Loading…
Comparison of hock- and footpad-injection as a prostate adenocarcinoma model in rats
Objective of this study is a feasibility-test comparing hock- and footpad-injection in rats with inoculated MatLyLu - adenocarcinoma tumor model. This study compares the development of an adenocarcinoma model (MatLyLu) in 12 Copenhagen rats. Two groups (n = 6) of animals were inoculated with 1 × 10...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC veterinary research 2018-11, Vol.14 (1), p.327-327, Article 327 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7d7da49b09ea79e16f0e18ec8eb42ceba5fda4fc4f375d9f399210c1893a993b3 |
container_end_page | 327 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 327 |
container_title | BMC veterinary research |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Richter, Henning Karol, Agnieszka Nuss, Katja Lenisa, Aymone Bruellmann, Erika Maudens, Stella-Saphira Hoffmann, Heinrich von Rechenberg, Brigitte Kircher, Patrick R |
description | Objective of this study is a feasibility-test comparing hock- and footpad-injection in rats with inoculated MatLyLu - adenocarcinoma tumor model. This study compares the development of an adenocarcinoma model (MatLyLu) in 12 Copenhagen rats. Two groups (n = 6) of animals were inoculated with 1 × 10
MatLyLu tumor cells solved in 0.1 ml NaCl either by footpad or hock injection. All animals were examined before tumor inoculation and before euthanasia using a 3.0 Tesla MRI. Histological evaluation of all organs was performed post mortem.
Both types of injection were able to induce the adenocarcinoma model using MatLyLu tumor cells. The primary tumor could be visualized in MRI and confirmed histologically. Comparing the risk of reflux and the maximum injection volume during injection, the hock injection was superior to the footpad injection (less reflux, less anatomical restrictions for larger volumes). The hock injection induces a faster tumor growth compared to the footpad injection. As consequence the maximum level of long term discomfort after hock injection was reached earlier, even if it grew on a not weight bearing structure. Early lymph node tumor metastasis could not be observed macroscopically nor detected histologically. Therefore the reproducibility of the MatLyLu tumor model is questionable.
Hock injection is a feasible alternative technique compared with footpad-injection in rats. It provides a save and easy injection method for various early-terminated applications with the potential to increase animal welfare during tumor models in rats. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12917-018-1659-x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_04d1e81c5f9b4934bddca8e47f5e0ee0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A567964501</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_04d1e81c5f9b4934bddca8e47f5e0ee0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A567964501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7d7da49b09ea79e16f0e18ec8eb42ceba5fda4fc4f375d9f399210c1893a993b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk9v1DAQxSMEoqXwAbigSFy4pHhiJ44vSNWKP5UqcSlna2KPt14Se7GzVfn2eNlSugj5YGvmvZ819quq18DOAYb-fYZWgWwYDA30nWrunlSnIEXf9CCGp4_OJ9WLnDeMCaFk_7w64UwwJhU_ra5Xcd5i8jmGOrr6JprvTY3B1i7GZYu28WFDZvGljbnGeptiXnChGi2FaDAZH-KM9RwtTbUPdcIlv6yeOZwyvbrfz6pvnz5er740V18_X64urhrTQbs00kqLQo1MEUpF0DtGMJAZaBStoRE7V_rOCMdlZ5XjSrXADAyKo1J85GfV5YFrI270NvkZ008d0evfhZjWGtPizUSaCQs0gOmcGoXiYrTW4EBCuo4YESusDwfWdjfOZA2FJeF0BD3uBH-j1_FW9y0oYEMBvLsHpPhjR3nRs8-GpgkDxV3WLXA2MA6givTtP9JN3KVQnmqv6kTLepB_VWssA_jgYrnX7KH6ouul6kXHoKjO_6Mqy9LsTQzkfKkfGeBgMOUrcyL3MCMwvY-VPsRKl1jpfaz0XfG8efw4D44_OeK_AEhyyGk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2135420617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of hock- and footpad-injection as a prostate adenocarcinoma model in rats</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Richter, Henning ; Karol, Agnieszka ; Nuss, Katja ; Lenisa, Aymone ; Bruellmann, Erika ; Maudens, Stella-Saphira ; Hoffmann, Heinrich ; von Rechenberg, Brigitte ; Kircher, Patrick R</creator><creatorcontrib>Richter, Henning ; Karol, Agnieszka ; Nuss, Katja ; Lenisa, Aymone ; Bruellmann, Erika ; Maudens, Stella-Saphira ; Hoffmann, Heinrich ; von Rechenberg, Brigitte ; Kircher, Patrick R</creatorcontrib><description>Objective of this study is a feasibility-test comparing hock- and footpad-injection in rats with inoculated MatLyLu - adenocarcinoma tumor model. This study compares the development of an adenocarcinoma model (MatLyLu) in 12 Copenhagen rats. Two groups (n = 6) of animals were inoculated with 1 × 10
MatLyLu tumor cells solved in 0.1 ml NaCl either by footpad or hock injection. All animals were examined before tumor inoculation and before euthanasia using a 3.0 Tesla MRI. Histological evaluation of all organs was performed post mortem.
