Loading…
Vulnerability factors of snake bite patients in China
To analyze the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients in China. Multi-stage random sampling was used as the main sampling method and snowball sampling as the auxiliary sampling method. The knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite among Chinese residents were investigated. Non-parametric te...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC public health 2024-06, Vol.24 (1), p.1704-12, Article 1704 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-af9a4fea27a4c6a35c46da78435dd2dd1de090bec2af1a7f488d2feb6e915cdd3 |
container_end_page | 12 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1704 |
container_title | BMC public health |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Hao, Wenjie Lv, Chuanzhu Song, Xingyue He, Lanfen Wang, Juntao Hu, Yanlan Chen, Yu Gan, Yong Yan, Shijiao Han, Xiaotong |
description | To analyze the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients in China.
Multi-stage random sampling was used as the main sampling method and snowball sampling as the auxiliary sampling method. The knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite among Chinese residents were investigated. Non-parametric test was used to compare the percentage differences in residents' knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite, and generalized linear regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors, and the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients were comprehensively analyzed.
A total of 6338 subjects were included in this study, of which 68.4% were males, and 58.6% were farmers, workers and service personnel. The median total score of knowledge, attitude, and behavior was 26 (22,36). The patients who were improperly treated after injury were ligation proximal to the affected area (23.43%), squeezing (21.82%), and oral and suction wounds (8.74%). Did not go to hospital due to poverty (1351 cases) and did not receive antivenom (2068 cases). There were 21.32% and 32.63%, respectively. Among 4270 patients injected with antivenom 30.7% were vaccinated within 2 h. Among the patients who went to the hospital for treatment (4987), 75.0% arrived at the hospital within 6 h; Among the 4,761 patients who made emergency calls, 37.4% were treated within 0.5 h.
Snakebite patients in China have weak knowledge about snakebite, low awareness of medical treatment, lack of correct prevention and emergency treatment measures, dependence on folk remedies, poor housing and so on. In addition, there are low availability of antivenoms and unreasonable distribution of medical resources in some areas of China. Multisectoral and multidisciplinary cooperation should be developed to prevent and control snakebites in order to reduce the burden caused by snakebites. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12889-024-19169-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0501a0b459124b03ae3d6a6d90eba5c5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A799162332</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0501a0b459124b03ae3d6a6d90eba5c5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A799162332</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-af9a4fea27a4c6a35c46da78435dd2dd1de090bec2af1a7f488d2feb6e915cdd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk9vEzEQxVcIREvhC3BAK3HhssV_d-0TqiJaKlXiAlytWXucOmzsYG-Q-u1xklIlCPlga_zez5rxa5q3lFxSqvqPhTKldEeY6Kimve74s-acioF2TEj1_Oh81rwqZUUIHZRkL5szrjTrlVbnjfyxnSJmGMMU5ofWg51TLm3ybYnwE9sxzNhuYA4Y59KG2C7uQ4TXzQsPU8E3j_tF8_3687fFl-7u683t4uqus0LIuQOvQXgENoCwPXBpRe9gUIJL55hz1CHRZETLwFMYvFDKMY9jj5pK6xy_aG4PXJdgZTY5rCE_mATB7AspLw3kOdgJDZGEAhmF1JSJkXBA7nronSY4grSysj4dWJvtuEZna0MZphPo6U0M92aZfhtKGSFqYJXw4ZGQ068tltmsQ7E4TRAxbYvhZGCKMLaXvv9HukrbHOusdirNKNXkSLWE2kGIPtWH7Q5qrgZdv5RxvlNd_kdVl8N1sCmiD7V-YmAHg82plIz-qUlKzC455pAcU5Nj9skxvJreHY_nyfI3KvwPHsi9bQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3079211902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vulnerability factors of snake bite patients in China</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Hao, Wenjie ; Lv, Chuanzhu ; Song, Xingyue ; He, Lanfen ; Wang, Juntao ; Hu, Yanlan ; Chen, Yu ; Gan, Yong ; Yan, Shijiao ; Han, Xiaotong</creator><creatorcontrib>Hao, Wenjie ; Lv, Chuanzhu ; Song, Xingyue ; He, Lanfen ; Wang, Juntao ; Hu, Yanlan ; Chen, Yu ; Gan, Yong ; Yan, Shijiao ; Han, Xiaotong</creatorcontrib><description>To analyze the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients in China.
Multi-stage random sampling was used as the main sampling method and snowball sampling as the auxiliary sampling method. The knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite among Chinese residents were investigated. Non-parametric test was used to compare the percentage differences in residents' knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite, and generalized linear regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors, and the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients were comprehensively analyzed.
