Loading…

Vulnerability factors of snake bite patients in China

To analyze the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients in China. Multi-stage random sampling was used as the main sampling method and snowball sampling as the auxiliary sampling method. The knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite among Chinese residents were investigated. Non-parametric te...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC public health 2024-06, Vol.24 (1), p.1704-12, Article 1704
Main Authors: Hao, Wenjie, Lv, Chuanzhu, Song, Xingyue, He, Lanfen, Wang, Juntao, Hu, Yanlan, Chen, Yu, Gan, Yong, Yan, Shijiao, Han, Xiaotong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-af9a4fea27a4c6a35c46da78435dd2dd1de090bec2af1a7f488d2feb6e915cdd3
container_end_page 12
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1704
container_title BMC public health
container_volume 24
creator Hao, Wenjie
Lv, Chuanzhu
Song, Xingyue
He, Lanfen
Wang, Juntao
Hu, Yanlan
Chen, Yu
Gan, Yong
Yan, Shijiao
Han, Xiaotong
description To analyze the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients in China. Multi-stage random sampling was used as the main sampling method and snowball sampling as the auxiliary sampling method. The knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite among Chinese residents were investigated. Non-parametric test was used to compare the percentage differences in residents' knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite, and generalized linear regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors, and the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients were comprehensively analyzed. A total of 6338 subjects were included in this study, of which 68.4% were males, and 58.6% were farmers, workers and service personnel. The median total score of knowledge, attitude, and behavior was 26 (22,36). The patients who were improperly treated after injury were ligation proximal to the affected area (23.43%), squeezing (21.82%), and oral and suction wounds (8.74%). Did not go to hospital due to poverty (1351 cases) and did not receive antivenom (2068 cases). There were 21.32% and 32.63%, respectively. Among 4270 patients injected with antivenom 30.7% were vaccinated within 2 h. Among the patients who went to the hospital for treatment (4987), 75.0% arrived at the hospital within 6 h; Among the 4,761 patients who made emergency calls, 37.4% were treated within 0.5 h. Snakebite patients in China have weak knowledge about snakebite, low awareness of medical treatment, lack of correct prevention and emergency treatment measures, dependence on folk remedies, poor housing and so on. In addition, there are low availability of antivenoms and unreasonable distribution of medical resources in some areas of China. Multisectoral and multidisciplinary cooperation should be developed to prevent and control snakebites in order to reduce the burden caused by snakebites.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12889-024-19169-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0501a0b459124b03ae3d6a6d90eba5c5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A799162332</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0501a0b459124b03ae3d6a6d90eba5c5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A799162332</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-af9a4fea27a4c6a35c46da78435dd2dd1de090bec2af1a7f488d2feb6e915cdd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk9vEzEQxVcIREvhC3BAK3HhssV_d-0TqiJaKlXiAlytWXucOmzsYG-Q-u1xklIlCPlga_zez5rxa5q3lFxSqvqPhTKldEeY6Kimve74s-acioF2TEj1_Oh81rwqZUUIHZRkL5szrjTrlVbnjfyxnSJmGMMU5ofWg51TLm3ybYnwE9sxzNhuYA4Y59KG2C7uQ4TXzQsPU8E3j_tF8_3687fFl-7u683t4uqus0LIuQOvQXgENoCwPXBpRe9gUIJL55hz1CHRZETLwFMYvFDKMY9jj5pK6xy_aG4PXJdgZTY5rCE_mATB7AspLw3kOdgJDZGEAhmF1JSJkXBA7nronSY4grSysj4dWJvtuEZna0MZphPo6U0M92aZfhtKGSFqYJXw4ZGQ068tltmsQ7E4TRAxbYvhZGCKMLaXvv9HukrbHOusdirNKNXkSLWE2kGIPtWH7Q5qrgZdv5RxvlNd_kdVl8N1sCmiD7V-YmAHg82plIz-qUlKzC455pAcU5Nj9skxvJreHY_nyfI3KvwPHsi9bQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3079211902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vulnerability factors of snake bite patients in China</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Hao, Wenjie ; Lv, Chuanzhu ; Song, Xingyue ; He, Lanfen ; Wang, Juntao ; Hu, Yanlan ; Chen, Yu ; Gan, Yong ; Yan, Shijiao ; Han, Xiaotong</creator><creatorcontrib>Hao, Wenjie ; Lv, Chuanzhu ; Song, Xingyue ; He, Lanfen ; Wang, Juntao ; Hu, Yanlan ; Chen, Yu ; Gan, Yong ; Yan, Shijiao ; Han, Xiaotong</creatorcontrib><description>To analyze the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients in China. Multi-stage random sampling was used as the main sampling method and snowball sampling as the auxiliary sampling method. The knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite among Chinese residents were investigated. Non-parametric test was used to compare the percentage differences in residents' knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite, and generalized linear regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors, and the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients were comprehensively analyzed. A total of 6338 subjects were included in this study, of which 68.4% were males, and 58.6% were farmers, workers and service personnel. The median total score of knowledge, attitude, and behavior was 26 (22,36). The patients who were improperly treated after injury were ligation proximal to the affected area (23.43%), squeezing (21.82%), and oral and suction wounds (8.74%). Did not go to hospital due to poverty (1351 cases) and did not receive antivenom (2068 cases). There were 21.32% and 32.63%, respectively. Among 4270 patients injected with antivenom 30.7% were vaccinated within 2 h. Among the patients who went to the hospital for treatment (4987), 75.0% arrived at the hospital within 6 h; Among the 4,761 patients who made emergency calls, 37.4% were treated within 0.5 h. Snakebite patients in China have weak knowledge about snakebite, low awareness of medical treatment, lack of correct prevention and emergency treatment measures, dependence on folk remedies, poor housing and so on. In addition, there are low availability of antivenoms and unreasonable distribution of medical resources in some areas