Loading…
Combined short- and long-axis ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is superior to conventional techniques: A cross-over randomized controlled manikin trial
Visualizing the needle tip using the short-axis (SA) ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization approach can be challenging. It has been suggested to start the process with the SA approach and then switch to the long-axis (LA); however, to our knowledge, this combination has not been evaluated...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189258-e0189258 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c706t-e2f10855d2504538dcb2ce8125c2bc723cc0345c58009cccd82c58f6be07ac333 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c706t-e2f10855d2504538dcb2ce8125c2bc723cc0345c58009cccd82c58f6be07ac333 |
container_end_page | e0189258 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e0189258 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Takeshita, Jun Nishiyama, Kei Beppu, Satoru Sasahashi, Nozomu Shime, Nobuaki |
description | Visualizing the needle tip using the short-axis (SA) ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization approach can be challenging. It has been suggested to start the process with the SA approach and then switch to the long-axis (LA); however, to our knowledge, this combination has not been evaluated. We compared the combined short- and long-axis (SLA) approach with the SA approach in a manikin study.
We performed a prospective randomized controlled cross-over study in an urban emergency department and intensive care unit. Resident physicians in post-graduate years 1-2 performed a simulated ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture using the SA and SLA approaches on manikins. Twenty resident physicians were randomly assigned to two equal groups: (1) one group performed punctures using the SA approach followed by SLA; and (2) the other performed the same procedures in the opposite order. We compared the success rate and procedure duration for the two approaches. Procedural success was defined as insertion of the guide-wire into the vein while visualizing the needle tip at the time of anterior wall puncture, without penetrating the posterior wall.
Six resident physicians (30%) performed both approaches successfully, while 12 (60%) performed the SLA approach, but not the SA, successfully. Those who performed the SA approach successfully also succeeded with the SLA approach. Two resident physicians (10%) failed to perform both approaches. The SLA approach had a significantly higher success rate than the SA approach (P < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) procedure duration was 59.5 [46.0-88.5] seconds and 45.0 [37.5-84.0] seconds for the SLA and SA approaches, respectively. The difference of the duration between the two procedures was 15.5 [0-28.5] seconds. There was no significant difference in duration between the two approaches (P = 0.12).
Using the SLA approach significantly improved the success rate of internal jugular vein puncture performed by novice physicians on a manikin model, without increasing procedural duration. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the procedure's utility in actual patients.
UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000026199. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0189258 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_019da14c268046bea999fb89b0d75097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A517829091</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_019da14c268046bea999fb89b0d75097</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A517829091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c706t-e2f10855d2504538dcb2ce8125c2bc723cc0345c58009cccd82c58f6be07ac333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QCguhFxySdfsQLYRj8GFhY8Os2pGnaZkyT2SQd1v1D_k1Pd8ZlCl5IL3py8rxv2pNzkuQ5wQuSleTt1o3eCrPYOasWmFSM5tWD5JywjKYFxdnDk_gseRLCFuM8q4ricXJGGSVFlpHz5PfaDbW2qkGhdz6mSNgGGWe7VNzogEYTvQhutE3ajboBTCoLKYP2yroxIClir6Ly-lZE7SwCTRh3sHYeRYekswBOOyCJSvZWX48qvEMrJL0LIXV75ZGHQ92gbyd7B_bOGAgHYfVPbVH0WpinyaNWmKCeHd8XyfePH76tP6eXV58269VlKktcxFTRluAqzxua4yX8bSNrKlVFaC5pLUuaSYmzZS7zCmMmpWwqCnFb1AqXQmZZdpFsDr6NE1u-83oQ_hd3QvO7hPMdFz5qaRTHhDWCLCUtKrwEB8EYa-uK1bgpc8xK8Hp_8NqN9aCaY-VmpvMdq3veuT3PS4oLmoPB66OBd1PZIh90kMoYYRUUnxMGB8FNMgboywPaCfg0bVsHjnLC-SonZUUZZgSoxT8oeBo1aCi9ajXkZ4I3M8F0PeomdmIMgW--fvl_9urHnH11wvZKmNgHZ8apU8IcXB7Au3bxqr0vH8F8mgN-nAM-zQE_zgHIXpyW_l70t_GzP5BGCSM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1975021699</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined short- and long-axis ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is superior to conventional techniques: A cross-over randomized controlled manikin trial</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Takeshita, Jun ; Nishiyama, Kei ; Beppu, Satoru ; Sasahashi, Nozomu ; Shime, Nobuaki</creator><contributor>Hills, Robert K</contributor><creatorcontrib>Takeshita, Jun ; Nishiyama, Kei ; Beppu, Satoru ; Sasahashi, Nozomu ; Shime, Nobuaki ; Hills, Robert K</creatorcontrib><description>Visualizing the needle tip using the short-axis (SA) ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization approach can be challenging. It has been suggested to start the process with the SA approach and then switch to the long-axis (LA); however, to our knowledge, this combination has not been evaluated. We compared the combined short- and long-axis (SLA) approach with the SA approach in a manikin study.
