Loading…

Combined short- and long-axis ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is superior to conventional techniques: A cross-over randomized controlled manikin trial

Visualizing the needle tip using the short-axis (SA) ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization approach can be challenging. It has been suggested to start the process with the SA approach and then switch to the long-axis (LA); however, to our knowledge, this combination has not been evaluated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189258-e0189258
Main Authors: Takeshita, Jun, Nishiyama, Kei, Beppu, Satoru, Sasahashi, Nozomu, Shime, Nobuaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c706t-e2f10855d2504538dcb2ce8125c2bc723cc0345c58009cccd82c58f6be07ac333
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c706t-e2f10855d2504538dcb2ce8125c2bc723cc0345c58009cccd82c58f6be07ac333
container_end_page e0189258
container_issue 12
container_start_page e0189258
container_title PloS one
container_volume 12
creator Takeshita, Jun
Nishiyama, Kei
Beppu, Satoru
Sasahashi, Nozomu
Shime, Nobuaki
description Visualizing the needle tip using the short-axis (SA) ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization approach can be challenging. It has been suggested to start the process with the SA approach and then switch to the long-axis (LA); however, to our knowledge, this combination has not been evaluated. We compared the combined short- and long-axis (SLA) approach with the SA approach in a manikin study. We performed a prospective randomized controlled cross-over study in an urban emergency department and intensive care unit. Resident physicians in post-graduate years 1-2 performed a simulated ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture using the SA and SLA approaches on manikins. Twenty resident physicians were randomly assigned to two equal groups: (1) one group performed punctures using the SA approach followed by SLA; and (2) the other performed the same procedures in the opposite order. We compared the success rate and procedure duration for the two approaches. Procedural success was defined as insertion of the guide-wire into the vein while visualizing the needle tip at the time of anterior wall puncture, without penetrating the posterior wall. Six resident physicians (30%) performed both approaches successfully, while 12 (60%) performed the SLA approach, but not the SA, successfully. Those who performed the SA approach successfully also succeeded with the SLA approach. Two resident physicians (10%) failed to perform both approaches. The SLA approach had a significantly higher success rate than the SA approach (P < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) procedure duration was 59.5 [46.0-88.5] seconds and 45.0 [37.5-84.0] seconds for the SLA and SA approaches, respectively. The difference of the duration between the two procedures was 15.5 [0-28.5] seconds. There was no significant difference in duration between the two approaches (P = 0.12). Using the SLA approach significantly improved the success rate of internal jugular vein puncture performed by novice physicians on a manikin model, without increasing procedural duration. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the procedure's utility in actual patients. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000026199.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0189258
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_019da14c268046bea999fb89b0d75097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A517829091</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_019da14c268046bea999fb89b0d75097</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A517829091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c706t-e2f10855d2504538dcb2ce8125c2bc723cc0345c58009cccd82c58f6be07ac333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QCguhFxySdfsQLYRj8GFhY8Os2pGnaZkyT2SQd1v1D_k1Pd8ZlCl5IL3py8rxv2pNzkuQ5wQuSleTt1o3eCrPYOasWmFSM5tWD5JywjKYFxdnDk_gseRLCFuM8q4ricXJGGSVFlpHz5PfaDbW2qkGhdz6mSNgGGWe7VNzogEYTvQhutE3ajboBTCoLKYP2yroxIClir6Ly-lZE7SwCTRh3sHYeRYekswBOOyCJSvZWX48qvEMrJL0LIXV75ZGHQ92gbyd7B_bOGAgHYfVPbVH0WpinyaNWmKCeHd8XyfePH76tP6eXV58269VlKktcxFTRluAqzxua4yX8bSNrKlVFaC5pLUuaSYmzZS7zCmMmpWwqCnFb1AqXQmZZdpFsDr6NE1u-83oQ_hd3QvO7hPMdFz5qaRTHhDWCLCUtKrwEB8EYa-uK1bgpc8xK8Hp_8NqN9aCaY-VmpvMdq3veuT3PS4oLmoPB66OBd1PZIh90kMoYYRUUnxMGB8FNMgboywPaCfg0bVsHjnLC-SonZUUZZgSoxT8oeBo1aCi9ajXkZ4I3M8F0PeomdmIMgW--fvl_9urHnH11wvZKmNgHZ8apU8IcXB7Au3bxqr0vH8F8mgN-nAM-zQE_zgHIXpyW_l70t_GzP5BGCSM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1975021699</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined short- and long-axis ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is superior to conventional techniques: A cross-over randomized controlled manikin trial</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Takeshita, Jun ; Nishiyama, Kei ; Beppu, Satoru ; Sasahashi, Nozomu ; Shime, Nobuaki</creator><contributor>Hills, Robert K</contributor><creatorcontrib>Takeshita, Jun ; Nishiyama, Kei ; Beppu, Satoru ; Sasahashi, Nozomu ; Shime, Nobuaki ; Hills, Robert K</creatorcontrib><description>Visualizing the needle tip using the short-axis (SA) ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization approach can be challenging. It has been suggested to start the process with the SA approach and then switch to the long-axis (LA); however, to our knowledge, this combination has not been evaluated. We compared the combined short- and long-axis (SLA) approach with the SA approach in a manikin study. We performed a prospective randomized controlled cross-over study in an urban emergency department and intensive care unit. Resident physicians in post-graduate years 1-2 performed a simulated ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture using the SA and SLA approaches on manikins. Twenty resident physicians were randomly assigned to two equal groups: (1) one group performed punctures