Loading…
Measuring the differences between human-human and human-machine dialogs
In this paper, we assess the applicability of user simulation techniques to generate dialogs which are similar to real human-machine spoken interactions.To do so, we present the results of the comparison between three corpora acquired by means of different techniques. The first corpus was acquired w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Advances in distributed computing and artificial intelligence journal 2015-01, Vol.4 (2), p.99-112 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 112 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 99 |
container_title | Advances in distributed computing and artificial intelligence journal |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Griol, David Molina, José |
description | In this paper, we assess the applicability of user simulation techniques to generate dialogs which are similar to real human-machine spoken interactions.To do so, we present the results of the comparison between three corpora acquired by means of different techniques. The first corpus was acquired with real users.A statistical user simulation technique has been applied to the same task to acquire the second corpus. In this technique, the next user answer is selected by means of a classification process that takes into account the previous dialog history, the lexical information in the clause, and the subtask of the dialog to which it contributes. Finally, a dialog simulation technique has been developed for the acquisition of the third corpus. This technique uses a random selection of the user and system turns, defining stop conditions for automatically deciding if the simulated dialog is successful or not. We use several evaluation measures proposed in previous research to compare between our three acquired corpora, and then discuss the similarities and differences with regard to these measures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.14201/ADCAIJ20154299112 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_09e4c3075b9847249b1b49a3355b74c5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_09e4c3075b9847249b1b49a3355b74c5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2051028592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-661333fcea0e1c737e396cdd92ce922db64e2dee0e57807622496e36191e88133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUE1LAzEQDaJgqf0DnhY8ryaTr82xVK2Vihc9h2x2tt3SZmuyi_jvXdsigpeZN8N7b4ZHyDWjt0wAZXfT-9l08TwgKcAYxuCMjACkzKFQ_PwPviSTlDaUUsZBAtMjMn9Bl_rYhFXWrTGrmrrGiMFjykrsPhFDtu53LuSHmrlQnead8-sm_Cjctl2lK3JRu23CyamPyfvjw9vsKV--zhez6TL3oFSXK8U457VHR5F5zTVyo3xVGfBoAKpSCYQKkaLUBdUKQBiFXDHDsCgG7Zgsjr5V6zZ2H5udi1-2dY09LNq4si52jd-ipQaF51TL0hRCD0YlK4VxnEtZauHl4HVz9NrH9qPH1NlN28cwvG-BSkahkAYGFhxZPrYpRax_rzJqD_nbf_nzbwJ9dbs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2051028592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring the differences between human-human and human-machine dialogs</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Griol, David ; Molina, José</creator><creatorcontrib>Griol, David ; Molina, José</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we assess the applicability of user simulation techniques to generate dialogs which are similar to real human-machine spoken interactions.To do so, we present the results of the comparison between three corpora acquired by means of different techniques. The first corpus was acquired with real users.A statistical user simulation technique has been applied to the same task to acquire the second corpus. In this technique, the next user answer is selected by means of a classification process that takes into account the previous dialog history, the lexical information in the clause, and the subtask of the dialog to which it contributes. Finally, a dialog simulation technique has been developed for the acquisition of the third corpus. This technique uses a random selection of the user and system turns, defining stop conditions for automatically deciding if the simulated dialog is successful or not. We use several evaluation measures proposed in previous research to compare between our three acquired corpora, and then discuss the similarities and differences with regard to these measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2255-2863</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2255-2863</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14201/ADCAIJ20154299112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca</publisher><subject>conversational agents ; dialog structure annotation ; domain knowledge acquisition ; Simulation ; spoken dialog systems ; spoken interaction</subject><ispartof>Advances in distributed computing and artificial intelligence journal, 2015-01, Vol.4 (2), p.99-112</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2051028592?