Loading…

Are implant-based treatments considered viable for patients with focal or florid cemento-osseous dysplasia? A systematic review

Background Focal and florid cemento-osseous dysplasia are benign fibro-osseous lesions affecting the quality and quantity of the jawbones. This study aimed to determine the viability of implant-based approaches in the affected patients. Main text Different scientific databases, including PubMed/MEDL...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery 2024-06, Vol.46 (1), p.23-9, Article 23
Main Authors: Hosseinpour, Setareh, Khademi, Mohammad Hadi, Erfani, Maryam, Mosaddad, Seyed Ali, Heboyan, Artak
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-a57d9d5b5c9f042211ad610c0ddca880bed41d5eca2f3a294bc259d6582238a23
container_end_page 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 23
container_title Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery
container_volume 46
creator Hosseinpour, Setareh
Khademi, Mohammad Hadi
Erfani, Maryam
Mosaddad, Seyed Ali
Heboyan, Artak
description Background Focal and florid cemento-osseous dysplasia are benign fibro-osseous lesions affecting the quality and quantity of the jawbones. This study aimed to determine the viability of implant-based approaches in the affected patients. Main text Different scientific databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, were searched until October 8, 2023, using a pre-determined search strategy. Two reviewers screened the retrieved reports and extracted the required information from the included studies. The eligibility criteria included English-language case reports/series or clinical trials. The JBI critical appraisal checklist for case reports was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Three studies were deemed eligible to be included in this study out of the initial 202 records found. Five implants were placed in three patients, positioned in the proximity of the lesion area, without any additional treatment to remove the pathology. The mandibular posterior area was the affected site in all patients. Only one implant failed in one patient after 16 years, which was attributed to peri-implantitis and not the lesion. Other implants demonstrated successful maintenance over follow-up periods. Conclusions Although the number of the included records was relatively low to draw firm conclusions, it seems that implant-based treatments in patients with focal/florid cemento-osseous dysplasia could be viable, considering a conservative and well-planned approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s40902-024-00432-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0a5c2967226343a0ad266fbb3583dd70</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0a5c2967226343a0ad266fbb3583dd70</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3070129110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-a57d9d5b5c9f042211ad610c0ddca880bed41d5eca2f3a294bc259d6582238a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRAVrdr-gR6QJS5cAmM7TuxTtaoKVKrEhZ6tie1svUrixc5uuyf-Ot5NKS0HTrZm3nvz9YrigsInSmX9OVWggJXAqhKg4qx8fFOcMCZlKYWs3774HxfnKa0AgDLRNJy_K465VACcVyfFr0V0xA_rHsepbDE5S6bocBrcOCViwpi8dTFHtx7b3pEuRLLGyR_SD366zxGDPcnhrg_RW2LcnhvKkJILm0TsLmX15PGSLEjapckNmW9IdFvvHs6Kow775M6f3tPi7sv1j6tv5e33rzdXi9vSVFJNJYrGKitaYVQHFWOUoq0pGLDWoJTQOltRK5xB1nFkqmoNE8rWQjLGJTJ-WtzMujbgSq-jHzDudECvD4EQlxpjbqt3GlAYpuqGsZpXHAEtq-uubbmQ3NoGstblrLXetIOzJo8bsX8l-joz-nu9DFtN8-WUbFRW-PikEMPPjUuTHnwyrs9X2O9Mc2hA5qpSZOiHf6CrsIlj3tUBRZmidN8Sm1Em5r1H1z13Q0Hv_aJnv-jsF33wi37MpPcv53im_HFHBvAZkHJqXLr4t_Z_ZH8DiE_OBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3070129110</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are implant-based treatments considered viable for patients with focal or florid cemento-osseous dysplasia? A systematic review</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Hosseinpour, Setareh ; Khademi, Mohammad Hadi ; Erfani, Maryam ; Mosaddad, Seyed Ali ; Heboyan, Artak</creator><creatorcontrib>Hosseinpour, Setareh ; Khademi, Mohammad Hadi ; Erfani, Maryam ; Mosaddad, Seyed Ali ; Heboyan, Artak</creatorcontrib><description>Background Focal and florid cemento-osseous dysplasia are benign fibro-osseous lesions affecting the quality and quantity of the jawbones. This study aimed to determine the viability of implant-based approaches in the affected patients. Main text Different scientific databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, were searched until October 8, 2023, using a pre-determined search strategy. Two reviewers screened the retrieved reports and extracted the required information from the included studies. The eligibility criteria included English-language case reports/series or clinical trials. The JBI critical appraisal checklist for case reports was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Three studies were deemed eligible to be included in this study out of the initial 202 records found. Five implants were placed in three patients, positioned in the proximity of the lesion area, without any additional treatment to remove the pathology. The mandibular posterior area was the affected site in all patients. Only one implant failed in one patient