Both types of injection were able to induce the adenocarcinoma model using MatLyLu tumor cells. The primary tumor could be visualized in MRI and confirmed histologically. Comparing the risk of reflux and the maximum injection volume during injection, the hock injection was superior to the footpad injection (less reflux, less anatomical restrictions for larger volumes). The hock injection induces a faster tumor growth compared to the footpad injection. As consequence the maximum level of long term discomfort after hock injection was reached earlier, even if it grew on a not weight bearing structure. Early lymph node tumor metastasis could not be observed macroscopically nor detected histologically. Therefore the reproducibility of the MatLyLu tumor model is questionable.
Hock injection is a feasible alternative technique compared with footpad-injection in rats. It provides a save and easy injection method for various early-terminated applications with the potential to increase animal welfare during tumor models in rats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-6148</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-6148</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1659-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30400793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma ; Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - veterinary ; Animal models ; Animal welfare ; Animals ; Cancer patients ; Cancer therapies ; Cell differentiation ; Copenhagen rat ; Diagnosis ; Disease Models, Animal ; Feasibility studies ; Female ; Foot ; Footpad injection ; Genetic aspects ; Health aspects ; Hock injection ; Injection ; Injections - veterinary ; Inoculation ; Laboratories ; Lymph nodes ; Lymphatic system ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; MatLyLu ; Medical research ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Methods ; Neoplasm Transplantation - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasm Transplantation - pathology ; Neoplasm Transplantation - veterinary ; Organs ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - veterinary ; Rats ; Rodents ; Sheep ; Sodium chloride ; Tarsus, Animal ; Tumor cells ; Tumor model ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>BMC veterinary research, 2018-11, Vol.14 (1), p.327-327, Article 327</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7d7da49b09ea79e16f0e18ec8eb42ceba5fda4fc4f375d9f399210c1893a993b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3696-6993</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219108/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2135420617?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richter, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karol, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuss, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenisa, Aymone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruellmann, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maudens, Stella-Saphira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Heinrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Rechenberg, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kircher, Patrick R</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of hock- and footpad-injection as a prostate adenocarcinoma model in rats</title><title>BMC veterinary research</title><addtitle>BMC Vet Res</addtitle><description>Objective of this study is a feasibility-test comparing hock- and footpad-injection in rats with inoculated MatLyLu - adenocarcinoma tumor model. This study compares the development of an adenocarcinoma model (MatLyLu) in 12 Copenhagen rats. Two groups (n = 6) of animals were inoculated with 1 × 10
MatLyLu tumor cells solved in 0.1 ml NaCl either by footpad or hock injection. All animals were examined before tumor inoculation and before euthanasia using a 3.0 Tesla MRI. Histological evaluation of all organs was performed post mortem.
