Loading…
Convergence or Divergence: Preferences for Establishing an Unemployment Subsidy During the COVID-19 Period by Taxing Across Earnings Redistribution in Urban China
With the advancement of marketization, China has achieved rapid economic growth and economic class differentiation. This research analyzes the data from China’s livelihood survey, divides the urban Chinese into five socio-economic classes, and tests their preferences and tendencies for income redist...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in psychology 2022-06, Vol.13, p.852792-852792 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-6c3ad8e15f4c04d40af07c64a0fce57149dc8e836de3d6c1789b58e96d3500b93 |
container_end_page | 852792 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 852792 |
container_title | Frontiers in psychology |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Zhou, Yaping Zhou, Jiangjie Li, Yinan Rui, Donggen |
description | With the advancement of marketization, China has achieved rapid economic growth and economic class differentiation. This research analyzes the data from China’s livelihood survey, divides the urban Chinese into five socio-economic classes, and tests their preferences and tendencies for income redistribution. It obtains the general attitude differences in subsidy policy and income inequality during COVID-19. Our conclusion are consistent with the existing literature to a great extent; that is, personal factors (self-interest and belief in fairness) play a crucial role in the attitude of Chinese citizens. In the analysis of situational factors, the results show that the higher the level of marketization, the people are more likely to have stronger negative emotions about subsidy or redistribution policies. Further analysis shows that people with the lowest income are susceptible to the fact that income inequality has become significant and show a strong willingness to support the government’s redistribution policy. In contrast, middle-class people tend to favor the government’s redistribution policy, although they will not benefit much from the redistribution policy. Therefore, they lack the motivation to support the government in vigorously implementing the subsidy policy. Significantly, high-income people are indifferent, as they lack such motivation even more. The difference in redistribution preferences between upper-class and lower-class groups signals polarization in Chinese society, especially income redistribution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852792 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_043d33edea114db1a1de2d0967df7bd5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_043d33edea114db1a1de2d0967df7bd5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2681443834</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-6c3ad8e15f4c04d40af07c64a0fce57149dc8e836de3d6c1789b58e96d3500b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVks1u1DAUhSMEolXpA7Dzkk0G_8VxWCBVmQFGqtQKWraWY99kXCX2YCdV53V4UpKZgqg3vtfn6jvS9cmy9wSvGJPVx3afDt2KYkpXsqBlRV9l50QInhNcytf_1WfZZUoPeD4cU4zp2-yMFWUhaCXPs9918I8QO_AGUIho7f52n9BthBbiUifUztomjbrpXdo53yHt0b2HYd-HwwB-RD-mJjl7QOspLvK4A1Tf_Nyuc1KhW4guWNQc0J1-WtQrE0NKaKOjn9uEvoN1aYyumUYXPHIzOzazQz1b6XfZm1b3CS6f74vs_svmrv6WX9983dZX17lhlI-5MExbCaRoucHccqxbXBrBNW4NFCXhlTUSJBMWmBWGlLJqCgmVsKzAuKnYRbY9cW3QD2of3aDjQQXt1PEhxE7pODrTg8KcWcbAgiaE24ZoYoFaXInStmVji5n1-cTaT80A1swbirp_AX2peLdTXXhUFaWCiQXw4RkQw68J0qgGlwz0vfYQpqSokIRzJhmfR8lp9LjU-c_-2RCslqioY1TUEhV1igr7A8pXtNE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681443834</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Convergence or Divergence: Preferences for Establishing an Unemployment Subsidy During the COVID-19 Period by Taxing Across Earnings Redistribution in Urban China</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zhou, Yaping ; Zhou, Jiangjie ; Li, Yinan ; Rui, Donggen</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yaping ; Zhou, Jiangjie ; Li, Yinan ; Rui, Donggen</creatorcontrib><description>With the advancement of marketization, China has achieved rapid economic growth and economic class differentiation. This research analyzes the data from China’s livelihood survey, divides the urban Chinese into five socio-economic classes, and tests their preferences and tendencies for income redistribution. It obtains the general attitude differences in subsidy policy and income inequality during COVID-19. Our conclusion are consistent with the existing literature to a great extent; that is, personal factors (self-interest and belief in fairness) play a crucial role in the attitude of Chinese citizens. In the analysis of situational factors, the results show that the higher the level of marketization, the people are more likely to have stronger negative emotions about subsidy or redistribution policies. Further analysis shows that people with the lowest income are susceptible to the fact that income inequality has become significant and show a strong willingness to support the government’s redistribution policy. In contrast, middle-class people tend to favor the government’s redistribution policy, although they will not benefit much from the redistribution policy. Therefore, they lack the motivation to support the government in vigorously implementing the subsidy policy. Significantly, high-income people are indifferent, as they lack such motivation even more. The difference in redistribution preferences between upper-class and lower-class groups signals polarization in Chinese society, especially income redistribution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852792</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35756298</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>China ; COVID-19 ; earnings redistribution ; preferences ; Psychology ; unemployment subsidy</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2022-06, Vol.13, p.852792-852792</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Zhou, Zhou, Li and Rui. 2022 Zhou, Zhou, Li and Rui</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-6c3ad8e15f4c04d40af07c64a0fce57149dc8e836de3d6c1789b58e96d3500b93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226365/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226365/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yaping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jiangjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rui, Donggen</creatorcontrib><title>Convergence or Divergence: Preferences for Establishing an Unemployment Subsidy During the COVID-19 Period by Taxing Across Earnings Redistribution in Urban China</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><description>With the advancement of marketization, China has achieved rapid economic growth and economic class differentiation. This research analyzes the data from China’s