Loading…

Convergence or Divergence: Preferences for Establishing an Unemployment Subsidy During the COVID-19 Period by Taxing Across Earnings Redistribution in Urban China

With the advancement of marketization, China has achieved rapid economic growth and economic class differentiation. This research analyzes the data from China’s livelihood survey, divides the urban Chinese into five socio-economic classes, and tests their preferences and tendencies for income redist...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology 2022-06, Vol.13, p.852792-852792
Main Authors: Zhou, Yaping, Zhou, Jiangjie, Li, Yinan, Rui, Donggen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-6c3ad8e15f4c04d40af07c64a0fce57149dc8e836de3d6c1789b58e96d3500b93
container_end_page 852792
container_issue
container_start_page 852792
container_title Frontiers in psychology
container_volume 13
creator Zhou, Yaping
Zhou, Jiangjie
Li, Yinan
Rui, Donggen
description With the advancement of marketization, China has achieved rapid economic growth and economic class differentiation. This research analyzes the data from China’s livelihood survey, divides the urban Chinese into five socio-economic classes, and tests their preferences and tendencies for income redistribution. It obtains the general attitude differences in subsidy policy and income inequality during COVID-19. Our conclusion are consistent with the existing literature to a great extent; that is, personal factors (self-interest and belief in fairness) play a crucial role in the attitude of Chinese citizens. In the analysis of situational factors, the results show that the higher the level of marketization, the people are more likely to have stronger negative emotions about subsidy or redistribution policies. Further analysis shows that people with the lowest income are susceptible to the fact that income inequality has become significant and show a strong willingness to support the government’s redistribution policy. In contrast, middle-class people tend to favor the government’s redistribution policy, although they will not benefit much from the redistribution policy. Therefore, they lack the motivation to support the government in vigorously implementing the subsidy policy. Significantly, high-income people are indifferent, as they lack such motivation even more. The difference in redistribution preferences between upper-class and lower-class groups signals polarization in Chinese society, especially income redistribution.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852792
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_043d33edea114db1a1de2d0967df7bd5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_043d33edea114db1a1de2d0967df7bd5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2681443834</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-6c3ad8e15f4c04d40af07c64a0fce57149dc8e836de3d6c1789b58e96d3500b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVks1u1DAUhSMEolXpA7Dzkk0G_8VxWCBVmQFGqtQKWraWY99kXCX2YCdV53V4UpKZgqg3vtfn6jvS9cmy9wSvGJPVx3afDt2KYkpXsqBlRV9l50QInhNcytf_1WfZZUoPeD4cU4zp2-yMFWUhaCXPs9918I8QO_AGUIho7f52n9BthBbiUifUztomjbrpXdo53yHt0b2HYd-HwwB-RD-mJjl7QOspLvK4A1Tf_Nyuc1KhW4guWNQc0J1-WtQrE0NKaKOjn9uEvoN1aYyumUYXPHIzOzazQz1b6XfZm1b3CS6f74vs_svmrv6WX9983dZX17lhlI-5MExbCaRoucHccqxbXBrBNW4NFCXhlTUSJBMWmBWGlLJqCgmVsKzAuKnYRbY9cW3QD2of3aDjQQXt1PEhxE7pODrTg8KcWcbAgiaE24ZoYoFaXInStmVji5n1-cTaT80A1swbirp_AX2peLdTXXhUFaWCiQXw4RkQw68J0qgGlwz0vfYQpqSokIRzJhmfR8lp9LjU-c_-2RCslqioY1TUEhV1igr7A8pXtNE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681443834</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Convergence or Divergence: Preferences for Establishing an Unemployment Subsidy During the COVID-19 Period by Taxing Across Earnings Redistribution in Urban China</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zhou, Yaping ; Zhou, Jiangjie ; Li, Yinan ; Rui, Donggen</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yaping ; Zhou, Jiangjie ; Li, Yinan ; Rui, Donggen</creatorcontrib><description>With the advancement of marketization, China has achieved rapid economic growth and economic class differentiation. This research analyzes the data from China’s livelihood survey, divides the urban Chinese into five socio-economic classes, and tests their preferences and tendencies for income redistribution. It obtains the general attitude differences in subsidy policy and income inequality during COVID-19. Our conclusion are consistent with the existing literature to a great extent; that is, personal factors (self-interest and belief in fairness) play a crucial role in the attitude of Chinese citizens. In the analysis of situational factors, the results show that the higher the level of marketization, the people are more likely to have stronger negative emotions about subsidy or redistribution policies. Further analysis shows that people with the lowest income are susceptible to the fact that income inequality has become significant and show a strong willingness to support the government’s redistribution policy. In contrast, middle-class people tend to favor the government’s redistribution policy, although they will not benefit much from the redistribution policy. Therefore, they lack the motivation to support the government in vigorously implementing the subsidy policy. Significantly, high-income people are indifferent, as they lack such motivation even more. The difference in redistribution preferences between upper-class and lower-class groups signals polarization in Chinese society, especially income redistribution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852792</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35756298</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>China ; COVID-19 ; earnings redistribution ; preferences ; Psychology ; unemployment subsidy</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2022-06, Vol.13, p.852792-852792</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Zhou, Zhou, Li and Rui. 2022 Zhou, Zhou, Li and Rui</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-6c3ad8e15f4c04d40af07c64a0fce57149dc8e836de3d6c1789b58e96d3500b93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226365/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226365/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yaping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jiangjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rui, Donggen</creatorcontrib><title>Convergence or Divergence: Preferences for Establishing an Unemployment Subsidy During the COVID-19 Period by Taxing Across Earnings Redistribution in Urban China</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><description>With the advancement of marketization, China has achieved rapid economic growth and economic class differentiation. This research analyzes