Energy Flexibility Comparison of Different Control Strategies for Zones with Radiant Floor Systems

• Published in: Buildings (Basel) 2022-06, Vol.12 (6), p.837
• Main Authors: Saberi-Derakhtenjani, Ali, Athienitis, Andreas K., Eicker, Ursula, Rodriguez-Ubinas, Edwin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Air temperature; Alternative energy sources; Buildings; demand response; Demand side management; Design; Energy; energy flexibility; Energy resources; Energy storage; Environmental chambers; Flexibility; Heat; Heating; Heating load; Heating systems; Linear algebra; low-order model; Peak demand; Peak load; radiant floor heating; Radiant heating; Renewable resources; Smart grid; Surface temperature; Temperature control; Test chambers; Thermal energy
• ISSN: 2075-5309; 2075-5309
• DOI: 10.3390/buildings12060837

Radiant floor systems offer significant potential for studying and developing energy flexibility strategies for buildings and their interaction with smart grids. Efficient design and operation of such systems require several critical decisions on design and control variables to maintain comfortable thermal conditions in the space and floor surface temperatures within the recommended range. This study presents a comparison of different control strategies to activate energy flexibility for zones with radiant floor heating systems. The focus of this study is on the zones with radiant floor systems for which the hydronic pipes are located deep in the concrete and therefore, there is a significant thermal lag. A perimeter zone test room equipped with a hydronic radiant floor system in an environmental chamber is used as to validate the modelling methodology. Considering a typical cloudy and cold winter day, three different control strategies for radiant heating were studied based on controlling the zone air temperature, floor surface temperature, and the operative temperature. Then considering morning and evening peak demand periods, the downward and upward energy flexibility are quantified and compared with each other for the different control strategies. It is observed that for the same 2 °C increase or decrease in the setpoint, the control strategy based on the zone air temperature results in the higher flexibility for both downward and upward scenarios compared with the floor surface and operative temperature controls. The effect of increasing window to wall ratio (WWR) is also investigated. Then, also the effect of solar gains on a sunny day on energy flexibility is studied. No significant difference in the upward and downward flexibility is observed. However, the hours of zero heating load are significantly increased due to the contribution from the solar gains.