Loading…
Performance of an Existing Reinforced Concrete Building Designed in Accordance to Older Indonesian Seismic Code: A Case Study for a Hotel in Kupang, Indonesia
The recent seismic code SNI 1726-2012 is significantly different compared to the older code SNI 1726-2002. The seismic hazard map was significantly changed and the level of maximum considered earthquake was significantly increased. Therefore, buildings designed according to outdated code may not res...
Saved in:
Published in: | Dimensi teknik sipil 2018-04, Vol.20 (1), p.35-40 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1502-8b75081a03f2207949f6eb502505a55cf49075daedc011d5998bea8a601c27f83 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 40 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 35 |
container_title | Dimensi teknik sipil |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Pudjisuryadi, Pamuda Lumantarna, Benjamin Setiawan, Ryan Handoko, Christian |
description | The recent seismic code SNI 1726-2012 is significantly different compared to the older code SNI 1726-2002. The seismic hazard map was significantly changed and the level of maximum considered earthquake was significantly increased. Therefore, buildings designed according to outdated code may not resist the higher demand required by newer code. In this study, seismic performance of Hotel X in Kupang, Indonesia which was designed based on SNI-1726-2002 is investigated. The structure was analyzed using Nonlinear Time History Analysis. The seismic load used was a spectrum consistent ground acceleration generated from El-Centro 18 May 1940 North-South component in accordance to SNI 1726-2012. The results show that Hotel X can resist maximum considered earthquake required by SNI 1726-2012. The maximum drift ratio is 0.81% which is lower than the limit set by FEMA 356-2000 (2%). Plastic hinge damage level is also lower than the allowance in ACMC 2001. |
doi_str_mv | 10.9744/ced.20.1.35-40 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_067ff6a774a242b3b898488c1a0f3c02</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_067ff6a774a242b3b898488c1a0f3c02</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_067ff6a774a242b3b898488c1a0f3c02</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1502-8b75081a03f2207949f6eb502505a55cf49075daedc011d5998bea8a601c27f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0d1qFDEUB_BBFKzVW6_zAM548jVJvFvXahcLFavgXcgkJ0vKbFIys9C-jM9qthW9OiH_k1_gnK57S2EwSoj3HsPAYKADl72AZ90ZNcr0UsGv5-0sKPRGcnjZvVqWW4DRUD6edb-_YY2lHlz2SEokLpOL-7SsKe_Jd0y5Zc0l25J9xRXJx2Oawyn8hEva5xalTDbelxoeibWQ6zlgJbscSm49DbzBtBySb0jAD2RDtm5BcrMewwNpPHHksqw4n6CvxzuX9-_-P37dvYhuXvDN33re_fx88WN72V9df9ltN1e9pxJYryclQVMHPDIGyggTR5xaIkE6KX0UBpQMDoMHSoM0Rk_otBuBeqai5ufd7skNxd3au5oOrj7Y4pJ9vCh1b11dk5_RwqhiHJ1SwjHBJj5po4XWvv0euQfWrOHJ8rUsS8X4z6NgT5uybaKWgaWWSyuA_wGyL4b3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of an Existing Reinforced Concrete Building Designed in Accordance to Older Indonesian Seismic Code: A Case Study for a Hotel in Kupang, Indonesia</title><source>ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources</source><creator>Pudjisuryadi, Pamuda ; Lumantarna, Benjamin ; Setiawan, Ryan ; Handoko, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Pudjisuryadi, Pamuda ; Lumantarna, Benjamin ; Setiawan, Ryan ; Handoko, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>The recent seismic code SNI 1726-2012 is significantly different compared to the older code SNI 1726-2002. The seismic hazard map was significantly changed and the level of maximum considered earthquake was significantly increased. Therefore, buildings designed according to outdated code may not resist the higher demand required by newer code. In this study, seismic performance of Hotel X in Kupang, Indonesia which was designed based on SNI-1726-2002 is investigated. The structure was analyzed using Nonlinear Time History Analysis. The seismic load used was a spectrum consistent ground acceleration generated from El-Centro 18 May 1940 North-South component in accordance to SNI 1726-2012. The results show that Hotel X can resist maximum considered earthquake required by SNI 1726-2012. The maximum drift ratio is 0.81% which is lower than the limit set by FEMA 356-2000 (2%). Plastic hinge damage level is also lower than the allowance in ACMC 2001.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1410-9530</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1979-570X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.9744/ced.20.1.35-40</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Petra Christian University</publisher><subject>indonesian seismic code ; non-linear time history analysis ; reinforced concrete ; seismic performance</subject><ispartof>Dimensi teknik sipil, 2018-04, Vol.20 (1), p.35-40</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1502-8b75081a03f2207949f6eb502505a55cf49075daedc011d5998bea8a601c27f83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pudjisuryadi, Pamuda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumantarna, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Setiawan, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handoko, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of an Existing Reinforced Concrete Building Designed in Accordance to Older Indonesian Seismic Code: A Case Study for a Hotel in Kupang, Indonesia</title><title>Dimensi teknik sipil</title><description>The recent seismic code SNI 1726-2012 is significantly different compared to the older code SNI 1726-2002. The seismic hazard map was significantly changed and the level of maximum considered earthquake was significantly increased. Therefore, buildings designed according to outdated code may not resist the higher demand required by newer code. In this study, seismic performance of Hotel X in Kupang, Indonesia which was designed based on SNI-1726-2002 is investigated. The structure was analyzed using Nonlinear Time History Analysis. The seismic load used was a spectrum consistent ground acceleration generated from El-Centro 18 May 1940 North-South component in accordance to SNI 1726-2012. The results show that Hotel X can resist maximum considered earthquake required by SNI 1726-2012. The maximum drift ratio is 0.81% which is lower than the limit set by FEMA 356-2000 (2%). Plastic hinge damage level is also lower than the allowance in ACMC 2001.</description><subject>indonesian seismic code</subject><subject>non-linear time history analysis</subject><subject>reinforced concrete</subject><subject>seismic performance</subject><issn>1410-9530</issn><issn>1979-570X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0d1qFDEUB_BBFKzVW6_zAM548jVJvFvXahcLFavgXcgkJ0vKbFIys9C-jM9qthW9OiH_k1_gnK57S2EwSoj3HsPAYKADl72AZ90ZNcr0UsGv5-0sKPRGcnjZvVqWW4DRUD6edb-_YY2lHlz2SEokLpOL-7SsKe_Jd0y5Zc0l25J9xRXJx2Oawyn8hEva5xalTDbelxoeibWQ6zlgJbscSm49DbzBtBySb0jAD2RDtm5BcrMewwNpPHHksqw4n6CvxzuX9-_-P37dvYhuXvDN33re_fx88WN72V9df9ltN1e9pxJYryclQVMHPDIGyggTR5xaIkE6KX0UBpQMDoMHSoM0Rk_otBuBeqai5ufd7skNxd3au5oOrj7Y4pJ9vCh1b11dk5_RwqhiHJ1SwjHBJj5po4XWvv0euQfWrOHJ8rUsS8X4z6NgT5uybaKWgaWWSyuA_wGyL4b3</recordid><startdate>20180407</startdate><enddate>20180407</enddate><creator>Pudjisuryadi, Pamuda</creator><creator>Lumantarna, Benjamin</creator><creator>Setiawan, Ryan</creator><creator>Handoko, Christian</creator><general>Petra Christian University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180407</creationdate><title>Performance of an Existing Reinforced Concrete Building Designed in Accordance to Older Indonesian Seismic Code: A Case Study for a Hotel in Kupang, Indonesia</title><author>Pudjisuryadi, Pamuda ; Lumantarna, Benjamin ; Setiawan, Ryan ; Handoko, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1502-8b75081a03f2207949f6eb502505a55cf49075daedc011d5998bea8a601c27f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>indonesian seismic code</topic><topic>non-linear time history analysis</topic><topic>reinforced concrete</topic><topic>seismic performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pudjisuryadi, Pamuda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumantarna, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Setiawan, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handoko, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Dimensi teknik sipil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pudjisuryadi, Pamuda</au><au>Lumantarna, Benjamin</au><au>Setiawan, Ryan</au><au>Handoko, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of an Existing Reinforced Concrete Building Designed in Accordance to Older Indonesian Seismic Code: A Case Study for a Hotel in Kupang, Indonesia</atitle><jtitle>Dimensi teknik sipil</jtitle><date>2018-04-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>35-40</pages><issn>1410-9530</issn><eissn>1979-570X</eissn><abstract>The recent seismic code SNI 1726-2012 is significantly different compared to the older code SNI 1726-2002. The seismic hazard map was significantly changed and the level of maximum considered earthquake was significantly increased. Therefore, buildings designed according to outdated code may not resist the higher demand required by newer code. In this study, seismic performance of Hotel X in Kupang, Indonesia which was designed based on SNI-1726-2002 is investigated. The structure was analyzed using Nonlinear Time History Analysis. The seismic load used was a spectrum consistent ground acceleration generated from El-Centro 18 May 1940 North-South component in accordance to SNI 1726-2012. The results show that Hotel X can resist maximum considered earthquake required by SNI 1726-2012. The maximum drift ratio is 0.81% which is lower than the limit set by FEMA 356-2000 (2%). Plastic hinge damage level is also lower than the allowance in ACMC 2001.</abstract><pub>Petra Christian University</pub><doi>10.9744/ced.20.1.35-40</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1410-9530 |
ispartof | Dimensi teknik sipil, 2018-04, Vol.20 (1), p.35-40 |
issn | 1410-9530 1979-570X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_067ff6a774a242b3b898488c1a0f3c02 |
source | ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources |
subjects | indonesian seismic code non-linear time history analysis reinforced concrete seismic performance |
title | Performance of an Existing Reinforced Concrete Building Designed in Accordance to Older Indonesian Seismic Code: A Case Study for a Hotel in Kupang, Indonesia |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A14%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20an%20Existing%20Reinforced%20Concrete%20Building%20Designed%20in%20Accordance%20to%20Older%20Indonesian%20Seismic%20Code:%20A%20Case%20Study%20for%20a%20Hotel%20in%20Kupang,%20Indonesia&rft.jtitle=Dimensi%20teknik%20sipil&rft.au=Pudjisuryadi,%20Pamuda&rft.date=2018-04-07&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=35-40&rft.issn=1410-9530&rft.eissn=1979-570X&rft_id=info:doi/10.9744/ced.20.1.35-40&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_067ff6a774a242b3b898488c1a0f3c02%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1502-8b75081a03f2207949f6eb502505a55cf49075daedc011d5998bea8a601c27f83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |