Automated Progress-Monitoring for Literate Language Use in Narrative Assessment (LLUNA)

• Published in: Frontiers in psychology 2022-05, Vol.13, p.894478-894478
• Main Authors: Fox, Carly, Jones, Sharad, Gillam, Sandra Laing, Israelsen-Augenstein, Megan, Schwartz, Sarah, Gillam, Ronald Bradley
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: computer automation; literate language; narrative; natural language processing; progress-monitoring; Psychology
• ISSN: 1664-1078; 1664-1078
• DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894478

Language sample analysis (LSA) is an important practice for providing a culturally sensitive and accurate assessment of a child's language abilities. A child's usage of literate language devices in narrative samples has been shown to be a critical target for evaluation. While automated scoring systems have begun to appear in the field, no such system exists for conducting progress-monitoring on literate language usage within narratives. The current study aimed to develop a hard-coded scoring system called the Literate Language Use in Narrative Assessment (LLUNA), to automatically evaluate six aspects of literate language in non-coded narrative transcripts. LLUNA was designed to individually score six literate language elements (e.g., coordinating and subordinating conjunctions, meta-linguistic and meta-cognitive verbs, adverbs, and elaborated noun phrases). The interrater reliability of LLUNA with an expert scorer, as well as its' reliability compared to certified undergraduate scorers was calculated using a quadratic weighted kappa ( ). Results indicated that LLUNA met strong levels of interrater reliability with an expert scorer on all six elements. LLUNA also surpassed the reliability levels of certified, but non-expert scorers on four of the six elements and came close to matching reliability levels on the remaining two. LLUNA shows promise as means for automating the scoring of literate language in LSA and narrative samples for the purpose of assessment and progress-monitoring.