Effect of Estimated Daily Global Solar Radiation Data on the Results of Crop Growth Models

• Published in: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2007-10, Vol.7 (10), p.2330-2362
• Main Authors: Trnka, Miroslav, Eitzinger, Josef, Kapler, Pavel, Dubrovský, Martin, Semerádová, Daniela, Žalud, Zdeněk, Formayer, Herbert
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural production; Barley; CERES-Barley; CERES-Wheat; Climate change; crop yields; Estimates; Full Research Paper; Growth models; Methods; Neural networks; Precipitation; Radiation; Remote sensing; Sensors; spring barley; Wheat; winter wheat; WOFOST
• ISSN: 1424-8220; 1424-8220
• DOI: 10.3390/s7102330

The results of previous studies have suggested that estimated daily globalradiation (R ) values contain an error that could compromise the precision of subsequentcrop model applications. The following study presents a detailed site and spatial analysis ofthe R error propagation in CERES and WOFOST crop growth models in Central Europeanclimate conditions. The research was conducted i) at the eight individual sites in Austria andthe Czech Republic where measured daily R values were available as a reference, withseven methods for R estimation being tested, and ii) for the agricultural areas of the CzechRepublic using daily data from 52 weather stations, with five R estimation methods. In thelatter case the R values estimated from the hours of sunshine using the ångström-Prescottformula were used as the standard method because of the lack of measured R data. At thesite level we found that even the use of methods based on hours of sunshine, which showedthe lowest bias in R estimates, led to a significant distortion of the key crop model outputs.When the ångström-Prescott method was used to estimate R , for example, deviationsgreater than ±10 per cent in winter wheat and spring barley yields were noted in 5 to 6 percent of cases. The precision of the yield estimates and other crop model outputs was lowerwhen R estimates based on the diurnal temperature range and cloud cover were used (mean bias error 2.0 to 4.1 per cent). The methods for estimating R from the diurnal temperature range produced a wheat yield bias of more than 25 per cent in 12 to 16 per cent of the seasons. Such uncertainty in the crop model outputs makes the reliability of any seasonal yield forecasts or climate change impact assessments questionable if they are based on this type of data. The spatial assessment of the R data uncertainty propagation over the winter wheat yields also revealed significant differences within the study area. We found that R estimates based on diurnal temperature range or its combination with daily total precipitation produced a bias of to 30 per cent in the mean winter wheat grain yields in some regions compared with simulations in which R values had been estimated using the ångström-Prescott formula. In contrast to the results at the individual sites, the methods based on the diurnal temperature range in combination with daily precipitation totals showed significantly poorer performance than the methods based on the diurnal temperature range only. This was due to t