Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Measures, Pyramidal Score on Expanded Disability Status Scale and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Corticospinal Tract in Multiple Sclerosis

• Published in: Bioengineering (Basel) 2023-09, Vol.10 (10), p.1118
• Main Authors: Rogić Vidaković, Maja, Ćurković Katić, Ana, Pavelin, Sanda, Bralić, Antonia, Mikac, Una, Šoda, Joško, Jerković, Ana, Mastelić, Angela, Dolić, Krešimir, Markotić, Anita, Đogaš, Zoran, Režić Mužinić, Nikolina
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bioengineering; Biomarkers; Brain damage; Brain research; Brain stimulation; Correspondence; Disease; EDSS; Electromyography; Integrity; Latency; Lesions; Magnetic fields; Magnetic resonance imaging; Medical imaging; Methods; motor evoked potential; Motor evoked potentials; Multiple sclerosis; Muscles; Nervous system; Neuroimaging; Neurophysiology; Physiological aspects; Pyramidal tracts; Signs and symptoms; Spinal cord; Statistics; Transcranial magnetic stimulation
• ISSN: 2306-5354; 2306-5354
• DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10101118

Probing the cortic ospinal tract integrity by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) could help to understand the neurophysiological correlations of multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms. Therefore, the study objective was, first, to investigate TMS measures (resting motor threshold-RMT, motor evoked potential (MEP) latency, and amplitude) of corticospinal tract integrity in people with relapsing-remitting MS (pwMS). Then, the study examined the conformity of TMS measures with clinical disease-related (Expanded Disability Status Scale—EDSS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results (lesion count) in pwMS. The e-field navigated TMS, MRI, and EDSS data were collected in 23 pwMS and compared to non-clinical samples. The results show that pwMS differed from non-clinical samples in MEP latency for upper and lower extremity muscles. Also, pwMS with altered MEP latency (prolonged or absent MEP response) had higher EDSS, general and pyramidal, functional scores than pwMS with normal MEP latency finding. Furthermore, the RMT intensity for lower extremity muscles was predictive of EDSS functional pyramidal scores. TMS/MEP latency findings classified pwMS as the same as EDSS functional pyramidal scores in 70–83% of cases and were similar to the MRI results, corresponding to EDSS functional pyramidal scores in 57–65% of cases. PwMS with altered MEP latency differed from pwMS with normal MEP latency in the total number of lesions in the brain corticospinal and cervical corticospinal tract. The study provides preliminary results on the correspondence of MRI and TMS corticospinal tract evaluation results with EDSS functional pyramidal score results in MS.