ECG Monitoring during End of Life Care: Implications on Alarm Fatigue

Excessive numbers of clinical alarms in the intensive care unit (ICU) contribute to alarm fatigue. Efforts to eliminate unnecessary alarms, including during end of life (EOL) care, are pivotal. This study describes electrocardiographic (ECG) arrhythmia alarm usage following the decision for comfort...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Multimodal technologies and interaction 2019-03, Vol.3 (1), p.18
Main Authors: Suba, Sukardi, Sandoval, Cass, Hu, Xiao, Pelter, Michele
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
alarm management
Alarm systems
Alarms
Arrhythmia
Cardiac arrhythmia
clinical alarms
Comfort
Critical care
electrocardiographic monitoring
Electronic health records
End of life
end of life care
Fatigue
intensive care unit
Monitoring
Noise
Nurses
Patients
Telemedicine
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Excessive numbers of clinical alarms in the intensive care unit (ICU) contribute to alarm fatigue. Efforts to eliminate unnecessary alarms, including during end of life (EOL) care, are pivotal. This study describes electrocardiographic (ECG) arrhythmia alarm usage following the decision for comfort care. We conducted a review of electronic health records (EHR) in patients who died and had comfort care orders that were in place during our study. The occurrences of ECG arrhythmia alarms among these patients were examined. We found 151 arrhythmia alarms that were generated in 11 patients after comfort care was initiated: 72% were audible, 21% were manually muted, and 7% had an unknown audio label. Level of alarm: 33% crisis, 58% warning, 1% message, and 8% were labeled unknown. Our report shows that ECG monitoring was commonly maintained during the EOL care. Since the goal of care during this phase is for both patient and family comfort, it is important for the clinicians to weigh the benefits versus harms of the continuous ECG monitoring.
ISSN:2414-4088
2414-4088
DOI:10.3390/mti3010018