Loading…

Shining a light on fluorescent EV dyes: Evaluating efficacy, specificity and suitability by nano‐flow cytometry

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are mediators of intercellular communication, recently recognised for their clinical applications. Accurate characterisation and quantification of EVs are critical for understanding of their function and clinical relevance. Many platforms utilise fluorescence for EV char...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of extracellular biology 2024-10, Vol.3 (10), p.e70006-n/a
Main Authors: Brealey, Joseph, Lees, Rebecca, Tempest, Robert, Law, Alice, Guarnerio, Sonia, Maani, Rawan, Puvanenthiran, Soozana, Peake, Nick, Pink, Ryan, Peacock, Ben
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2916-be4586ccfe65a6444677f125a6a4ad18918f7eee2897ee57f51f289f75c9c35b3
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 10
container_start_page e70006
container_title Journal of extracellular biology
container_volume 3
creator Brealey, Joseph
Lees, Rebecca
Tempest, Robert
Law, Alice
Guarnerio, Sonia
Maani, Rawan
Puvanenthiran, Soozana
Peake, Nick
Pink, Ryan
Peacock, Ben
description Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are mediators of intercellular communication, recently recognised for their clinical applications. Accurate characterisation and quantification of EVs are critical for understanding of their function and clinical relevance. Many platforms utilise fluorescence for EV characterisation, frequently labelling surface proteins to identify EVs. The heterogeneity of EVs and the lack of a universal protein marker encourages the use of generic EV labelling methods, including membrane labelling. Using nano‐flow cytometry, we evaluated six membrane dyes, including MemGlow and CellMask. Evaluation criteria included EV labelling efficacy, non‐specific labelling of very low‐density lipoproteins (VLDLs), brightness and dye aggregation. Significant variation was observed in dye performance, with certain dyes showing poor EV labelling efficacy or high affinity to VLDLs. Importantly, several promising candidates were identified for further investigation. Overall, this study highlights the importance of selecting appropriate membrane dyes for EV staining tailored to the aims of the study and the EV origin. MemGlow and CellMask proved favourable, allowing bright, sensitive staining of EV membranes with minimal aggregation. However, MemGlow showed an affinity to VLDLs, and CellMask requires additional sample handling for optimal labelling. These results contribute to deepening our understanding of EV membrane dyes, allowing for better dye selection and EV identification in future studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jex2.70006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_057b5b96544244939118a46a6bf6896e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_057b5b96544244939118a46a6bf6896e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3116337856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2916-be4586ccfe65a6444677f125a6a4ad18918f7eee2897ee57f51f289f75c9c35b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQhyMEolXphQdAPiLEltixnZgLqqoFiipx4I-4WRPveNcrb7y1k5bceASekSfBaUrVXjjN2P70eTS_onhOyxNaluzNFn-yk7osS_moOGS1bBasofTxvf6gOE5pmwmmaKWYeFocVKpSiil-WFx-2bjOdWsCxLv1piehI9YPIWIy2PVk-Z2sRkxvyfIK_AD9hKK1zoAZX5O0R-PywfUjgW5F0uB6aJ2fzu1IOujCn1-_rQ_XxIx92GEfx2fFEws-4fFtPSq-vV9-Pfu4uPj84fzs9GJh8pxy0SIXjTTGohQgOeeyri1luQcOK9oo2tgaEVmjchG1FdTm3tbCKFOJtjoqzmfvKsBW76PbQRx1AKdvLkJca4i9Mx51KepWtEoKzhnneTeUNsAlyNbKRknMrnezaz-0O1xNm4ngH0gfvnRuo9fhSlPKs1WIbHh5a4jhcsDU653LG_YeOgxD0hWlsqrqRsiMvppRE0NKEe3dP7TUU-Z6ylzfZJ7hF_cnu0P_JZwBOgPXzuP4H5X-tPzBZulfIDC4ZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3116337856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shining a light on fluorescent EV dyes: Evaluating efficacy, specificity and suitability by nano‐flow cytometry</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Brealey, Joseph ; Lees, Rebecca ; Tempest, Robert ; Law, Alice ; Guarnerio, Sonia ; Maani, Rawan ; Puvanenthiran, Soozana ; Peake, Nick ; Pink, Ryan ; Peacock, Ben</creator><creatorcontrib>Brealey, Joseph ; Lees, Rebecca ; Tempest, Robert ; Law, Alice ; Guarnerio, Sonia ; Maani, Rawan ; Puvanenthiran, Soozana ; Peake, Nick ; Pink, Ryan ; Peacock, Ben</creatorcontrib><description>Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are mediators of intercellular communication, recently recognised for their clinical applications. Accurate characterisation and quantification of EVs are critical for understanding of their function and clinical relevance. Many platforms utilise fluorescence for EV characterisation, frequently labelling surface proteins to identify EVs. The heterogeneity of EVs and the lack of a universal protein marker encourages the use of generic EV labelling methods, including membrane labelling. Using nano‐flow cytometry, we evaluated six membrane dyes, including MemGlow and CellMask. Evaluation criteria included EV labelling efficacy, non‐specific labelling of very low‐density lipoproteins (VLDLs), brightness and dye aggregation. Significant variation was observed in dye performance, with certain dyes showing poor EV labelling efficacy or high affinity to VLDLs. Importantly, several promising candidates were identified for further investigation. Overall, this study highlights the importance of selecting appropriate membrane dyes for EV staining tailored to the aims of the study and the EV origin. MemGlow and CellMask proved favourable, allowing