Both types of injection were able to induce the adenocarcinoma model using MatLyLu tumor cells. The primary tumor could be visualized in MRI and confirmed histologically. Comparing the risk of reflux and the maximum injection volume during injection, the hock injection was superior to the footpad injection (less reflux, less anatomical restrictions for larger volumes). The hock injection induces a faster tumor growth compared to the footpad injection. As consequence the maximum level of long term discomfort after hock injection was reached earlier, even if it grew on a not weight bearing structure. Early lymph node tumor metastasis could not be observed macroscopically nor detected histologically. Therefore the reproducibility of the MatLyLu tumor model is questionable.
Hock injection is a feasible alternative technique compared with footpad-injection in rats. It provides a save and easy injection method for various early-terminated applications with the potential to increase animal welfare during tumor models in rats.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - veterinary</subject><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>Animal welfare</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cell differentiation</subject><subject>Copenhagen rat</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foot</subject><subject>Footpad injection</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hock injection</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Injections - veterinary</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>MatLyLu</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Neoplasm Transplantation - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasm Transplantation - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Transplantation - veterinary</subject><subject>Organs</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - veterinary</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Sodium chloride</subject><subject>Tarsus, Animal</subject><subject>Tumor cells</subject><subject>Tumor model</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>1746-6148</issn><issn>1746-6148</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk9v1DAQxSMEoqXwAbigSFy4pHhiJ44vSNWKP5UqcSlna2KPt14Se7GzVfn2eNlSugj5YGvmvZ819quq18DOAYb-fYZWgWwYDA30nWrunlSnIEXf9CCGp4_OJ9WLnDeMCaFk_7w64UwwJhU_ra5Xcd5i8jmGOrr6JprvTY3B1i7GZYu28WFDZvGljbnGeptiXnChGi2FaDAZH-KM9RwtTbUPdcIlv6yeOZwyvbrfz6pvnz5er740V18_X64urhrTQbs00kqLQo1MEUpF0DtGMJAZaBStoRE7V_rOCMdlZ5XjSrXADAyKo1J85GfV5YFrI270NvkZ008d0evfhZjWGtPizUSaCQs0gOmcGoXiYrTW4EBCuo4YESusDwfWdjfOZA2FJeF0BD3uBH-j1_FW9y0oYEMBvLsHpPhjR3nRs8-GpgkDxV3WLXA2MA6givTtP9JN3KVQnmqv6kTLepB_VWssA_jgYrnX7KH6ouul6kXHoKjO_6Mqy9LsTQzkfKkfGeBgMOUrcyL3MCMwvY-VPsRKl1jpfaz0XfG8efw4D44_OeK_AEhyyGk</recordid><startdate>20181106</startdate><enddate>20181106</enddate><creator>Richter, Henning</creator><creator>Karol, Agnieszka</creator><creator>Nuss, Katja</creator><creator>Lenisa, Aymone</creator><creator>Bruellmann, Erika</creator><creator>Maudens, Stella-Saphira</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Heinrich</creator><creator>von Rechenberg, Brigitte</creator><creator>Kircher, Patrick R</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3696-6993</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181106</creationdate><title>Comparison of hock- and footpad-injection as a prostate adenocarcinoma model in rats</title><author>Richter, Henning ; Karol, Agnieszka ; Nuss, Katja ; Lenisa, Aymone ; Bruellmann, Erika ; Maudens, Stella-Saphira ; Hoffmann, Heinrich ; von Rechenberg, Brigitte ; Kircher, Patrick R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7d7da49b09ea79e16f0e18ec8eb42ceba5fda4fc4f375d9f399210c1893a993b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - veterinary</topic><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>Animal welfare</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cell differentiation</topic><topic>Copenhagen rat</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foot</topic><topic>Footpad injection</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hock injection</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Injections - veterinary</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>MatLyLu</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Neoplasm Transplantation - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasm Transplantation - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Transplantation - veterinary</topic><topic>Organs</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - veterinary</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Sodium chloride</topic><topic>Tarsus, Animal</topic><topic>Tumor cells</topic><topic>Tumor