Loading…

Contribution of Common Sulfur-Containing Substrates to Hydrogen Sulfide Production By Human Gut Microbiota Using an In Vitro Model Standardized For Bacterial Counts

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) produced by human gut microbiota is highly toxic and implicated in pathogenesis of gastrointestinal tract disorders. Sulfur-containing amino acid (SAA) degradation is a major contributor to its production, but SAA degradation pathways have not been extensively characterized. I...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gut microbes reports 2024-12, Vol.1 (1), p.1-9
Main Authors: Teigen, Levi M., Kaiser-Powers, Thomas, Matson, Michael, Elkin, Baila, Kabage, Amanda J., Hamilton, Matthew, Vaughn, Byron P, Sadowsky, Michael J., Staley, Christopher, Khoruts, Alexander
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1596-f168b57849b0b8a53a3aece319aa7f14db34fb58afc8c507deea1d612a9ba0053
container_end_page 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Gut microbes reports
container_volume 1
creator Teigen, Levi M.
Kaiser-Powers, Thomas
Matson, Michael
Elkin, Baila
Kabage, Amanda J.
Hamilton, Matthew
Vaughn, Byron P
Sadowsky, Michael J.
Staley, Christopher
Khoruts, Alexander
description Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) produced by human gut microbiota is highly toxic and implicated in pathogenesis of gastrointestinal tract disorders. Sulfur-containing amino acid (SAA) degradation is a major contributor to its production, but SAA degradation pathways have not been extensively characterized. In vitro model systems of fecal H2S production offer a basic method to help elucidate SAA degradation pathways, but the approach is not standardized. To address this, we used fecal microbiota separated from feces and standardized for bacterial counts to measure H2S production potential in response to different substrates in healthy controls (n = 6) with repeated sampling (three samples per participant). H2S production was highest with cysteine (mean = 16.7 ppm) compared to sodium sulfate (0.7 ppm) and taurine (0.8 ppm). Sodium-sulfate-driven H2S production negatively correlated with Ruminococcus (Spearman’s ρ = −0.5) and cysteine-driven H2S production negatively correlated with Firmicutes (Spearman’s ρ = −0.5). These findings, using a protocol controlling for confounding variables such as bacterial counts, validate previous findings of cysteine as a primary driver of H2S production. Finally, the inclusion of samples from two patients with UC allowed for the illustration of the potential of this approach to identify functional differences in specific disease states.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/29933935.2024.2361246
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_03b9da18efa9417eb7af02675eef0e86</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_03b9da18efa9417eb7af02675eef0e86</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_03b9da18efa9417eb7af02675eef0e86</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1596-f168b57849b0b8a53a3aece319aa7f14db34fb58afc8c507deea1d612a9ba0053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkdFKxDAQRYsoKLqfIOQHuiZN0zaPuqi7oCjo-homzWSJdBtJ0of1e_xQ210Vn2a4dzjMzM2yS0bnjDb0qpCSc8nFvKBFOS94xYqyOsrOJj2fjON__Wk2i_GdUso5K2RZn2VfC9-n4PSQnO-Jt2Tht9uxexk6O4R8csH1rt-Mio4pQMJIkifLnQl-g4dBZ5A8B2-Gdk-52ZHlsIWe3A-JPLo2eO18ArKOE2fUVz15cyl48ugNduQlQW8gGPeJhtz5QG6gTRgcdOM2Q5_iRXZioYs4-6nn2fru9nWxzB-e7leL64e8ZUJWuWVVo0XdlFJT3YDgwAFb5EwC1JaVRvPSatGAbZtW0NogAjPjw0BqoFTw82x14BoP7-ojuC2EnfLg1F7wYaMgJNd2qCjX0gBr0IIsWY26BkuLqhaIlmJTjSxxYI3nxxjQ_vEYVVNy6jc5NSWnfpLj3yrJj0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contribution of Common Sulfur-Containing Substrates to Hydrogen Sulfide Production By Human Gut Microbiota Using an In Vitro Model Standardized For Bacterial Counts</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Teigen, Levi M. ; Kaiser-Powers, Thomas ; Matson, Michael ; Elkin, Baila ; Kabage, Amanda J. ; Hamilton, Matthew ; Vaughn, Byron P ; Sadowsky, Michael J. ; Staley, Christopher ; Khoruts, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Teigen, Levi M. ; Kaiser-Powers, Thomas ; Matson, Michael ; Elkin, Baila ; Kabage, Amanda J. ; Hamilton, Matthew ; Vaughn, Byron P ; Sadowsky, Michael J. ; Staley, Christopher ; Khoruts, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) produced by human gut microbiota is highly toxic and implicated in pathogenesis of gastrointestinal tract disorders. Sulfur-containing amino acid (SAA) degradation is a major contributor to its production, but SAA degradation pathways have not been extensively characterized. In vitro model systems of fecal H2S production offer a basic method to help elucidate SAA degradation pathways, but the approach is not standardized. To address this, we used fecal microbiota separated from feces and standardized for bacterial counts to measure H2S production potential