Loading…

The comparison of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction between single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: A sub‐study of a randomized, prospective clinical trial

Aim The present study clarified the effect on the health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction of single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy compared with multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer. Methods We conducted a multicenter, randomized, control trial comparing single‐inc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of gastroenterological surgery 2020-11, Vol.4 (6), p.684-692
Main Authors: Ohya, Hiroki, Watanabe, Jun, Suwa, Yusuke, Suwa, Hirokazu, Ozawa, Mayumi, Ishibe, Atsushi, Fujii, Shoichi, Kubota, Kazumi, Kunisaki, Chikara, Endo, Itaru
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6328-e6214c3624d38fd104e1a71da6514218d862bb00d1df00e3c3d672ee28a294f13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6328-e6214c3624d38fd104e1a71da6514218d862bb00d1df00e3c3d672ee28a294f13
container_end_page 692
container_issue 6
container_start_page 684
container_title Annals of gastroenterological surgery
container_volume 4
creator Ohya, Hiroki
Watanabe, Jun
Suwa, Yusuke
Suwa, Hirokazu
Ozawa, Mayumi
Ishibe, Atsushi
Fujii, Shoichi
Kubota, Kazumi
Kunisaki, Chikara
Endo, Itaru
description Aim The present study clarified the effect on the health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction of single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy compared with multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer. Methods We conducted a multicenter, randomized, control trial comparing single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. We performed a pre‐planned secondary analysis of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction data of 200 patients. Health‐related quality of life was evaluated using the Japanese 36‐item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) version 2.0 before surgery and at 1 month after surgery. Patient satisfaction was compared using seven questionnaires at 1 month after surgery. Results One hundred patients were assigned to each group. After excluding 18 patients (9.0%) who did not complete the SF‐36, 182 patients (91.0%) were included in the analysis (92 cases of single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy and 90 cases of multiport laparoscopic colectomy). The SF‐36 scores at 1 month after surgery were not significantly different between the two arms. The role physical, bodily pain, vitality and physical component summary were significantly lower at 1 month after surgery than before in both groups. However, the role emotional was significantly lower after surgery than before only in the single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy group. In terms of patient satisfaction at 1 month after surgery, there were no significant differences in any of the seven items on the questionnaire. Conclusions Single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy was similar to multiport laparoscopic colectomy in terms of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction. However, single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy may be inferior than multiport laparoscopic colectomy in terms of the role emotional. We demonstrated in this sub‐analysis of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) and multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MPLC) for colon cancer patients that SILC was similar to MPLC in terms of health‐related quality of life and satisfaction. However, SILC may be inferior in terms of the role emotional.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ags3.12378
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_075795c779b642858c38878e37278fe4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_075795c779b642858c38878e37278fe4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2470284025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6328-e6214c3624d38fd104e1a71da6514218d862bb00d1df00e3c3d672ee28a294f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAQxyMEotXSCw-ALHFBqFv8kcQOB6RVBaVSJQ6Us-XYk12vnDi1nVbLiUfg0foMPAne3VK1HHryx_znN-PxvyheE3xCMKYf1DKyE0IZF8-KQ1ryao4ZFc8f7A-KoxjXGGPSkJpW7GVxwBjLh6o5LG4vV4C070cVbPQD8h1agXJp9efX7wBOJTDoalLOps025mwHSA0GjSpZGBKKeY2d0snm5BbSDcCAoh2WDjLBDtrGbWSb0k8u2dGHhJzK5XzUfrQ6F3egk-83qPMBaTVoCB_RAsWpzYSYJrOrrFDIEN_bn2CO0ZjTx5xmr3P3zg5WK4dSsMq9Kl50ykU4ultnxY8vny9Pv84vvp2dny4u5rrOM5lDTUmpWU1Lw0RnCC6BKE6MqitSUiKMqGnbYmyI6TAGppmpOQWgQtGm7AibFed7rvFqLcdgexU20isrdxc-LKUKyWoHEvOKN5XmvGnrkopKaCYEF8A45aKDMrM-7Vnj1PZgdB5sUO4R9HFksCu59NeSc1rXQmTAuztA8FcTxCR7GzU4pwbwU5TZC5iKEuffnxVv_5Ou_RSGPCpJeSOqkjKBn1SVtagqzhjNqvd7lc7fEQN09y0TLLfulFt3yp07s_jNw0feS_95MQvIXnBjHWyeQMnF2Xe2h_4F5xL1CQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2468557332</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The comparison of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction between single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: A sub‐study of a randomized, prospective clinical trial</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>Ohya, Hiroki ; Watanabe, Jun ; Suwa, Yusuke ; Suwa, Hirokazu ; Ozawa, Mayumi ; Ishibe, Atsushi ; Fujii, Shoichi ; Kubota, Kazumi ; Kunisaki, Chikara ; Endo, Itaru</creator><creatorcontrib>Ohya, Hiroki ; Watanabe, Jun ; Suwa, Yusuke ; Suwa, Hirokazu ; Ozawa, Mayumi ; Ishibe, Atsushi ; Fujii, Shoichi ; Kubota, Kazumi ; Kunisaki, Chikara ; Endo, Itaru</creatorcontrib><description>Aim The present study clarified the effect on the health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction of single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy compared with multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer. Methods We conducted a multicenter, randomized, control trial comparing single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. We performed a pre‐planned secondary analysis of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction data of 200 patients. Health‐related quality of life was evaluated using the Japanese 36‐item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) version 2.0 before surgery and at 1 month after surgery. Patient satisfaction was compared using seven questionnaires at 1 month after surgery. Results One hundred patients were assigned to each group. After excluding 18 patients (9.0%) who did not complete the SF‐36, 182 patients (91.0%) were included in the analysis (92 cases of single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy and 90 cases of multiport laparoscopic colectomy). The SF‐36 scores at 1 month after surgery were not significantly different between the two arms. The role physical, bodily pain, vitality and physical component summary were significantly lower at 1 month after surgery than before in both groups. However, the role emotional was significantly lower after surgery than before only in the single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy group. In terms of patient satisfaction at 1 month after surgery, there were no significant differences in any of the seven items on the questionnaire. Conclusions Single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy was similar to multiport laparoscopic colectomy in terms of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction. However, single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy may be inferior than multiport laparoscopic colectomy in terms of the role emotional. We demonstrated in this sub‐analysis of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) and multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MPLC) for colon cancer patients that SILC was similar to MPLC in terms of health‐related quality of life and satisfaction. However, SILC may be inferior in terms of the role emotional.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2475-0328</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-0328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12378</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33319159</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Colorectal cancer ; colorectal surgery ; Computer centers ; Correspondence ; Endoscopy ; health‐related quality of life ; laparoscopic surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Mann-Whitney U test ; Original ; Pain ; Patient satisfaction ; Quality of life ; Questionnaires ; single‐incision ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes</subject><ispartof>Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2020-11, Vol.4 (6), p.684-692</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology.</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6328-e6214c3624d38fd104e1a71da6514218d862bb00d1df00e3c3d672ee28a294f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6328-e6214c3624d38fd104e1a71da6514218d862bb00d1df00e3c3d672ee28a294f13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5215-3960 ; 0000-0002-3251-3658 ; 0000-0002-7187-3664 ; 0000-0001-5520-8114</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2798542380/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2798542380?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,46052,46476,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33319159$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ohya, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suwa, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suwa, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozawa, Mayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishibe, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Shoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubota, Kazumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunisaki, Chikara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Itaru</creatorcontrib><title>The comparison of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction between single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: A sub‐study of a randomized, prospective clinical trial</title><title>Annals of gastroenterological surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Gastroenterol Surg</addtitle><description>Aim The present study clarified the effect on the health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction of single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy compared with multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer. Methods We conducted a multicenter, randomized, control trial comparing single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. We performed a pre‐planned secondary