Loading…
Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Kits for Assessment of Bacterial Diversity in Activated Sludge, Biofilm, and Anaerobic Digestate
Direct DNA analysis is the most widely used approach for microorganism characterization in natural and built environments; therefore, reliable and effective methods of nucleic acid extraction for samples from particular types of environments are needed. In this study, we compared three commercial ki...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied sciences 2022-10, Vol.12 (19), p.9797 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-ec8e20dc55df871c77e6736146806c72128899bf19514262bffe9b2f8a7946183 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-ec8e20dc55df871c77e6736146806c72128899bf19514262bffe9b2f8a7946183 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 9797 |
container_title | Applied sciences |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Florczyk, Maciej Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka Ziembinska-Buczynska, Aleksandra Ciesielski, Slawomir |
description | Direct DNA analysis is the most widely used approach for microorganism characterization in natural and built environments; therefore, reliable and effective methods of nucleic acid extraction for samples from particular types of environments are needed. In this study, we compared three commercial kits for metagenomic DNA extraction from three types of biomass: activated sludge, biofilm, and anaerobic digestate. The yield, purity, and quality of DNA were measured, and the effect that the DNA kit had on the subsequent microbial community analysis was assessed with amplified ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA). Amplicons were analyzed automatically utilizing capillary electrophoresis. For the activated sludge and digestate, the suggested kit is FastDNA™ Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals). This kit allowed the highest DNA yield to be obtained and provided the highest biodiversity. For biofilm with a high content of extracellular polymeric substances, the FavorPrep™ Soil DNA Isolation Mini Kit (FAVORGEN) is recommended. This kit allowed to obtain the highest biodiversity and provided the most reliable results of genetic distance assessment in this type of biomass. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/app12199797 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0286045040e94cdf8a64d272daf20a5a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0286045040e94cdf8a64d272daf20a5a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_0286045040e94cdf8a64d272daf20a5a</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-ec8e20dc55df871c77e6736146806c72128899bf19514262bffe9b2f8a7946183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkctOwzAQRSMEEqh0xQ94DwXbSfxYhrY8RAULYB1NnHExSuLKNhVd8-OEhxCzmdGde88sJstOGD3Pc00vYLNhnGkttdzLjjiVYpYXTO7_mw-zaYyvdCzNcsXoUfYx9_0Ggot-IN6Sp5eASBb3FVm-pwAmuVG_cykS6wOpYsQYexzSl_dyXGNw0JGF22KILu2IG0g1hraQsCWP3Vu7xjNy6bx1XX9GYGhJNQAG3zgzptYY0-g8zg4sdBGnv32SPV8tn-Y3s9XD9e28Ws0MFyLN0CjktDVl2VolmZEShcwFK4SiwkjOuFJaN5bpkhVc8MZa1A23CqQuBFP5JLv94bYeXutNcD2EXe3B1d-CD-saQnKmw5pyJWhR0oKiLsx4D0TRcslbsJxCCSPr9Idlgo8xoP3jMVp_vaP-9478E2C0fPM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Kits for Assessment of Bacterial Diversity in Activated Sludge, Biofilm, and Anaerobic Digestate</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Florczyk, Maciej ; Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka ; Ziembinska-Buczynska, Aleksandra ; Ciesielski, Slawomir</creator><creatorcontrib>Florczyk, Maciej ; Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka ; Ziembinska-Buczynska, Aleksandra ; Ciesielski, Slawomir</creatorcontrib><description>Direct DNA analysis is the most widely used approach for microorganism characterization in natural and built environments; therefore, reliable and effective methods of nucleic acid extraction for samples from particular types of environments are needed. In this study, we compared three commercial kits for metagenomic DNA extraction from three types of biomass: activated sludge, biofilm, and anaerobic digestate. The yield, purity, and quality of DNA were measured, and the effect that the DNA kit had on the subsequent microbial community analysis was assessed with amplified ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA). Amplicons were analyzed automatically utilizing capillary electrophoresis. For the activated sludge and digestate, the suggested kit is FastDNA™ Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals). This kit allowed the highest DNA yield to be obtained and provided the highest biodiversity. For biofilm with a high content of extracellular polymeric substances, the FavorPrep™ Soil DNA Isolation Mini Kit (FAVORGEN) is recommended. This kit allowed to obtain the highest biodiversity and provided the most reliable results of genetic distance assessment in this type of biomass.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/app12199797</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><subject>biodiversity ; bioeconomy ; metagenomics ; mixed microbial communities</subject><ispartof>Applied sciences, 2022-10, Vol.12 (19), p.9797</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-ec8e20dc55df871c77e6736146806c72128899bf19514262bffe9b2f8a7946183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-ec8e20dc55df871c77e6736146806c72128899bf19514262bffe9b2f8a7946183</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2277-312X ; 0000-0002-9084-9782 ; 0000-0002-8710-8297</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Florczyk, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziembinska-Buczynska, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciesielski, Slawomir</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Kits for Assessment of Bacterial Diversity in Activated Sludge, Biofilm, and Anaerobic Digestate</title><title>Applied sciences</title><description>Direct DNA analysis is the most widely used approach for microorganism characterization in natural and built environments; therefore, reliable and effective methods of nucleic acid