Validation of an alternative technique for RQ estimation in anesthetized pigs

Background Respiratory quotient (RQ) is an important variable when assessing metabolic status in intensive care patients. However, analysis of RQ requires cumbersome technical equipment. The aim of the current study was to examine a simplified blood gas-based method of RQ assessment, using Douglas b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Intensive care medicine experimental 2024-01, Vol.12 (1), p.11-9, Article 11
Main Authors: Karlsson, Jacob, Svedmyr, Anders, Wallin, Mats, Hallbäck, Magnus, Lönnqvist, Per-Arne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal model
Blood gas
Blood gas analysis
Calorimetry
Carbon dioxide
Catheters
Critical Care Medicine
Fentanyl
Gases
Hogs
Intensive
Intensive care
Laboratory animals
Measurement techniques
Medical research
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metabolism
Ostomy
Pigs
Pulmonary arteries
Respiration
Respiratory quotient
Veins & arteries
Ventilators
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Respiratory quotient (RQ) is an important variable when assessing metabolic status in intensive care patients. However, analysis of RQ requires cumbersome technical equipment. The aim of the current study was to examine a simplified blood gas-based method of RQ assessment, using Douglas bag measurement of RQ (Douglas-RQ) as reference in a laboratory porcine model under metabolic steady state. In addition, we aimed at establishing reference values for RQ in the same population, thereby generating data to facilitate further research. Methods RQ was measured in 11 mechanically ventilated pigs under metabolic steady state using Douglas-RQ and CO-oximetry blood gas analysis of pulmonary artery and systemic carbon dioxide and oxygen content. The CO-oximetry data were used to calculate RQ (blood gas RQ). Paired recordings with both methods were made once in the morning and once in the afternoon and values obtained were analyzed for potential significant differences. Results The average Douglas-RQ, for all data points over the whole day, was 0.97 (95%CI 0.95–0.99). The corresponding blood gas RQ was 0.95 (95%CI 0.87–1.02). There was no statistically significant difference in RQ values obtained using Douglas-RQ or blood gas RQ for all data over the whole day ( P  = 0.43). Bias was − 0.02 (95% limits of agreement ± 0.3). Douglas-RQ decreased during the day 1.00 (95%CI 0.97–1.03) vs 0.95 (95%CI 0.92–0.98) P  
ISSN:2197-425X
2197-425X
DOI:10.1186/s40635-024-00598-8