analysis of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction data of 200 patients. Health‐related quality of life was evaluated using the Japanese 36‐item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) version 2.0 before surgery and at 1 month after surgery. Patient satisfaction was compared using seven questionnaires at 1 month after surgery. Results One hundred patients were assigned to each group. After excluding 18 patients (9.0%) who did not complete the SF‐36, 182 patients (91.0%) were included in the analysis (92 cases of single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy and 90 cases of multiport laparoscopic colectomy). The SF‐36 scores at 1 month after surgery were not significantly different between the two arms. The role physical, bodily pain, vitality and physical component summary were significantly lower at 1 month after surgery than before in both groups. However, the role emotional was significantly lower after surgery than before only in the single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy group. In terms of patient satisfaction at 1 month after surgery, there were no significant differences in any of the seven items on the questionnaire. Conclusions Single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy was similar to multiport laparoscopic colectomy in terms of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction. However, single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy may be inferior than multiport laparoscopic colectomy in terms of the role emotional. We demonstrated in this sub‐analysis of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) and multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MPLC) for colon cancer patients that SILC was similar to MPLC in terms of health‐related quality of life and satisfaction. However, SILC may be inferior in terms of the role emotional.</description><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>colorectal surgery</subject><subject>Computer centers</subject><subject>Correspondence</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>health‐related quality of life</subject><subject>laparoscopic surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Mann-Whitney U test</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>single‐incision</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><issn>2475-0328</issn><issn>2475-0328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAQxyMEotXSCw-ALHFBqFv8kcQOB6RVBaVSJQ6Us-XYk12vnDi1nVbLiUfg0foMPAne3VK1HHryx_znN-PxvyheE3xCMKYf1DKyE0IZF8-KQ1ryao4ZFc8f7A-KoxjXGGPSkJpW7GVxwBjLh6o5LG4vV4C070cVbPQD8h1agXJp9efX7wBOJTDoalLOps025mwHSA0GjSpZGBKKeY2d0snm5BbSDcCAoh2WDjLBDtrGbWSb0k8u2dGHhJzK5XzUfrQ6F3egk-83qPMBaTVoCB_RAsWpzYSYJrOrrFDIEN_bn2CO0ZjTx5xmr3P3zg5WK4dSsMq9Kl50ykU4ultnxY8vny9Pv84vvp2dny4u5rrOM5lDTUmpWU1Lw0RnCC6BKE6MqitSUiKMqGnbYmyI6TAGppmpOQWgQtGm7AibFed7rvFqLcdgexU20isrdxc-LKUKyWoHEvOKN5XmvGnrkopKaCYEF8A45aKDMrM-7Vnj1PZgdB5sUO4R9HFksCu59NeSc1rXQmTAuztA8FcTxCR7GzU4pwbwU5TZC5iKEuffnxVv_5Ou_RSGPCpJeSOqkjKBn1SVtagqzhjNqvd7lc7fEQN09y0TLLfulFt3yp07s_jNw0feS_95MQvIXnBjHWyeQMnF2Xe2h_4F5xL1CQ</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Ohya, Hiroki</creator><creator>Watanabe, Jun</creator><creator>Suwa, Yusuke</creator><creator>Suwa, Hirokazu</creator><creator>Ozawa, Mayumi</creator><creator>Ishibe, Atsushi</creator><creator>Fujii, Shoichi</creator><creator>Kubota, Kazumi</creator><creator>Kunisaki, Chikara</creator><creator>Endo, Itaru</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5215-3960</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3251-3658</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7187-3664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5520-8114</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>The comparison of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction between single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: A sub‐study of a randomized, prospective clinical trial</title><author>Ohya, Hiroki ; Watanabe, Jun ; Suwa, Yusuke ; Suwa, Hirokazu ; Ozawa, Mayumi ; Ishibe, Atsushi ; Fujii, Shoichi ; Kubota, Kazumi ; Kunisaki, Chikara ; Endo, Itaru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6328-e6214c3624d38fd104e1a71da6514218d862bb00d1df00e3c3d672ee28a294f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>colorectal surgery</topic><topic>Computer centers</topic><topic>Correspondence</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>health‐related quality of life</topic><topic>laparoscopic surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Mann-Whitney U test</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>single‐incision</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ohya, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suwa, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suwa, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozawa, Mayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishibe, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Shoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubota, Kazumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunisaki, Chikara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Itaru</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Backfiles (Open access)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Annals