model</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richter, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karol, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuss, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenisa, Aymone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruellmann, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maudens, Stella-Saphira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Heinrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Rechenberg, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kircher, Patrick R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC veterinary research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richter, Henning</au><au>Karol, Agnieszka</au><au>Nuss, Katja</au><au>Lenisa, Aymone</au><au>Bruellmann, Erika</au><au>Maudens, Stella-Saphira</au><au>Hoffmann, Heinrich</au><au>von Rechenberg, Brigitte</au><au>Kircher, Patrick R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of hock- and footpad-injection as a prostate adenocarcinoma model in rats</atitle><jtitle>BMC veterinary research</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Vet Res</addtitle><date>2018-11-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>327</spage><epage>327</epage><pages>327-327</pages><artnum>327</artnum><issn>1746-6148</issn><eissn>1746-6148</eissn><abstract>Objective of this study is a feasibility-test comparing hock- and footpad-injection in rats with inoculated MatLyLu - adenocarcinoma tumor model. This study compares the development of an adenocarcinoma model (MatLyLu) in 12 Copenhagen rats. Two groups (n = 6) of animals were inoculated with 1 × 10
MatLyLu tumor cells solved in 0.1 ml NaCl either by footpad or hock injection. All animals were examined before tumor inoculation and before euthanasia using a 3.0 Tesla MRI. Histological evaluation of all organs was performed post mortem.
Both types of injection were able to induce the adenocarcinoma model using MatLyLu tumor cells. The primary tumor could be visualized in MRI and confirmed histologically. Comparing the risk of reflux and the maximum injection volume during injection, the hock injection was superior to the footpad injection (less reflux, less anatomical restrictions for larger volumes). The hock injection induces a faster tumor growth compared to the footpad injection. As consequence the maximum level of long term discomfort after hock injection was reached earlier, even if it grew on a not weight bearing structure. Early lymph node tumor metastasis could not be observed macroscopically nor detected histologically. Therefore the reproducibility of the MatLyLu tumor model is questionable.
Hock injection is a feasible alternative technique compared with footpad-injection in rats. It provides a save and easy injection method for various early-terminated applications with the potential to increase animal welfare during tumor models in rats.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>30400793</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12917-018-1659-x</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3696-6993</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1746-6148 |
ispartof | BMC veterinary research, 2018-11, Vol.14 (1), p.327-327, Article 327 |
issn | 1746-6148 1746-6148 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_04d1e81c5f9b4934bddca8e47f5e0ee0 |
source | ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging Adenocarcinoma - pathology Adenocarcinoma - veterinary Animal models Animal welfare Animals Cancer patients Cancer therapies Cell differentiation Copenhagen rat Diagnosis Disease Models, Animal Feasibility studies Female Foot Footpad injection Genetic aspects Health aspects Hock injection Injection Injections - veterinary Inoculation Laboratories Lymph nodes Lymphatic system Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male MatLyLu Medical research Metastases Metastasis Methods Neoplasm Transplantation - diagnostic imaging Neoplasm Transplantation - pathology Neoplasm Transplantation - veterinary Organs Prostate Prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Prostatic Neoplasms - veterinary Rats Rodents Sheep Sodium chloride Tarsus, Animal Tumor cells Tumor model Ultrasonic imaging |
title | Comparison of hock- and footpad-injection as a prostate adenocarcinoma model in rats |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A12%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20hock-%20and%20footpad-injection%20as%20a%20prostate%20adenocarcinoma%20model%20in%20rats&rft.jtitle=BMC%20veterinary%20research&rft.au=Richter,%20Henning&rft.date=2018-11-06&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=327&rft.epage=327&rft.pages=327-327&rft.artnum=327&rft.issn=1746-6148&rft.eissn=1746-6148&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12917-018-1659-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA567964501%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7d7da49b09ea79e16f0e18ec8eb42ceba5fda4fc4f375d9f399210c1893a993b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2135420617&rft_id=info:pmid/30400793&rft_galeid=A567964501&rfr_iscdi=true |