Loading…

Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Kits for Assessment of Bacterial Diversity in Activated Sludge, Biofilm, and Anaerobic Digestate

Direct DNA analysis is the most widely used approach for microorganism characterization in natural and built environments; therefore, reliable and effective methods of nucleic acid extraction for samples from particular types of environments are needed. In this study, we compared three commercial ki...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied sciences 2022-10, Vol.12 (19), p.9797
Main Authors: Florczyk, Maciej, Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka, Ziembinska-Buczynska, Aleksandra, Ciesielski, Slawomir
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-ec8e20dc55df871c77e6736146806c72128899bf19514262bffe9b2f8a7946183
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-ec8e20dc55df871c77e6736146806c72128899bf19514262bffe9b2f8a7946183
container_end_page
container_issue 19
container_start_page 9797
container_title Applied sciences
container_volume 12
creator Florczyk, Maciej
Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka
Ziembinska-Buczynska, Aleksandra
Ciesielski, Slawomir
description Direct DNA analysis is the most widely used approach for microorganism characterization in natural and built environments; therefore, reliable and effective methods of nucleic acid extraction for samples from particular types of environments are needed. In this study, we compared three commercial kits for metagenomic DNA extraction from three types of biomass: activated sludge, biofilm, and anaerobic digestate. The yield, purity, and quality of DNA were measured, and the effect that the DNA kit had on the subsequent microbial community analysis was assessed with amplified ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA). Amplicons were analyzed automatically utilizing capillary electrophoresis. For the activated sludge and digestate, the suggested kit is FastDNA™ Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals). This kit allowed the highest DNA yield to be obtained and provided the highest biodiversity. For biofilm with a high content of extracellular polymeric substances, the FavorPrep™ Soil DNA Isolation Mini Kit (FAVORGEN) is recommended. This kit allowed to obtain the highest biodiversity and provided the most reliable results of genetic distance assessment in this type of biomass.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/app12199797
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0286045040e94cdf8a64d272daf20a5a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0286045040e94cdf8a64d272daf20a5a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_0286045040e94cdf8a64d272daf20a5a</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-ec8e20dc55df871c77e6736146806c72128899bf19514262bffe9b2f8a7946183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkctOwzAQRSMEEqh0xQ94DwXbSfxYhrY8RAULYB1NnHExSuLKNhVd8-OEhxCzmdGde88sJstOGD3Pc00vYLNhnGkttdzLjjiVYpYXTO7_mw-zaYyvdCzNcsXoUfYx9_0Ggot-IN6Sp5eASBb3FVm-pwAmuVG_cykS6wOpYsQYexzSl_dyXGNw0JGF22KILu2IG0g1hraQsCWP3Vu7xjNy6bx1XX9GYGhJNQAG3zgzptYY0-g8zg4sdBGnv32SPV8tn-Y3s9XD9e28Ws0MFyLN0CjktDVl2VolmZEShcwFK4SiwkjOuFJaN5bpkhVc8MZa1A23CqQuBFP5JLv94bYeXutNcD2EXe3B1d-CD-saQnKmw5pyJWhR0oKiLsx4D0TRcslbsJxCCSPr9Idlgo8xoP3jMVp_vaP-9478E2C0fPM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Kits for Assessment of Bacterial Diversity in Activated Sludge, Biofilm, and Anaerobic Digestate</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Florczyk, Maciej ; Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka ; Ziembinska-Buczynska, Aleksandra ; Ciesielski, Slawomir</creator><creatorcontrib>Florczyk, Maciej ; Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka ; Ziembinska-Buczynska, Aleksandra ; Ciesielski, Slawomir</creatorcontrib><description>Direct DNA analysis is the most widely used approach for microorganism characterization in natural and built environments; therefore, reliable and effective methods of nucleic acid extraction for samples from particular types of environments are needed. In this study, we compared three commercial kits for metagenomic DNA extraction from three types of biomass: activated sludge, biofilm, and anaerobic digestate. The yield, purity, and quality of DNA were measured, and the effect that the DNA kit had on the subsequent microbial community analysis was assessed with amplified ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA). Amplicons were analyzed automatically utilizing capillary electrophoresis. For the activated sludge and digestate, the suggested kit is FastDNA™ Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals). This kit allowed the highest DNA yield to be obtained and provided the highest biodiversity. For biofilm with a high content of extracellular polymeric substances, the FavorPrep™ Soil DNA Isolation Mini Kit (FAVORGEN) is recommended. This kit allowed to obtain the highest biodiversity and provided the most reliable results of genetic distance assessment in this type of biomass.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/app12199797</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><subject>biodiversity ; bioeconomy ; metagenomics ; mixed microbial communities</subject><ispartof>Applied sciences, 2022-10, Vol.12 (19), p.9797</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-ec8e20dc55df871c77e6736146806c72128899bf19514262bffe9b2f8a7946183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-ec8e20dc55df871c77e6736146806c72128899bf19514262bffe9b2f8a7946183</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2277-312X ; 0000-0002-9084-9782 ; 0000-0002-8710-8297</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Florczyk, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziembinska-Buczynska, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciesielski, Slawomir</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Kits for Assessment of Bacterial Diversity in Activated Sludge, Biofilm, and Anaerobic Digestate</title><title>Applied sciences</title><description>Direct DNA analysis is the most widely used approach for microorganism characterization in natural and built