using the SA approach followed by SLA; and (2) the other performed the same procedures in the opposite order. We compared the success rate and procedure duration for the two approaches. Procedural success was defined as insertion of the guide-wire into the vein while visualizing the needle tip at the time of anterior wall puncture, without penetrating the posterior wall. Six resident physicians (30%) performed both approaches successfully, while 12 (60%) performed the SLA approach, but not the SA, successfully. Those who performed the SA approach successfully also succeeded with the SLA approach. Two resident physicians (10%) failed to perform both approaches. The SLA approach had a significantly higher success rate than the SA approach (P &lt; 0.001). The median (interquartile range) procedure duration was 59.5 [46.0-88.5] seconds and 45.0 [37.5-84.0] seconds for the SLA and SA approaches, respectively. The difference of the duration between the two procedures was 15.5 [0-28.5] seconds. There was no significant difference in duration between the two approaches (P = 0.12). Using the SLA approach significantly improved the success rate of internal jugular vein puncture performed by novice physicians on a manikin model, without increasing procedural duration. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the procedure's utility in actual patients. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000026199.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189258</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29216331</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Catheterization ; Clinical trials ; Comparative analysis ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; People and Places ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Ultrasound imaging</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189258-e0189258</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Takeshita et al 2017 Takeshita et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c706t-e2f10855d2504538dcb2ce8125c2bc723cc0345c58009cccd82c58f6be07ac333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c706t-e2f10855d2504538dcb2ce8125c2bc723cc0345c58009cccd82c58f6be07ac333</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9162-9864</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720625/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720625/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,37013,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216331$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Hills, Robert K</contributor><creatorcontrib>Takeshita, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishiyama, Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beppu, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasahashi, Nozomu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shime, Nobuaki</creatorcontrib><title>Combined short- and long-axis ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is superior to conventional techniques: A cross-over randomized controlled manikin trial</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Visualizing the needle tip using the short-axis (SA) ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization approach can be challenging. It has been suggested to start the process with the SA approach and then switch to the long-axis (LA); however, to our knowledge, this combination has not been evaluated. We compared the combined short- and long-axis (SLA) approach with the SA approach in a manikin study. We performed a prospective randomized controlled cross-over study in an urban emergency department and intensive care unit. Resident physicians in post-graduate years 1-2 performed a simulated ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture using the SA and SLA approaches on manikins. Twenty resident physicians were randomly assigned to two equal groups: (1) one group performed punctures using the SA approach followed by SLA; and (2) the other performed the same procedures in the opposite order. We compared the success rate and procedure duration for the two approaches. Procedural success was defined as insertion of the guide-wire into the vein while visualizing the needle tip at the time of anterior wall puncture, without penetrating the posterior wall. Six resident physicians (30%) performed both approaches successfully, while 12 (60%) performed the SLA approach, but not the SA, successfully. Those who performed the SA approach successfully also succeeded with the SLA approach. Two resident physicians (10%) failed to perform both approaches. The SLA approach had a significantly higher success rate than the SA approach (P &lt; 0.001). The median (interquartile range) procedure duration was 59.5 [46.0-88.5] seconds and 45.0 [37.5-84.0] seconds for the SLA and SA approaches, respectively. The difference of the duration between the two procedures was 15.5 [0-28.5] seconds. There was no significant difference in duration between the two approaches (P = 0.12). Using the SLA approach significantly improved the success rate of internal jugular vein puncture performed by novice physicians on a manikin model, without increasing procedural duration. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the procedure's utility in actual patients. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000026199.