of China. Multisectoral and multidisciplinary cooperation should be developed to prevent and control snakebites in order to reduce the burden caused by snakebites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19169-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38926898</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Access to medical resources ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Analysis ; Antivenins - therapeutic use ; Antivenom ; Attitudes ; Biological products ; Bites and stings ; Care and treatment ; China ; China - epidemiology ; Disease ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency medicine ; Fatalities ; Female ; Folk medicine ; Health education ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health literacy ; Health services ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Male ; Medical treatment ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Poverty ; Questionnaires ; Random sampling ; Regression analysis ; Risk Factors ; Sampling methods ; Snake bite ; Snake bites ; Snake Bites - epidemiology ; Snake Bites - therapy ; Snakes ; Software ; Statistical sampling ; Suction ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Vulnerability ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>BMC public health, 2024-06, Vol.24 (1), p.1704-12, Article 1704</ispartof><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-af9a4fea27a4c6a35c46da78435dd2dd1de090bec2af1a7f488d2feb6e915cdd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11200872/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3079211902?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38926898$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hao, Wenjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Chuanzhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Xingyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Lanfen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Juntao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yanlan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Shijiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xiaotong</creatorcontrib><title>Vulnerability factors of snake bite patients in China</title><title>BMC public health</title><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><description>To analyze the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients in China. Multi-stage random sampling was used as the main sampling method and snowball sampling as the auxiliary sampling method. The knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite among Chinese residents were investigated. Non-parametric test was used to compare the percentage differences in residents' knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite, and generalized linear regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors, and the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients were comprehensively analyzed. A total of 6338 subjects were included in this study, of which 68.4% were males, and 58.6% were farmers, workers and service personnel. The median total score of knowledge, attitude, and behavior was 26 (22,36). The patients who were improperly treated after injury were ligation proximal to the affected area (23.43%), squeezing (21.82%), and oral and suction wounds (8.74%). Did not go to hospital due to poverty (1351 cases) and did not receive antivenom (2068 cases). There were 21.32% and 32.63%, respectively. Among 4270 patients injected with antivenom 30.7% were vaccinated within 2 h. Among the patients who went to the hospital for treatment (4987), 75.0% arrived at the hospital within 6 h; Among the 4,761 patients who made emergency calls, 37.4% were treated within 0.5 h. Snakebite patients in China have weak knowledge about snakebite, low awareness of medical treatment, lack of correct prevention and emergency treatment measures, dependence on folk remedies, poor housing and so on. In addition, there are low availability of antivenoms and unreasonable distribution of medical resources in some areas of China. Multisectoral and multidisciplinary cooperation should be developed to prevent and control snakebites in order to reduce the burden caused by snakebites.</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Access to medical resources</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antivenins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antivenom</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Biological products</subject><subject>Bites and stings</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>China - epidemiology</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency medicine</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Folk medicine</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health literacy</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Random sampling</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Snake bite</subject><subject>Snake bites</subject><subject>Snake Bites - epidemiology</subject><subject>Snake Bites - therapy</subject><subject>Snakes</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical sampling</subject><subject>Suction</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1471-2458</issn><issn>1471-2458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk9vEzEQxVcIREvhC3BAK3HhssV_d-0TqiJaKlXiAlytWXucOmzsYG-Q-u1xklIlCPlga_zez5rxa5q3lFxSqvqPhTKldEeY6Kimve74s-acioF2TEj1_Oh81rwqZUUIHZRkL5szrjTrlVbnjfyxnSJmGMMU5ofWg51TLm3ybYnwE9sxzNhuYA4Y59KG2C7uQ4TXzQsPU8E3j_tF8_3687fFl-7u683t4uqus0LIuQOvQXgENoCwPXBpRe9gUIJL55hz1CHRZETLwFMYvFDKMY9jj5pK6xy_aG4PXJdgZTY5rCE_mATB7AspLw3kOdgJDZGEAhmF1JSJkXBA7nronSY4grSysj4dWJvtuEZna0MZphPo6U0M92aZfhtKGSFqYJXw4ZGQ068tltmsQ7E4TRAxbYvhZGCKMLaXvv9HukrbHOusdirNKNXkSLWE2kGIPtWH7Q5qrgZdv5RxvlNd_kdVl8N1sCmiD7V-YmAHg82plIz-qUlKzC455pAcU5Nj9skxvJreHY_nyfI3KvwPHsi9bQ</recordid><startdate>20240626</startdate><enddate>20240626</enddate><creator>Hao, Wenjie</creator><creator>Lv, Chuanzhu</creator><creator>Song, Xingyue</creator><creator>He, Lanfen</creator><creator>Wang, Juntao</creator><creator>Hu, Yanlan</creator><creator>Chen, Yu</creator><creator>Gan, Yong</creator><creator>Yan, Shijiao</creator><creator>Han, Xiaotong</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240626</creationdate><title>Vulnerability factors