of gastroenterological surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ohya, Hiroki</au><au>Watanabe, Jun</au><au>Suwa, Yusuke</au><au>Suwa, Hirokazu</au><au>Ozawa, Mayumi</au><au>Ishibe, Atsushi</au><au>Fujii, Shoichi</au><au>Kubota, Kazumi</au><au>Kunisaki, Chikara</au><au>Endo, Itaru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The comparison of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction between single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: A sub‐study of a randomized, prospective clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Annals of gastroenterological surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Gastroenterol Surg</addtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>684</spage><epage>692</epage><pages>684-692</pages><issn>2475-0328</issn><eissn>2475-0328</eissn><abstract>Aim The present study clarified the effect on the health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction of single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy compared with multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer. Methods We conducted a multicenter, randomized, control trial comparing single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. We performed a pre‐planned secondary analysis of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction data of 200 patients. Health‐related quality of life was evaluated using the Japanese 36‐item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) version 2.0 before surgery and at 1 month after surgery. Patient satisfaction was compared using seven questionnaires at 1 month after surgery. Results One hundred patients were assigned to each group. After excluding 18 patients (9.0%) who did not complete the SF‐36, 182 patients (91.0%) were included in the analysis (92 cases of single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy and 90 cases of multiport laparoscopic colectomy). The SF‐36 scores at 1 month after surgery were not significantly different between the two arms. The role physical, bodily pain, vitality and physical component summary were significantly lower at 1 month after surgery than before in both groups. However, the role emotional was significantly lower after surgery than before only in the single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy group. In terms of patient satisfaction at 1 month after surgery, there were no significant differences in any of the seven items on the questionnaire. Conclusions Single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy was similar to multiport laparoscopic colectomy in terms of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction. However, single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy may be inferior than multiport laparoscopic colectomy in terms of the role emotional. We demonstrated in this sub‐analysis of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) and multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MPLC) for colon cancer patients that SILC was similar to MPLC in terms of health‐related quality of life and satisfaction. However, SILC may be inferior in terms of the role emotional.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33319159</pmid><doi>10.1002/ags3.12378</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5215-3960</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3251-3658</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7187-3664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5520-8114</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2475-0328
ispartof Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2020-11, Vol.4 (6), p.684-692
issn 2475-0328
2475-0328
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_075795c779b642858c38878e37278fe4
source PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Wiley Online Library Open Access
subjects Colorectal cancer
colorectal surgery
Computer centers
Correspondence
Endoscopy
health‐related quality of life
laparoscopic surgery
Laparoscopy
Mann-Whitney U test
Original
Pain
Patient satisfaction
Quality of life
Questionnaires
single‐incision
Surgery
Surgical outcomes
title The comparison of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction between single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: A sub‐study of a randomized, prospective clinical trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T08%3A48%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20comparison%20of%20health%E2%80%90related%20quality%20of%20life%20and%20patient%20satisfaction%20between%20single%E2%80%90incision%20and%20multiport%20laparoscopic%20colectomy%20for%20cancer:%20A%20sub%E2%80%90study%20of%20a%20randomized,%20prospective%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20gastroenterological%20surgery&rft.au=Ohya,%20Hiroki&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=684&rft.epage=692&rft.pages=684-692&rft.issn=2475-0328&rft.eissn=2475-0328&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ags3.12378&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2470284025%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6328-e6214c3624d38fd104e1a71da6514218d862bb00d1df00e3c3d672ee28a294f13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2468557332&rft_id=info:pmid/33319159&rfr_iscdi=true