A total of 6338 subjects were included in this study, of which 68.4% were males, and 58.6% were farmers, workers and service personnel. The median total score of knowledge, attitude, and behavior was 26 (22,36). The patients who were improperly treated after injury were ligation proximal to the affected area (23.43%), squeezing (21.82%), and oral and suction wounds (8.74%). Did not go to hospital due to poverty (1351 cases) and did not receive antivenom (2068 cases). There were 21.32% and 32.63%, respectively. Among 4270 patients injected with antivenom 30.7% were vaccinated within 2 h. Among the patients who went to the hospital for treatment (4987), 75.0% arrived at the hospital within 6 h; Among the 4,761 patients who made emergency calls, 37.4% were treated within 0.5 h.
Snakebite patients in China have weak knowledge about snakebite, low awareness of medical treatment, lack of correct prevention and emergency treatment measures, dependence on folk remedies, poor housing and so on. In addition, there are low availability of antivenoms and unreasonable distribution of medical resources in some areas of China. Multisectoral and multidisciplinary cooperation should be developed to prevent and control snakebites in order to reduce the burden caused by snakebites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19169-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38926898</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Access to medical resources ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Analysis ; Antivenins - therapeutic use ; Antivenom ; Attitudes ; Biological products ; Bites and stings ; Care and treatment ; China ; China - epidemiology ; Disease ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency medicine ; Fatalities ; Female ; Folk medicine ; Health education ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health literacy ; Health services ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Male ; Medical treatment ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Poverty ; Questionnaires ; Random sampling ; Regression analysis ; Risk Factors ; Sampling methods ; Snake bite ; Snake bites ; Snake Bites - epidemiology ; Snake Bites - therapy ; Snakes ; Software ; Statistical sampling ; Suction ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Vulnerability ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>BMC public health, 2024-06, Vol.24 (1), p.1704-12, Article 1704</ispartof><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-af9a4fea27a4c6a35c46da78435dd2dd1de090bec2af1a7f488d2feb6e915cdd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11200872/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3079211902?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38926898$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hao, Wenjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Chuanzhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Xingyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Lanfen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Juntao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yanlan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Shijiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xiaotong</creatorcontrib><title>Vulnerability factors of snake bite patients in China</title><title>BMC public health</title><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><description>To analyze the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients in China.
Multi-stage random sampling was used as the main sampling method and snowball sampling as the auxiliary sampling method. The knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite among Chinese residents were investigated. Non-parametric test was used to compare the percentage differences in residents' knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite, and generalized linear regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors, and the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients were comprehensively analyzed.
A total of 6338 subjects were included in this study, of which 68.4% were males, and 58.6% were farmers, workers and service personnel. The median total score of knowledge, attitude, and behavior was 26 (22,36). The patients who were improperly treated after injury were ligation proximal to the affected area (23.43%), squeezing (21.82%), and oral and suction wounds (8.74%). Did not go to hospital due to poverty (1351 cases) and did not receive antivenom (2068 cases). There were 21.32% and 32.63%, respectively. Among 4270 patients injected with antivenom 30.7% were vaccinated within 2 h. Among the patients who went to the hospital for treatment (4987), 75.0% arrived at the hospital within 6 h; Among the 4,761 patients who made emergency calls, 37.4% were treated within 0.5 h.
Snakebite patients in China have weak knowledge about snakebite, low awareness of medical treatment, lack of correct prevention and emergency treatment measures, dependence on folk remedies, poor housing and so on. In addition, there are low availability of antivenoms and unreasonable distribution of medical resources in some areas of China. Multisectoral and multidisciplinary cooperation should be developed to prevent and control snakebites in order to reduce the burden caused by snakebites.</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Access to medical resources</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antivenins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antivenom</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Biological products</subject><subject>Bites and stings</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>China - epidemiology</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency medicine</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Folk medicine</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health literacy</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Random sampling</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Snake bite</subject><subject>Snake bites</subject><subject>Snake Bites - epidemiology</subject><subject>Snake Bites - therapy</subject><subject>Snakes</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical sampling</subject><subject>Suction</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1471-2458</issn><issn>1471-2458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk9vEzEQxVcIREvhC3BAK3HhssV_d-0TqiJaKlXiAlytWXucOmzsYG-Q-u1xklIlCPlga_zez5rxa5q3lFxSqvqPhTKldEeY6Kimve74s-acioF2TEj1_Oh81rwqZUUIHZRkL5szrjTrlVbnjfyxnSJmGMMU5ofWg51TLm3ybYnwE9sxzNhuYA4Y59KG2C7uQ4TXzQsPU8E3j_tF8_3687fFl-7u683t4uqus0LIuQOvQXgENoCwPXBpRe9gUIJL55hz1CHRZETLwFMYvFDKMY9jj5pK6xy_aG4PXJdgZTY5rCE_mATB7AspLw3kOdgJDZGEAhmF1JSJkXBA7nronSY4grSysj4dWJvtuEZna0MZphPo6U0M92aZfhtKGSFqYJXw4ZGQ068tltmsQ7E4TRAxbYvhZGCKMLaXvv9HukrbHOusdirNKNXkSLWE2kGIPtWH7Q5qrgZdv5RxvlNd_kdVl8N1sCmiD7V-YmAHg82plIz-qUlKzC455pAcU5Nj9skxvJreHY_nyfI3KvwPHsi9bQ</recordid><startdate>20240626</startdate><enddate>20240626</enddate><creator>Hao, Wenjie</creator><creator>Lv, Chuanzhu</creator><creator>Song, Xingyue</creator><creator>He, Lanfen</creator><creator>Wang, Juntao</creator><creator>Hu, Yanlan</creator><creator>Chen, Yu</creator><creator>Gan, Yong</creator><creator>Yan, Shijiao</creator><creator>Han, Xiaotong</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240626</creationdate><title>Vulnerability