Loading…

Assessing the suitability of cell counting methods during different stages of a cell processing workflow using an ISO 20391-2 guided study design and analysis

Cell counting is a fundamental measurement for determining viable cell numbers in biomanufacturing processes. The properties of different cell types and the range of intended uses for cell counts within a biomanufacturing process can lead to challenges in identifying suitable counting methods for ea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology 2023-08, Vol.11, p.1223227-1223227
Main Authors: Richards, Colleen, Sarkar, Sumona, Kandell, Jennifer, Snyder, Richard, Lakshmipathy, Uma
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-412f42cdfba8c22f914354b5e0c30e0288c33983d3ae1796ac8995737da8fa363
container_end_page 1223227
container_issue
container_start_page 1223227
container_title Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology
container_volume 11
creator Richards, Colleen
Sarkar, Sumona
Kandell, Jennifer
Snyder, Richard
Lakshmipathy, Uma
description Cell counting is a fundamental measurement for determining viable cell numbers in biomanufacturing processes. The properties of different cell types and the range of intended uses for cell counts within a biomanufacturing process can lead to challenges in identifying suitable counting methods for each potential application. This is further amplified by user subjectivity in identifying the cells of interest and further identifying viable cells. Replacement of traditionally used manual counting methods with automated systems has alleviated some of these issues. However, a single cell type can exhibit different physical properties at various stages of cell processing which is further compounded by process impurities such as cell debris or magnetic beads. These factors make it challenging to develop a robust cell counting method that offers a high level of confidence in the results. Several initiatives from standards development organizations have attempted to address this critical need for standardization in cell counting. This study utilizes flow-based and image-based methods for the quantitative measurement of cell concentration and viability in the absence of a reference material, based on the tools and guidance provided by the International of Standards (ISO) and the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Primary cells were examined at different stages of cell processing in a cell therapy workflow. Results from this study define a systematic approach that enables the identification of counting methods and parameters that are best suited for specific cell types and workflows to ensure accuracy and consistency. Cell counting is a foundational method used extensively along various steps of cell and gene therapy. The standard used in this study may be applied to other cell and gene therapy processes to enable accurate measurement of parameters required to guide critical decisions throughout the development and production process. Using a framework that confirms the suitability of the cell counting method used can minimize variability in the process and final product.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1223227
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_06318fe024134b71aaa1459f5d12ef77</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_06318fe024134b71aaa1459f5d12ef77</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2854349031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-412f42cdfba8c22f914354b5e0c30e0288c33983d3ae1796ac8995737da8fa363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkk1vGyEQhldVKzVK8wd64tiLXRhYL5yqKOqHpUg5tD2jWT7WpOvFBbaR_0x-a1nbqpoDgmHeeRAzb9O8Z3TNuVQffR-iWwMFvmYAHKB71VwBqM1KMNm-_u_8trnJ-ZFSyqDtWglXzfNtzi7nMA2k7BzJcyjYhzGUI4meGDeOxMR5Kotg78ou2kzsnJbQBu9dclMhueDg8lKA55JDiuZCfYrplx_jE5lPIU5k-_2BAOWKrYAMc7DOVsBsj8S6HIapSmxdOB5zyO-aNx7H7G4u-3Xz88vnH3ffVvcPX7d3t_crw1VX6t_ACzDW9ygNgFdM8Fb0raOGU0dBSsO5ktxydKxTGzRSqbbjnUXpkW_4dbM9c23ER31IYY_pqCMGfbqIadCYSjCj03TDmfQVKhgXfccQkYlW-dYycL7rKuvTmXWY-72zpnYo4fgC-jIzhZ0e4h_NqKjjFKoSPlwIKf6eXS56H_LSWJxcnLMG2QouFOWsSuEsNSnmnJz_9w6jenGHPrlDL-7QF3fwv4pssKo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2854349031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the suitability of cell counting methods during different stages of a cell processing workflow using an ISO 20391-2 guided study design and analysis</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Richards, Colleen ; Sarkar, Sumona ; Kandell, Jennifer ; Snyder, Richard ; Lakshmipathy, Uma</creator><creatorcontrib>Richards, Colleen ; Sarkar, Sumona ; Kandell, Jennifer ; Snyder, Richard ; Lakshmipathy, Uma</creatorcontrib><description>Cell counting is a fundamental measurement for determining viable cell numbers in biomanufacturing processes. The properties of different cell types and the range of intended uses for cell counts within a biomanufacturing process can lead to challenges in identifying suitable counting methods for each potential application. This is further amplified by user subjectivity in identifying the cells of interest and further identifying viable cells. Replacement of traditionally used manual counting methods with automated systems has alleviated some of these issues. However, a single cell type can exhibit different physical properties at various stages of cell processing which is further compounded by process impurities such as cell debris or magnetic beads. These factors make it challenging to develop a robust cell counting method that offers a high level of confidence in the results. Several initiatives from standards development organizations have attempted to address this critical need for standardization in cell counting. This study utilizes flow-based and image-based methods for the quantitative measurement of cell concentration and viability in the absence of a reference material, based on the tools and guidance provided by the International of Standards (ISO) and the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Primary cells were examined at different stages of cell processing in a cell therapy workflow. Results from this study define a systematic approach that enables the identification of counting methods and parameters that are best suited for specific cell types and workflows to ensure accuracy and consistency. Cell counting is a foundational method used extensively along various steps of cell and gene therapy. The standard used in this study may be applied to other cell and gene therapy processes to enable accurate measurement of parameters required to guide critical decisions throughout the development and production process. Using a framework that confirms the suitability of the cell counting method used can minimize variability in the process and final product.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2296-4185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2296-4185</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1223227</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>Bioengineering and Biotechnology ; biomanufacturing ; cell count ; cell processing ; cell therapy ; gene therapy ; viability</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023-08, Vol.11, p.1223227-1223227</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Richards, Sarkar, Kandell, Snyder and Lakshmipathy. 2023 Richards, Sarkar, Kandell, Snyder and Lakshmipathy</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-412f42cdfba8c22f914354b5e0c30e0288c33983d3ae1796ac8995737da8fa363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438949/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438949/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richards, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Sumona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandell, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakshmipathy, Uma</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the suitability of cell counting methods during different stages of a cell processing workflow using an ISO 20391-2 guided study design and analysis</title><title>Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology</title><description>Cell counting is a fundamental measurement for determining viable cell numbers in biomanufacturing processes. The properties of different cell types and the range of intended uses for cell counts within a biomanufacturing process can lead to challenges in identifying suitable counting methods for each potential application. This is further amplified by user subjectivity in identifying the cells of interest and further identifying viable cells. Replacement of traditionally used manual counting methods with automated systems has alleviated some of these issues. However, a single cell type can exhibit different physical properties at various stages of cell processing which is further compounded by process impurities such as cell debris or magnetic beads. These factors make it challenging to develop a robust cell counting method that offers a high level of confidence in the results. Several initiatives from standards development organizations have attempted to address this critical need for standardization in cell counting. This study utilizes flow-based and image-based methods for the quantitative measurement of cell concentration and viability in the absence of a reference material, based on the tools and guidance provided by the International of Standards (ISO) and the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Primary cells were examined at different stages of cell processing in a cell therapy workflow. Results from this study define a systematic approach that enables the identification of counting methods and parameters that are best suited for specific cell types and workflows to ensure accuracy and consistency. Cell counting is a foundational method used extensively along various steps of cell and gene therapy. The standard used in this study may be applied to other cell and gene therapy processes to enable accurate measurement of parameters required to guide critical decisions throughout the development and production process. Using a framework that confirms the suitability of the cell counting method used can minimize variability in the process and final product.