environments; therefore, reliable and effective methods of nucleic acid extraction for samples from particular types of environments are needed. In this study, we compared three commercial kits for metagenomic DNA extraction from three types of biomass: activated sludge, biofilm, and anaerobic digestate. The yield, purity, and quality of DNA were measured, and the effect that the DNA kit had on the subsequent microbial community analysis was assessed with amplified ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA). Amplicons were analyzed automatically utilizing capillary electrophoresis. For the activated sludge and digestate, the suggested kit is FastDNA™ Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals). This kit allowed the highest DNA yield to be obtained and provided the highest biodiversity. For biofilm with a high content of extracellular polymeric substances, the FavorPrep™ Soil DNA Isolation Mini Kit (FAVORGEN) is recommended. This kit allowed to obtain the highest biodiversity and provided the most reliable results of genetic distance assessment in this type of biomass.</description><subject>biodiversity</subject><subject>bioeconomy</subject><subject>metagenomics</subject><subject>mixed microbial communities</subject><issn>2076-3417</issn><issn>2076-3417</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkctOwzAQRSMEEqh0xQ94DwXbSfxYhrY8RAULYB1NnHExSuLKNhVd8-OEhxCzmdGde88sJstOGD3Pc00vYLNhnGkttdzLjjiVYpYXTO7_mw-zaYyvdCzNcsXoUfYx9_0Ggot-IN6Sp5eASBb3FVm-pwAmuVG_cykS6wOpYsQYexzSl_dyXGNw0JGF22KILu2IG0g1hraQsCWP3Vu7xjNy6bx1XX9GYGhJNQAG3zgzptYY0-g8zg4sdBGnv32SPV8tn-Y3s9XD9e28Ws0MFyLN0CjktDVl2VolmZEShcwFK4SiwkjOuFJaN5bpkhVc8MZa1A23CqQuBFP5JLv94bYeXutNcD2EXe3B1d-CD-saQnKmw5pyJWhR0oKiLsx4D0TRcslbsJxCCSPr9Idlgo8xoP3jMVp_vaP-9478E2C0fPM</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Florczyk, Maciej</creator><creator>Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka</creator><creator>Ziembinska-Buczynska, Aleksandra</creator><creator>Ciesielski, Slawomir</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2277-312X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9084-9782</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8710-8297</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Kits for Assessment of Bacterial Diversity in Activated Sludge, Biofilm, and Anaerobic Digestate</title><author>Florczyk, Maciej ; Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka ; Ziembinska-Buczynska, Aleksandra ; Ciesielski, Slawomir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-ec8e20dc55df871c77e6736146806c72128899bf19514262bffe9b2f8a7946183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>biodiversity</topic><topic>bioeconomy</topic><topic>metagenomics</topic><topic>mixed microbial communities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Florczyk, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziembinska-Buczynska, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciesielski, Slawomir</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Florczyk, Maciej</au><au>Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka</au><au>Ziembinska-Buczynska, Aleksandra</au><au>Ciesielski, Slawomir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Kits for Assessment of Bacterial Diversity in Activated Sludge, Biofilm, and Anaerobic Digestate</atitle><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>9797</spage><pages>9797-</pages><issn>2076-3417</issn><eissn>2076-3417</eissn><abstract>Direct DNA analysis is the most widely used approach for microorganism characterization in natural and built environments; therefore, reliable and effective methods of nucleic acid extraction for samples from particular types of environments are needed. In this study, we compared three commercial kits for metagenomic DNA extraction from three types of biomass: activated sludge, biofilm, and anaerobic digestate. The yield, purity, and quality of DNA were measured, and the effect that the DNA kit had on the subsequent microbial community analysis was assessed with amplified ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA). Amplicons were analyzed automatically utilizing capillary electrophoresis. For the activated sludge and digestate, the suggested kit is FastDNA™ Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals). This kit allowed the highest DNA yield to be obtained and provided the highest biodiversity. For biofilm with a high content of extracellular polymeric substances, the FavorPrep™ Soil DNA Isolation Mini Kit (FAVORGEN) is recommended. This kit allowed to obtain the highest biodiversity and provided the most reliable results of genetic distance assessment in this type of biomass.</abstract><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/app12199797</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2277-312X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9084-9782</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8710-8297</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2076-3417
ispartof Applied sciences, 2022-10, Vol.12 (19), p.9797
issn 2076-3417
2076-3417
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0286045040e94cdf8a64d272daf20a5a
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects biodiversity
bioeconomy
metagenomics
mixed microbial communities
title Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Kits for Assessment of Bacterial Diversity in Activated Sludge, Biofilm, and Anaerobic Digestate
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A54%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Three%20DNA%20Extraction%20Kits%20for%20Assessment%20of%20Bacterial%20Diversity%20in%20Activated%20Sludge,%20Biofilm,%20and%20Anaerobic%20Digestate&rft.jtitle=Applied%20sciences&rft.au=Florczyk,%20Maciej&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=9797&rft.pages=9797-&rft.issn=2076-3417&rft.eissn=2076-3417&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/app12199797&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_0286045040e94cdf8a64d272daf20a5a%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-ec8e20dc55df871c77e6736146806c72128899bf19514262bffe9b2f8a7946183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true