Chronic deficiency of diversity and pluralism in research on nature's mental health effects: A planetary health problem

We explore two as-yet-unconnected trends: evidence of nature's effects on mental health/wellbeing, and acknowledgment that behavioral research is overwhelmingly informed by globally non-representative societies. We assess geographies, ethnicities, and conceptualizations in 174 peer-reviewed stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current research in environmental sustainability 2022, Vol.4, p.100148, Article 100148
Main Authors: Gallegos-Riofrío, Carlos Andres, Arab, Hassan, Carrasco-Torrontegui, Amaya, Gould, Rachelle K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ethnicity/ethno-cognition/ethno-language/Ethnosphere
Indigenous people
Mental health/wellbeing
Nature-exposure
Planetary health
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We explore two as-yet-unconnected trends: evidence of nature's effects on mental health/wellbeing, and acknowledgment that behavioral research is overwhelmingly informed by globally non-representative societies. We assess geographies, ethnicities, and conceptualizations in 174 peer-reviewed studies of nature's mental-health/wellbeing connection. Findings reveal a Western-World bias: over-representation of White participants; ethnicity overlooked (62% of studies do not report participants' ethnicity); narrow views of mental health/wellbeing; and nature operationalized largely as greenspace and forests. Because planetary health is largely contingent on the Ethnosphere (the planet's rich cultural web), we encourage future studies to test nature's mental health/wellbeing effects pluralistically and beyond unrepresentative subsets of humankind.
ISSN:2666-0490
2666-0490
DOI:10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100148