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Griol, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molina, José</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring the differences between human-human and human-machine dialogs</title><title>Advances in distributed computing and artificial intelligence journal</title><description>In this paper, we assess the applicability of user simulation techniques to generate dialogs which are similar to real human-machine spoken interactions.To do so, we present the results of the comparison between three corpora acquired by means of different techniques. The first corpus was acquired with real users.A statistical user simulation technique has been applied to the same task to acquire the second corpus. In this technique, the next user answer is selected by means of a classification process that takes into account the previous dialog history, the lexical information in the clause, and the subtask of the dialog to which it contributes. Finally, a dialog simulation technique has been developed for the acquisition of the third corpus. This technique uses a random selection of the user and system turns, defining stop conditions for automatically deciding if the simulated dialog is successful or not. We use several evaluation measures proposed in previous research to compare between our three acquired corpora, and then discuss the similarities and differences with regard to these measures.</description><subject>conversational agents</subject><subject>dialog structure annotation</subject><subject>domain knowledge acquisition</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>spoken dialog systems</subject><subject>spoken interaction</subject><issn>2255-2863</issn><issn>2255-2863</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNplUE1LAzEQDaJgqf0DnhY8ryaTr82xVK2Vihc9h2x2tt3SZmuyi_jvXdsigpeZN8N7b4ZHyDWjt0wAZXfT-9l08TwgKcAYxuCMjACkzKFQ_PwPviSTlDaUUsZBAtMjMn9Bl_rYhFXWrTGrmrrGiMFjykrsPhFDtu53LuSHmrlQnead8-sm_Cjctl2lK3JRu23CyamPyfvjw9vsKV--zhez6TL3oFSXK8U457VHR5F5zTVyo3xVGfBoAKpSCYQKkaLUBdUKQBiFXDHDsCgG7Zgsjr5V6zZ2H5udi1-2dY09LNq4si52jd-ipQaF51TL0hRCD0YlK4VxnEtZauHl4HVz9NrH9qPH1NlN28cwvG-BSkahkAYGFhxZPrYpRax_rzJqD_nbf_nzbwJ9dbs</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Griol, David</creator><creator>Molina, José</creator><general>Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Measuring the differences between human-human and human-machine dialogs</title><author>Griol, David ; Molina, José</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-661333fcea0e1c737e396cdd92ce922db64e2dee0e57807622496e36191e88133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>conversational agents</topic><topic>dialog structure annotation</topic><topic>domain knowledge acquisition</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>spoken dialog systems</topic><topic>spoken interaction</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Griol, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molina, José</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>DOAJ, Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Advances in distributed computing and artificial intelligence journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Griol, David</au><au>Molina, José</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring the differences between human-human and human-machine dialogs</atitle><jtitle>Advances in distributed computing and artificial intelligence journal</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>112</epage><pages>99-112</pages><issn>2255-2863</issn><eissn>2255-2863</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we assess the applicability of user simulation techniques to generate dialogs which are similar to real human-machine spoken interactions.To do so, we present the results of the comparison between three corpora acquired by means of different techniques. The first corpus was acquired with real users.A statistical user simulation technique has been applied to the same task to acquire the second corpus. In this technique, the next user answer is selected by means of a classification process that takes into account the previous dialog history, the lexical information in the clause, and the subtask of the dialog to which it contributes. Finally, a dialog simulation technique has been developed for the acquisition of the third corpus. This technique uses a random selection of the user and system turns, defining stop conditions for automatically deciding if the simulated dialog is successful or not. We use several evaluation measures proposed in previous research to compare between our three acquired corpora, and then discuss the similarities and differences with regard to these measures.</abstract><cop>Salamanca</cop><pub>Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca</pub><doi>10.14201/ADCAIJ20154299112</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2255-2863 |
ispartof | Advances in distributed computing and artificial intelligence journal, 2015-01, Vol.4 (2), p.99-112 |
issn | 2255-2863 2255-2863 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_09e4c3075b9847249b1b49a3355b74c5 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | conversational agents dialog structure annotation domain knowledge acquisition Simulation spoken dialog systems spoken interaction |
title | Measuring the differences between human-human and human-machine dialogs |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T22%3A47%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20the%20differences%20between%20human-human%20and%20human-machine%20dialogs&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20distributed%20computing%20and%20artificial%20intelligence%20journal&rft.au=Griol,%20David&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=112&rft.pages=99-112&rft.issn=2255-2863&rft.eissn=2255-2863&rft_id=info:doi/10.14201/ADCAIJ20154299112&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2051028592%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-661333fcea0e1c737e396cdd92ce922db64e2dee0e57807622496e36191e88133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2051028592&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |