Loading…
The Biogas Production Potential and Community Structure Characteristics of the Co-Digestion of Dairy Manure and Tomato Residues
Anaerobic digestion is an important means to turn agricultural waste into resources and an important way to address the challenges in treating vegetable residues in China. In this study, the co-digestion of dairy manure with tomato residue was investigated to clarify the effect of the total solids (...
Saved in:
Published in: | Agronomy (Basel) 2024-05, Vol.14 (5), p.881 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-2c54ccc5c2a8a16f431391336738a952989af5cc5f4393eec311a23e9de26b33 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 881 |
container_title | Agronomy (Basel) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Wang, Yanqin Li, Yan Yao, Li Fu, Longyun Liu, Zhaodong |
description | Anaerobic digestion is an important means to turn agricultural waste into resources and an important way to address the challenges in treating vegetable residues in China. In this study, the co-digestion of dairy manure with tomato residue was investigated to clarify the effect of the total solids (TS) of the digestion substrate on methane’s production and mechanism using the self-made anaerobic digestion device. The results showed that all treatments could rapidly ferment methane and that the daily methane production showed a trend of increasing first and then decreasing. The optimal concentrations of the digestion substrate for liquid anaerobic digestion (L-AD), hemi-solid-state anaerobic digestion (HSS-AD), and solid-state anaerobic digestion (SS-AD) were 10%, 18%, and 25%, respectively. Compared with SS-AD and HSS-AD, L-AD gas production peaked 3–6 days earlier. Treatment TS25 had the best cumulative methane production, reaching 117.4 mL/g VS. However, treatment TS6 had acid accumulation and a very unstable system. The cumulative methane production of SS-AD was higher than that of HSS-AD and L-AD. Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the dominant flora, and Methanoculleus, Methanosarcina, and Methanobrevibacter were the main archaeal groups. The TS significantly changed the microbial community composition of the digestion system, especially the low TS treatment. The results presented herein indicated that TS significantly changed the bacterial and archaeal community composition of the digestion system, and thus with the increase in TS from 6% to 25%, the methane yield increased. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/agronomy14050881 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_01a3ad41c0fb4d3f96fcfc2e8c0828e3</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A795385654</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_01a3ad41c0fb4d3f96fcfc2e8c0828e3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A795385654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-2c54ccc5c2a8a16f431391336738a952989af5cc5f4393eec311a23e9de26b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFv3CAQha2olRqlufeIlLNTYIwNx9Rpm0iJGrV7tyYYHFZrTwr4sKf-9bDZqKoKB9Djzad5TFV9EvwSwPDPOEVaaN6LhiuutTipTiXvoG7AqHf_3D9U5ylteVlGgObdafVn8-TYl0ATJvYQaVxtDrSwB8puyQF3DJeR9TTP6xLynv3KsTjW6Fj_hBFtdjGkHGxi5FkuqJ7q6zC59Eop2jWGuGf3uBxqDqwNzZiJ_XQpjKtLH6v3HnfJnb-dZ9Xm29dNf1Pf_fh-21_d1RY6kWtpVWOtVVaiRtH6BgSUCNB2oNEoabRBr4qhvBhwzoIQKMGZ0cn2EeCsuj1iR8Lt8BzDjHE_EIbhVaA4DRhLjp0buEDAsRGW-8dmBG9ab72VTluupXYH1sWR9Rzpd4mQhy2tcSndD8CVkY1shCiuy6NrwgINi6dc_qvs0c3B0uJ8KPpVZxRo1aqmFPBjgY2UUnT-b5uCD4cpD_9PGV4AJ6adPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3059242411</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Biogas Production Potential and Community Structure Characteristics of the Co-Digestion of Dairy Manure and Tomato Residues</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Wang, Yanqin ; Li, Yan ; Yao, Li ; Fu, Longyun ; Liu, Zhaodong</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yanqin ; Li, Yan ; Yao, Li ; Fu, Longyun ; Liu, Zhaodong</creatorcontrib><description>Anaerobic digestion is an important means to turn agricultural waste into resources and an important way to address the challenges in treating vegetable residues in China. In this study, the co-digestion of dairy manure with tomato residue was investigated to clarify the effect of the total solids (TS) of the digestion substrate on methane’s production and mechanism using the self-made anaerobic digestion device. The results showed that all treatments could rapidly ferment methane and that the daily methane production showed a trend of increasing first and then decreasing. The optimal concentrations of the digestion substrate for liquid anaerobic digestion (L-AD), hemi-solid-state anaerobic digestion (HSS-AD), and solid-state anaerobic digestion (SS-AD) were 10%, 18%, and 25%, respectively. Compared with SS-AD and HSS-AD, L-AD gas production peaked 3–6 days earlier. Treatment TS25 had the best cumulative methane production, reaching 117.4 mL/g VS. However, treatment TS6 had acid accumulation and a very unstable system. The cumulative methane production of SS-AD was higher than that of HSS-AD and L-AD. Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the dominant flora, and Methanoculleus, Methanosarcina, and Methanobrevibacter were the main archaeal groups. The TS significantly changed the microbial community composition of the digestion system, especially the low TS treatment. The results presented herein indicated that TS significantly changed the bacterial and archaeal community composition of the digestion system, and thus with the increase in TS from 6% to 25%, the methane yield increased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4395</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4395</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/agronomy14050881</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural wastes ; Air bags ; Anaerobic digestion ; Animal wastes ; Biogas ; Biomass energy ; Community composition ; Community structure ; Composition ; dairy manure ; Flora ; Food waste ; Gas production ; gas production performance ; Livestock ; Manures ; Methane ; microbial community structure ; Microorganisms ; Nitrogen ; Oil and gas production ; Poultry ; Raw materials ; Residues ; Software ; solid content of digestion substrate ; Solid state ; Substrates ; tomato residues ; Tomatoes</subject><ispartof>Agronomy (Basel), 2024-05, Vol.14 (5), p.881</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-2c54ccc5c2a8a16f431391336738a952989af5cc5f4393eec311a23e9de26b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3059242411/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3059242411?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yanqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Longyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhaodong</creatorcontrib><title>The Biogas Production Potential and Community Structure Characteristics of the Co-Digestion of Dairy Manure and Tomato Residues</title><title>Agronomy (Basel)</title><description>Anaerobic digestion is an important means to turn agricultural waste into resources and an important way to address the challenges in treating vegetable residues in China. In this study, the co-digestion of dairy manure with tomato residue was investigated to clarify the effect of the total solids (TS) of the digestion substrate on methane’s production and mechanism using the self-made anaerobic digestion device. The results showed that all treatments could rapidly ferment methane and that the daily methane production showed a trend of increasing first and then decreasing. The optimal concentrations of the digestion substrate for liquid anaerobic digestion (L-AD), hemi-solid-state anaerobic digestion (HSS-AD), and solid-state anaerobic digestion (SS-AD) were 10%, 18%, and 25%, respectively. Compared with SS-AD and HSS-AD, L-AD gas production peaked 3–6 days earlier. Treatment TS25 had the best cumulative methane production, reaching 117.4 mL/g VS. However, treatment TS6 had acid accumulation and a very unstable system. The cumulative methane production of SS-AD was higher than that of HSS-AD and L-AD. Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the dominant flora, and Methanoculleus, Methanosarcina, and Methanobrevibacter were the main archaeal groups. The TS significantly changed the microbial community composition of the digestion system, especially the low TS treatment. The results presented herein indicated that TS significantly changed the bacterial and archaeal community composition of the digestion system, and thus with the increase in TS from 6% to 25%, the methane yield increased.</description><subject>Agricultural wastes</subject><subject>Air bags</subject><subject>Anaerobic digestion</subject><subject>Animal wastes</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Biomass energy</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>dairy manure</subject><subject>Flora</subject><subject>Food waste</subject><subject>Gas production</subject><subject>gas production performance</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>microbial community structure</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Oil and gas production</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Residues</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>solid content of digestion substrate</subject><subject>Solid state</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>tomato residues</subject><subject>Tomatoes</subject><issn>2073-4395</issn><issn>2073-4395</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFv3CAQha2olRqlufeIlLNTYIwNx9Rpm0iJGrV7tyYYHFZrTwr4sKf-9bDZqKoKB9Djzad5TFV9EvwSwPDPOEVaaN6LhiuutTipTiXvoG7AqHf_3D9U5ylteVlGgObdafVn8-TYl0ATJvYQaVxtDrSwB8puyQF3DJeR9TTP6xLynv3KsTjW6Fj_hBFtdjGkHGxi5FkuqJ7q6zC59Eop2jWGuGf3uBxqDqwNzZiJ_XQpjKtLH6v3HnfJnb-dZ9Xm29dNf1Pf_fh-21_d1RY6kWtpVWOtVVaiRtH6BgSUCNB2oNEoabRBr4qhvBhwzoIQKMGZ0cn2EeCsuj1iR8Lt8BzDjHE_EIbhVaA4DRhLjp0buEDAsRGW-8dmBG9ab72VTluupXYH1sWR9Rzpd4mQhy2tcSndD8CVkY1shCiuy6NrwgINi6dc_qvs0c3B0uJ8KPpVZxRo1aqmFPBjgY2UUnT-b5uCD4cpD_9PGV4AJ6adPw</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Wang, Yanqin</creator><creator>Li, Yan</creator><creator>Yao, Li</creator><creator>Fu, Longyun</creator><creator>Liu, Zhaodong</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>The Biogas Production Potential and Community Structure Characteristics of the Co-Digestion of Dairy Manure and Tomato Residues</title><author>Wang, Yanqin ; Li, Yan ; Yao, Li ; Fu, Longyun ; Liu, Zhaodong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-2c54ccc5c2a8a16f431391336738a952989af5cc5f4393eec311a23e9de26b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural wastes</topic><topic>Air bags</topic><topic>Anaerobic digestion</topic><topic>Animal wastes</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Biomass energy</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>dairy manure</topic><topic>Flora</topic><topic>Food waste</topic><topic>Gas production</topic><topic>gas production performance</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>microbial community structure</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Oil and gas production</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Residues</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>solid content of digestion substrate</topic><topic>Solid state</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>tomato residues</topic><topic>Tomatoes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yanqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Longyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhaodong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Agronomy (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Yanqin</au><au>Li, Yan</au><au>Yao, Li</au><au>Fu, Longyun</au><au>Liu, Zhaodong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Biogas Production Potential and Community Structure Characteristics of the Co-Digestion of Dairy Manure and Tomato Residues</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy (Basel)</jtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>881</spage><pages>881-</pages><issn>2073-4395</issn><eissn>2073-4395</eissn><abstract>Anaerobic digestion is an important means to turn agricultural waste into resources and an important way to address the challenges in treating vegetable residues in China. In this study, the co-digestion of dairy manure with tomato residue was investigated to clarify the effect of the total solids (TS) of the digestion substrate on methane’s production and mechanism using the self-made anaerobic digestion device. The results showed that all treatments could rapidly ferment methane and that the daily methane production showed a trend of increasing first and then decreasing. The optimal concentrations of the digestion substrate for liquid anaerobic digestion (L-AD), hemi-solid-state anaerobic digestion (HSS-AD), and solid-state anaerobic digestion (SS-AD) were 10%, 18%, and 25%, respectively. Compared with SS-AD and HSS-AD, L-AD gas production peaked 3–6 days earlier. Treatment TS25 had the best cumulative methane production, reaching 117.4 mL/g VS. However, treatment TS6 had acid accumulation and a very unstable system. The cumulative methane production of SS-AD was higher than that of HSS-AD and L-AD. Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the dominant flora, and Methanoculleus, Methanosarcina, and Methanobrevibacter were the main archaeal groups. The TS significantly changed the microbial community composition of the digestion system, especially the low TS treatment. The results presented herein indicated that TS significantly changed the bacterial and archaeal community composition of the digestion system, and thus with the increase in TS from 6% to 25%, the methane yield increased.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/agronomy14050881</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2073-4395 |
ispartof | Agronomy (Basel), 2024-05, Vol.14 (5), p.881 |
issn | 2073-4395 2073-4395 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_01a3ad41c0fb4d3f96fcfc2e8c0828e3 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Agricultural wastes Air bags Anaerobic digestion Animal wastes Biogas Biomass energy Community composition Community structure Composition dairy manure Flora Food waste Gas production gas production performance Livestock Manures Methane microbial community structure Microorganisms Nitrogen Oil and gas production Poultry Raw materials Residues Software solid content of digestion substrate Solid state Substrates tomato residues Tomatoes |
title | The Biogas Production Potential and Community Structure Characteristics of the Co-Digestion of Dairy Manure and Tomato Residues |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A05%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Biogas%20Production%20Potential%20and%20Community%20Structure%20Characteristics%20of%20the%20Co-Digestion%20of%20Dairy%20Manure%20and%20Tomato%20Residues&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20(Basel)&rft.au=Wang,%20Yanqin&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=881&rft.pages=881-&rft.issn=2073-4395&rft.eissn=2073-4395&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/agronomy14050881&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA795385654%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-2c54ccc5c2a8a16f431391336738a952989af5cc5f4393eec311a23e9de26b33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3059242411&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A795385654&rfr_iscdi=true |