bright, sensitive staining of EV membranes with minimal aggregation. However, MemGlow showed an affinity to VLDLs, and CellMask requires additional sample handling for optimal labelling. These results contribute to deepening our understanding of EV membrane dyes, allowing for better dye selection and EV identification in future studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2768-2811</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2768-2811</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jex2.70006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39399294</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley and Sons Inc</publisher><subject>brightness ; extracellular vesicles (EVs) ; fluorescent labelling ; membrane dyes ; nano‐flow cytometry ; single particle characterisation ; specificity</subject><ispartof>Journal of extracellular biology, 2024-10, Vol.3 (10), p.e70006-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 NanoFCM Co., Ltd. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Extracellular Vesicles.</rights><rights>2024 NanoFCM Co., Ltd. Journal of Extracellular Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Extracellular Vesicles.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2916-be4586ccfe65a6444677f125a6a4ad18918f7eee2897ee57f51f289f75c9c35b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7823-8719 ; 0000-0002-3013-9375 ; 0000-0001-7501-558X ; 0000-0001-5682-2642</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465455/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465455/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11562,27924,27925,37013,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39399294$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brealey, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lees, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tempest, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarnerio, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maani, Rawan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puvanenthiran, Soozana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peake, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pink, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Ben</creatorcontrib><title>Shining a light on fluorescent EV dyes: Evaluating efficacy, specificity and suitability by nano‐flow cytometry</title><title>Journal of extracellular biology</title><addtitle>J Extracell Biol</addtitle><description>Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are mediators of intercellular communication, recently recognised for their clinical applications. Accurate characterisation and quantification of EVs are critical for understanding of their function and clinical relevance. Many platforms utilise fluorescence for EV characterisation, frequently labelling surface proteins to identify EVs. The heterogeneity of EVs and the lack of a universal protein marker encourages the use of generic EV labelling methods, including membrane labelling. Using nano‐flow cytometry, we evaluated six membrane dyes, including MemGlow and CellMask. Evaluation criteria included EV labelling efficacy, non‐specific labelling of very low‐density lipoproteins (VLDLs), brightness and dye aggregation. Significant variation was observed in dye performance, with certain dyes showing poor EV labelling efficacy or high affinity to VLDLs. Importantly, several promising candidates were identified for further investigation. Overall, this study highlights the importance of selecting appropriate membrane dyes for EV staining tailored to the aims of the study and the EV origin. MemGlow and CellMask proved favourable, allowing bright, sensitive staining of EV membranes with minimal aggregation. However, MemGlow showed an affinity to VLDLs, and CellMask requires additional sample handling for optimal labelling. These results contribute to deepening our understanding of EV membrane dyes, allowing for better dye selection and EV identification in future studies.</description><subject>brightness</subject><subject>extracellular vesicles (EVs)</subject><subject>fluorescent labelling</subject><subject>membrane dyes</subject><subject>nano‐flow cytometry</subject><subject>single particle characterisation</subject><subject>specificity</subject><issn>2768-2811</issn><issn>2768-2811</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQhyMEolXphQdAPiLEltixnZgLqqoFiipx4I-4WRPveNcrb7y1k5bceASekSfBaUrVXjjN2P70eTS_onhOyxNaluzNFn-yk7osS_moOGS1bBasofTxvf6gOE5pmwmmaKWYeFocVKpSiil-WFx-2bjOdWsCxLv1piehI9YPIWIy2PVk-Z2sRkxvyfIK_AD9hKK1zoAZX5O0R-PywfUjgW5F0uB6aJ2fzu1IOujCn1-_rQ_XxIx92GEfx2fFEws-4fFtPSq-vV9-Pfu4uPj84fzs9GJh8pxy0SIXjTTGohQgOeeyri1luQcOK9oo2tgaEVmjchG1FdTm3tbCKFOJtjoqzmfvKsBW76PbQRx1AKdvLkJca4i9Mx51KepWtEoKzhnneTeUNsAlyNbKRknMrnezaz-0O1xNm4ngH0gfvnRuo9fhSlPKs1WIbHh5a4jhcsDU653LG_YeOgxD0hWlsqrqRsiMvppRE0NKEe3dP7TUU-Z6ylzfZJ7hF_cnu0P_JZwBOgPXzuP4H5X-tPzBZulfIDC4ZA</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Brealey, Joseph</creator><creator>Lees, Rebecca</creator><creator>Tempest, Robert</creator><creator>Law, Alice</creator><creator>Guarnerio, Sonia</creator><creator>Maani, Rawan</creator><creator>Puvanenthiran, Soozana</creator><creator>Peake, Nick</creator><creator>Pink, Ryan</creator><creator>Peacock, Ben</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7823-8719</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3013-9375</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7501-558X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5682-2642</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Shining