Loading…

Efficacy of atosiban for repeated implantation failure in frozen embryo transfer cycles

Atosiban was commonly added to improve pregnancy outcomes of patients with repeated embryo implantation failure (RIF). In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of atosiban before transferring the frozen-thawed embryo to RIF patients. This retrospective study was conducted in the Hospital fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2023-06, Vol.13 (1), p.9277-9277, Article 9277
Main Authors: Li, Xiufang, Du, Yanbo, Han, Xu, Wang, Huidan, Sheng, Yan, Lian, Fang, Lian, Qingfeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-cb258dfc9ceeb0135cae11538be0ca9eb1996597d7bdf72193e8abb3ae9c5c13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-cb258dfc9ceeb0135cae11538be0ca9eb1996597d7bdf72193e8abb3ae9c5c13
container_end_page 9277
container_issue 1
container_start_page 9277
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 13
creator Li, Xiufang
Du, Yanbo
Han, Xu
Wang, Huidan
Sheng, Yan
Lian, Fang
Lian, Qingfeng
description Atosiban was commonly added to improve pregnancy outcomes of patients with repeated embryo implantation failure (RIF). In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of atosiban before transferring the frozen-thawed embryo to RIF patients. This retrospective study was conducted in the Hospital for Reproductive Medicine affiliated to Shandong University from August 2017 to June 2021. A total of 1774 women with a history of RIF undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET) were included in this study. All the participants were classified into atosiban or control group: Group A included 677 patients who were administered atosiban intravenously 30 min prior to FET with a dose of 37.5 mg; Group B included 1097 patients who received no atosiban before the transfer. There were no significant differences observed in the live birth rate (LBR) (39.73% vs. 39.02%, P  = 0.928) between the two groups. Other secondary outcomes including biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, clinical miscarriage rate and preterm birth rate were similar between the two groups (all P  > 0.05). However, subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly higher preterm birth rates in the control group compared with the atosiban group (0 versus 3.0%, P  = 0.024) in the natural FET cycles. Atosiban may not improve pregnancy outcomes of RIF patients in FET cycles. However, the effects of Atosiban on pregnancy outcomes should be assessed in clinical trials with larger sample sizes.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41598-023-36286-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_083cebdcc77548e093c12f7c1d15c9fd</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_083cebdcc77548e093c12f7c1d15c9fd</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2823991909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-cb258dfc9ceeb0135cae11538be0ca9eb1996597d7bdf72193e8abb3ae9c5c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQtRAVrbb9Az2gSFy4BPwRr-MTQlWBSpW4VOrRsifjxaskXuwEKf31uE0pLQd88WjmzZuvR8g5ox8YFe3H3DCp25pyUYstb7f18oqccNrImgvOXz-zj8lZzntanuS6YfoNORaqZCjJT8jtpfcBLCxV9JWdYg7OjpWPqUp4QDthV4Xh0NtxslOIJWJDPyesQjFTvMOxwsGlJVZTsmP2mCpYoMd8So687TOePf4bcvPl8ubiW339_evVxefrGmTDphocl23nQQOio0xIsMiYFK1DClajY1pvpVadcp1XnGmBrXVOWNQggYkNuVppu2j35pDCYNNiog3mwRHTztg0hdKRoa0AdB2AUrJpkWoBjHsFrGMStO8K16eV6zC7ATvAsczUvyB9GRnDD7OLvwyjvFGqXGVD3j8ypPhzxjyZIWTAvqwP45wNb7nQmulSe0Pe_QPdxzmNZVX3KCn5VjFVUHxFQYo5J_RP3TBq7mVgVhmYIgPzIAOzlKS3z-d4Svlz9AIQKyCX0LjD9Lf2f2h_A5QswHE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2825526717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of atosiban for repeated implantation failure in frozen embryo transfer cycles</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Li, Xiufang ; Du, Yanbo ; Han, Xu ; Wang, Huidan ; Sheng, Yan ; Lian, Fang ; Lian, Qingfeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiufang ; Du, Yanbo ; Han, Xu ; Wang, Huidan ; Sheng, Yan ; Lian, Fang ; Lian, Qingfeng</creatorcontrib><description>Atosiban was commonly added to improve pregnancy outcomes of patients with repeated embryo implantation failure (RIF). In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of atosiban before transferring the frozen-thawed embryo to RIF patients. This retrospective study was conducted in the Hospital for Reproductive Medicine affiliated to Shandong University from August 2017 to June 2021. A total of 1774 women with a history of RIF undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET) were included in this study. All the participants were classified into atosiban or control group: Group A included 677 patients who were administered atosiban intravenously 30 min prior to FET with