after 16 years, which was attributed to peri-implantitis and not the lesion. Other implants demonstrated successful maintenance over follow-up periods. Conclusions Although the number of the included records was relatively low to draw firm conclusions, it seems that implant-based treatments in patients with focal/florid cemento-osseous dysplasia could be viable, considering a conservative and well-planned approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2288-8586</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2288-8101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2288-8586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40902-024-00432-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38900334</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore</publisher><subject>Case reports ; Dental implants ; Dentistry ; Fibrous dysplasia of bone ; Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia ; Implant‐supported dental prosthesis ; Medicine ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ; Plastic Surgery ; Review ; Survival rate ; Transplants &amp; implants</subject><ispartof>Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2024-06, Vol.46 (1), p.23-9, Article 23</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-a57d9d5b5c9f042211ad610c0ddca880bed41d5eca2f3a294bc259d6582238a23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6963-8289</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189879/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3070129110?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38900334$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hosseinpour, Setareh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khademi, Mohammad Hadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erfani, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosaddad, Seyed Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heboyan, Artak</creatorcontrib><title>Are implant-based treatments considered viable for patients with focal or florid cemento-osseous dysplasia? A systematic review</title><title>Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery</title><addtitle>Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Background Focal and florid cemento-osseous dysplasia are benign fibro-osseous lesions affecting the quality and quantity of the jawbones. This study aimed to determine the viability of implant-based approaches in the affected patients. Main text Different scientific databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, were searched until October 8, 2023, using a pre-determined search strategy. Two reviewers screened the retrieved reports and extracted the required information from the included studies. The eligibility criteria included English-language case reports/series or clinical trials. The JBI critical appraisal checklist for case reports was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Three studies were deemed eligible to be included in this study out of the initial 202 records found. Five implants were placed in three patients, positioned in the proximity of the lesion area, without any additional treatment to remove the pathology. The mandibular posterior area was the affected site in all patients. Only one implant failed in one patient after 16 years, which was attributed to peri-implantitis and not the lesion. Other implants demonstrated successful maintenance over follow-up periods. Conclusions Although the number of the included records was relatively low to draw firm conclusions, it seems that implant-based treatments in patients with focal/florid cemento-osseous dysplasia could be viable, considering a conservative and well-planned approach.</description><subject>Case reports</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Fibrous dysplasia of bone</subject><subject>Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia</subject><subject>Implant‐supported dental prosthesis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Survival rate</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><issn>2288-8586</issn><issn>2288-8101</issn><issn>2288-8586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRAVrdr-gR6QJS5cAmM7TuxTtaoKVKrEhZ6tie1svUrixc5uuyf-Ot5NKS0HTrZm3nvz9YrigsInSmX9OVWggJXAqhKg4qx8fFOcMCZlKYWs3774HxfnKa0AgDLRNJy_K465VACcVyfFr0V0xA_rHsepbDE5S6bocBrcOCViwpi8dTFHtx7b3pEuRLLGyR_SD366zxGDPcnhrg_RW2LcnhvKkJILm0TsLmX15PGSLEjapckNmW9IdFvvHs6Kow775M6f3tPi7sv1j6tv5e33rzdXi9vSVFJNJYrGKitaYVQHFWOUoq0pGLDWoJTQOltRK5xB1nFkqmoNE8rWQjLGJTJ-WtzMujbgSq-jHzDudECvD4EQlxpjbqt3GlAYpuqGsZpXHAEtq-uubbmQ3NoGstblrLXetIOzJo8bsX8l-joz-nu9DFtN8-WUbFRW-PikEMPPjUuTHnwyrs9X2O9Mc2hA5qpSZOiHf6CrsIlj3tUBRZmidN8Sm1Em5r1H1z13Q0Hv_aJnv-jsF33wi37MpPcv53im_HFHBvAZkHJqXLr4t_Z_ZH8DiE_OBA</recordid><startdate>20240620</startdate><enddate>20240620</enddate><creator>Hosseinpour, Setareh</creator><creator>Khademi, Mohammad Hadi</creator><creator>Erfani, Maryam</creator><creator>Mosaddad, Seyed Ali</creator><creator>Heboyan, Artak</creator><general>Springer Nature Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>SpringerOpen</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6963-8289</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240620</creationdate><title>Are