Realist evaluation of Autism ServiCe Delivery (RE-ASCeD): which diagnostic pathways work best, for whom and in what context? Findings from a rapid realist review

• Published in: BMJ open 2021-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e051241-e051241
• Main Authors: Abrahamson, Vanessa, Zhang, Wenjing, Wilson, Patricia M, Farr, William, Reddy, Venkat, Parr, Jeremy, Peckham, Anna, Male, Ian
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; Autism; Autistic Disorder - diagnosis; Autistic Disorder - therapy; Child; Child & adolescent mental health; Children & youth; developmental neurology & neurodisability; Humans; Intervention; Medical diagnosis; Mental disorders; Mental health; paediatric neurology; Paediatrics; Parents; Pediatrics; primary care; quality in health care; Quality standards; Referral and Consultation; Stakeholders; Teenagers
• ISSN: 2044-6055; 2044-6055
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051241

ObjectivesWaiting times in the UK for an autism diagnostic assessment have increased rapidly in the last 5 years. This review explored research (including ‘grey’ literature) to uncover the current evidence base about autism diagnostic pathways and what works best, for whom and in what circumstances, to deliver high quality and timely diagnosis.DesignWe performed a Rapid Realist Review consistent with recognised standards for realist syntheses. We collected 129 grey literature and policy/guidelines and 220 articles from seven databases (January 2011–December 2019). We developed programme theories of how, why and in what contexts an intervention worked, based on cross comparison and synthesis of evidence. The focus was on identifying factors that contributed to a clearly defined intervention (the diagnostic pathway), associated with specific outcomes (high quality and timely), within specific parameters (Autism diagnostic services in Paediatric and Child & Adolescent Mental Health services in the UK). Our Expert Stakeholder Group, including representatives from local parent forums, national advocacy groups and clinicians, was integral to the process.ResultsBased on 45 relevant articles, we identified 7 programme theories that were integral to the process of diagnostic service delivery. Four were related to the clinical pathway: initial recognition of possible autism; referral and triaging; diagnostic model; and providing feedback to parents. Three programme theories were pertinent to all stages of the referral and diagnostic process: working in partnership with families; interagency working; and training, service evaluation and development.ConclusionsThis theory informed review of childhood autism diagnostic pathways identified important aspects that may contribute to efficient, high quality and family-friendly service delivery. The programme theories will be further tested through a national survey of current practice and in-depth longitudinal case studies of exemplar services.Trial registration numberNCT04422483.