Loading…
Efficacy of atosiban for repeated implantation failure in frozen embryo transfer cycles
Atosiban was commonly added to improve pregnancy outcomes of patients with repeated embryo implantation failure (RIF). In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of atosiban before transferring the frozen-thawed embryo to RIF patients. This retrospective study was conducted in the Hospital fo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Scientific reports 2023-06, Vol.13 (1), p.9277-9277, Article 9277 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-cb258dfc9ceeb0135cae11538be0ca9eb1996597d7bdf72193e8abb3ae9c5c13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-cb258dfc9ceeb0135cae11538be0ca9eb1996597d7bdf72193e8abb3ae9c5c13 |
container_end_page | 9277 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 9277 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Li, Xiufang Du, Yanbo Han, Xu Wang, Huidan Sheng, Yan Lian, Fang Lian, Qingfeng |
description | Atosiban was commonly added to improve pregnancy outcomes of patients with repeated embryo implantation failure (RIF). In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of atosiban before transferring the frozen-thawed embryo to RIF patients. This retrospective study was conducted in the Hospital for Reproductive Medicine affiliated to Shandong University from August 2017 to June 2021. A total of 1774 women with a history of RIF undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET) were included in this study. All the participants were classified into atosiban or control group: Group A included 677 patients who were administered atosiban intravenously 30 min prior to FET with a dose of 37.5 mg; Group B included 1097 patients who received no atosiban before the transfer. There were no significant differences observed in the live birth rate (LBR) (39.73% vs. 39.02%,
P
= 0.928) between the two groups. Other secondary outcomes including biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, clinical miscarriage rate and preterm birth rate were similar between the two groups (all
P
> 0.05). However, subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly higher preterm birth rates in the control group compared with the atosiban group (0 versus 3.0%,
P
= 0.024) in the natural FET cycles. Atosiban may not improve pregnancy outcomes of RIF patients in FET cycles. However, the effects of Atosiban on pregnancy outcomes should be assessed in clinical trials with larger sample sizes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-023-36286-y |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_083cebdcc77548e093c12f7c1d15c9fd</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_083cebdcc77548e093c12f7c1d15c9fd</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2823991909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-cb258dfc9ceeb0135cae11538be0ca9eb1996597d7bdf72193e8abb3ae9c5c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQtRAVrbb9Az2gSFy4BPwRr-MTQlWBSpW4VOrRsifjxaskXuwEKf31uE0pLQd88WjmzZuvR8g5ox8YFe3H3DCp25pyUYstb7f18oqccNrImgvOXz-zj8lZzntanuS6YfoNORaqZCjJT8jtpfcBLCxV9JWdYg7OjpWPqUp4QDthV4Xh0NtxslOIJWJDPyesQjFTvMOxwsGlJVZTsmP2mCpYoMd8So687TOePf4bcvPl8ubiW339_evVxefrGmTDphocl23nQQOio0xIsMiYFK1DClajY1pvpVadcp1XnGmBrXVOWNQggYkNuVppu2j35pDCYNNiog3mwRHTztg0hdKRoa0AdB2AUrJpkWoBjHsFrGMStO8K16eV6zC7ATvAsczUvyB9GRnDD7OLvwyjvFGqXGVD3j8ypPhzxjyZIWTAvqwP45wNb7nQmulSe0Pe_QPdxzmNZVX3KCn5VjFVUHxFQYo5J_RP3TBq7mVgVhmYIgPzIAOzlKS3z-d4Svlz9AIQKyCX0LjD9Lf2f2h_A5QswHE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2825526717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of atosiban for repeated implantation failure in frozen embryo transfer cycles</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Li, Xiufang ; Du, Yanbo ; Han, Xu ; Wang, Huidan ; Sheng, Yan ; Lian, Fang ; Lian, Qingfeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiufang ; Du, Yanbo ; Han, Xu ; Wang, Huidan ; Sheng, Yan ; Lian, Fang ; Lian, Qingfeng</creatorcontrib><description>Atosiban was commonly added to improve pregnancy outcomes of patients with repeated embryo implantation failure (RIF). In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of atosiban before transferring the frozen-thawed embryo to RIF patients. This retrospective study was conducted in the Hospital for Reproductive Medicine affiliated to Shandong University from August 2017 to June 2021. A total of 1774 women with a history of RIF undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET) were included in this study. All the participants were classified into atosiban or control group: Group A included 677 patients who were administered atosiban intravenously 30 min prior to FET with a dose of 37.5 mg; Group B included 1097 patients who received no atosiban before the transfer. There were no significant differences observed in the live birth rate (LBR) (39.73% vs. 39.02%,