livelihood survey, divides the urban Chinese into five socio-economic classes, and tests their preferences and tendencies for income redistribution. It obtains the general attitude differences in subsidy policy and income inequality during COVID-19. Our conclusion are consistent with the existing literature to a great extent; that is, personal factors (self-interest and belief in fairness) play a crucial role in the attitude of Chinese citizens. In the analysis of situational factors, the results show that the higher the level of marketization, the people are more likely to have stronger negative emotions about subsidy or redistribution policies. Further analysis shows that people with the lowest income are susceptible to the fact that income inequality has become significant and show a strong willingness to support the government’s redistribution policy. In contrast, middle-class people tend to favor the government’s redistribution policy, although they will not benefit much from the redistribution policy. Therefore, they lack the motivation to support the government in vigorously implementing the subsidy policy. Significantly, high-income people are indifferent, as they lack such motivation even more. The difference in redistribution preferences between upper-class and lower-class groups signals polarization in Chinese society, especially income redistribution.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>earnings redistribution</subject><subject>preferences</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>unemployment subsidy</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVks1u1DAUhSMEolXpA7Dzkk0G_8VxWCBVmQFGqtQKWraWY99kXCX2YCdV53V4UpKZgqg3vtfn6jvS9cmy9wSvGJPVx3afDt2KYkpXsqBlRV9l50QInhNcytf_1WfZZUoPeD4cU4zp2-yMFWUhaCXPs9918I8QO_AGUIho7f52n9BthBbiUifUztomjbrpXdo53yHt0b2HYd-HwwB-RD-mJjl7QOspLvK4A1Tf_Nyuc1KhW4guWNQc0J1-WtQrE0NKaKOjn9uEvoN1aYyumUYXPHIzOzazQz1b6XfZm1b3CS6f74vs_svmrv6WX9983dZX17lhlI-5MExbCaRoucHccqxbXBrBNW4NFCXhlTUSJBMWmBWGlLJqCgmVsKzAuKnYRbY9cW3QD2of3aDjQQXt1PEhxE7pODrTg8KcWcbAgiaE24ZoYoFaXInStmVji5n1-cTaT80A1swbirp_AX2peLdTXXhUFaWCiQXw4RkQw68J0qgGlwz0vfYQpqSokIRzJhmfR8lp9LjU-c_-2RCslqioY1TUEhV1igr7A8pXtNE</recordid><startdate>20220610</startdate><enddate>20220610</enddate><creator>Zhou, Yaping</creator><creator>Zhou, Jiangjie</creator><creator>Li, Yinan</creator><creator>Rui, Donggen</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220610</creationdate><title>Convergence or Divergence: Preferences for Establishing an Unemployment Subsidy During the COVID-19 Period by Taxing Across Earnings Redistribution in Urban China</title><author>Zhou, Yaping ; Zhou, Jiangjie ; Li, Yinan ; Rui, Donggen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-6c3ad8e15f4c04d40af07c64a0fce57149dc8e836de3d6c1789b58e96d3500b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>earnings redistribution</topic><topic>preferences</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>unemployment subsidy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yaping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jiangjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rui, Donggen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals - May need to register for free articles</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, Yaping</au><au>Zhou, Jiangjie</au><au>Li, Yinan</au><au>Rui, Donggen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Convergence or Divergence: Preferences for Establishing an Unemployment Subsidy During the COVID-19 Period by Taxing Across Earnings Redistribution in Urban China</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><date>2022-06-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><spage>852792</spage><epage>852792</epage><pages>852792-852792</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>With the advancement of marketization, China has achieved rapid economic growth and economic class differentiation. This research analyzes the data from China’s livelihood survey, divides the urban Chinese into five socio-economic classes, and tests their preferences and tendencies for income redistribution. It obtains the general attitude differences in subsidy policy and income inequality during COVID-19. Our conclusion are consistent with the existing literature to a great extent; that is, personal factors (self-interest and belief in fairness) play a crucial role in the attitude of Chinese citizens. In the analysis of situational factors, the results show that the higher the level of marketization, the people are more likely to have stronger negative emotions about subsidy or redistribution policies. Further analysis shows that people with the lowest income are susceptible to the fact that income inequality has become significant and show a strong willingness to support the government’s redistribution policy. In contrast, middle-class people tend to favor the government’s redistribution policy, although they will not benefit much from the redistribution policy. Therefore, they lack the motivation to support the government in vigorously implementing the subsidy policy. Significantly, high-income people are indifferent, as they lack such motivation even more. The difference in redistribution preferences between upper-class and lower-class groups signals polarization in Chinese society, especially income redistribution.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>35756298</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852792</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1664-1078 |
ispartof | Frontiers in psychology, 2022-06, Vol.13, p.852792-852792 |
issn | 1664-1078 1664-1078 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_043d33edea114db1a1de2d0967df7bd5 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | China COVID-19 earnings redistribution preferences Psychology unemployment subsidy |
title | Convergence or Divergence: Preferences for Establishing an Unemployment Subsidy During the COVID-19 Period by Taxing Across Earnings Redistribution in Urban China |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T16%3A47%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Convergence%20or%20Divergence:%20Preferences%20for%20Establishing%20an%20Unemployment%20Subsidy%20During%20the%20COVID-19%20Period%20by%20Taxing%20Across%20Earnings%20Redistribution%20in%20Urban%20China&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Zhou,%20Yaping&rft.date=2022-06-10&rft.volume=13&rft.spage=852792&rft.epage=852792&rft.pages=852792-852792&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852792&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2681443834%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-6c3ad8e15f4c04d40af07c64a0fce57149dc8e836de3d6c1789b58e96d3500b93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681443834&rft_id=info:pmid/35756298&rfr_iscdi=true |