Loading…

Performance of Oak Seedlings Grown under Different Oust® XP Regimes

Herbaceous weed control (HWC) is prescribed for growing season control of vegetative competition in hardwood afforestation attempts on former agricultural areas. Without HWC, planted seedlings often exhibit poor growth and survival. While currently employed HWC methods are proven, there is a substan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Forests 2014-06, Vol.5 (6), p.1331-1340
Main Authors: Self, Andrew, Ezell, Andrew, Rowe, Dennis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-d1b5e149ee1ee4107e661ca19f189e925432b46b6593a6e5804168bf1d3a6e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-d1b5e149ee1ee4107e661ca19f189e925432b46b6593a6e5804168bf1d3a6e3
container_end_page 1340
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1331
container_title Forests
container_volume 5
creator Self, Andrew
Ezell, Andrew
Rowe, Dennis
description Herbaceous weed control (HWC) is prescribed for growing season control of vegetative competition in hardwood afforestation attempts on former agricultural areas. Without HWC, planted seedlings often exhibit poor growth and survival. While currently employed HWC methods are proven, there is a substantial void in research comparing HWC treatments spanning multiple years. A total of 4,320 bare-root seedlings of three oak species were planted on three Mississippi sites. All sites were of comparable soils and received above average precipitation for the majority of the three-year study. Eight combinations of HWC and mechanical site preparation were utilized at each site, with 480 seedlings planted in each of the nine blocks, and a total of 1,440 seedlings per species planted across all sites. Treatments were installed on 3.1 m centers, with mechanical treatments as follows: control, subsoiling, bedding, and combination plowing. HWC treatments included one and two-year applications of Oust® XP. Treatments were applied over seedlings post-planting in 1.5 m bands, at a rate of 140.1 g product/hectare. Excepting one species, HWC dependent height or groundline diameter differences were not detected among mechanical treatments, species, HWC regime, or combinations thereof. No survival differences were observed among site preparation treatments or species. However, analysis detected a growing season/HWC treatment interaction for seedling survival.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/f5061331
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_06442c8259f84c1fa80c4cb12eb86c7e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_06442c8259f84c1fa80c4cb12eb86c7e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3351000121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-d1b5e149ee1ee4107e661ca19f189e925432b46b6593a6e5804168bf1d3a6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1KAzEUhQdRsGjBRwi4cVPNnfxMspRWa6HQYl24C5nMTZnaTmoyg_hSPoRPZmtVvJv7w-E7l5NlF0CvGdP0xgsqgTE4ynqgtR5wTYvjf_Np1k9pRXclCqVz3stGc4w-xI1tHJLgycy-kAVita6bZSLjGN4a0jUVRjKqvceITUtmXWo_P8jznDzist5gOs9OvF0n7P_0s2xxf_c0fBhMZ-PJ8HY6cEyIdlBBKRC4RgREDrRAKcFZ0B6URp0LzvKSy1IKzaxEoSgHqUoP1X5lZ9nkQK2CXZltrDc2vptga_N9CHFpbGxrt0ZDJee5U7nQXnEH3irquCshx1JJV-xZlwfWNobXDlNrVqGLze55A4JTBbnWxU51dVC5GFKK6P9cgZp94OY3cPYFybtwbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1540812997</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of Oak Seedlings Grown under Different Oust® XP Regimes</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Self, Andrew ; Ezell, Andrew ; Rowe, Dennis</creator><creatorcontrib>Self, Andrew ; Ezell, Andrew ; Rowe, Dennis</creatorcontrib><description>Herbaceous weed control (HWC) is prescribed for growing season control of vegetative competition in hardwood afforestation attempts on former agricultural areas. Without HWC, planted seedlings often exhibit poor growth and survival. While currently employed HWC methods are proven, there is a substantial void in research comparing HWC treatments spanning multiple years. A total of 4,320 bare-root seedlings of three oak species were planted on three Mississippi sites. All sites were of comparable soils and received above average precipitation for the majority of the three-year study. Eight combinations of HWC and mechanical site preparation were utilized at each site, with 480 seedlings planted in each of the nine blocks, and a total of 1,440 seedlings per species planted across all sites. Treatments were installed on 3.1 m centers, with mechanical treatments as follows: control, subsoiling, bedding, and combination plowing. HWC treatments included one and two-year applications of Oust® XP. Treatments were applied over seedlings post-planting in 1.5 m bands, at a rate of 140.1 g product/hectare. Excepting one species, HWC dependent height or groundline diameter differences were not detected among mechanical treatments, species, HWC regime, or combinations thereof. No survival differences were observed among site preparation treatments or species. However, analysis detected a growing season/HWC treatment interaction for seedling survival.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/f5061331</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Competition ; Forests ; hardwood plantations ; herbaceous weed control ; oak afforestation ; Oust XP treatment ; Plantations ; silvicultural treatments</subject><ispartof>Forests, 2014-06, Vol.5 (6), p.1331-1340</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-d1b5e149ee1ee4107e661ca19f189e925432b46b6593a6e5804168bf1d3a6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-d1b5e149ee1ee4107e661ca19f189e925432b46b6593a6e5804168bf1d3a6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1540812997/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1540812997?