Loading…

Assessing MR-compatibility of somatosensory stimulation devices: A systematic review on testing methodologies

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been extensively used as a tool to map the brain processes related to somatosensory stimulation. This mapping includes the localization of task-related brain activation and the characterization of brain activity dynamics and neural circuitries related...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in neuroscience 2023-01, Vol.17, p.1071749-1071749
Main Authors: Travassos, Carolina, Sayal, Alexandre, Direito, Bruno, Pereira, João, Sousa, Teresa, Castelo-Branco, Miguel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-700bd53c557235ab97473919677d0ed3868bd8eeaab09ec5ea63ea760975b88c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-700bd53c557235ab97473919677d0ed3868bd8eeaab09ec5ea63ea760975b88c3
container_end_page 1071749
container_issue
container_start_page 1071749
container_title Frontiers in neuroscience
container_volume 17
creator Travassos, Carolina
Sayal, Alexandre
Direito, Bruno
Pereira, João
Sousa, Teresa
Castelo-Branco, Miguel
description Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been extensively used as a tool to map the brain processes related to somatosensory stimulation. This mapping includes the localization of task-related brain activation and the characterization of brain activity dynamics and neural circuitries related to the processing of somatosensory information. However, the magnetic resonance (MR) environment presents unique challenges regarding participant and equipment safety and compatibility. This study aims to systematically review and analyze the state-of-the-art methodologies to assess the safety and compatibility of somatosensory stimulation devices in the MR environment. A literature search, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines, was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to find original research on the development and testing of devices for somatosensory stimulation in the MR environment. Nineteen records that complied with the inclusion and eligibility criteria were considered. The findings are discussed in the context of the existing international standards available for the safety and compatibility assessment of devices intended to be used in the MR environment. In sum, the results provided evidence for a lack of uniformity in the applied testing methodologies, as well as an in-depth presentation of the testing methodologies and results. Lastly, we suggest an assessment methodology (safety, compatibility, performance, and user acceptability) that can be applied to devices intended to be used in the MR environment. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021257838.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fnins.2023.1071749
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0634667ac9674edeaf43bfe64b4e6fd3</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0634667ac9674edeaf43bfe64b4e6fd3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2775953939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-700bd53c557235ab97473919677d0ed3868bd8eeaab09ec5ea63ea760975b88c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1r3DAQhkVpaJJt_0APxcdevJUtWR89FJbQNoGEQmmhN6GP8UbBtrYab8r--yjZ7ZKgg8TMO8-86CXkfUOXjCn9qZ_ihMuWtmzZUNlIrl-Rs0aItuYd-_P6-ObqlJwj3lEqWsXbN-SUCSmlYOKMjCtEQIzTurr5Wfs0buwcXRzivKtSX2Ea7ZwQJkx5V-Ecx-1QBGmqAtxHD_i5WlW4wxmKLvoqlyr8q0p_hqIu1BHm2xTSkNYR8C056e2A8O5wL8jvb19_XVzW1z--X12srmvPhZprSakLHfNdJ1vWWacll0w3urgOFAJTQrmgAKx1VIPvwAoGVgqqZeeU8mxBrvbckOyd2eQ42rwzyUbzVEh5bWwufgcwVDAuhLS-0DkEsD1nrgfBHQfRB1ZYX_aszdaNEDxMc7bDC-jLzhRvzTrdG61p8UwL4OMBkNPfbfkWM0b0MAx2grRF00rZ6Y7pchak3Ut9TogZ-uOahprHzM1T5uYxc3PIvAx9eG7wOPI_ZPYARU-tQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2775953939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing MR-compatibility of somatosensory stimulation devices: A systematic review on testing methodologies</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Travassos, Carolina ; Sayal, Alexandre ; Direito, Bruno ; Pereira, João ; Sousa, Teresa ; Castelo-Branco, Miguel</creator><creatorcontrib>Travassos, Carolina ; Sayal, Alexandre ; Direito, Bruno ; Pereira, João ; Sousa, Teresa ; Castelo-Branco, Miguel</creatorcontrib><description>Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been extensively used as a tool to map the brain processes related to somatosensory stimulation. This mapping includes the localization of task-related brain activation and the characterization of brain activity dynamics and neural circuitries related to the processing of somatosensory information. However, the magnetic resonance (MR) environment presents unique challenges regarding participant and equipment safety and compatibility. This study aims to systematically review and analyze the state-of-the-art methodologies to assess the safety and compatibility of somatosensory stimulation devices in the MR environment. A literature search, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines, was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to find original research on the development and testing of devices for somatosensory stimulation in the MR environment. Nineteen records that complied with the inclusion and eligibility criteria were considered. The findings are discussed in the context of the existing international standards available for the safety and compatibility assessment of devices intended to be used in the MR environment. In sum, the results provided evidence for a lack of uniformity in the applied testing methodologies, as well as an in-depth presentation of the testing methodologies and results. Lastly, we suggest an assessment methodology (safety, compatibility, performance, and user acceptability) that can be applied to devices intended to be used in the MR environment. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021257838.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1662-4548</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1662-453X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1662-453X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1071749</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36777636</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>compatibility ; functional MRI (fMRI) ; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ; MR-compatible ; Neuroscience ; safety ; somatosensory stimulation devices</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023-01, Vol.17, p.1071749-1071749</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Travassos, Sayal, Direito, Pereira, Sousa and Castelo-Branco.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Travassos, Sayal, Direito, Pereira, Sousa and Castelo-Branco. 2023 Travassos, Sayal, Direito, Pereira, Sousa and Castelo-Branco</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-700bd53c557235ab97473919677d0ed3868bd8eeaab09ec5ea63ea760975b88c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-700bd53c557235ab97473919677d0ed3868bd8eeaab09ec5ea63ea760975b88c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909190/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909190/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,37013,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36777636$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Travassos, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayal, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Direito, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelo-Branco, Miguel</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing MR-compatibility of somatosensory stimulation devices: A systematic review on testing methodologies</title><title>Frontiers in neuroscience</title><addtitle>Front Neurosci</addtitle><description>Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been extensively used as a tool to map the brain processes related to somatosensory stimulation. This mapping includes the localization of task-related brain activation and the characterization of brain activity dynamics and neural circuitries related to the processing of somatosensory information. However, the magnetic resonance (MR) environment presents unique challenges regarding participant and equipment safety and compatibility. This study aims to systematically review and analyze the state-of-the-art methodologies to assess the safety and compatibility of somatosensory stimulation devices in the MR environment. A literature search, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines, was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to find original research on the development and testing of devices for somatosensory stimulation in the MR environment. Nineteen records that complied with the inclusion and eligibility criteria were considered. The findings are discussed in the context of the existing international standards available for the safety and compatibility assessment of devices intended to be used in the MR environment. In sum, the results provided evidence for a lack of uniformity in the applied testing methodologies, as well as an in-depth presentation of the testing methodologies and results. Lastly, we suggest an assessment methodology (safety, compatibility, performance, and user acceptability) that can be applied to devices intended to be used in the MR environment. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021257838.</description><subject>compatibility</subject><subject>functional MRI (fMRI)</subject><subject>magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)</subject><subject>MR-compatible</subject><subject>Neuroscience</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>somatosensory stimulation devices</subject><issn>1662-4548</issn><issn>1662-453X</issn><issn>1662-453X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1r3DAQhkVpaJJt_0APxcdevJUtWR89FJbQNoGEQmmhN6GP8UbBtrYab8r--yjZ7ZKgg8TMO8-86CXkfUOXjCn9qZ_ihMuWtmzZUNlIrl-Rs0aItuYd-_P6-ObqlJwj3lEqWsXbN-SUCSmlYOKMjCtEQIzTurr5Wfs0buwcXRzivKtSX2Ea7ZwQJkx5V-Ecx-1QBGmqAtxHD_i5WlW4wxmKLvoqlyr8q0p_hqIu1BHm2xTSkNYR8C056e2A8O5wL8jvb19_XVzW1z--X12srmvPhZprSakLHfNdJ1vWWacll0w3urgOFAJTQrmgAKx1VIPvwAoGVgqqZeeU8mxBrvbckOyd2eQ42rwzyUbzVEh5bWwufgcwVDAuhLS-0DkEsD1nrgfBHQfRB1ZYX_aszdaNEDxMc7bDC-jLzhRvzTrdG61p8UwL4OMBkNPfbfkWM0b0MAx2grRF00rZ6Y7pchak3Ut9TogZ-uOahprHzM1T5uYxc3PIvAx9eG7wOPI_ZPYARU-tQw</recordid><startdate>20230126</startdate><enddate>20230126</enddate><creator>Travassos, Carolina</creator><creator>Sayal, Alexandre</creator><creator>Direito, Bruno</creator><creator>Pereira, João</creator><creator>Sousa, Teresa</creator><creator>Castelo-Branco, Miguel</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230126</creationdate><title>Assessing