Loading…
Thinking better about high-quality science: a look at some ethical flaws and productivity evaluation
Recently, some issues related to scientific ethics and the evaluation of productivity have been increasingly discussed, especially in graduate programs. At the University of the State of Mato Grosso (UNEMAT), on the Campus of Nova Xavantina, Brazil, the researchers have discussed certain issues rega...
Saved in:
Published in: | Brazilian journal of biology 2014-11, Vol.74 (4), p.1009-1010 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-bed5bc2bf3e93409ed434eaa8d1b163b553cb195154699c9b2cb846d3937e85c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-bed5bc2bf3e93409ed434eaa8d1b163b553cb195154699c9b2cb846d3937e85c3 |
container_end_page | 1010 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1009 |
container_title | Brazilian journal of biology |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Eisenlohr, P V Tavares, J R Oliveira, S L Santos, A O Valadão, M B X Bilce, J M Roberto, R L Castro, H B Zaratim, E C P Lima, S L Santos, A J Silva, A P G Lima, L B Melo-Santos, K S Figueiredo, J D S Santos, L M Pereira, F C Oliveira, J C A Miguel, T B Serpa, A O Kreutz, C Reis, S M A |
description | Recently, some issues related to scientific ethics and the evaluation of productivity have been increasingly discussed, especially in graduate programs. At the University of the State of Mato Grosso (UNEMAT), on the Campus of Nova Xavantina, Brazil, the researchers have discussed certain issues regarding this subject. They present the main points and perspectives that emerged from this discussion in order to stimulate debate in other graduate programs and shed light on ethical issues that should be addressed to produce high-quality science. In ancient times, creativity was guided by the mysteries of nature, and this was reflected in the resulting publications; however, today, creativity is considered an important requirement for a successful career in science. This new conception of both creativity and scientific productivity is accompanied by the fact that the number of published articles, the number of citations received and the impact factor of journals have become essential components for the evaluation of both individual and institutional scientific production. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1590/1519-6984.17413 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0a3a455325454281bf9aa22844ce7360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A414693978</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0a3a455325454281bf9aa22844ce7360</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A414693978</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-bed5bc2bf3e93409ed434eaa8d1b163b553cb195154699c9b2cb846d3937e85c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1v1DAQxSMEoqVw5oYscYFDtvFnbG5VxcdKlZCgnK2xM9l1m43b2Cn0v8fbbYsWcUA-2Br_3tPM6FXVa9osqDTNMZXU1MposaCtoPxJdUhVq2vBW_m0vB9-D6oXKV00DZMN18-rAyYVaxVVh1V3vg7jZRhXxGHOOBFwcc5kHVbr-nqGIeRbknzA0eMHAmSI8ZJAJilukGBeBw8D6Qf4mQiMHbmaYjf7HG62MryBYYYc4viyetbDkPDV_X1U_fj08fz0S3329fPy9OSs9pLJXDvspPPM9RwNF43BTnCBALqjjirupOTeUSOpFMoYbxzzTgvVccNb1NLzo2q58-0iXNirKWxgurURgr0rxGllYcrBD2gb4CCKIZNCCqap6w0AY1oIjy1XTfF6t_MqM13PmLLdhORxGGDEOCdLldJMGsXl_6BCCK5bVtC3f6EXcZ7GspRCSaq1lK36Q62gtBrGPuYJ_NbUnghahuem1YVa_IMqp8NN8HHEPpT6nuD9nqAwGX_lFcwp2eX3b_vs8Y71U0xpwv5xnbSx2-jZbbjsNlz2LnpF8eZ-tNltsHvkH7LGfwNQyM98</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1651885576</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thinking better about high-quality science: a look at some ethical flaws and productivity evaluation</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><source>SciELO</source><creator>Eisenlohr, P V ; Tavares, J R ; Oliveira, S L ; Santos, A O ; Valadão, M B X ; Bilce, J M ; Roberto, R L ; Castro, H B ; Zaratim, E C P ; Lima, S L ; Santos, A J ; Silva, A P G ; Lima, L B ; Melo-Santos, K S ; Figueiredo, J D S ; Santos, L M ; Pereira, F C ; Oliveira, J C A ; Miguel, T B ; Serpa, A O ; Kreutz, C ; Reis, S M A</creator><creatorcontrib>Eisenlohr, P V ; Tavares, J R ; Oliveira, S L ; Santos, A O ; Valadão, M B X ; Bilce, J M ; Roberto, R L ; Castro, H B ; Zaratim, E C P ; Lima, S L ; Santos, A J ; Silva, A P G ; Lima, L B ; Melo-Santos, K S ; Figueiredo, J D S ; Santos, L M ; Pereira, F C ; Oliveira, J C A ; Miguel, T B ; Serpa, A O ; Kreutz, C ; Reis, S M A</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, some issues related to scientific ethics and the evaluation of productivity have been increasingly discussed, especially in graduate programs. At the University of the State of Mato Grosso (UNEMAT), on the Campus of Nova Xavantina, Brazil, the researchers have discussed certain issues regarding this subject. They present the main points and perspectives that emerged from this discussion in order to stimulate debate in other graduate programs and shed light on ethical issues that should be addressed to produce high-quality science. In ancient times, creativity was guided by the mysteries of nature, and this was reflected in the resulting publications; however, today, creativity is considered an important requirement for a successful career in science. This new conception of both creativity and scientific productivity is accompanied by the fact that the number of published articles, the number of citations received and the impact factor of journals have become essential components for the evaluation of both individual and institutional scientific