in response to different substrates in healthy controls (n = 6) with repeated sampling (three samples per participant). H2S production was highest with cysteine (mean = 16.7 ppm) compared to sodium sulfate (0.7 ppm) and taurine (0.8 ppm). Sodium-sulfate-driven H2S production negatively correlated with Ruminococcus (Spearman’s ρ = −0.5) and cysteine-driven H2S production negatively correlated with Firmicutes (Spearman’s ρ = −0.5). These findings, using a protocol controlling for confounding variables such as bacterial counts, validate previous findings of cysteine as a primary driver of H2S production. Finally, the inclusion of samples from two patients with UC allowed for the illustration of the potential of this approach to identify functional differences in specific disease states.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2993-3935</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2993-3935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/29933935.2024.2361246</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>cysteine ; hydrogen sulfide ; Microbiome ; sulfate ; taurine</subject><ispartof>Gut microbes reports, 2024-12, Vol.1 (1), p.1-9</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1596-f168b57849b0b8a53a3aece319aa7f14db34fb58afc8c507deea1d612a9ba0053</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6409-0485 ; 0000-0002-3205-3188</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teigen, Levi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser-Powers, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matson, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elkin, Baila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabage, Amanda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughn, Byron P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadowsky, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staley, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoruts, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Contribution of Common Sulfur-Containing Substrates to Hydrogen Sulfide Production By Human Gut Microbiota Using an In Vitro Model Standardized For Bacterial Counts</title><title>Gut microbes reports</title><description>Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) produced by human gut microbiota is highly toxic and implicated in pathogenesis of gastrointestinal tract disorders. Sulfur-containing amino acid (SAA) degradation is a major contributor to its production, but SAA degradation pathways have not been extensively characterized. In vitro model systems of fecal H2S production offer a basic method to help elucidate SAA degradation pathways, but the approach is not standardized. To address this, we used fecal microbiota separated from feces and standardized for bacterial counts to measure H2S production potential in response to different substrates in healthy controls (n = 6) with repeated sampling (three samples per participant). H2S production was highest with cysteine (mean = 16.7 ppm) compared to sodium sulfate (0.7 ppm) and taurine (0.8 ppm). Sodium-sulfate-driven H2S production negatively correlated with Ruminococcus (Spearman’s ρ = −0.5) and cysteine-driven H2S production negatively correlated with Firmicutes (Spearman’s ρ = −0.5). These findings, using a protocol controlling for confounding variables such as bacterial counts, validate previous findings of cysteine as a primary driver of H2S production. Finally, the inclusion of samples from two patients with UC allowed for the illustration of the potential of this approach to identify functional differences in specific disease states.</description><subject>cysteine</subject><subject>hydrogen sulfide</subject><subject>Microbiome</subject><subject>sulfate</subject><subject>taurine</subject><issn>2993-3935</issn><issn>2993-3935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkdFKxDAQRYsoKLqfIOQHuiZN0zaPuqi7oCjo-homzWSJdBtJ0of1e_xQ210Vn2a4dzjMzM2yS0bnjDb0qpCSc8nFvKBFOS94xYqyOsrOJj2fjON__Wk2i_GdUso5K2RZn2VfC9-n4PSQnO-Jt2Tht9uxexk6O4R8csH1rt-Mio4pQMJIkifLnQl-g4dBZ5A8B2-Gdk-52ZHlsIWe3A-JPLo2eO18ArKOE2fUVz15cyl48ugNduQlQW8gGPeJhtz5QG6gTRgcdOM2Q5_iRXZioYs4-6nn2fru9nWxzB-e7leL64e8ZUJWuWVVo0XdlFJT3YDgwAFb5EwC1JaVRvPSatGAbZtW0NogAjPjw0BqoFTw82x14BoP7-ojuC2EnfLg1F7wYaMgJNd2qCjX0gBr0IIsWY26BkuLqhaIlmJTjSxxYI3nxxjQ_vEYVVNy6jc5NSWnfpLj3yrJj0A</recordid><startdate>20241231</startdate><enddate>20241231</enddate><creator>Teigen, Levi M.</creator><creator>Kaiser-Powers, Thomas</creator><creator>Matson, Michael</creator><creator>Elkin, Baila</creator><creator>Kabage, Amanda J.</creator><creator>Hamilton, Matthew</creator><creator>Vaughn, Byron P</creator><creator>Sadowsky, Michael J.