the data from China’s livelihood survey, divides the urban Chinese into five socio-economic classes, and tests their preferences and tendencies for income redistribution. It obtains the general attitude differences in subsidy policy and income inequality during COVID-19. Our conclusion are consistent with the existing literature to a great extent; that is, personal factors (self-interest and belief in fairness) play a crucial role in the attitude of Chinese citizens. In the analysis of situational factors, the results show that the higher the level of marketization, the people are more likely to have stronger negative emotions about subsidy or redistribution policies. Further analysis shows that people with the lowest income are susceptible to the fact that income inequality has become significant and show a strong willingness to support the government’s redistribution policy. In contrast, middle-class people tend to favor the government’s redistribution policy, although they will not benefit much from the redistribution policy. Therefore, they lack the motivation to support the government in vigorously implementing the subsidy policy. Significantly, high-income people are indifferent, as they lack such motivation even more. The difference in redistribution preferences between upper-class and lower-class groups signals polarization in Chinese society, especially income redistribution.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>earnings redistribution</subject><subject>preferences</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>unemployment subsidy</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVks1u1DAUhSMEolXpA7Dzkk0G_8VxWCBVmQFGqtQKWraWY99kXCX2YCdV53V4UpKZgqg3vtfn6jvS9cmy9wSvGJPVx3afDt2KYkpXsqBlRV9l50QInhNcytf_1WfZZUoPeD4cU4zp2-yMFWUhaCXPs9918I8QO_AGUIho7f52n9BthBbiUifUztomjbrpXdo53yHt0b2HYd-HwwB-RD-mJjl7QOspLvK4A1Tf_Nyuc1KhW4guWNQc0J1-WtQrE0NKaKOjn9uEvoN1aYyumUYXPHIzOzazQz1b6XfZm1b3CS6f74vs_svmrv6WX9983dZX17lhlI-5MExbCaRoucHccqxbXBrBNW4NFCXhlTUSJBMWmBWGlLJqCgmVsKzAuKnYRbY9cW3QD2of3aDjQQXt1PEhxE7pODrTg8KcWcbAgiaE24ZoYoFaXInStmVji5n1-cTaT80A1swbirp_AX2peLdTXXhUFaWCiQXw4RkQw68J0qgGlwz0vfYQpqSokIRzJhmfR8lp9LjU-c_-2RCslqioY1TUEhV1igr7A8pXtNE</recordid><startdate>20220610</startdate><enddate>20220610</enddate><creator>Zhou, Yaping</creator><creator>Zhou, Jiangjie</creator><creator>Li, Yinan</creator><creator>Rui, Donggen</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220610</creationdate><title>Convergence or Divergence: Preferences for Establishing an Unemployment Subsidy During the COVID-19 Period by Taxing Across Earnings Redistribution in Urban China</title><author>Zhou, Yaping ; Zhou, Jiangjie ; Li, Yinan ; Rui, Donggen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-6c3ad8e15f4c04d40af07c64a0fce57149dc8e836de3d6c1789b58e96d3500b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>earnings redistribution</topic><topic>preferences</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>unemployment subsidy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yaping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jiangjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rui, Donggen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals - May need to register for free articles</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, Yaping</au><au>Zhou, Jiangjie</au><au>Li, Yinan</au><au>Rui, Donggen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Convergence or Divergence: Preferences for Establishing an Unemployment Subsidy During the COVID-19 Period by Taxing Across Earnings Redistribution in Urban China</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><date>2022-06-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><spage>852792</spage><epage>852792</epage><pages>852792-852792</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>With the advancement of marketization, China has achieved rapid economic growth and economic class differentiation. This research analyzes the data from China’s livelihood survey, divides the urban Chinese into five socio-economic classes, and tests their preferences and tendencies for income redistribution. It obtains the general attitude differences in subsidy policy and income inequality during COVID-19. Our conclusion are consistent with the existing literature to a great extent; that is, personal factors (self-interest and belief in fairness) play a crucial role in the attitude of Chinese citizens. In the analysis of situational factors, the results show that the higher the level of marketization, the people are more likely to have stronger negative emotions about subsidy or redistribution policies. Further analysis shows that people with the lowest income are susceptible to the fact that income inequality has become significant and show a strong willingness to support the government’s redistribution policy. In contrast, middle-class people tend to favor the government’s redistribution policy, although they will not benefit much from the redistribution policy. Therefore, they lack the motivation to support the government in vigorously implementing the subsidy policy. Significantly, high-income people are indifferent, as they lack such motivation even more. The difference in redistribution preferences between upper-class and lower-class groups signals polarization in Chinese society, especially income redistribution.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>35756298</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852792</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-1078
ispartof Frontiers in psychology, 2022-06, Vol.13, p.852792-852792
issn 1664-1078
1664-1078
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_043d33edea114db1a1de2d0967df7bd5
source PubMed Central
subjects China
COVID-19
earnings redistribution
preferences
Psychology
unemployment subsidy
title Convergence or Divergence: Preferences for Establishing an Unemployment Subsidy During the COVID-19 Period by Taxing Across Earnings Redistribution in Urban China
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T16%3A47%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Convergence%20or%20Divergence:%20Preferences%20for%20Establishing%20an%20Unemployment%20Subsidy%20During%20the%20COVID-19%20Period%20by%20Taxing%20Across%20Earnings%20Redistribution%20in%20Urban%20China&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Zhou,%20Yaping&rft.date=2022-06-10&rft.volume=13&rft.spage=852792&rft.epage=852792&rft.pages=852792-852792&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852792&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2681443834%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-6c3ad8e15f4c04d40af07c64a0fce57149dc8e836de3d6c1789b58e96d3500b93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681443834&rft_id=info:pmid/35756298&rfr_iscdi=true