implant-based treatments considered viable for patients with focal or florid cemento-osseous dysplasia? A systematic review</title><author>Hosseinpour, Setareh ; Khademi, Mohammad Hadi ; Erfani, Maryam ; Mosaddad, Seyed Ali ; Heboyan, Artak</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-a57d9d5b5c9f042211ad610c0ddca880bed41d5eca2f3a294bc259d6582238a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Case reports</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Fibrous dysplasia of bone</topic><topic>Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia</topic><topic>Implant‐supported dental prosthesis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Survival rate</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hosseinpour, Setareh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khademi, Mohammad Hadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erfani, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosaddad, Seyed Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heboyan, Artak</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hosseinpour, Setareh</au><au>Khademi, Mohammad Hadi</au><au>Erfani, Maryam</au><au>Mosaddad, Seyed Ali</au><au>Heboyan, Artak</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are implant-based treatments considered viable for patients with focal or florid cemento-osseous dysplasia? A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery</jtitle><stitle>Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg</stitle><addtitle>Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2024-06-20</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>23-9</pages><artnum>23</artnum><issn>2288-8586</issn><issn>2288-8101</issn><eissn>2288-8586</eissn><abstract>Background Focal and florid cemento-osseous dysplasia are benign fibro-osseous lesions affecting the quality and quantity of the jawbones. This study aimed to determine the viability of implant-based approaches in the affected patients. Main text Different scientific databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, were searched until October 8, 2023, using a pre-determined search strategy. Two reviewers screened the retrieved reports and extracted the required information from the included studies. The eligibility criteria included English-language case reports/series or clinical trials. The JBI critical appraisal checklist for case reports was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Three studies were deemed eligible to be included in this study out of the initial 202 records found. Five implants were placed in three patients, positioned in the proximity of the lesion area, without any additional treatment to remove the pathology. The mandibular posterior area was the affected site in all patients. Only one implant failed in one patient after 16 years, which was attributed to peri-implantitis and not the lesion. Other implants demonstrated successful maintenance over follow-up periods. Conclusions Although the number of the included records was relatively low to draw firm conclusions, it seems that implant-based treatments in patients with focal/florid cemento-osseous dysplasia could be viable, considering a conservative and well-planned approach.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Nature Singapore</pub><pmid>38900334</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40902-024-00432-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6963-8289</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2288-8586
ispartof Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2024-06, Vol.46 (1), p.23-9, Article 23
issn 2288-8586
2288-8101
2288-8586
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0a5c2967226343a0ad266fbb3583dd70
source PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database; Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access
subjects Case reports
Dental implants
Dentistry
Fibrous dysplasia of bone
Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia
Implant‐supported dental prosthesis
Medicine
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Plastic Surgery
Review
Survival rate
Transplants & implants
title Are implant-based treatments considered viable for patients with focal or florid cemento-osseous dysplasia? A systematic review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T17%3A53%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20implant-based%20treatments%20considered%20viable%20for%20patients%20with%20focal%20or%20florid%20cemento-osseous%20dysplasia?%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Maxillofacial%20plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery&rft.au=Hosseinpour,%20Setareh&rft.date=2024-06-20&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=23-9&rft.artnum=23&rft.issn=2288-8586&rft.eissn=2288-8586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40902-024-00432-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3070129110%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-a57d9d5b5c9f042211ad610c0ddca880bed41d5eca2f3a294bc259d6582238a23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3070129110&rft_id=info:pmid/38900334&rfr_iscdi=true