P
= 0.928) between the two groups. Other secondary outcomes including biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, clinical miscarriage rate and preterm birth rate were similar between the two groups (all
P
> 0.05). However, subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly higher preterm birth rates in the control group compared with the atosiban group (0 versus 3.0%,
P
= 0.024) in the natural FET cycles. Atosiban may not improve pregnancy outcomes of RIF patients in FET cycles. However, the effects of Atosiban on pregnancy outcomes should be assessed in clinical trials with larger sample sizes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36286-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37286752</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/163 ; 692/308 ; Birth ; Birth rate ; Clinical trials ; Embryo Implantation ; Embryo Transfer ; Embryos ; Female ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Implantation ; Infant, Newborn ; multidisciplinary ; Patients ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Premature Birth ; Retrospective Studies ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2023-06, Vol.13 (1), p.9277-9277, Article 9277</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-cb258dfc9ceeb0135cae11538be0ca9eb1996597d7bdf72193e8abb3ae9c5c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-cb258dfc9ceeb0135cae11538be0ca9eb1996597d7bdf72193e8abb3ae9c5c13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2825526717/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2825526717?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25744,27915,27916,37003,37004,44581,53782,53784,74887</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37286752$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiufang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Yanbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Huidan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Qingfeng</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of atosiban for repeated implantation failure in frozen embryo transfer cycles</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Atosiban was commonly added to improve pregnancy outcomes of patients with repeated embryo implantation failure (RIF). In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of atosiban before transferring the frozen-thawed embryo to RIF patients. This retrospective study was conducted in the Hospital for Reproductive Medicine affiliated to Shandong University from August 2017 to June 2021. A total of 1774 women with a history of RIF undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET) were included in this study. All the participants were classified into atosiban or control group: Group A included 677 patients who were administered atosiban intravenously 30 min prior to FET with a dose of 37.5 mg; Group B included 1097 patients who received no atosiban before the transfer. There were no significant differences observed in the live birth rate (LBR) (39.73% vs. 39.02%,
P
= 0.928) between the two groups. Other secondary outcomes including biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, clinical miscarriage rate and preterm birth rate were similar between the two groups (all
P
> 0.05). However, subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly higher preterm birth rates in the control group compared with the atosiban group (0 versus 3.0%,
P
= 0.024) in the natural FET cycles. Atosiban may not improve pregnancy outcomes of RIF patients in FET cycles. However, the effects of Atosiban on pregnancy outcomes should be assessed in clinical trials with larger sample sizes.</description><subject>692/163</subject><subject>692/308</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Birth rate</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Embryo Implantation</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Premature Birth</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQtRAVrbb9Az2gSFy4BPwRr-MTQlWBSpW4VOrRsifjxaskXuwEKf31uE0pLQd88WjmzZuvR8g5ox8YFe3H3DCp25pyUYstb7f18oqccNrImgvOXz-zj8lZzntanuS6YfoNORaqZCjJT8jtpfcBLCxV9JWdYg7OjpWPqUp4QDthV4Xh0NtxslOIJWJDPyesQjFTvMOxwsGlJVZTsmP2mCpYoMd8So687TOePf4bcvPl8ubiW339_evVxefrGmTDphocl23nQQOio0xIsMiYFK1DClajY1pvpVadcp1XnGmBrXVOWNQggYkNuVppu2j35pDCYNNiog3mwRHTztg0hdKRoa0AdB2AUrJpkWoBjHsFrGMStO8K16eV6zC7ATvAsczUvyB9GRnDD7OLvwyjvFGqXGVD3j8ypPhzxjyZIWTAvqwP45wNb7nQmulSe0Pe_QPdxzmNZVX3KCn5VjFVUHxFQYo5J_RP3TBq7mVgVhmYIgPzIAOzlKS3z-d4Svlz9AIQKyCX0LjD9Lf2f2h_A5QswHE</recordid><startdate>20230607</startdate><enddate>20230607</enddate><creator>Li, Xiufang</creator><creator>Du, Yanbo</creator><creator>Han, Xu</creator><creator>Wang, Huidan</creator><creator>Sheng, Yan</creator><creator>Lian, Fang</creator><creator>Lian, Qingfeng</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230607</creationdate><title>Efficacy