Loading…
Are implant-based treatments considered viable for patients with focal or florid cemento-osseous dysplasia? A systematic review
Background Focal and florid cemento-osseous dysplasia are benign fibro-osseous lesions affecting the quality and quantity of the jawbones. This study aimed to determine the viability of implant-based approaches in the affected patients. Main text Different scientific databases, including PubMed/MEDL...
Saved in:
Published in: | Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery 2024-06, Vol.46 (1), p.23-9, Article 23 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-a57d9d5b5c9f042211ad610c0ddca880bed41d5eca2f3a294bc259d6582238a23 |
container_end_page | 9 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 23 |
container_title | Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Hosseinpour, Setareh Khademi, Mohammad Hadi Erfani, Maryam Mosaddad, Seyed Ali Heboyan, Artak |
description | Background
Focal and florid cemento-osseous dysplasia are benign fibro-osseous lesions affecting the quality and quantity of the jawbones. This study aimed to determine the viability of implant-based approaches in the affected patients.
Main text
Different scientific databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, were searched until October 8, 2023, using a pre-determined search strategy. Two reviewers screened the retrieved reports and extracted the required information from the included studies. The eligibility criteria included English-language case reports/series or clinical trials. The JBI critical appraisal checklist for case reports was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Three studies were deemed eligible to be included in this study out of the initial 202 records found. Five implants were placed in three patients, positioned in the proximity of the lesion area, without any additional treatment to remove the pathology. The mandibular posterior area was the affected site in all patients. Only one implant failed in one patient after 16 years, which was attributed to peri-implantitis and not the lesion. Other implants demonstrated successful maintenance over follow-up periods.
Conclusions
Although the number of the included records was relatively low to draw firm conclusions, it seems that implant-based treatments in patients with focal/florid cemento-osseous dysplasia could be viable, considering a conservative and well-planned approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s40902-024-00432-x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0a5c2967226343a0ad266fbb3583dd70</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0a5c2967226343a0ad266fbb3583dd70</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3070129110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-a57d9d5b5c9f042211ad610c0ddca880bed41d5eca2f3a294bc259d6582238a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRAVrdr-gR6QJS5cAmM7TuxTtaoKVKrEhZ6tie1svUrixc5uuyf-Ot5NKS0HTrZm3nvz9YrigsInSmX9OVWggJXAqhKg4qx8fFOcMCZlKYWs3774HxfnKa0AgDLRNJy_K465VACcVyfFr0V0xA_rHsepbDE5S6bocBrcOCViwpi8dTFHtx7b3pEuRLLGyR_SD366zxGDPcnhrg_RW2LcnhvKkJILm0TsLmX15PGSLEjapckNmW9IdFvvHs6Kow775M6f3tPi7sv1j6tv5e33rzdXi9vSVFJNJYrGKitaYVQHFWOUoq0pGLDWoJTQOltRK5xB1nFkqmoNE8rWQjLGJTJ-WtzMujbgSq-jHzDudECvD4EQlxpjbqt3GlAYpuqGsZpXHAEtq-uubbmQ3NoGstblrLXetIOzJo8bsX8l-joz-nu9DFtN8-WUbFRW-PikEMPPjUuTHnwyrs9X2O9Mc2hA5qpSZOiHf6CrsIlj3tUBRZmidN8Sm1Em5r1H1z13Q0Hv_aJnv-jsF33wi37MpPcv53im_HFHBvAZkHJqXLr4t_Z_ZH8DiE_OBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3070129110</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are implant-based treatments considered viable for patients with focal or florid cemento-osseous dysplasia? A systematic review</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Hosseinpour, Setareh ; Khademi, Mohammad Hadi ; Erfani, Maryam ; Mosaddad, Seyed Ali ; Heboyan, Artak</creator><creatorcontrib>Hosseinpour, Setareh ; Khademi, Mohammad Hadi ; Erfani, Maryam ; Mosaddad, Seyed Ali ; Heboyan, Artak</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Focal and florid cemento-osseous dysplasia are benign fibro-osseous lesions affecting the quality and quantity of the jawbones. This study aimed to determine the viability of implant-based approaches in the affected patients.
Main text
Different scientific databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, were searched until October 8, 2023, using a pre-determined search strategy. Two reviewers screened the retrieved reports and extracted the required information from the included studies. The eligibility criteria included English-language case reports/series or clinical trials. The JBI critical appraisal checklist for case reports was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Three studies were deemed eligible to be included in this study out of the initial 202 records found. Five implants were placed in three patients, positioned in the proximity of the lesion area, without any additional treatment to remove the pathology. The mandibular posterior area was the affected site in all patients. Only one implant failed in one patient after 16 years, which was attributed to peri-implantitis and not the lesion. Other implants demonstrated successful maintenance over follow-up periods.
Conclusions
Although the number of the included records was relatively low to draw firm conclusions, it seems that implant-based treatments in patients with focal/florid cemento-osseous dysplasia could be viable, considering a conservative and well-planned approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2288-8586</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2288-8101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2288-8586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40902-024-00432-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38900334</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore</publisher><subject>Case reports ; Dental implants ; Dentistry ; Fibrous dysplasia of bone ; Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia ; Implant‐supported dental prosthesis ; Medicine ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ; Plastic Surgery ; Review ; Survival rate ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2024-06, Vol.46 (1), p.23-9, Article 23</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-a57d9d5b5c9f042211ad610c0ddca880bed41d5eca2f3a294bc259d6582238a23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6963-8289</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189879/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3070129110?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38900334$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hosseinpour, Setareh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khademi, Mohammad Hadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erfani, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosaddad, Seyed Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heboyan, Artak</creatorcontrib><title>Are implant-based treatments considered viable for patients with focal or florid cemento-osseous dysplasia? A systematic review</title><title>Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery</title><addtitle>Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Background
Focal and florid cemento-osseous dysplasia are benign fibro-osseous lesions affecting the quality and quantity of the jawbones. This study aimed to determine the viability of implant-based approaches in the affected patients.
Main text
Different scientific databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, were searched until October 8, 2023, using a pre-determined search strategy. Two reviewers screened the retrieved reports and extracted the required information from the included studies. The eligibility criteria included English-language case reports/series or clinical trials. The JBI critical appraisal checklist for case reports was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Three studies were deemed eligible to be included in this study out of the initial 202 records found. Five implants were placed in three patients, positioned in the proximity of the lesion area, without any additional treatment to remove the pathology. The mandibular posterior area was the affected site in all patients. Only one implant failed in one patient after 16 years, which was attributed to peri-implantitis and not the lesion. Other implants demonstrated successful maintenance over follow-up periods.
Conclusions
Although the number of the included records was relatively low to draw firm conclusions, it seems that implant-based treatments in patients with focal/florid cemento-osseous dysplasia could be viable, considering a conservative and well-planned approach.</description><subject>Case reports</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Fibrous dysplasia of bone</subject><subject>Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia</subject><subject>Implant‐supported dental prosthesis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Survival rate</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>2288-8586</issn><issn>2288-8101</issn><issn>2288-8586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRAVrdr-gR6QJS5cAmM7TuxTtaoKVKrEhZ6tie1svUrixc5uuyf-Ot5NKS0HTrZm3nvz9YrigsInSmX9OVWggJXAqhKg4qx8fFOcMCZlKYWs3774HxfnKa0AgDLRNJy_K465VACcVyfFr0V0xA_rHsepbDE5S6bocBrcOCViwpi8dTFHtx7b3pEuRLLGyR_SD366zxGDPcnhrg_RW2LcnhvKkJILm0TsLmX15PGSLEjapckNmW9IdFvvHs6Kow775M6f3tPi7sv1j6tv5e33rzdXi9vSVFJNJYrGKitaYVQHFWOUoq0pGLDWoJTQOltRK5xB1nFkqmoNE8rWQjLGJTJ-WtzMujbgSq-jHzDudECvD4EQlxpjbqt3GlAYpuqGsZpXHAEtq-uubbmQ3NoGstblrLXetIOzJo8bsX8l-joz-nu9DFtN8-WUbFRW-PikEMPPjUuTHnwyrs9X2O9Mc2hA5qpSZOiHf6CrsIlj3tUBRZmidN8Sm1Em5r1H1z13Q0Hv_aJnv-jsF33wi37MpPcv53im_HFHBvAZkHJqXLr4t_Z_ZH8DiE_OBA</recordid><startdate>20240620</startdate><enddate>20240620</enddate><creator>Hosseinpour, Setareh</creator><creator>Khademi, Mohammad