Behavioral and physiological methods for early quantitative assessment of spinal cord injury and prognosis in rats

• Published in: Brazilian journal of medical and biological research 2006-12, Vol.39 (12), p.1613-1623
• Main Authors: Giglio, C A, Defino, H L A, da-Silva, C A, de-Souza, A S, Del Bel, E A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Behavior, Animal - physiology; BIOLOGY; Disease Models, Animal; Experimental models; Laminectomy; Male; MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL; Motor performance test; Neurologic Examination - methods; Prognosis; Psychomotor Performance - physiology; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Reproducibility of Results; Sensorial test; Severity of Illness Index; Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology; Spinal cord injury; Time Factors; Trauma
• ISSN: 0100-879X; 1414-431X; 0100-879X; 1414-431X
• DOI: 10.1590/S0100-879X2006001200013

Methods for reliable evaluation of spinal cord (SC) injury in rats at short periods (2 and 24 h) after lesion were tested to characterize the mechanisms implicated in primary SC damage. We measured the physiological changes occurring after several procedures for producing SC injury, with particular emphasis on sensorimotor functions. Segmental and suprasegmental reflexes were tested in 39 male Wistar rats weighing 250-300 g divided into three control groups that were subjected to a) anesthesia, b) dissection of soft prevertebral tissue, and c) laminectomy of the vertebral segments between T10 and L1. In the lesion group the SC was completely transected, hemisected or subjected to vertebral compression. All animals were evaluated 2 and 24 h after the experimental procedure by the hind limb motility index, Bohlman motor score, open-field, hot-plate, tail flick, and paw compression tests. The locomotion scale proved to be less sensitive than the sensorimotor tests. A reduction in exploratory movements was detected in the animals 24 h after the procedures. The hot-plate was the most sensitive test for detecting sensorimotor deficiencies following light, moderate or severe SC injury. The most sensitive and simplest test of reflex function was the hot-plate. The hemisection model promoted reproducible moderate SC injury which allowed us to quantify the resulting behavior and analyze the evolution of the lesion and its consequences during the first 24 h after injury. We conclude that hemisection permitted the quantitation of behavioral responses for evaluation of the development of deficits after lesions. Hind limb evaluation scores and spontaneous exploration events provided a sensitive index of immediate injury effects after SC lesion at 2 and 24 h. Taken together, locomotion scales, open-field, and hot-plate tests represent reproducible, quantitatively sensitive methods for detecting functional deficiencies within short periods of time, indicating their potential for the study of cellular mechanisms of primary injury and repair after traumatic SC injury.