of atosiban for repeated implantation failure in frozen embryo transfer cycles</title><author>Li, Xiufang ; Du, Yanbo ; Han, Xu ; Wang, Huidan ; Sheng, Yan ; Lian, Fang ; Lian, Qingfeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-cb258dfc9ceeb0135cae11538be0ca9eb1996597d7bdf72193e8abb3ae9c5c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>692/163</topic><topic>692/308</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Birth rate</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Embryo Implantation</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Premature Birth</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiufang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Yanbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Huidan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Qingfeng</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Xiufang</au><au>Du, Yanbo</au><au>Han, Xu</au><au>Wang, Huidan</au><au>Sheng, Yan</au><au>Lian, Fang</au><au>Lian, Qingfeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of atosiban for repeated implantation failure in frozen embryo transfer cycles</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2023-06-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9277</spage><epage>9277</epage><pages>9277-9277</pages><artnum>9277</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Atosiban was commonly added to improve pregnancy outcomes of patients with repeated embryo implantation failure (RIF). In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of atosiban before transferring the frozen-thawed embryo to RIF patients. This retrospective study was conducted in the Hospital for Reproductive Medicine affiliated to Shandong University from August 2017 to June 2021. A total of 1774 women with a history of RIF undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET) were included in this study. All the participants were classified into atosiban or control group: Group A included 677 patients who were administered atosiban intravenously 30 min prior to FET with a dose of 37.5 mg; Group B included 1097 patients who received no atosiban before the transfer. There were no significant differences observed in the live birth rate (LBR) (39.73% vs. 39.02%,
P
= 0.928) between the two groups. Other secondary outcomes including biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, clinical miscarriage rate and preterm birth rate were similar between the two groups (all
P
> 0.05). However, subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly higher preterm birth rates in the control group compared with the atosiban group (0 versus 3.0%,
P
= 0.024) in the natural FET cycles. Atosiban may not improve pregnancy outcomes of RIF patients in FET cycles. However, the effects of Atosiban on pregnancy outcomes should be assessed in clinical trials with larger sample sizes.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>37286752</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-023-36286-y</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2023-06, Vol.13 (1), p.9277-9277, Article 9277 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_083cebdcc77548e093c12f7c1d15c9fd |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access |
subjects | 692/163 692/308 Birth Birth rate Clinical trials Embryo Implantation Embryo Transfer Embryos Female Humanities and Social Sciences Humans Implantation Infant, Newborn multidisciplinary Patients Pregnancy Pregnancy Rate Premature Birth Retrospective Studies Science Science (multidisciplinary) |
title | Efficacy of atosiban for repeated implantation failure in frozen embryo transfer cycles |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A46%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20atosiban%20for%20repeated%20implantation%20failure%20in%20frozen%20embryo%20transfer%20cycles&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Li,%20Xiufang&rft.date=2023-06-07&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9277&rft.epage=9277&rft.pages=9277-9277&rft.artnum=9277&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-023-36286-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2823991909%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-cb258dfc9ceeb0135cae11538be0ca9eb1996597d7bdf72193e8abb3ae9c5c13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2825526717&rft_id=info:pmid/37286752&rfr_iscdi=true |