We performed a prospective randomized controlled cross-over study in an urban emergency department and intensive care unit. Resident physicians in post-graduate years 1-2 performed a simulated ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture using the SA and SLA approaches on manikins. Twenty resident physicians were randomly assigned to two equal groups: (1) one group performed punctures using the SA approach followed by SLA; and (2) the other performed the same procedures in the opposite order. We compared the success rate and procedure duration for the two approaches. Procedural success was defined as insertion of the guide-wire into the vein while visualizing the needle tip at the time of anterior wall puncture, without penetrating the posterior wall.
Six resident physicians (30%) performed both approaches successfully, while 12 (60%) performed the SLA approach, but not the SA, successfully. Those who performed the SA approach successfully also succeeded with the SLA approach. Two resident physicians (10%) failed to perform both approaches. The SLA approach had a significantly higher success rate than the SA approach (P < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) procedure duration was 59.5 [46.0-88.5] seconds and 45.0 [37.5-84.0] seconds for the SLA and SA approaches, respectively. The difference of the duration between the two procedures was 15.5 [0-28.5] seconds. There was no significant difference in duration between the two approaches (P = 0.12).
Using the SLA approach significantly improved the success rate of internal jugular vein puncture performed by novice physicians on a manikin model, without increasing procedural duration. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the procedure's utility in actual patients.
UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000026199.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189258</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29216331</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Catheterization ; Clinical trials ; Comparative analysis ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; People and Places ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Ultrasound imaging</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189258-e0189258</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Takeshita et al 2017 Takeshita et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c706t-e2f10855d2504538dcb2ce8125c2bc723cc0345c58009cccd82c58f6be07ac333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c706t-e2f10855d2504538dcb2ce8125c2bc723cc0345c58009cccd82c58f6be07ac333</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9162-9864</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720625/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720625/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,37013,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216331$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Hills, Robert K</contributor><creatorcontrib>Takeshita, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishiyama, Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beppu, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasahashi, Nozomu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shime, Nobuaki</creatorcontrib><title>Combined short- and long-axis ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is superior to conventional techniques: A cross-over randomized controlled manikin trial</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Visualizing the needle tip using the short-axis (SA) ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization approach can be challenging. It has been suggested to start the process with the SA approach and then switch to the long-axis (LA); however, to our knowledge, this combination has not been evaluated. We compared the combined short- and long-axis (SLA) approach with the SA approach in a manikin study.
We performed a prospective randomized controlled cross-over study in an urban emergency department and intensive care unit. Resident physicians in post-graduate years 1-2 performed a simulated ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture using the SA and SLA approaches on manikins. Twenty resident physicians were randomly assigned to two equal groups: (1) one group performed punctures using the SA approach followed by SLA; and (2) the other performed the same procedures in the opposite order. We compared the success rate and procedure duration for the two approaches. Procedural success was defined as insertion of the guide-wire into the vein while visualizing the needle tip at the time of anterior wall puncture, without penetrating the posterior wall.
Six resident physicians (30%) performed both approaches successfully, while 12 (60%) performed the SLA approach, but not the SA, successfully. Those who performed the SA approach successfully also succeeded with the SLA approach. Two resident physicians (10%) failed to perform both approaches. The SLA approach had a significantly higher success rate than the SA approach (P < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) procedure duration was 59.5 [46.0-88.5] seconds and 45.0 [37.5-84.0] seconds for the SLA and SA approaches, respectively. The difference of the duration between the two procedures was 15.5 [0-28.5] seconds. There was no significant difference in duration between the two approaches (P = 0.12).
Using the SLA approach significantly improved the success rate of internal jugular vein puncture performed by novice physicians on a manikin model, without increasing procedural duration. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the procedure's utility in actual patients.
UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000026199.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Catheterization</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Ultrasound imaging</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QCguhFxySdfsQLYRj8GFhY8Os2pGnaZkyT2SQd1v1D_k1Pd8ZlCl5IL3py8rxv2pNzkuQ5wQuSleTt1o3eCrPYOasWmFSM5tWD5JywjKYFxdnDk_gseRLCFuM8q4ricXJGGSVFlpHz5PfaDbW2qkGhdz6mSNgGGWe7VNzogEYTvQhutE3ajboBTCoLKYP2yroxIClir6Ly-lZE7SwCTRh3sHYeRYekswBOOyCJSvZWX48qvEMrJL0LIXV75ZGHQ92gbyd7B_bOGAgHYfVPbVH0WpinyaNWmKCeHd8XyfePH76tP6eXV58269VlKktcxFTRluAqzxua4yX8bSNrKlVFaC5pLUuaSYmzZS7zCmMmpWwqCnFb1AqXQmZZdpFsDr6NE1u-83oQ_hd3QvO7hPMdFz5qaRTHhDWCLCUtKrwEB8EYa-uK1bgpc8xK8Hp_8NqN9aCaY-VmpvMdq3veuT3PS4oLmoPB66OBd1PZIh90kMoYYRUUnxMGB8FNMgboywPaCfg0bVsHjnLC-SonZUUZZgSoxT8oeBo1aCi9ajXkZ4I3M8F0PeomdmIMgW--fvl_9urHnH11wvZKmNgHZ8apU8IcXB7Au3bxqr0vH8F8mgN-nAM-zQE_zgHIXpyW_l70t_GzP5BGCSM</recordid><startdate>20171207</startdate><enddate>20171207</enddate><creator>Takeshita, Jun</creator><creator>Nishiyama, Kei</creator><creator>Beppu, Satoru</creator><creator>Sasahashi, Nozomu</creator><creator>Shime, Nobuaki</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9162-9864</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171207</creationdate><title>Combined short- and long-axis ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is superior to conventional techniques: A cross-over randomized controlled manikin trial</title><author>Takeshita, Jun ; Nishiyama, Kei ; Beppu, Satoru ; Sasahashi, Nozomu ; Shime, Nobuaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c706t-e2f10855d2504538dcb2ce8125c2bc723cc0345c58009cccd82c58f6be07ac333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Catheterization</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Ultrasound imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takeshita, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishiyama, Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beppu, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasahashi, Nozomu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shime, Nobuaki</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJÂ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takeshita, Jun</au><au>Nishiyama, Kei</au><au>Beppu, Satoru</au><au>Sasahashi, Nozomu</au><au>Shime, Nobuaki</au><au>Hills, Robert K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined short- and long-axis ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is superior to conventional techniques: A cross-over randomized controlled manikin trial</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-12-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0189258</spage><epage>e0189258</epage><pages>e0189258-e0189258</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Visualizing the needle tip using the short-axis (SA) ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization approach can be challenging. It has been suggested to start the process with the SA approach and then switch to the long-axis (LA); however, to our knowledge, this combination has not been evaluated. We compared the combined short- and long-axis (SLA) approach with the SA approach in a manikin study.
We performed a prospective randomized controlled cross-over study in an urban emergency department and intensive care unit. Resident physicians in post-graduate years 1-2 performed a simulated ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture using the SA and SLA approaches on manikins. Twenty resident physicians were randomly assigned to two equal groups: (1) one group performed punctures using the SA approach followed by SLA; and (2) the other performed the same procedures in the opposite order. We compared the success rate and procedure duration for the two approaches. Procedural success was defined as insertion of the guide-wire into the vein while visualizing the needle tip at the time of anterior wall puncture, without penetrating the posterior wall.
Six resident physicians (30%) performed both approaches successfully, while 12 (60%) performed the SLA approach, but not the SA, successfully. Those who performed the SA approach successfully also succeeded with the SLA approach. Two resident physicians (10%) failed to perform both approaches. The SLA approach had a significantly higher success rate than the SA approach (P < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) procedure duration was 59.5 [46.0-88.5] seconds and 45.0 [37.5-84.0] seconds for the SLA and SA approaches, respectively. The difference of the duration between the two procedures was 15.5 [0-28.5] seconds. There was no significant difference in duration between the two approaches (P = 0.12).
Using the SLA approach significantly improved the success rate of internal jugular vein puncture performed by novice physicians on a manikin model, without increasing procedural duration. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the procedure's utility in actual patients.
UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000026199.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29216331</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0189258</doi><tpages>e0189258</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9162-9864</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189258-e0189258 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_019da14c268046bea999fb89b0d75097 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
subjects | Analysis Biology and Life Sciences Catheterization Clinical trials Comparative analysis Medicine and Health Sciences Methods People and Places Research and Analysis Methods Ultrasound imaging |
title | Combined short- and long-axis ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is superior to conventional techniques: A cross-over randomized controlled manikin trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A02%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20short-%20and%20long-axis%20ultrasound-guided%20central%20venous%20catheterization%20is%20superior%20to%20conventional%20techniques:%20A%20cross-over%20randomized%20controlled%20manikin%20trial&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Takeshita,%20Jun&rft.date=2017-12-07&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0189258&rft.epage=e0189258&rft.pages=e0189258-e0189258&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0189258&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA517829091%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c706t-e2f10855d2504538dcb2ce8125c2bc723cc0345c58009cccd82c58f6be07ac333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1975021699&rft_id=info:pmid/29216331&rft_galeid=A517829091&rfr_iscdi=true |