Loading…

Comparison of hock- and footpad-injection as a prostate adenocarcinoma model in rats

Objective of this study is a feasibility-test comparing hock- and footpad-injection in rats with inoculated MatLyLu - adenocarcinoma tumor model. This study compares the development of an adenocarcinoma model (MatLyLu) in 12 Copenhagen rats. Two groups (n = 6) of animals were inoculated with 1 × 10...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC veterinary research 2018-11, Vol.14 (1), p.327-327, Article 327
Main Authors: Richter, Henning, Karol, Agnieszka, Nuss, Katja, Lenisa, Aymone, Bruellmann, Erika, Maudens, Stella-Saphira, Hoffmann, Heinrich, von Rechenberg, Brigitte, Kircher, Patrick R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7d7da49b09ea79e16f0e18ec8eb42ceba5fda4fc4f375d9f399210c1893a993b3
container_end_page 327
container_issue 1
container_start_page 327
container_title BMC veterinary research
container_volume 14
creator Richter, Henning
Karol, Agnieszka
Nuss, Katja
Lenisa, Aymone
Bruellmann, Erika
Maudens, Stella-Saphira
Hoffmann, Heinrich
von Rechenberg, Brigitte
Kircher, Patrick R
description Objective of this study is a feasibility-test comparing hock- and footpad-injection in rats with inoculated MatLyLu - adenocarcinoma tumor model. This study compares the development of an adenocarcinoma model (MatLyLu) in 12 Copenhagen rats. Two groups (n = 6) of animals were inoculated with 1 × 10 MatLyLu tumor cells solved in 0.1 ml NaCl either by footpad or hock injection. All animals were examined before tumor inoculation and before euthanasia using a 3.0 Tesla MRI. Histological evaluation of all organs was performed post mortem. Both types of injection were able to induce the adenocarcinoma model using MatLyLu tumor cells. The primary tumor could be visualized in MRI and confirmed histologically. Comparing the risk of reflux and the maximum injection volume during injection, the hock injection was superior to the footpad injection (less reflux, less anatomical restrictions for larger volumes). The hock injection induces a faster tumor growth compared to the footpad injection. As consequence the maximum level of long term discomfort after hock injection was reached earlier, even if it grew on a not weight bearing structure. Early lymph node tumor metastasis could not be observed macroscopically nor detected histologically. Therefore the reproducibility of the MatLyLu tumor model is questionable. Hock injection is a feasible alternative technique compared with footpad-injection in rats. It provides a save and easy injection method for various early-terminated applications with the potential to increase animal welfare during tumor models in rats.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12917-018-1659-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_04d1e81c5f9b4934bddca8e47f5e0ee0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A567964501</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_04d1e81c5f9b4934bddca8e47f5e0ee0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A567964501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7d7da49b09ea79e16f0e18ec8eb42ceba5fda4fc4f375d9f399210c1893a993b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk9v1DAQxSMEoqXwAbigSFy4pHhiJ44vSNWKP5UqcSlna2KPt14Se7GzVfn2eNlSugj5YGvmvZ819quq18DOAYb-fYZWgWwYDA30nWrunlSnIEXf9CCGp4_OJ9WLnDeMCaFk_7w64UwwJhU_ra5Xcd5i8jmGOrr6JprvTY3B1i7GZYu28WFDZvGljbnGeptiXnChGi2FaDAZH-KM9RwtTbUPdcIlv6yeOZwyvbrfz6pvnz5er740V18_X64urhrTQbs00kqLQo1MEUpF0DtGMJAZaBStoRE7V_rOCMdlZ5XjSrXADAyKo1J85GfV5YFrI270NvkZ008d0evfhZjWGtPizUSaCQs0gOmcGoXiYrTW4EBCuo4YESusDwfWdjfOZA2FJeF0BD3uBH-j1_FW9y0oYEMBvLsHpPhjR3nRs8-GpgkDxV3WLXA2MA6givTtP9JN3KVQnmqv6kTLepB_VWssA_jgYrnX7KH6ouul6kXHoKjO_6Mqy9LsTQzkfKkfGeBgMOUrcyL3MCMwvY-VPsRKl1jpfaz0XfG8efw4D44_OeK_AEhyyGk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2135420617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of hock- and footpad-injection as a prostate adenocarcinoma model in rats</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Richter, Henning ; Karol, Agnieszka ; Nuss, Katja ; Lenisa, Aymone ; Bruellmann, Erika ; Maudens, Stella-Saphira ; Hoffmann, Heinrich ; von Rechenberg, Brigitte ; Kircher, Patrick R</creator><creatorcontrib>Richter, Henning ; Karol, Agnieszka ; Nuss, Katja ; Lenisa, Aymone ; Bruellmann, Erika ; Maudens, Stella-Saphira ; Hoffmann, Heinrich ; von Rechenberg, Brigitte ; Kircher, Patrick R</creatorcontrib><description>Objective of this study is a feasibility-test comparing hock- and footpad-injection in rats with inoculated MatLyLu - adenocarcinoma tumor model. This study compares the development of an adenocarcinoma model (MatLyLu) in 12 Copenhagen rats. Two groups (n = 6) of animals were