of snake bite patients in China</title><author>Hao, Wenjie ; Lv, Chuanzhu ; Song, Xingyue ; He, Lanfen ; Wang, Juntao ; Hu, Yanlan ; Chen, Yu ; Gan, Yong ; Yan, Shijiao ; Han, Xiaotong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-af9a4fea27a4c6a35c46da78435dd2dd1de090bec2af1a7f488d2feb6e915cdd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Access to medical resources</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antivenins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antivenom</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Biological products</topic><topic>Bites and stings</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>China - epidemiology</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency medicine</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Folk medicine</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health literacy</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Random sampling</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Snake bite</topic><topic>Snake bites</topic><topic>Snake Bites - epidemiology</topic><topic>Snake Bites - therapy</topic><topic>Snakes</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical sampling</topic><topic>Suction</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hao, Wenjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Chuanzhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Xingyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Lanfen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Juntao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yanlan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Shijiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xiaotong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hao, Wenjie</au><au>Lv, Chuanzhu</au><au>Song, Xingyue</au><au>He, Lanfen</au><au>Wang, Juntao</au><au>Hu, Yanlan</au><au>Chen, Yu</au><au>Gan, Yong</au><au>Yan, Shijiao</au><au>Han, Xiaotong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vulnerability factors of snake bite patients in China</atitle><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><date>2024-06-26</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1704</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1704-12</pages><artnum>1704</artnum><issn>1471-2458</issn><eissn>1471-2458</eissn><abstract>To analyze the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients in China. Multi-stage random sampling was used as the main sampling method and snowball sampling as the auxiliary sampling method. The knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite among Chinese residents were investigated. Non-parametric test was used to compare the percentage differences in residents' knowledge, attitude and behavior of snakebite, and generalized linear regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors, and the vulnerability factors of snakebite patients were comprehensively analyzed. A total of 6338 subjects were included in this study, of which 68.4% were males, and 58.6% were farmers, workers and service personnel. The median total score of knowledge, attitude, and behavior was 26 (22,36). The patients who were improperly treated after injury were ligation proximal to the affected area (23.43%), squeezing (21.82%), and oral and suction wounds (8.74%). Did not go to hospital due to poverty (1351 cases) and did not receive antivenom (2068 cases). There were 21.32% and 32.63%, respectively. Among 4270 patients injected with antivenom 30.7% were vaccinated within 2 h. Among the patients who went to the hospital for treatment (4987), 75.0% arrived at the hospital within 6 h; Among the 4,761 patients who made emergency calls, 37.4% were treated within 0.5 h. Snakebite patients in China have weak knowledge about snakebite, low awareness of medical treatment, lack of correct prevention and emergency treatment measures, dependence on folk remedies, poor housing and so on. In addition, there are low availability of antivenoms and unreasonable distribution of medical resources in some areas of China. Multisectoral and multidisciplinary cooperation should be developed to prevent and control snakebites in order to reduce the burden caused by snakebites.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>38926898</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12889-024-19169-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2458
ispartof BMC public health, 2024-06, Vol.24 (1), p.1704-12, Article 1704
issn 1471-2458
1471-2458
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0501a0b459124b03ae3d6a6d90eba5c5
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Access to information
Access to medical resources
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Analysis
Antivenins - therapeutic use
Antivenom
Attitudes
Biological products
Bites and stings
Care and treatment
China
China - epidemiology
Disease
Emergency medical services
Emergency medicine
Fatalities
Female
Folk medicine
Health education
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health literacy
Health services
Hospitals
Humans
Knowledge
Male
Medical treatment
Middle Aged
Patients
Poverty
Questionnaires
Random sampling
Regression analysis
Risk Factors
Sampling methods
Snake bite
Snake bites
Snake Bites - epidemiology
Snake Bites - therapy
Snakes
Software
Statistical sampling
Suction
Surveys
Surveys and Questionnaires
Vulnerability
Young Adult
title Vulnerability factors of snake bite patients in China
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T06%3A20%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vulnerability%20factors%20of%20snake%20bite%20patients%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=BMC%20public%20health&rft.au=Hao,%20Wenjie&rft.date=2024-06-26&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1704&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1704-12&rft.artnum=1704&rft.issn=1471-2458&rft.eissn=1471-2458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12889-024-19169-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA799162332%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-af9a4fea27a4c6a35c46da78435dd2dd1de090bec2af1a7f488d2feb6e915cdd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3079211902&rft_id=info:pmid/38926898&rft_galeid=A799162332&rfr_iscdi=true