Positive end-expiratory pressure and prone position alter the capacity of force generation from diaphragm in acute respiratory distress syndrome: an animal experiment

• Published in: BMC anesthesiology 2022-12, Vol.22 (1), p.373-373, Article 373
• Main Authors: Firstiogusran, Andi Muhammad Fadlillah, Yoshida, Takeshi, Hashimoto, Haruka, Iwata, Hirofumi, Fujino, Yuji
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal Experimentation; Animal research; Animals; ARDS; Atrophy; Computed tomography; Diaphragm; Diaphragm (Anatomy); Esophagus; Laboratory animals; Lungs; Mechanical ventilation; PEEP; Phrenic nerve; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Pressure; Prone Position; Rabbits; Respiratory distress syndrome; Respiratory Distress Syndrome - therapy; Respiratory system; Spontaneous breathing; Statistical analysis; Variance analysis; Ventilators
• ISSN: 1471-2253; 1471-2253
• DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01921-0

Spontaneous breathing potentially injures lungs and diaphragm when spontaneous effort is vigorous in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) while immobility also has risks of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) acquired weakness and diaphragm atrophy. Thus, ventilatory strategy to mitigate strong spontaneous effort should be promptly established without a systemic use of neuromuscular blocking agent. Here, we investigated the impacts of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and body position on the capacity of force generation from diaphragm following bilateral phrenic nerve stimulations in a rabbit ARDS model. Using lung-injured rabbits, we measured 1) transdiaphragmatic pressure by bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation and 2) end-expiratory lung volume using computed tomography, under two different levels of PEEP (high, low) and body positions (supine, prone). Overall, transdiaphragmatic pressure was the highest at low PEEP in supine position and the lowest at high PEEP in prone position. Compared to values in low PEEP + supine, transdiaphragmatic pressure was significantly reduced by either prone alone (the same PEEP) or increasing PEEP alone (the same position) or both combinations. End-expiratory lung volume was significantly increased with increasing PEEP in both positions, but it was not altered by body position. The capacity of force generation from diaphragm was modulated by PEEP and body position during mechanical ventilation in ARDS. Higher PEEP or prone position per se or both was effective to decrease the force generation from diaphragm.