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Self, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezell, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Dennis</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of Oak Seedlings Grown under Different Oust® XP Regimes</title><title>Forests</title><description>Herbaceous weed control (HWC) is prescribed for growing season control of vegetative competition in hardwood afforestation attempts on former agricultural areas. Without HWC, planted seedlings often exhibit poor growth and survival. While currently employed HWC methods are proven, there is a substantial void in research comparing HWC treatments spanning multiple years. A total of 4,320 bare-root seedlings of three oak species were planted on three Mississippi sites. All sites were of comparable soils and received above average precipitation for the majority of the three-year study. Eight combinations of HWC and mechanical site preparation were utilized at each site, with 480 seedlings planted in each of the nine blocks, and a total of 1,440 seedlings per species planted across all sites. Treatments were installed on 3.1 m centers, with mechanical treatments as follows: control, subsoiling, bedding, and combination plowing. HWC treatments included one and two-year applications of Oust® XP. Treatments were applied over seedlings post-planting in 1.5 m bands, at a rate of 140.1 g product/hectare. Excepting one species, HWC dependent height or groundline diameter differences were not detected among mechanical treatments, species, HWC regime, or combinations thereof. No survival differences were observed among site preparation treatments or species. However, analysis detected a growing season/HWC treatment interaction for seedling survival.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>hardwood plantations</subject><subject>herbaceous weed control</subject><subject>oak afforestation</subject><subject>Oust XP treatment</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>silvicultural treatments</subject><issn>1999-4907</issn><issn>1999-4907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1KAzEUhQdRsGjBRwi4cVPNnfxMspRWa6HQYl24C5nMTZnaTmoyg_hSPoRPZmtVvJv7w-E7l5NlF0CvGdP0xgsqgTE4ynqgtR5wTYvjf_Np1k9pRXclCqVz3stGc4w-xI1tHJLgycy-kAVita6bZSLjGN4a0jUVRjKqvceITUtmXWo_P8jznDzist5gOs9OvF0n7P_0s2xxf_c0fBhMZ-PJ8HY6cEyIdlBBKRC4RgREDrRAKcFZ0B6URp0LzvKSy1IKzaxEoSgHqUoP1X5lZ9nkQK2CXZltrDc2vptga_N9CHFpbGxrt0ZDJee5U7nQXnEH3irquCshx1JJV-xZlwfWNobXDlNrVqGLze55A4JTBbnWxU51dVC5GFKK6P9cgZp94OY3cPYFybtwbg</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Self, Andrew</creator><creator>Ezell, Andrew</creator><creator>Rowe, Dennis</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Performance of Oak Seedlings Grown under Different Oust® XP Regimes</title><author>Self, Andrew ; Ezell, Andrew ; Rowe, Dennis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-d1b5e149ee1ee4107e661ca19f189e925432b46b6593a6e5804168bf1d3a6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>hardwood plantations</topic><topic>herbaceous weed control</topic><topic>oak afforestation</topic><topic>Oust XP treatment</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>silvicultural treatments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Self, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezell, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Dennis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Forests</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Self, Andrew</au><au>Ezell, Andrew</au><au>Rowe, Dennis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of Oak Seedlings Grown under Different Oust® XP Regimes</atitle><jtitle>Forests</jtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1331</spage><epage>1340</epage><pages>1331-1340</pages><issn>1999-4907</issn><eissn>1999-4907</eissn><abstract>Herbaceous weed control (HWC) is prescribed for growing season control of vegetative competition in hardwood afforestation attempts on former agricultural areas. Without HWC, planted seedlings often exhibit poor growth and survival. While currently employed HWC methods are proven, there is a substantial void in research comparing HWC treatments spanning multiple years. A total of 4,320 bare-root seedlings of three oak species were planted on three Mississippi sites. All sites were of comparable soils and received above average precipitation for the majority of the three-year study. Eight combinations of HWC and mechanical site preparation were utilized at each site, with 480 seedlings planted in each of the nine blocks, and a total of 1,440 seedlings per species planted across all sites. Treatments were installed on 3.1 m centers, with mechanical treatments as follows: control, subsoiling, bedding, and combination plowing. HWC treatments included one and two-year applications of Oust® XP. Treatments were applied over seedlings post-planting in 1.5 m bands, at a rate of 140.1 g product/hectare. Excepting one species, HWC dependent height or groundline diameter differences were not detected among mechanical treatments, species, HWC regime, or combinations thereof. No survival differences were observed among site preparation treatments or species. However, analysis detected a growing season/HWC treatment interaction for seedling survival.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/f5061331</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1999-4907
ispartof Forests, 2014-06, Vol.5 (6), p.1331-1340
issn 1999-4907
1999-4907
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_06442c8259f84c1fa80c4cb12eb86c7e
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Agriculture
Competition
Forests
hardwood plantations
herbaceous weed control
oak afforestation
Oust XP treatment
Plantations
silvicultural treatments
title Performance of Oak Seedlings Grown under Different Oust® XP Regimes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A10%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20Oak%20Seedlings%20Grown%20under%20Different%20Oust%C2%AE%20XP%20Regimes&rft.jtitle=Forests&rft.au=Self,%20Andrew&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1331&rft.epage=1340&rft.pages=1331-1340&rft.issn=1999-4907&rft.eissn=1999-4907&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/f5061331&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3351000121%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-d1b5e149ee1ee4107e661ca19f189e925432b46b6593a6e5804168bf1d3a6e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1540812997&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true