inoculated with 1 × 10 MatLyLu tumor cells solved in 0.1 ml NaCl either by footpad or hock injection. All animals were examined before tumor inoculation and before euthanasia using a 3.0 Tesla MRI. Histological evaluation of all organs was performed post mortem. Both types of injection were able to induce the adenocarcinoma model using MatLyLu tumor cells. The primary tumor could be visualized in MRI and confirmed histologically. Comparing the risk of reflux and the maximum injection volume during injection, the hock injection was superior to the footpad injection (less reflux, less anatomical restrictions for larger volumes). The hock injection induces a faster tumor growth compared to the footpad injection. As consequence the maximum level of long term discomfort after hock injection was reached earlier, even if it grew on a not weight bearing structure. Early lymph node tumor metastasis could not be observed macroscopically nor detected histologically. Therefore the reproducibility of the MatLyLu tumor model is questionable. Hock injection is a feasible alternative technique compared with footpad-injection in rats. It provides a save and easy injection method for various early-terminated applications with the potential to increase animal welfare during tumor models in rats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-6148</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-6148</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1659-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30400793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma ; Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - veterinary ; Animal models ; Animal welfare ; Animals ; Cancer patients ; Cancer therapies ; Cell differentiation ; Copenhagen rat ; Diagnosis ; Disease Models, Animal ; Feasibility studies ; Female ; Foot ; Footpad injection ; Genetic aspects ; Health aspects ; Hock injection ; Injection ; Injections - veterinary ; Inoculation ; Laboratories ; Lymph nodes ; Lymphatic system ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; MatLyLu ; Medical research ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Methods ; Neoplasm Transplantation - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasm Transplantation - pathology ; Neoplasm Transplantation - veterinary ; Organs ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - veterinary ; Rats ; Rodents ; Sheep ; Sodium chloride ; Tarsus, Animal ; Tumor cells ; Tumor model ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>BMC veterinary research, 2018-11, Vol.14 (1), p.327-327, Article 327</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7d7da49b09ea79e16f0e18ec8eb42ceba5fda4fc4f375d9f399210c1893a993b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3696-6993</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219108/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2135420617?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richter, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karol, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuss, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenisa, Aymone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruellmann, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maudens, Stella-Saphira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Heinrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Rechenberg, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kircher, Patrick R</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of hock- and footpad-injection as a prostate adenocarcinoma model in rats</title><title>BMC veterinary research</title><addtitle>BMC Vet Res</addtitle><description>Objective of this study is a feasibility-test comparing hock- and footpad-injection in rats with inoculated MatLyLu - adenocarcinoma tumor model. This study compares the development of an adenocarcinoma model (MatLyLu) in 12 Copenhagen rats. Two groups (n = 6) of animals were inoculated with 1 × 10 MatLyLu tumor cells solved in 0.1 ml NaCl either by footpad or hock injection. All animals were examined before tumor inoculation and before euthanasia using a 3.0 Tesla MRI. Histological evaluation of all organs was performed post mortem. Both types of injection were able to induce the adenocarcinoma model using MatLyLu tumor cells. The primary tumor could be visualized in MRI and confirmed histologically. Comparing the risk of reflux and the maximum injection volume during injection, the hock injection was superior to the footpad injection (less reflux, less anatomical restrictions for larger volumes). The hock injection induces a faster tumor growth compared to the footpad injection. As consequence the maximum level of long term discomfort after hock injection was reached earlier, even if it grew on a not weight bearing structure. Early lymph node tumor metastasis could not be observed macroscopically nor detected histologically. Therefore the reproducibility of the MatLyLu tumor model is questionable. Hock injection is a feasible alternative technique compared with footpad-injection in rats. It provides a save and easy injection method for various early-terminated applications with the potential to increase animal welfare during tumor models in rats.