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Catheterization</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Ultrasound imaging</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QCguhFxySdfsQLYRj8GFhY8Os2pGnaZkyT2SQd1v1D_k1Pd8ZlCl5IL3py8rxv2pNzkuQ5wQuSleTt1o3eCrPYOasWmFSM5tWD5JywjKYFxdnDk_gseRLCFuM8q4ricXJGGSVFlpHz5PfaDbW2qkGhdz6mSNgGGWe7VNzogEYTvQhutE3ajboBTCoLKYP2yroxIClir6Ly-lZE7SwCTRh3sHYeRYekswBOOyCJSvZWX48qvEMrJL0LIXV75ZGHQ92gbyd7B_bOGAgHYfVPbVH0WpinyaNWmKCeHd8XyfePH76tP6eXV58269VlKktcxFTRluAqzxua4yX8bSNrKlVFaC5pLUuaSYmzZS7zCmMmpWwqCnFb1AqXQmZZdpFsDr6NE1u-83oQ_hd3QvO7hPMdFz5qaRTHhDWCLCUtKrwEB8EYa-uK1bgpc8xK8Hp_8NqN9aCaY-VmpvMdq3veuT3PS4oLmoPB66OBd1PZIh90kMoYYRUUnxMGB8FNMgboywPaCfg0bVsHjnLC-SonZUUZZgSoxT8oeBo1aCi9ajXkZ4I3M8F0PeomdmIMgW--fvl_9urHnH11wvZKmNgHZ8apU8IcXB7Au3bxqr0vH8F8mgN-nAM-zQE_zgHIXpyW_l70t_GzP5BGCSM</recordid><startdate>20171207</startdate><enddate>20171207</enddate><creator>Takeshita, Jun</creator><creator>Nishiyama, Kei</creator><creator>Beppu, Satoru</creator><creator>Sasahashi, Nozomu</creator><creator>Shime, Nobuaki</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9162-9864</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171207</creationdate><title>Combined short- and long-axis ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is superior to conventional techniques: A cross-over randomized controlled manikin trial</title><author>Takeshita, Jun ; Nishiyama, Kei ; Beppu, Satoru ; Sasahashi, Nozomu ; Shime, Nobuaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c706t-e2f10855d2504538dcb2ce8125c2bc723cc0345c58009cccd82c58f6be07ac333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Catheterization</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Ultrasound imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takeshita, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishiyama, Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beppu, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasahashi, Nozomu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shime, Nobuaki</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takeshita, Jun</au><au>Nishiyama, Kei</au><au>Beppu, Satoru</au><au>Sasahashi, Nozomu</au><au>Shime, Nobuaki</au><au>Hills, Robert K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined short- and long-axis ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is superior to conventional techniques: A cross-over randomized controlled manikin trial</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-12-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0189258</spage><epage>e0189258</epage><pages>e0189258-e0189258</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Visualizing the needle tip using the short-axis (SA) ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization approach can be challenging. It has been suggested to start the process with the SA approach and then switch to the long-axis (LA); however, to our knowledge, this combination has not been evaluated. We compared the combined short- and long-axis (SLA) approach with the SA approach in a manikin study. We performed a prospective randomized controlled cross-over study in an urban emergency department and intensive care unit. Resident physicians in post-graduate years 1-2 performed a simulated ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture using the SA and SLA approaches on manikins. Twenty resident physicians were randomly assigned to two equal groups: (1) one group performed punctures using the SA approach followed by SLA; and (2) the other performed the same procedures in the opposite order. We compared the success rate and procedure duration for the two approaches. Procedural success was defined as insertion of the guide-wire into the vein while visualizing the needle tip at the time of anterior wall puncture, without penetrating the posterior wall. Six resident physicians (30%) performed both approaches successfully, while 12 (60%) performed the SLA approach, but not the SA, successfully. Those who performed the SA approach successfully also succeeded with the SLA approach. Two resident physicians (10%) failed to perform both approaches. The SLA approach had a significantly higher success rate than the SA approach (P &lt; 0.001). The median (interquartile range) procedure duration was 59.5 [46.0-88.5] seconds and 45.0 [37.5-84.0] seconds for the SLA and SA approaches, respectively. The difference of the duration between the two procedures was 15.5 [0-28.5] seconds. There was no significant difference in duration between the two approaches (P = 0.12). Using the SLA approach significantly improved the success rate of internal jugular vein puncture performed by novice physicians on a manikin model, without increasing procedural duration. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the procedure's utility in actual patients. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000026199.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29216331</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0189258</doi><tpages>e0189258</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9162-9864</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189258-e0189258
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_019da14c268046bea999fb89b0d75097
source PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Analysis
Biology and Life Sciences
Catheterization
Clinical trials
Comparative analysis
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
People and Places
Research and Analysis Methods
Ultrasound imaging
title Combined short- and long-axis ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is superior to conventional techniques: A cross-over randomized controlled manikin trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A02%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20short-%20and%20long-axis%20ultrasound-guided%20central%20venous%20catheterization%20is%20superior%20to%20conventional%20techniques:%20A%20cross-over%20randomized%20controlled%20manikin%20trial&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Takeshita,%20Jun&rft.date=2017-12-07&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0189258&rft.epage=e0189258&rft.pages=e0189258-e0189258&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0189258&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA517829091%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c706t-e2f10855d2504538dcb2ce8125c2bc723cc0345c58009cccd82c58f6be07ac333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1975021699&rft_id=info:pmid/29216331&rft_galeid=A517829091&rfr_iscdi=true