Loading…

Measuring the differences between human-human and human-machine dialogs

In this paper, we assess the applicability of user simulation techniques to generate dialogs which are similar to real human-machine spoken interactions.To do so, we present the results of the comparison between three corpora acquired by means of different techniques. The first corpus was acquired w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in distributed computing and artificial intelligence journal 2015-01, Vol.4 (2), p.99-112
Main Authors: Griol, David, Molina, José
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 112
container_issue 2
container_start_page 99
container_title Advances in distributed computing and artificial intelligence journal
container_volume 4
creator Griol, David
Molina, José
description In this paper, we assess the applicability of user simulation techniques to generate dialogs which are similar to real human-machine spoken interactions.To do so, we present the results of the comparison between three corpora acquired by means of different techniques. The first corpus was acquired with real users.A statistical user simulation technique has been applied to the same task to acquire the second corpus. In this technique, the next user answer is selected by means of a classification process that takes into account the previous dialog history, the lexical information in the clause, and the subtask of the dialog to which it contributes. Finally, a dialog simulation technique has been developed for the acquisition of the third corpus. This technique uses a random selection of the user and system turns, defining stop conditions for automatically deciding if the simulated dialog is successful or not. We use several evaluation measures proposed in previous research to compare between our three acquired corpora, and then discuss the similarities and differences with regard to these measures.
doi_str_mv 10.14201/ADCAIJ20154299112
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_09e4c3075b9847249b1b49a3355b74c5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_09e4c3075b9847249b1b49a3355b74c5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2051028592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-661333fcea0e1c737e396cdd92ce922db64e2dee0e57807622496e36191e88133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUE1LAzEQDaJgqf0DnhY8ryaTr82xVK2Vihc9h2x2tt3SZmuyi_jvXdsigpeZN8N7b4ZHyDWjt0wAZXfT-9l08TwgKcAYxuCMjACkzKFQ_PwPviSTlDaUUsZBAtMjMn9Bl_rYhFXWrTGrmrrGiMFjykrsPhFDtu53LuSHmrlQnead8-sm_Cjctl2lK3JRu23CyamPyfvjw9vsKV--zhez6TL3oFSXK8U457VHR5F5zTVyo3xVGfBoAKpSCYQKkaLUBdUKQBiFXDHDsCgG7Zgsjr5V6zZ2H5udi1-2dY09LNq4si52jd-ipQaF51TL0hRCD0YlK4VxnEtZauHl4HVz9NrH9qPH1NlN28cwvG-BSkahkAYGFhxZPrYpRax_rzJqD_nbf_nzbwJ9dbs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2051028592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring the differences between human-human and human-machine dialogs</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Griol, David ; Molina, José</creator><creatorcontrib>Griol, David ; Molina, José</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we assess the applicability of user simulation techniques to generate dialogs which are similar to real human-machine spoken interactions.To do so, we present the results of the comparison between three corpora acquired by means of different techniques. The first corpus was acquired with real users.A statistical user simulation technique has been applied to the same task to acquire the second corpus. In this technique, the next user answer is selected by means of a classification process that takes into account the previous dialog history, the lexical information in the clause, and the subtask of the dialog to which it contributes. Finally, a dialog simulation technique has been developed for the acquisition of the third corpus. This technique uses a random selection of the user and system turns, defining stop conditions for automatically deciding if the simulated dialog is successful or not. We use several evaluation measures proposed in previous research to compare between our three acquired corpora, and then discuss the similarities and differences with regard to these measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2255-2863</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2255-2863</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14201/ADCAIJ20154299112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca</publisher><subject>conversational agents ; dialog structure annotation ; domain knowledge acquisition ; Simulation ; spoken dialog systems ; spoken interaction</subject><ispartof>Advances in distributed computing and artificial intelligence journal, 2015-01, Vol.4 (2), p.99-112</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2051028592?