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - veterinary</subject><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>Animal welfare</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cell differentiation</subject><subject>Copenhagen rat</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foot</subject><subject>Footpad injection</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hock injection</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Injections - veterinary</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>MatLyLu</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Neoplasm Transplantation - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasm Transplantation - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Transplantation - veterinary</subject><subject>Organs</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - veterinary</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Sodium chloride</subject><subject>Tarsus, Animal</subject><subject>Tumor cells</subject><subject>Tumor model</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>1746-6148</issn><issn>1746-6148</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk9v1DAQxSMEoqXwAbigSFy4pHhiJ44vSNWKP5UqcSlna2KPt14Se7GzVfn2eNlSugj5YGvmvZ819quq18DOAYb-fYZWgWwYDA30nWrunlSnIEXf9CCGp4_OJ9WLnDeMCaFk_7w64UwwJhU_ra5Xcd5i8jmGOrr6JprvTY3B1i7GZYu28WFDZvGljbnGeptiXnChGi2FaDAZH-KM9RwtTbUPdcIlv6yeOZwyvbrfz6pvnz5er740V18_X64urhrTQbs00kqLQo1MEUpF0DtGMJAZaBStoRE7V_rOCMdlZ5XjSrXADAyKo1J85GfV5YFrI270NvkZ008d0evfhZjWGtPizUSaCQs0gOmcGoXiYrTW4EBCuo4YESusDwfWdjfOZA2FJeF0BD3uBH-j1_FW9y0oYEMBvLsHpPhjR3nRs8-GpgkDxV3WLXA2MA6givTtP9JN3KVQnmqv6kTLepB_VWssA_jgYrnX7KH6ouul6kXHoKjO_6Mqy9LsTQzkfKkfGeBgMOUrcyL3MCMwvY-VPsRKl1jpfaz0XfG8efw4D44_OeK_AEhyyGk</recordid><startdate>20181106</startdate><enddate>20181106</enddate><creator>Richter, Henning</creator><creator>Karol, Agnieszka</creator><creator>Nuss, Katja</creator><creator>Lenisa, Aymone</creator><creator>Bruellmann, Erika</creator><creator>Maudens, Stella-Saphira</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Heinrich</creator><creator>von Rechenberg, Brigitte</creator><creator>Kircher, Patrick R</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3696-6993</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181106</creationdate><title>Comparison of hock- and footpad-injection as a prostate adenocarcinoma model in rats</title><author>Richter, Henning ; Karol, Agnieszka ; Nuss, Katja ; Lenisa, Aymone ; Bruellmann, Erika ; Maudens, Stella-Saphira ; Hoffmann, Heinrich ; von Rechenberg, Brigitte ; Kircher, Patrick R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7d7da49b09ea79e16f0e18ec8eb42ceba5fda4fc4f375d9f399210c1893a993b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - veterinary</topic><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>Animal welfare</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cell differentiation</topic><topic>Copenhagen rat</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foot</topic><topic>Footpad injection</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hock injection</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Injections - veterinary</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>MatLyLu</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Neoplasm Transplantation - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasm Transplantation - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Transplantation - veterinary</topic><topic>Organs</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - veterinary</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Sodium chloride</topic><topic>Tarsus, Animal</topic><topic>Tumor cells</topic><topic>Tumor model</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richter, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karol, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuss, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenisa, Aymone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruellmann, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maudens, Stella-Saphira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Heinrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Rechenberg, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kircher, Patrick