a light on fluorescent EV dyes: Evaluating efficacy, specificity and suitability by nano‐flow cytometry</title><author>Brealey, Joseph ; Lees, Rebecca ; Tempest, Robert ; Law, Alice ; Guarnerio, Sonia ; Maani, Rawan ; Puvanenthiran, Soozana ; Peake, Nick ; Pink, Ryan ; Peacock, Ben</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2916-be4586ccfe65a6444677f125a6a4ad18918f7eee2897ee57f51f289f75c9c35b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>brightness</topic><topic>extracellular vesicles (EVs)</topic><topic>fluorescent labelling</topic><topic>membrane dyes</topic><topic>nano‐flow cytometry</topic><topic>single particle characterisation</topic><topic>specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brealey, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lees, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tempest, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarnerio, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maani, Rawan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puvanenthiran, Soozana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peake, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pink, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Ben</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Backfiles (Open access)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of extracellular biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brealey, Joseph</au><au>Lees, Rebecca</au><au>Tempest, Robert</au><au>Law, Alice</au><au>Guarnerio, Sonia</au><au>Maani, Rawan</au><au>Puvanenthiran, Soozana</au><au>Peake, Nick</au><au>Pink, Ryan</au><au>Peacock, Ben</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shining a light on fluorescent EV dyes: Evaluating efficacy, specificity and suitability by nano‐flow cytometry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of extracellular biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Extracell Biol</addtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e70006</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e70006-n/a</pages><issn>2768-2811</issn><eissn>2768-2811</eissn><abstract>Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are mediators of intercellular communication, recently recognised for their clinical applications. Accurate characterisation and quantification of EVs are critical for understanding of their function and clinical relevance. Many platforms utilise fluorescence for EV characterisation, frequently labelling surface proteins to identify EVs. The heterogeneity of EVs and the lack of a universal protein marker encourages the use of generic EV labelling methods, including membrane labelling. Using nano‐flow cytometry, we evaluated six membrane dyes, including MemGlow and CellMask. Evaluation criteria included EV labelling efficacy, non‐specific labelling of very low‐density lipoproteins (VLDLs), brightness and dye aggregation. Significant variation was observed in dye performance, with certain dyes showing poor EV labelling efficacy or high affinity to VLDLs. Importantly, several promising candidates were identified for further investigation. Overall, this study highlights the importance of selecting appropriate membrane dyes for EV staining tailored to the aims of the study and the EV origin. MemGlow and CellMask proved favourable, allowing bright, sensitive staining of EV membranes with minimal aggregation. However, MemGlow showed an affinity to VLDLs, and CellMask requires additional sample handling for optimal labelling. These results contribute to deepening our understanding of EV membrane dyes, allowing for better dye selection and EV identification in future studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons Inc</pub><pmid>39399294</pmid><doi>10.1002/jex2.70006</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7823-8719</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3013-9375</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7501-558X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5682-2642</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2768-2811
ispartof Journal of extracellular biology, 2024-10, Vol.3 (10), p.e70006-n/a
issn 2768-2811
2768-2811
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_057b5b96544244939118a46a6bf6896e
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals; PubMed Central
subjects brightness
extracellular vesicles (EVs)
fluorescent labelling
membrane dyes
nano‐flow cytometry
single particle characterisation
specificity
title Shining a light on fluorescent EV dyes: Evaluating efficacy, specificity and suitability by nano‐flow cytometry
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A28%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shining%20a%20light%20on%20fluorescent%20EV%20dyes:%20Evaluating%20efficacy,%20specificity%20and%20suitability%20by%20nano%E2%80%90flow%20cytometry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20extracellular%20biology&rft.au=Brealey,%20Joseph&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e70006&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e70006-n/a&rft.issn=2768-2811&rft.eissn=2768-2811&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jex2.70006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3116337856%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2916-be4586ccfe65a6444677f125a6a4ad18918f7eee2897ee57f51f289f75c9c35b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3116337856&rft_id=info:pmid/39399294&rfr_iscdi=true