MR-compatibility of somatosensory stimulation devices: A systematic review on testing methodologies</title><author>Travassos, Carolina ; Sayal, Alexandre ; Direito, Bruno ; Pereira, João ; Sousa, Teresa ; Castelo-Branco, Miguel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-700bd53c557235ab97473919677d0ed3868bd8eeaab09ec5ea63ea760975b88c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>compatibility</topic><topic>functional MRI (fMRI)</topic><topic>magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)</topic><topic>MR-compatible</topic><topic>Neuroscience</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>somatosensory stimulation devices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Travassos, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayal, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Direito, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelo-Branco, Miguel</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Travassos, Carolina</au><au>Sayal, Alexandre</au><au>Direito, Bruno</au><au>Pereira, João</au><au>Sousa, Teresa</au><au>Castelo-Branco, Miguel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing MR-compatibility of somatosensory stimulation devices: A systematic review on testing methodologies</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>Front Neurosci</addtitle><date>2023-01-26</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>17</volume><spage>1071749</spage><epage>1071749</epage><pages>1071749-1071749</pages><issn>1662-4548</issn><issn>1662-453X</issn><eissn>1662-453X</eissn><abstract>Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been extensively used as a tool to map the brain processes related to somatosensory stimulation. This mapping includes the localization of task-related brain activation and the characterization of brain activity dynamics and neural circuitries related to the processing of somatosensory information. However, the magnetic resonance (MR) environment presents unique challenges regarding participant and equipment safety and compatibility. This study aims to systematically review and analyze the state-of-the-art methodologies to assess the safety and compatibility of somatosensory stimulation devices in the MR environment. A literature search, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines, was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to find original research on the development and testing of devices for somatosensory stimulation in the MR environment. Nineteen records that complied with the inclusion and eligibility criteria were considered. The findings are discussed in the context of the existing international standards available for the safety and compatibility assessment of devices intended to be used in the MR environment. In sum, the results provided evidence for a lack of uniformity in the applied testing methodologies, as well as an in-depth presentation of the testing methodologies and results. Lastly, we suggest an assessment methodology (safety, compatibility, performance, and user acceptability) that can be applied to devices intended to be used in the MR environment. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021257838.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>36777636</pmid><doi>10.3389/fnins.2023.1071749</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1662-4548
ispartof Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023-01, Vol.17, p.1071749-1071749
issn 1662-4548
1662-453X
1662-453X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0634667ac9674edeaf43bfe64b4e6fd3
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects compatibility
functional MRI (fMRI)
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
MR-compatible
Neuroscience
safety
somatosensory stimulation devices
title Assessing MR-compatibility of somatosensory stimulation devices: A systematic review on testing methodologies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A26%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20MR-compatibility%20of%20somatosensory%20stimulation%20devices:%20A%20systematic%20review%20on%20testing%20methodologies&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20neuroscience&rft.au=Travassos,%20Carolina&rft.date=2023-01-26&rft.volume=17&rft.spage=1071749&rft.epage=1071749&rft.pages=1071749-1071749&rft.issn=1662-4548&rft.eissn=1662-453X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fnins.2023.1071749&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2775953939%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-700bd53c557235ab97473919677d0ed3868bd8eeaab09ec5ea63ea760975b88c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2775953939&rft_id=info:pmid/36777636&rfr_iscdi=true