R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC veterinary research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richter, Henning</au><au>Karol, Agnieszka</au><au>Nuss, Katja</au><au>Lenisa, Aymone</au><au>Bruellmann, Erika</au><au>Maudens, Stella-Saphira</au><au>Hoffmann, Heinrich</au><au>von Rechenberg, Brigitte</au><au>Kircher, Patrick R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of hock- and footpad-injection as a prostate adenocarcinoma model in rats</atitle><jtitle>BMC veterinary research</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Vet Res</addtitle><date>2018-11-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>327</spage><epage>327</epage><pages>327-327</pages><artnum>327</artnum><issn>1746-6148</issn><eissn>1746-6148</eissn><abstract>Objective of this study is a feasibility-test comparing hock- and footpad-injection in rats with inoculated MatLyLu - adenocarcinoma tumor model. This study compares the development of an adenocarcinoma model (MatLyLu) in 12 Copenhagen rats. Two groups (n = 6) of animals were inoculated with 1 × 10 MatLyLu tumor cells solved in 0.1 ml NaCl either by footpad or hock injection. All animals were examined before tumor inoculation and before euthanasia using a 3.0 Tesla MRI. Histological evaluation of all organs was performed post mortem. Both types of injection were able to induce the adenocarcinoma model using MatLyLu tumor cells. The primary tumor could be visualized in MRI and confirmed histologically. Comparing the risk of reflux and the maximum injection volume during injection, the hock injection was superior to the footpad injection (less reflux, less anatomical restrictions for larger volumes). The hock injection induces a faster tumor growth compared to the footpad injection. As consequence the maximum level of long term discomfort after hock injection was reached earlier, even if it grew on a not weight bearing structure. Early lymph node tumor metastasis could not be observed macroscopically nor detected histologically. Therefore the reproducibility of the MatLyLu tumor model is questionable. Hock injection is a feasible alternative technique compared with footpad-injection in rats. It provides a save and easy injection method for various early-terminated applications with the potential to increase animal welfare during tumor models in rats.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>30400793</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12917-018-1659-x</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3696-6993</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1746-6148
ispartof BMC veterinary research, 2018-11, Vol.14 (1), p.327-327, Article 327
issn 1746-6148
1746-6148
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_04d1e81c5f9b4934bddca8e47f5e0ee0
source ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Adenocarcinoma
Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging
Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Adenocarcinoma - veterinary
Animal models
Animal welfare
Animals
Cancer patients
Cancer therapies
Cell differentiation
Copenhagen rat
Diagnosis
Disease Models, Animal
Feasibility studies
Female
Foot
Footpad injection
Genetic aspects
Health aspects
Hock injection
Injection
Injections - veterinary
Inoculation
Laboratories
Lymph nodes
Lymphatic system
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
MatLyLu
Medical research
Metastases
Metastasis
Methods
Neoplasm Transplantation - diagnostic imaging
Neoplasm Transplantation - pathology
Neoplasm Transplantation - veterinary
Organs
Prostate
Prostate cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Prostatic Neoplasms - veterinary
Rats
Rodents
Sheep
Sodium chloride
Tarsus, Animal
Tumor cells
Tumor model
Ultrasonic imaging
title Comparison of hock- and footpad-injection as a prostate adenocarcinoma model in rats
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A12%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20hock-%20and%20footpad-injection%20as%20a%20prostate%20adenocarcinoma%20model%20in%20rats&rft.jtitle=BMC%20veterinary%20research&rft.au=Richter,%20Henning&rft.date=2018-11-06&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=327&rft.epage=327&rft.pages=327-327&rft.artnum=327&rft.issn=1746-6148&rft.eissn=1746-6148&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12917-018-1659-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA567964501%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7d7da49b09ea79e16f0e18ec8eb42ceba5fda4fc4f375d9f399210c1893a993b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2135420617&rft_id=info:pmid/30400793&rft_galeid=A567964501&rfr_iscdi=true