a dose of 37.5 mg; Group B included 1097 patients who received no atosiban before the transfer. There were no significant differences observed in the live birth rate (LBR) (39.73% vs. 39.02%, P  = 0.928) between the two groups. Other secondary outcomes including biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, clinical miscarriage rate and preterm birth rate were similar between the two groups (all P  &gt; 0.05). However, subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly higher preterm birth rates in the control group compared with the atosiban group (0 versus 3.0%, P  = 0.024) in the natural FET cycles. Atosiban may not improve pregnancy outcomes of RIF patients in FET cycles. However, the effects of Atosiban on pregnancy outcomes should be assessed in clinical trials with larger sample sizes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36286-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37286752</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/163 ; 692/308 ; Birth ; Birth rate ; Clinical trials ; Embryo Implantation ; Embryo Transfer ; Embryos ; Female ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Implantation ; Infant, Newborn ; multidisciplinary ; Patients ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Premature Birth ; Retrospective Studies ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2023-06, Vol.13 (1), p.9277-9277, Article 9277</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-cb258dfc9ceeb0135cae11538be0ca9eb1996597d7bdf72193e8abb3ae9c5c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-cb258dfc9ceeb0135cae11538be0ca9eb1996597d7bdf72193e8abb3ae9c5c13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2825526717/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2825526717?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25744,27915,27916,37003,37004,44581,53782,53784,74887</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37286752$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiufang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Yanbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Huidan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Qingfeng</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of atosiban for repeated implantation failure in frozen embryo transfer cycles</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Atosiban was commonly added to improve pregnancy outcomes of patients with repeated embryo implantation failure (RIF). In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of atosiban before transferring the frozen-thawed embryo to RIF patients. This retrospective study was conducted in the Hospital for Reproductive Medicine affiliated to Shandong University from August 2017 to June 2021. A total of 1774 women with a history of RIF undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET) were included in this study. All the participants were classified into atosiban or control group: Group A included 677 patients who were administered atosiban intravenously 30 min prior to FET with a dose of 37.5 mg; Group B included 1097 patients who received no atosiban before the transfer. There were no significant differences observed in the live birth rate (LBR) (39.73% vs. 39.02%, P  = 0.928) between the two groups. Other secondary outcomes including biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, clinical miscarriage rate and preterm birth rate were similar between the two groups (all P  &gt; 0.05). However, subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly higher preterm birth rates in the control group compared with the atosiban group (0 versus 3.0%, P  = 0.024) in the natural FET cycles. Atosiban may not improve pregnancy outcomes of RIF patients in FET cycles. However, the effects of Atosiban on pregnancy outcomes should be assessed in clinical trials with larger sample sizes.</description><subject>692/163</subject><subject>692/308</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Birth rate</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Embryo Implantation</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Premature Birth</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQtRAVrbb9Az2gSFy4BPwRr-MTQlWBSpW4VOrRsifjxaskXuwEKf31uE0pLQd88WjmzZuvR8g5ox8YFe3H3DCp25pyUYstb7f18oqccNrImgvOXz-zj8lZzntanuS6YfoNORaqZCjJT8jtpfcBLCxV9JWdYg7OjpWPqUp4QDthV4Xh0NtxslOIJWJDPyesQjFTvMOxwsGlJVZTsmP2mCpYoMd8So687TOePf4bcvPl8ubiW339_evVxefrGmTDphocl23nQQOio0xIsMiYFK1DClajY1pvpVadcp1XnGmBrXVOWNQggYkNuVppu2j35pDCYNNiog3mwRHTztg0hdKRoa0AdB2AUrJpkWoBjHsFrGMStO8K16eV6zC7ATvAsczUvyB9GRnDD7OLvwyjvFGqXGVD3j8ypPhzxjyZIWTAvqwP45wNb7nQmulSe0Pe_QPdxzmNZVX3KCn5VjFVUHxFQYo5J_RP3TBq7mVgVhmYIgPzIAOzlKS3z-d4Svlz9AIQKyCX0LjD9Lf2f2h_A5QswHE</recordid><startdate>20230607</startdate><enddate>20230607</enddate><creator>Li, Xiufang</creator><creator>Du, Yanbo</creator><creator>Han, Xu</creator><creator>Wang, Huidan</creator><creator>Sheng, Yan</creator><creator>Lian, Fang</creator><creator>Lian, Qingfeng</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230607</creationdate><title>Efficacy