Hadi</creator><creator>Erfani, Maryam</creator><creator>Mosaddad, Seyed Ali</creator><creator>Heboyan, Artak</creator><general>Springer Nature Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>SpringerOpen</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6963-8289</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240620</creationdate><title>Are implant-based treatments considered viable for patients with focal or florid cemento-osseous dysplasia? A systematic review</title><author>Hosseinpour, Setareh ; Khademi, Mohammad Hadi ; Erfani, Maryam ; Mosaddad, Seyed Ali ; Heboyan, Artak</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-a57d9d5b5c9f042211ad610c0ddca880bed41d5eca2f3a294bc259d6582238a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Case reports</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Fibrous dysplasia of bone</topic><topic>Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia</topic><topic>Implant‐supported dental prosthesis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Survival rate</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hosseinpour, Setareh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khademi, Mohammad Hadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erfani, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosaddad, Seyed Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heboyan, Artak</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hosseinpour, Setareh</au><au>Khademi, Mohammad Hadi</au><au>Erfani, Maryam</au><au>Mosaddad, Seyed Ali</au><au>Heboyan, Artak</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are implant-based treatments considered viable for patients with focal or florid cemento-osseous dysplasia? A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery</jtitle><stitle>Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg</stitle><addtitle>Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2024-06-20</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>23-9</pages><artnum>23</artnum><issn>2288-8586</issn><issn>2288-8101</issn><eissn>2288-8586</eissn><abstract>Background
Focal and florid cemento-osseous dysplasia are benign fibro-osseous lesions affecting the quality and quantity of the jawbones. This study aimed to determine the viability of implant-based approaches in the affected patients.
Main text
Different scientific databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, were searched until October 8, 2023, using a pre-determined search strategy. Two reviewers screened the retrieved reports and extracted the required information from the included studies. The eligibility criteria included English-language case reports/series or clinical trials. The JBI critical appraisal checklist for case reports was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Three studies were deemed eligible to be included in this study out of the initial 202 records found. Five implants were placed in three patients, positioned in the proximity of the lesion area, without any additional treatment to remove the pathology. The mandibular posterior area was the affected site in all patients. Only one implant failed in one patient after 16 years, which was attributed to peri-implantitis and not the lesion. Other implants demonstrated successful maintenance over follow-up periods.
Conclusions
Although the number of the included records was relatively low to draw firm conclusions, it seems that implant-based treatments in patients with focal/florid cemento-osseous dysplasia could be viable, considering a conservative and well-planned approach.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Nature Singapore</pub><pmid>38900334</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40902-024-00432-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6963-8289</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2288-8586 |
ispartof | Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2024-06, Vol.46 (1), p.23-9, Article 23 |
issn | 2288-8586 2288-8101 2288-8586 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0a5c2967226343a0ad266fbb3583dd70 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database; Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access |
subjects | Case reports Dental implants Dentistry Fibrous dysplasia of bone Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia Implant‐supported dental prosthesis Medicine Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Plastic Surgery Review Survival rate Transplants & implants |
title | Are implant-based treatments considered viable for patients with focal or florid cemento-osseous dysplasia? A systematic review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T17%3A53%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20implant-based%20treatments%20considered%20viable%20for%20patients%20with%20focal%20or%20florid%20cemento-osseous%20dysplasia?%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Maxillofacial%20plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery&rft.au=Hosseinpour,%20Setareh&rft.date=2024-06-20&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=23-9&rft.artnum=23&rft.issn=2288-8586&rft.eissn=2288-8586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40902-024-00432-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3070129110%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-a57d9d5b5c9f042211ad610c0ddca880bed41d5eca2f3a294bc259d6582238a23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3070129110&rft_id=info:pmid/38900334&rfr_iscdi=true |