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Griol, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molina, José</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring the differences between human-human and human-machine dialogs</title><title>Advances in distributed computing and artificial intelligence journal</title><description>In this paper, we assess the applicability of user simulation techniques to generate dialogs which are similar to real human-machine spoken interactions.To do so, we present the results of the comparison between three corpora acquired by means of different techniques. The first corpus was acquired with real users.A statistical user simulation technique has been applied to the same task to acquire the second corpus. In this technique, the next user answer is selected by means of a classification process that takes into account the previous dialog history, the lexical information in the clause, and the subtask of the dialog to which it contributes. Finally, a dialog simulation technique has been developed for the acquisition of the third corpus. This technique uses a random selection of the user and system turns, defining stop conditions for automatically deciding if the simulated dialog is successful or not. We use several evaluation measures proposed in previous research to compare between our three acquired corpora, and then discuss the similarities and differences with regard to these measures.</description><subject>conversational agents</subject><subject>dialog structure annotation</subject><subject>domain knowledge acquisition</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>spoken dialog systems</subject><subject>spoken interaction</subject><issn>2255-2863</issn><issn>2255-2863</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNplUE1LAzEQDaJgqf0DnhY8ryaTr82xVK2Vihc9h2x2tt3SZmuyi_jvXdsigpeZN8N7b4ZHyDWjt0wAZXfT-9l08TwgKcAYxuCMjACkzKFQ_PwPviSTlDaUUsZBAtMjMn9Bl_rYhFXWrTGrmrrGiMFjykrsPhFDtu53LuSHmrlQnead8-sm_Cjctl2lK3JRu23CyamPyfvjw9vsKV--zhez6TL3oFSXK8U457VHR5F5zTVyo3xVGfBoAKpSCYQKkaLUBdUKQBiFXDHDsCgG7Zgsjr5V6zZ2H5udi1-2dY09LNq4si52jd-ipQaF51TL0hRCD0YlK4VxnEtZauHl4HVz9NrH9qPH1NlN28cwvG-BSkahkAYGFhxZPrYpRax_rzJqD_nbf_nzbwJ9dbs</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Griol, David</creator><creator>Molina, José</creator><general>Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Measuring the differences between human-human and human-machine dialogs</title><author>Griol, David ; Molina, José</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-661333fcea0e1c737e396cdd92ce922db64e2dee0e57807622496e36191e88133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>conversational agents</topic><topic>dialog structure annotation</topic><topic>domain knowledge acquisition</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>spoken dialog systems</topic><topic>spoken interaction</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Griol, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molina, José</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>DOAJ, Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Advances in distributed computing and artificial intelligence journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Griol, David</au><au>Molina, José</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring the differences between human-human and human-machine dialogs</atitle><jtitle>Advances in distributed computing and artificial intelligence journal</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>112</epage><pages>99-112</pages><issn>2255-2863</issn><eissn>2255-2863</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we assess the applicability of user simulation techniques to generate dialogs which are similar to real human-machine spoken interactions.To do so, we present the results of the comparison between three corpora acquired by means of different techniques. The first corpus was acquired with real users.A statistical user simulation technique has been applied to the same task to acquire the second corpus. In this technique, the next user answer is selected by means of a classification process that takes into account the previous dialog history, the lexical information in the clause, and the subtask of the dialog to which it contributes. Finally, a dialog simulation technique has been developed for the acquisition of the third corpus. This technique uses a random selection of the user and system turns, defining stop conditions for automatically deciding if the simulated dialog is successful or not. We use several evaluation measures proposed in previous research to compare between our three acquired corpora, and then discuss the similarities and differences with regard to these measures.</abstract><cop>Salamanca</cop><pub>Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca</pub><doi>10.14201/ADCAIJ20154299112</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2255-2863
ispartof Advances in distributed computing and artificial intelligence journal, 2015-01, Vol.4 (2), p.99-112
issn 2255-2863
2255-2863
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_09e4c3075b9847249b1b49a3355b74c5
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects conversational agents
dialog structure annotation
domain knowledge acquisition
Simulation
spoken dialog systems
spoken interaction
title Measuring the differences between human-human and human-machine dialogs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T22%3A47%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20the%20differences%20between%20human-human%20and%20human-machine%20dialogs&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20distributed%20computing%20and%20artificial%20intelligence%20journal&rft.au=Griol,%20David&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=112&rft.pages=99-112&rft.issn=2255-2863&rft.eissn=2255-2863&rft_id=info:doi/10.14201/ADCAIJ20154299112&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2051028592%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-661333fcea0e1c737e396cdd92ce922db64e2dee0e57807622496e36191e88133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2051028592&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true