factors of snake bite patients in China</title><author>Hao, Wenjie ; Lv, Chuanzhu ; Song, Xingyue ; He, Lanfen ; Wang, Juntao ; Hu, Yanlan ; Chen, Yu ; Gan, Yong ; Yan, Shijiao ; Han, Xiaotong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-af9a4fea27a4c6a35c46da78435dd2dd1de090bec2af1a7f488d2feb6e915cdd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Access to medical resources</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antivenins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antivenom</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Biological products</topic><topic>Bites and stings</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>China - epidemiology</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency medicine</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Folk medicine</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health literacy</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Random sampling</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Snake bite</topic><topic>Snake bites</topic><topic>Snake Bites - epidemiology</topic><topic>Snake Bites - therapy</topic><topic>Snakes</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical sampling</topic><topic>Suction</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hao, Wenjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Chuanzhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Xingyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Lanfen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Juntao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yanlan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Shijiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xiaotong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hao, Wenjie</au><au>Lv, Chuanzhu</au><au>Song, Xingyue</au><au>He, Lanfen</au><au>Wang, Juntao</au><au>Hu, Yanlan</au><au>Chen, Yu</au><au>Gan, Yong</au><au>Yan, Shijiao</au><au>Han, Xiaotong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vulnerability factors of snake bite patients in China</atitle><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><date>2024-06-26</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1704</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1704-12</pages><artnum>1704</artnum><issn>1471-2458</issn><eissn>1471-2458</eissn><abstract>To analyze the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients in China.
Multi-stage random sampling was used as the main sampling method and snowball sampling as the auxiliary sampling method. The knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite among Chinese residents were investigated. Non-parametric test was used to compare the percentage differences in residents' knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite, and generalized linear regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors, and the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients were comprehensively analyzed.
A total of 6338 subjects were included in this study, of which 68.4% were males, and 58.6% were farmers, workers and service personnel. The median total score of knowledge, attitude, and behavior was 26 (22,36). The patients who were improperly treated after injury were ligation proximal to the affected area (23.43%), squeezing (21.82%), and oral and suction wounds (8.74%). Did not go to hospital due to poverty (1351 cases) and did not receive antivenom (2068 cases). There were 21.32% and 32.63%, respectively. Among 4270 patients injected with antivenom 30.7% were vaccinated within 2 h. Among the patients who went to the hospital for treatment (4987), 75.0% arrived at the hospital within 6 h; Among the 4,761 patients who made emergency calls, 37.4% were treated within 0.5 h.
Snakebite patients in China have weak knowledge about snakebite, low awareness of medical treatment, lack of correct prevention and emergency treatment measures, dependence on folk remedies, poor housing and so on. In addition, there are low availability of antivenoms and unreasonable distribution of medical resources in some areas of China. Multisectoral and multidisciplinary cooperation should be developed to prevent and control snakebites in order to reduce the burden caused by snakebites.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>38926898</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12889-024-19169-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2458 |
ispartof | BMC public health, 2024-06, Vol.24 (1), p.1704-12, Article 1704 |
issn | 1471-2458 1471-2458 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0501a0b459124b03ae3d6a6d90eba5c5 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Access to information Access to medical resources Adolescent Adult Aged Analysis Antivenins - therapeutic use Antivenom Attitudes Biological products Bites and stings Care and treatment China China - epidemiology Disease Emergency medical services Emergency medicine Fatalities Female Folk medicine Health education Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Health literacy Health services Hospitals Humans Knowledge Male Medical treatment Middle Aged Patients Poverty Questionnaires Random sampling Regression analysis Risk Factors Sampling methods Snake bite Snake bites Snake Bites - epidemiology Snake Bites - therapy Snakes Software Statistical sampling Suction Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires Vulnerability Young Adult |
title | Vulnerability factors of snake bite patients in China |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T06%3A20%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vulnerability%20factors%20of%20snake%20bite%20patients%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=BMC%20public%20health&rft.au=Hao,%20Wenjie&rft.date=2024-06-26&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1704&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1704-12&rft.artnum=1704&rft.issn=1471-2458&rft.eissn=1471-2458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12889-024-19169-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA799162332%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-af9a4fea27a4c6a35c46da78435dd2dd1de090bec2af1a7f488d2feb6e915cdd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3079211902&rft_id=info:pmid/38926898&rft_galeid=A799162332&rfr_iscdi=true |