</description><subject>Bioengineering and Biotechnology</subject><subject>biomanufacturing</subject><subject>cell count</subject><subject>cell processing</subject><subject>cell therapy</subject><subject>gene therapy</subject><subject>viability</subject><issn>2296-4185</issn><issn>2296-4185</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkk1vGyEQhldVKzVK8wd64tiLXRhYL5yqKOqHpUg5tD2jWT7WpOvFBbaR_0x-a1nbqpoDgmHeeRAzb9O8Z3TNuVQffR-iWwMFvmYAHKB71VwBqM1KMNm-_u_8trnJ-ZFSyqDtWglXzfNtzi7nMA2k7BzJcyjYhzGUI4meGDeOxMR5Kotg78ou2kzsnJbQBu9dclMhueDg8lKA55JDiuZCfYrplx_jE5lPIU5k-_2BAOWKrYAMc7DOVsBsj8S6HIapSmxdOB5zyO-aNx7H7G4u-3Xz88vnH3ffVvcPX7d3t_crw1VX6t_ACzDW9ygNgFdM8Fb0raOGU0dBSsO5ktxydKxTGzRSqbbjnUXpkW_4dbM9c23ER31IYY_pqCMGfbqIadCYSjCj03TDmfQVKhgXfccQkYlW-dYycL7rKuvTmXWY-72zpnYo4fgC-jIzhZ0e4h_NqKjjFKoSPlwIKf6eXS56H_LSWJxcnLMG2QouFOWsSuEsNSnmnJz_9w6jenGHPrlDL-7QF3fwv4pssKo</recordid><startdate>20230803</startdate><enddate>20230803</enddate><creator>Richards, Colleen</creator><creator>Sarkar, Sumona</creator><creator>Kandell, Jennifer</creator><creator>Snyder, Richard</creator><creator>Lakshmipathy, Uma</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230803</creationdate><title>Assessing the suitability of cell counting methods during different stages of a cell processing workflow using an ISO 20391-2 guided study design and analysis</title><author>Richards, Colleen ; Sarkar, Sumona ; Kandell, Jennifer ; Snyder, Richard ; Lakshmipathy, Uma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-412f42cdfba8c22f914354b5e0c30e0288c33983d3ae1796ac8995737da8fa363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bioengineering and Biotechnology</topic><topic>biomanufacturing</topic><topic>cell count</topic><topic>cell processing</topic><topic>cell therapy</topic><topic>gene therapy</topic><topic>viability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richards, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Sumona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandell, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakshmipathy, Uma</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richards, Colleen</au><au>Sarkar, Sumona</au><au>Kandell, Jennifer</au><au>Snyder, Richard</au><au>Lakshmipathy, Uma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the suitability of cell counting methods during different stages of a cell processing workflow using an ISO 20391-2 guided study design and analysis</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology</jtitle><date>2023-08-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>1223227</spage><epage>1223227</epage><pages>1223227-1223227</pages><issn>2296-4185</issn><eissn>2296-4185</eissn><abstract>Cell counting is a fundamental measurement for determining viable cell numbers in biomanufacturing processes. The properties of different cell types and the range of intended uses for cell counts within a biomanufacturing process can lead to challenges in identifying suitable counting methods for each potential application. This is further amplified by user subjectivity in identifying the cells of interest and further identifying viable cells. Replacement of traditionally used manual counting methods with automated systems has alleviated some of these issues. However, a single cell type can exhibit different physical properties at various stages of cell processing which is further compounded by process impurities such as cell debris or magnetic beads. These factors make it challenging to develop a robust cell counting method that offers a high level of confidence in the results. Several initiatives from standards development organizations have attempted to address this critical need for standardization in cell counting. This study utilizes flow-based and image-based methods for the quantitative measurement of cell concentration and viability in the absence of a reference material, based on the tools and guidance provided by the International of Standards (ISO) and the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Primary cells were examined at different stages of cell processing in a cell therapy workflow. Results from this study define a systematic approach that enables the identification of counting methods and parameters that are best suited for specific cell types and workflows to ensure accuracy and consistency. Cell counting is a foundational method used extensively along various steps of cell and gene therapy. The standard used in this study may be applied to other cell and gene therapy processes to enable accurate measurement of parameters required to guide critical decisions throughout the development and production process. Using a framework that confirms the suitability of the cell counting method used can minimize variability in the process and final product.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><doi>10.3389/fbioe.2023.1223227</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2296-4185
ispartof Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023-08, Vol.11, p.1223227-1223227
issn 2296-4185
2296-4185
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_06318fe024134b71aaa1459f5d12ef77
source Open Access: PubMed Central
subjects Bioengineering and Biotechnology
biomanufacturing
cell count
cell processing
cell therapy
gene therapy
viability
title Assessing the suitability of cell counting methods during different stages of a cell processing workflow using an ISO 20391-2 guided study design and analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A12%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20suitability%20of%20cell%20counting%20methods%20during%20different%20stages%20of%20a%20cell%20processing%20workflow%20using%20an%20ISO%2020391-2%20guided%20study%20design%20and%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20bioengineering%20and%20biotechnology&rft.au=Richards,%20Colleen&rft.date=2023-08-03&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=1223227&rft.epage=1223227&rft.pages=1223227-1223227&rft.issn=2296-4185&rft.eissn=2296-4185&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1223227&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2854349031%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-412f42cdfba8c22f914354b5e0c30e0288c33983d3ae1796ac8995737da8fa363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2854349031&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true