Informal care relationships and residential aged care recommendations: evidence from administrative data

• Published in: BMC geriatrics 2017-12, Vol.17 (1), p.289-289, Article 289
• Main Authors: Temple, Jeromey B, Jukic, Marijan, Dow, Briony
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Aged; Aged care assessments; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; Analysis; Australia - epidemiology; Caregivers; Caregivers - psychology; Caregivers - standards; Community support; Delivery of Health Care - standards; Elder care; Family - psychology; Female; Frailty; Gender; Geriatrics; Government policy; Humans; Independent Living - psychology; Independent Living - standards; Informal care; Institutionalization; Long term health care; Male; Marital status; Nursing homes; Older people; Patient Care - psychology; Patient Care - standards; Population; Regression analysis; Residential facilities; Residential Facilities - standards; Social aspects
• ISSN: 1471-2318; 1471-2318
• DOI: 10.1186/s12877-017-0656-4

The Australian government recognises the importance of informal care to enable ageing in place. Yet, few multivariable studies have examined aspects of informal care that alter the probability of entry to residential care in Australia. Existing Australian and international studies show differing effects of informal care on entry to residential care. We utilise unique administrative data on aged care assessments collected from 2010 to 2013, consisting of 280,000 persons aged 65 and over. Logistic regression models were fitted to measure the propensity to be recommended care in a residential care setting, disaggregated by characteristics of informal care provision. Providing some explanation for the divergent findings in the literature, we show that close familial carer relationships (partner or child) and coresidence are associated with recommendations to live in the community. Weaker non-coresidential friend or neighbour carer relationships are associated with recommendations to live in residential care for women, as are non-coresidential other relatives (not a child, partner or in-law) for both males and females. Non-coresident carers who are in-laws (for females) or parents have no impact on assessor recommendations. Despite these significant differences, health conditions and assistance needs play a strong role in assessor recommendations about entry to residential care. Co-resident care clearly plays an important protective role in residential care admission. Government policy should consider the need for differential supports for co-resident carers as part of future aged care reform.