production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1519-6984</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1678-4375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1678-4375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1519-6984</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/1519-6984.17413</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25627616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Association of the Brazilian Journal of Biology</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Creativity ; Ethics, Research ; Humans ; Periodicals as Topic - ethics ; Productivity ; Science</subject><ispartof>Brazilian journal of biology, 2014-11, Vol.74 (4), p.1009-1010</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Association of the Brazilian Journal of Biology</rights><rights>Copyright Instituto Internacional de Ecologia Nov 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-bed5bc2bf3e93409ed434eaa8d1b163b553cb195154699c9b2cb846d3937e85c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-bed5bc2bf3e93409ed434eaa8d1b163b553cb195154699c9b2cb846d3937e85c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1651885576?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25627616$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eisenlohr, P V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavares, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, S L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, A O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valadão, M B X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilce, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberto, R L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, H B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaratim, E C P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, S L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, A P G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, L B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo-Santos, K S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, J D S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, F C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, J C A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miguel, T B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serpa, A O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreutz, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, S M A</creatorcontrib><title>Thinking better about high-quality science: a look at some ethical flaws and productivity evaluation</title><title>Brazilian journal of biology</title><addtitle>Braz J Biol</addtitle><description>Recently, some issues related to scientific ethics and the evaluation of productivity have been increasingly discussed, especially in graduate programs. At the University of the State of Mato Grosso (UNEMAT), on the Campus of Nova Xavantina, Brazil, the researchers have discussed certain issues regarding this subject. They present the main points and perspectives that emerged from this discussion in order to stimulate debate in other graduate programs and shed light on ethical issues that should be addressed to produce high-quality science. In ancient times, creativity was guided by the mysteries of nature, and this was reflected in the resulting publications; however, today, creativity is considered an important requirement for a successful career in science. This new conception of both creativity and scientific productivity is accompanied by the fact that the number of published articles, the number of citations received and the impact factor of journals have become essential components for the evaluation of both individual and institutional scientific production.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Ethics, Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - ethics</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Science</subject><issn>1519-6984</issn><issn>1678-4375</issn><issn>1678-4375</issn><issn>1519-6984</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1v1DAQxSMEoqVw5oYscYFDtvFnbG5VxcdKlZCgnK2xM9l1m43b2Cn0v8fbbYsWcUA-2Br_3tPM6FXVa9osqDTNMZXU1MposaCtoPxJdUhVq2vBW_m0vB9-D6oXKV00DZMN18-rAyYVaxVVh1V3vg7jZRhXxGHOOBFwcc5kHVbr-nqGIeRbknzA0eMHAmSI8ZJAJilukGBeBw8D6Qf4mQiMHbmaYjf7HG62MryBYYYc4viyetbDkPDV_X1U_fj08fz0S3329fPy9OSs9pLJXDvspPPM9RwNF43BTnCBALqjjirupOTeUSOpFMoYbxzzTgvVccNb1NLzo2q58-0iXNirKWxgurURgr0rxGllYcrBD2gb4CCKIZNCCqap6w0AY1oIjy1XTfF6t_MqM13PmLLdhORxGGDEOCdLldJMGsXl_6BCCK5bVtC3f6EXcZ7GspRCSaq1lK36Q62gtBrGPuYJ_NbUnghahuem1YVa_IMqp8NN8HHEPpT6nuD9nqAwGX_lFcwp2eX3b_vs8Y71U0xpwv5xnbSx2-jZbbjsNlz2LnpF8eZ-tNltsHvkH7LGfwNQyM98</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Eisenlohr, P V</creator><creator>Tavares, J R</creator><creator>Oliveira, S L</creator><creator>Santos, A O</creator><creator>Valadão, M B X</creator><creator>Bilce, J M</creator><creator>Roberto, R L</creator><creator>Castro, H B</creator><creator>Zaratim, E C P</creator><creator>Lima, S L</creator><creator>Santos, A J</creator><creator>Silva, A P G</creator><creator>Lima, L B</creator><creator>Melo-Santos, K S</creator><creator>Figueiredo, J D S</creator><creator>Santos, L M</creator><creator>Pereira, F C</creator><creator>Oliveira, J C A</creator><creator>Miguel, T B</creator><creator>Serpa, A O</creator><creator>Kreutz, C</creator><creator>Reis, S M A</creator><general>Association of the Brazilian Journal of Biology</general><general>Instituto Internacional de Ecologia</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>INF</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Thinking better about high-quality science: a look at some ethical flaws and productivity evaluation</title><author>Eisenlohr, P V ; Tavares, J R ; Oliveira, S L ; Santos, A O ; Valadão, M B X ; Bilce, J M ; Roberto, R L ; Castro, H B ; Zaratim, E C P ; Lima, S L ; Santos, A J ; Silva, A P G ; Lima, L B ; Melo-Santos, K S ; Figueiredo, J D S ; Santos, L M ; Pereira, F C ; Oliveira, J C A ; Miguel, T B ; Serpa, A O ; Kreutz, C ; Reis, S M A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-bed5bc2bf3e93409ed434eaa8d1b163b553cb195154699c9b2cb846d3937e85c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Ethics, Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - ethics</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eisenlohr, P V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavares, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, S L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, A O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valadão, M B X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilce, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberto, R L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, H B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaratim, E C P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, S L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, A P G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, L B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo-Santos, K S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, J D S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, F C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, J C A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miguel, T B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serpa, A O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreutz, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, S M A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: Informe Academico</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America & Iberia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Brazilian journal of biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eisenlohr, P V</au><au>Tavares, J R</au><au>Oliveira, S L</au><au>Santos, A O</au><au>Valadão, M B X</au><au>Bilce, J M</au><au>Roberto, R L</au><au>Castro, H B</au><au>Zaratim, E C P</au><au>Lima, S L</au><au>Santos, A J</au><au>Silva, A P G</au><au>Lima, L B</au><au>Melo-Santos, K S</au><au>Figueiredo, J D S</au><au>Santos, L M</au><au>Pereira, F C</au><au>Oliveira, J C A</au><au>Miguel, T B</au><au>Serpa, A O</au><au>Kreutz, C</au><au>Reis, S M A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thinking better about high-quality science: a look at some ethical flaws and productivity evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian journal of biology</jtitle><addtitle>Braz J Biol</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1009</spage><epage>1010</epage><pages>1009-1010</pages><issn>1519-6984</issn><issn>1678-4375</issn><eissn>1678-4375</eissn><eissn>1519-6984</eissn><abstract>Recently, some issues related to scientific ethics and the evaluation of productivity have been increasingly discussed, especially in graduate programs. At the University of the State of Mato Grosso (UNEMAT), on the Campus of Nova Xavantina, Brazil, the researchers have discussed certain issues regarding this subject. They present the main points and perspectives that emerged from this discussion in order to stimulate debate in other graduate programs and shed light on ethical issues that should be addressed to produce high-quality science. In ancient times, creativity was guided by the mysteries of nature, and this was reflected in the resulting publications; however, today, creativity is considered an important requirement for a successful career in science. This new conception of both creativity and scientific productivity is accompanied by the fact that the number of published articles, the number of citations received and the impact factor of journals have become essential components for the evaluation of both individual and institutional scientific production.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Association of the Brazilian Journal of Biology</pub><pmid>25627616</pmid><doi>10.1590/1519-6984.17413</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1519-6984 |
ispartof | Brazilian journal of biology, 2014-11, Vol.74 (4), p.1009-1010 |
issn | 1519-6984 1678-4375 1678-4375 1519-6984 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0a3a455325454281bf9aa22844ce7360 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; IngentaConnect Journals; SciELO |
subjects | Behavior Creativity Ethics, Research Humans Periodicals as Topic - ethics Productivity Science |
title | Thinking better about high-quality science: a look at some ethical flaws and productivity evaluation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A56%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thinking%20better%20about%20high-quality%20science:%20a%20look%20at%20some%20ethical%20flaws%20and%20productivity%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20journal%20of%20biology&rft.au=Eisenlohr,%20P%20V&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1009&rft.epage=1010&rft.pages=1009-1010&rft.issn=1519-6984&rft.eissn=1678-4375&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/1519-6984.17413&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA414693978%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-bed5bc2bf3e93409ed434eaa8d1b163b553cb195154699c9b2cb846d3937e85c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1651885576&rft_id=info:pmid/25627616&rft_galeid=A414693978&rfr_iscdi=true |