqsDdcGaWcMI5zY0vRGoWO60lNHCQM2jYCJymsQDPY9rK6f9Z1BIfxGP0C8TQS-PGpQXEeIWZvA45cNFxqyZEbI7th0pYPMPWqwxatlbpofXzWKuf7sWHK4-KTLUvDirSlUSjFJe_kIAv64T_0QFssdztT5btlOd22vwGw7Zjz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1651919783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating Southern Ocean biological production in two ocean biogeochemical models on daily to seasonal timescales using satellite chlorophyll and O2 / Ar observations</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Jonsson, B F ; Doney, S ; Dunne, J ; Bender, M L</creator><creatorcontrib>Jonsson, B F ; Doney, S ; Dunne, J ; Bender, M L</creatorcontrib><description>We assess the ability of ocean biogeochemical models to represent seasonal structures in biomass and net community production (NCP) in the Southern Ocean. Two models are compared to observations on daily to seasonal timescales in four different sections of the region. We use daily satellite fields of chlorophyll (Chl) as a proxy for biomass and in situ observations of O2 and Ar supersaturation (δO2 / Ar) to estimate NCP. δO2 / Ar is converted to the flux of biologically generated O2 from sea to air (O2 bioflux). All data are aggregated to a climatological year with a daily resolution. To account for potential regional differences within the Southern Ocean, we conduct separate analyses of sections south of South Africa, around the Drake Passage, south of Australia, and south of New Zealand. We find that the models simulate the upper range of Chl concentrations well, underestimate spring levels significantly, and show differences in skill between early and late parts of the growing season. While there is a great deal of scatter in the bioflux observations in general, the four sectors each have distinct patterns that the models pick up. Neither model exhibits a significant distinction between the Australian and New Zealand sectors and between the Drake Passage and African sectors. South of 60° S, the models fail to predict the observed extent of biological O2 undersaturation. We suggest that this shortcoming may be due either to problems with the ecosystem dynamics or problems with the vertical transport of oxygen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1726-4170</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1726-4189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5194/bg-12-681-2015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Katlenburg-Lindau: Copernicus GmbH</publisher><subject>Marine</subject><ispartof>Biogeosciences, 2015-02, Vol.12 (3), p.681-695</ispartof><rights>Copyright Copernicus GmbH 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1651919783/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1651919783?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jonsson, B F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doney, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunne, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, M L</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating Southern Ocean biological production in two ocean biogeochemical models on daily to seasonal timescales using satellite chlorophyll and O2 / Ar observations</title><title>Biogeosciences</title><description>We assess the ability of ocean biogeochemical models to represent seasonal structures in biomass and net community production (NCP) in the Southern Ocean. Two models are compared to observations on daily to seasonal timescales in four different sections of the region. We use daily satellite fields of chlorophyll (Chl) as a proxy for biomass and in situ observations of O2 and Ar supersaturation (δO2 / Ar) to estimate NCP. δO2 / Ar is converted to the flux of biologically generated O2 from sea to air (O2 bioflux). All data are aggregated to a climatological year with a daily resolution. To account for potential regional differences within the Southern Ocean, we conduct separate analyses of sections south of South Africa, around the Drake Passage, south of Australia, and south of New Zealand. We find that the models simulate the upper range of Chl concentrations well, underestimate spring levels significantly, and show differences in skill between early and late parts of the growing season. While there is a great deal of scatter in the bioflux observations in general, the four sectors each have distinct patterns that the models pick up. Neither model exhibits a significant distinction between the Australian and New Zealand sectors and between the Drake Passage and African sectors. South of 60° S, the models fail to predict the observed extent of biological O2 undersaturation. We suggest that this shortcoming may be due either to problems with the ecosystem dynamics or problems with the vertical transport of oxygen.</description><subject>Marine</subject><issn>1726-4170</issn><issn>1726-4189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhiMEEqVw5WyJC5dQO3Ec51hVpVSqtAfgHI3tSdYrJ7PYTtH-Iv4m3hY4cJqvR--rmamq94J_6sQgr8xci6ZWWtQNF92L6kL0jaql0MPLf3nPX1dvUjpw3mquu4vq1-0jhA2yX2f2lba8x7iynUVYmfEUaPYWAjtGcpvNnlbmV5Z_EqO_yIxk97g8YQs5DIkVyoEPJ5aJJYREa5llv2AqECa2pbNbgowh-IzM7gNFOu5PITBYHds17IpdR0YmYXyEs216W72aICR89ydeVt8_3367-VI_7O7ub64faieGPte9awWgsUrpVqJqsDdcGaWcMI5zY0vRGoWO60lNHCQM2jYCJymsQDPY9rK6f9Z1BIfxGP0C8TQS-PGpQXEeIWZvA45cNFxqyZEbI7th0pYPMPWqwxatlbpofXzWKuf7sWHK4-KTLUvDirSlUSjFJe_kIAv64T_0QFssdztT5btlOd22vwGw7Zjz</recordid><startdate>20150204</startdate><enddate>20150204</enddate><creator>Jonsson, B F</creator><creator>Doney, S</creator><creator>Dunne, J</creator><creator>Bender, M L</creator><general>Copernicus GmbH</general><general>Copernicus Publications</general><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150204</creationdate><title>Evaluating Southern Ocean biological production in two ocean biogeochemical models on daily to seasonal timescales using satellite chlorophyll and O2 / Ar observations</title><author>Jonsson, B F ; Doney, S ; Dunne, J ; Bender, M L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d197t-7d31aebc66834e62e7b06b66d1bd00bc06b3b6ed08f6f0a4a98c21ef41c1eb9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Marine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jonsson, B F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doney, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunne, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, M L</creatorcontrib><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Biogeosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jonsson, B F</au><au>Doney, S</au><au>Dunne, J</au><au>Bender, M L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating Southern Ocean biological production in two ocean biogeochemical models on daily to seasonal timescales using satellite chlorophyll and O2 / Ar observations</atitle><jtitle>Biogeosciences</jtitle><date>2015-02-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>681</spage><epage>695</epage><pages>681-695</pages><issn>1726-4170</issn><eissn>1726-4189</eissn><abstract>We assess the ability of ocean biogeochemical models to represent seasonal structures in biomass and net community production (NCP) in the Southern Ocean. Two models are compared to observations on daily to seasonal timescales in four different sections of the region. We use daily satellite fields of chlorophyll (Chl) as a proxy for biomass and in situ observations of O2 and Ar supersaturation (δO2 / Ar) to estimate NCP. δO2 / Ar is converted to the flux of biologically generated O2 from sea to air (O2 bioflux). All data are aggregated to a climatological year with a daily resolution. To account for potential regional differences within the Southern Ocean, we conduct separate analyses of sections south of South Africa, around the Drake Passage, south of Australia, and south of New Zealand. We find that the models simulate the upper range of Chl concentrations well, underestimate spring levels significantly, and show differences in skill between early and late parts of the growing season. While there is a great deal of scatter in the bioflux observations in general, the four sectors each have distinct patterns that the models pick up. Neither model exhibits a significant distinction between the Australian and New Zealand sectors and between the Drake Passage and African sectors. South of 60° S, the models fail to predict the observed extent of biological O2 undersaturation. We suggest that this shortcoming may be due either to problems with the ecosystem dynamics or problems with the vertical transport of oxygen.</abstract><cop>Katlenburg-Lindau</cop><pub>Copernicus GmbH</pub><doi>10.5194/bg-12-681-2015</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1726-4170
ispartof Biogeosciences, 2015-02, Vol.12 (3), p.681-695
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_01204840e0bb459f8c09af765e3ecc48
source Publicly Available Content Database; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects Marine
title Evaluating Southern Ocean biological production in two ocean biogeochemical models on daily to seasonal timescales using satellite chlorophyll and O2 / Ar observations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A09%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20Southern%20Ocean%20biological%20production%20in%20two%20ocean%20biogeochemical%20models%20on%20daily%20to%20seasonal%20timescales%20using%20satellite%20chlorophyll%20and%20O2%20/%20Ar%20observations&rft.jtitle=Biogeosciences&rft.au=Jonsson,%20B%20F&rft.date=2015-02-04&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=681&rft.epage=695&rft.pages=681-695&rft.issn=1726-4170&rft.eissn=1726-4189&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194/bg-12-681-2015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3581740101%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d197t-7d31aebc66834e62e7b06b66d1bd00bc06b3b6ed08f6f0a4a98c21ef41c1eb9c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1651919783&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true