Applying Compressed Sensing Volumetric Interpolated Breath-Hold Examination and Spiral Ultrashort Echo Time Sequences for Lung Nodule Detection in MRI

• Published in: Diagnostics (Basel) 2021-12, Vol.12 (1), p.93
• Main Authors: Huang, Yu-Sen, Niisato, Emi, Su, Mao-Yuan Marine, Benkert, Thomas, Chien, Ning, Chiang, Pin-Yi, Lee, Wen-Jeng, Chen, Jin-Shing, Chang, Yeun-Chung
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cancer; compressed sensing; lung nodule; Magnetic resonance imaging; Morphology; Noise; Patients; Radiation; spiral UTE; Thoracic surgery; VIBE
• ISSN: 2075-4418; 2075-4418
• DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010093

This prospective study aimed to investigate the ability of spiral ultrashort echo time (UTE) and compressed sensing volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (CS-VIBE) sequences in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to conventional VIBE and chest computed tomography (CT) in terms of image quality and small nodule detection. Patients with small lung nodules scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung wedge resection were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent non-contrast chest CT and non-contrast MRI on the same day prior to thoracic surgery. The chest CT was performed to obtain a standard reference for nodule size, location, and morphology. The chest MRI included breath-hold conventional VIBE and CS-VIBE with scanning durations of 11 and 13 s, respectively, and free-breathing spiral UTE for 3.5-5 min. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and normal structure visualizations were measured to evaluate MRI quality. Nodule detection sensitivity was evaluated on a lobe-by-lobe basis. Inter-reader and inter-modality reliability analyses were performed using the Cohen κ statistic and the nodule size comparison was performed using Bland-Altman plots. Among 96 pulmonary nodules requiring surgery, the average nodule diameter was 7.7 ± 3.9 mm (range: 4-20 mm); of the 73 resected nodules, most were invasive cancer (74%) or pre-invasive carcinoma in situ (15%). Both spiral UTE and CS-VIBE images achieved significantly higher overall image quality scores, SNRs, and CNRs than conventional VIBE. Spiral UTE (81%) and CS-VIBE (83%) achieved a higher lung nodule detection rate than conventional VIBE (53%). Specifically, the nodule detection rate for spiral UTE and CS-VIBE reached 95% and 100% for nodules >8 and >10 mm, respectively. A 90% detection rate was achieved for nodules of all sizes with a part-solid or solid morphology. Spiral UTE and CS-VIBE under-estimated the nodule size by 0.2 ± 1.4 mm with 95% limits of agreement from -2.6 to 2.9 mm and by 0.2 ± 1.7 mm with 95% limits of agreement from -3.3 to 3.5 mm, respectively, compared to the reference CT. In conclusion, chest CT remains the gold standard for lung nodule detection due to its high image resolutions. Both spiral UTE and CS-VIBE MRI could detect small lung nodules requiring surgery and could be considered a potential alternative to chest CT; however, their clinical application requires further investigation.