Antenatal care addressing gestational weight gain (GWG): a cross sectional study of pregnant women's reported receipt and acceptability of recommended GWG care and associated characteristics

• Published in: BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2024-02, Vol.24 (1), p.111-15, Article 111
• Main Authors: Hollis, Jenna L, Deroover, Kristine, Licata, Milly, Tully, Belinda, Farragher, Eva, Lecathelinais, Christophe, Bennett, Nicole, Foster, Michelle, Pennell, Craig E, Wiggers, John, Daly, Justine, Kingsland, Melanie
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antenatal care; Australia; Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples; Body Mass Index; Clinical medicine; Clinical practice guidelines; Cross-Sectional Studies; Electronic health records; Evidence based practice; Exercise; Female; Gestational Weight Gain; GWG; Humans; Implementation; Maternal; Maternal child nursing; Medical personnel; Medical records; Midwifery; Native peoples; Native women; Participation; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Prenatal Care; Professional ethics; Research ethics; Telephone numbers; Womens health
• ISSN: 1471-2393; 1471-2393
• DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-06158-4

The Australian Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pregnancy Care recommend that during the first and subsequent antenatal visits all pregnant women are weighed; advised of recommended gestational weight gain (GWG), dietary intake and physical activity; and offered referrals for additional support if needed. The extent to which these recommendations are implemented and women's acceptability of recommended care is unknown. This study examines women's reported receipt and acceptability of guideline care for GWG, and characteristics associated with receipt of such care and its acceptability. From September 2018 to February 2019 a telephone survey was undertaken with women who had recently had a baby and received antenatal care from five public maternity services within a health district in Australia. Women self-reported their demographic characteristics, and receipt and acceptability of recommended GWG care. Receipt and acceptability of such care, and their association with the characteristics of women and the maternity service they attended, were examined using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Of 514 women, 13.1% (95%CI:10.3-16.5) reported that they received an assessment of weight at both their first and a subsequent antenatal visit, and less than one third (30.0%; 95%CI:26.0-33.9) received advice on their recommended GWG range, dietary intake and physical activity. Just 6.6% (95%CI:4.8-9.1) of women reported receiving all assessment and advice components of recommended antenatal care, and 9.9% (95%CI:7.6-12.8) of women reported being referred for extra support. Women who were younger (OR = 1.13;95%CI:1.05-1.21), identifying as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (OR = 24.54;95%CI:4.98-120.94), had a higher pre-pregnancy BMI (OR = 1.13;95%CI:1.05-1.21), were experiencing their first pregnancy (OR = 3.36;95%CI:1.27-8.86), and lived in a least disadvantaged area (compared to mid-disadvantaged area (OR = 18.5;95%CI:2.6-130.5) and most disadvantaged area (OR = 13.1;95%CI:2.09-82.4)) were more likely to receive recommended assessment and advice. Most Aboriginal (92%) and non-Aboriginal (93%) women agreed that recommended GWG care is acceptable. Most women perceive antenatal care for GWG as recommended by the Clinical Practice Guidelines as acceptable, but did not receive it. When provided, such care is not delivered consistently to all women regardless of their characteristics or those of the maternity service they attend. Th