</creator><creator>Staley, Christopher</creator><creator>Khoruts, Alexander</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6409-0485</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3205-3188</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241231</creationdate><title>Contribution of Common Sulfur-Containing Substrates to Hydrogen Sulfide Production By Human Gut Microbiota Using an In Vitro Model Standardized For Bacterial Counts</title><author>Teigen, Levi M. ; Kaiser-Powers, Thomas ; Matson, Michael ; Elkin, Baila ; Kabage, Amanda J. ; Hamilton, Matthew ; Vaughn, Byron P ; Sadowsky, Michael J. ; Staley, Christopher ; Khoruts, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1596-f168b57849b0b8a53a3aece319aa7f14db34fb58afc8c507deea1d612a9ba0053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>cysteine</topic><topic>hydrogen sulfide</topic><topic>Microbiome</topic><topic>sulfate</topic><topic>taurine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teigen, Levi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser-Powers, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matson, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elkin, Baila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabage, Amanda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughn, Byron P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadowsky, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staley, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoruts, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Gut microbes reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teigen, Levi M.</au><au>Kaiser-Powers, Thomas</au><au>Matson, Michael</au><au>Elkin, Baila</au><au>Kabage, Amanda J.</au><au>Hamilton, Matthew</au><au>Vaughn, Byron P</au><au>Sadowsky, Michael J.</au><au>Staley, Christopher</au><au>Khoruts, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contribution of Common Sulfur-Containing Substrates to Hydrogen Sulfide Production By Human Gut Microbiota Using an In Vitro Model Standardized For Bacterial Counts</atitle><jtitle>Gut microbes reports</jtitle><date>2024-12-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>2993-3935</issn><eissn>2993-3935</eissn><abstract>Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) produced by human gut microbiota is highly toxic and implicated in pathogenesis of gastrointestinal tract disorders. Sulfur-containing amino acid (SAA) degradation is a major contributor to its production, but SAA degradation pathways have not been extensively characterized. In vitro model systems of fecal H2S production offer a basic method to help elucidate SAA degradation pathways, but the approach is not standardized. To address this, we used fecal microbiota separated from feces and standardized for bacterial counts to measure H2S production potential in response to different substrates in healthy controls (n = 6) with repeated sampling (three samples per participant). H2S production was highest with cysteine (mean = 16.7 ppm) compared to sodium sulfate (0.7 ppm) and taurine (0.8 ppm). Sodium-sulfate-driven H2S production negatively correlated with Ruminococcus (Spearman’s ρ = −0.5) and cysteine-driven H2S production negatively correlated with Firmicutes (Spearman’s ρ = −0.5). These findings, using a protocol controlling for confounding variables such as bacterial counts, validate previous findings of cysteine as a primary driver of H2S production. Finally, the inclusion of samples from two patients with UC allowed for the illustration of the potential of this approach to identify functional differences in specific disease states.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/29933935.2024.2361246</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6409-0485</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3205-3188</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2993-3935
ispartof Gut microbes reports, 2024-12, Vol.1 (1), p.1-9
issn 2993-3935
2993-3935
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_03b9da18efa9417eb7af02675eef0e86
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects cysteine
hydrogen sulfide
Microbiome
sulfate
taurine
title Contribution of Common Sulfur-Containing Substrates to Hydrogen Sulfide Production By Human Gut Microbiota Using an In Vitro Model Standardized For Bacterial Counts
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A09%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contribution%20of%20Common%20Sulfur-Containing%20Substrates%20to%20Hydrogen%20Sulfide%20Production%20By%20Human%20Gut%20Microbiota%20Using%20an%20In%20Vitro%20Model%20Standardized%20For%20Bacterial%20Counts&rft.jtitle=Gut%20microbes%20reports&rft.au=Teigen,%20Levi%20M.&rft.date=2024-12-31&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=2993-3935&rft.eissn=2993-3935&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/29933935.2024.2361246&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_03b9da18efa9417eb7af02675eef0e86%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1596-f168b57849b0b8a53a3aece319aa7f14db34fb58afc8c507deea1d612a9ba0053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true