of atosiban for repeated implantation failure in frozen embryo transfer cycles</title><author>Li, Xiufang ; Du, Yanbo ; Han, Xu ; Wang, Huidan ; Sheng, Yan ; Lian, Fang ; Lian, Qingfeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-cb258dfc9ceeb0135cae11538be0ca9eb1996597d7bdf72193e8abb3ae9c5c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>692/163</topic><topic>692/308</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Birth rate</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Embryo Implantation</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Premature Birth</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiufang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Yanbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Huidan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Qingfeng</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Xiufang</au><au>Du, Yanbo</au><au>Han, Xu</au><au>Wang, Huidan</au><au>Sheng, Yan</au><au>Lian, Fang</au><au>Lian, Qingfeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of atosiban for repeated implantation failure in frozen embryo transfer cycles</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2023-06-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9277</spage><epage>9277</epage><pages>9277-9277</pages><artnum>9277</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Atosiban was commonly added to improve pregnancy outcomes of patients with repeated embryo implantation failure (RIF). In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of atosiban before transferring the frozen-thawed embryo to RIF patients. This retrospective study was conducted in the Hospital for Reproductive Medicine affiliated to Shandong University from August 2017 to June 2021. A total of 1774 women with a history of RIF undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET) were included in this study. All the participants were classified into atosiban or control group: Group A included 677 patients who were administered atosiban intravenously 30 min prior to FET with a dose of 37.5 mg; Group B included 1097 patients who received no atosiban before the transfer. There were no significant differences observed in the live birth rate (LBR) (39.73% vs. 39.02%, P  = 0.928) between the two groups. Other secondary outcomes including biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, clinical miscarriage rate and preterm birth rate were similar between the two groups (all P  &gt; 0.05). However, subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly higher preterm birth rates in the control group compared with the atosiban group (0 versus 3.0%, P  = 0.024) in the natural FET cycles. Atosiban may not improve pregnancy outcomes of RIF patients in FET cycles. However, the effects of Atosiban on pregnancy outcomes should be assessed in clinical trials with larger sample sizes.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>37286752</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-023-36286-y</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2023-06, Vol.13 (1), p.9277-9277, Article 9277
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_083cebdcc77548e093c12f7c1d15c9fd
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access
subjects 692/163
692/308
Birth
Birth rate
Clinical trials
Embryo Implantation
Embryo Transfer
Embryos
Female
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Implantation
Infant, Newborn
multidisciplinary
Patients
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Premature Birth
Retrospective Studies
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
title Efficacy of atosiban for repeated implantation failure in frozen embryo transfer cycles
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A46%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20atosiban%20for%20repeated%20implantation%20failure%20in%20frozen%20embryo%20transfer%20cycles&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Li,%20Xiufang&rft.date=2023-06-07&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9277&rft.epage=9277&rft.pages=9277-9277&rft.artnum=9277&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-023-36286-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2823991909%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-cb258dfc9ceeb0135cae11538be0ca9eb1996597d7bdf72193e8abb3ae9c5c13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2825526717&rft_id=info:pmid/37286752&rfr_iscdi=true