extraction for samples from particular types of environments are needed. In this study, we compared three commercial kits for metagenomic DNA extraction from three types of biomass: activated sludge, biofilm, and anaerobic digestate. The yield, purity, and quality of DNA were measured, and the effect that the DNA kit had on the subsequent microbial community analysis was assessed with amplified ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA). Amplicons were analyzed automatically utilizing capillary electrophoresis. For the activated sludge and digestate, the suggested kit is FastDNA™ Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals). This kit allowed the highest DNA yield to be obtained and provided the highest biodiversity. For biofilm with a high content of extracellular polymeric substances, the FavorPrep™ Soil DNA Isolation Mini Kit (FAVORGEN) is recommended. This kit allowed to obtain the highest biodiversity and provided the most reliable results of genetic distance assessment in this type of biomass.</description><subject>biodiversity</subject><subject>bioeconomy</subject><subject>metagenomics</subject><subject>mixed microbial communities</subject><issn>2076-3417</issn><issn>2076-3417</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkctOwzAQRSMEEqh0xQ94DwXbSfxYhrY8RAULYB1NnHExSuLKNhVd8-OEhxCzmdGde88sJstOGD3Pc00vYLNhnGkttdzLjjiVYpYXTO7_mw-zaYyvdCzNcsXoUfYx9_0Ggot-IN6Sp5eASBb3FVm-pwAmuVG_cykS6wOpYsQYexzSl_dyXGNw0JGF22KILu2IG0g1hraQsCWP3Vu7xjNy6bx1XX9GYGhJNQAG3zgzptYY0-g8zg4sdBGnv32SPV8tn-Y3s9XD9e28Ws0MFyLN0CjktDVl2VolmZEShcwFK4SiwkjOuFJaN5bpkhVc8MZa1A23CqQuBFP5JLv94bYeXutNcD2EXe3B1d-CD-saQnKmw5pyJWhR0oKiLsx4D0TRcslbsJxCCSPr9Idlgo8xoP3jMVp_vaP-9478E2C0fPM</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Florczyk, Maciej</creator><creator>Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka</creator><creator>Ziembinska-Buczynska, Aleksandra</creator><creator>Ciesielski, Slawomir</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2277-312X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9084-9782</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8710-8297</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Kits for Assessment of Bacterial Diversity in Activated Sludge, Biofilm, and Anaerobic Digestate</title><author>Florczyk, Maciej ; Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka ; Ziembinska-Buczynska, Aleksandra ; Ciesielski, Slawomir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-ec8e20dc55df871c77e6736146806c72128899bf19514262bffe9b2f8a7946183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>biodiversity</topic><topic>bioeconomy</topic><topic>metagenomics</topic><topic>mixed microbial communities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Florczyk, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziembinska-Buczynska, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciesielski, Slawomir</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Florczyk, Maciej</au><au>Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka</au><au>Ziembinska-Buczynska, Aleksandra</au><au>Ciesielski, Slawomir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Kits for Assessment of Bacterial Diversity in Activated Sludge, Biofilm, and Anaerobic Digestate</atitle><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>9797</spage><pages>9797-</pages><issn>2076-3417</issn><eissn>2076-3417</eissn><abstract>Direct DNA analysis is the most widely used approach for microorganism characterization in natural and built environments; therefore, reliable and effective methods of nucleic acid extraction for samples from particular types of environments are needed. In this study, we compared three commercial kits for metagenomic DNA extraction from three types of biomass: activated sludge, biofilm, and anaerobic digestate. The yield, purity, and quality of DNA were measured, and the effect that the DNA kit had on the subsequent microbial community analysis was assessed with amplified ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA). Amplicons were analyzed automatically utilizing capillary electrophoresis. For the activated sludge and digestate, the suggested kit is FastDNA™ Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals). This kit allowed the highest DNA yield to be obtained and provided the highest biodiversity. For biofilm with a high content of extracellular polymeric substances, the FavorPrep™ Soil DNA Isolation Mini Kit (FAVORGEN) is recommended. This kit allowed to obtain the highest biodiversity and provided the most reliable results of genetic distance assessment in this type of biomass.</abstract><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/app12199797</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2277-312X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9084-9782</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8710-8297</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2076-3417 |
ispartof | Applied sciences, 2022-10, Vol.12 (19), p.9797 |
issn | 2076-3417 2076-3417 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0286045040e94cdf8a64d272daf20a5a |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | biodiversity bioeconomy metagenomics mixed microbial communities |
title | Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Kits for Assessment of Bacterial Diversity in Activated Sludge, Biofilm, and Anaerobic Digestate |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A54%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Three%20DNA%20Extraction%20Kits%20for%20Assessment%20of%20Bacterial%20Diversity%20in%20Activated%20Sludge,%20Biofilm,%20and%20Anaerobic%20Digestate&rft.jtitle=Applied%20sciences&rft.au=Florczyk,%20Maciej&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=9797&rft.pages=9797-&rft.issn=2076-3417&rft.eissn=2076-3417&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/app12199797&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_0286045040e94cdf8a64d272daf20a5a%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-ec8e20dc55df871c77e6736146806c72128899bf19514262bffe9b2f8a7946183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |