Loading…

Radiographic Outcomes of Titanium Augment vs Bone Graft in Lateral Column Lengthening for Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

Background: Lateral column lengthening (LCL) is a surgical procedure used to manage forefoot abduction and, in theory, also increases the longitudinal arch by plantarflexion of the first ray through tensioning the peroneus longus for patients with stage IIB adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD)....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Foot & ankle orthopaedics 2023-04, Vol.8 (2), p.24730114231176554-24730114231176554
Main Authors: Stamatos, Nicholas J., Murasko, Marlon J., Richardson, Kyle, O’Connor, Casey, Anoushiravani, Afshin A., Adams, Curtis, Rosenbaum, Andrew
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4484-9c977adbda7af750ce81c9e43fb28beabc66b05d84ea240fcc9e3f84bd32382e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4484-9c977adbda7af750ce81c9e43fb28beabc66b05d84ea240fcc9e3f84bd32382e3
container_end_page 24730114231176554
container_issue 2
container_start_page 24730114231176554
container_title Foot & ankle orthopaedics
container_volume 8
creator Stamatos, Nicholas J.
Murasko, Marlon J.
Richardson, Kyle
O’Connor, Casey
Anoushiravani, Afshin A.
Adams, Curtis
Rosenbaum, Andrew
description Background: Lateral column lengthening (LCL) is a surgical procedure used to manage forefoot abduction and, in theory, also increases the longitudinal arch by plantarflexion of the first ray through tensioning the peroneus longus for patients with stage IIB adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). This procedure utilizes an opening wedge osteotomy of the calcaneus, which is then filled with autograft, allograft, or a porous metal wedge. The primary aim of this study was to compare the radiographic outcomes of these different bone substitutes following LCL for stage IIB AAFD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent LCL from October 2008 until October 2018. Preoperative weightbearing radiographs, initial postoperative radiographs, and 1-year weightbearing radiographs were reviewed. The following radiographic measurements were recorded: incongruency angle, talonavicular coverage angle (TNCA), talar–first metatarsal angle (T-1MT), and calcaneal pitch. Results: A total of 44 patients were included in our study. The mean age of the cohort was 54 (range, 18-74). The study cohort was divided into 2 groups. There were 17 (38.7%) patients who received a titanium metal wedge and 27 (61.5%) that received autograft or allograft. Patients that underwent LCL with the autograft/allograft group were significantly older (59 vs 47 years old, P = .006). Patients who underwent LCL with a titanium wedge had a significantly higher preoperative talonavicular angle (32 vs 27 degrees, P = .013). There were no significant differences in postoperative TNCA, incongruency angle, or calcaneal pitch at 6 months or 1 year. Conclusion: At 6 months and 1 year, no radiographic differences were found between autograft/allograft bone substitutes vs titanium wedge in LCL. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/24730114231176554
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0a82da621298433e82363bcbd626f698</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_24730114231176554</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0a82da621298433e82363bcbd626f698</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2827253846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4484-9c977adbda7af750ce81c9e43fb28beabc66b05d84ea240fcc9e3f84bd32382e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEolXpD-CCLHHhssVfcZwTWhZaKq1UCZWz5djjrFdJvLWdShV_Hm-3lBbEyZ533nk8Hk1VvSX4jJCm-Uh5wzAhnLISirrmL6rjvbbYiy-f3I-q05S2GGPS1G0r5evqiDWM1qJlx9XP79r60Ee923iDruZswggJBYeufdaTn0e0nPsRpoxuE_ocJkAXUbuM_ITWOkPUA1qFYR5LCFOfNzD5qUcuRLS085AXS3Mz-wgWnQ86uxAy-gIlO_p896Z65fSQ4PThPKl-nH-9Xn1brK8uLlfL9cJwLvmiNW3TaNtZ3WjX1NiAJKYFzlxHZQe6M0J0uLaSg6YcO1OSzEneWUaZpMBOqssD1wa9VbvoRx3vVNBe3Qsh9krH7M0ACmtJrRaU0FZyxkBSJlhnOiuocKKVhfXpwNrN3QjWlMGUETyDPs9MfqP6cKsIpoVBWCF8eCDEcDNDymr0ycAw6AnCnBSVtKE1k1wU6_u_rNswx6nMqriYoLht71siB5eJIaUI7rEbgtV-VdQ_q1Jq3j39xmPF78UohrODIeke_jz7f-IvY5LHLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2836209998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiographic Outcomes of Titanium Augment vs Bone Graft in Lateral Column Lengthening for Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>SAGE Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Stamatos, Nicholas J. ; Murasko, Marlon J. ; Richardson, Kyle ; O’Connor, Casey ; Anoushiravani, Afshin A. ; Adams, Curtis ; Rosenbaum, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Stamatos, Nicholas J. ; Murasko, Marlon J. ; Richardson, Kyle ; O’Connor, Casey ; Anoushiravani, Afshin A. ; Adams, Curtis ; Rosenbaum, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Lateral column lengthening (LCL) is a surgical procedure used to manage forefoot abduction and, in theory, also increases the longitudinal arch by plantarflexion of the first ray through tensioning the peroneus longus for patients with stage IIB adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). This procedure utilizes an opening wedge osteotomy of the calcaneus, which is then filled with autograft, allograft, or a porous metal wedge. The primary aim of this study was to compare the radiographic outcomes of these different bone substitutes following LCL for stage IIB AAFD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent LCL from October 2008 until October 2018. Preoperative weightbearing radiographs, initial postoperative radiographs, and 1-year weightbearing radiographs were reviewed. The following radiographic measurements were recorded: incongruency angle, talonavicular coverage angle (TNCA), talar–first metatarsal angle (T-1MT), and calcaneal pitch. Results: A total of 44 patients were included in our study. The mean age of the cohort was 54 (range, 18-74). The study cohort was divided into 2 groups. There were 17 (38.7%) patients who received a titanium metal wedge and 27 (61.5%) that received autograft or allograft. Patients that underwent LCL with the autograft/allograft group were significantly older (59 vs 47 years old, P = .006). Patients who underwent LCL with a titanium wedge had a significantly higher preoperative talonavicular angle (32 vs 27 degrees, P = .013). There were no significant differences in postoperative TNCA, incongruency angle, or calcaneal pitch at 6 months or 1 year. Conclusion: At 6 months and 1 year, no radiographic differences were found between autograft/allograft bone substitutes vs titanium wedge in LCL. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2473-0114</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-0114</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/24730114231176554</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37325693</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Titanium</subject><ispartof>Foot &amp; ankle orthopaedics, 2023-04, Vol.8 (2), p.24730114231176554-24730114231176554</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023 2023 American Orthopaedic Foot &amp; Ankle Society, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4484-9c977adbda7af750ce81c9e43fb28beabc66b05d84ea240fcc9e3f84bd32382e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4484-9c977adbda7af750ce81c9e43fb28beabc66b05d84ea240fcc9e3f84bd32382e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5671-7874 ; 0000-0003-3459-062X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262613/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2836209998?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,21945,25731,27830,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,44921,45309,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37325693$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stamatos, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murasko, Marlon J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connor, Casey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anoushiravani, Afshin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Curtis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Radiographic Outcomes of Titanium Augment vs Bone Graft in Lateral Column Lengthening for Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity</title><title>Foot &amp; ankle orthopaedics</title><addtitle>Foot Ankle Orthop</addtitle><description>Background: Lateral column lengthening (LCL) is a surgical procedure used to manage forefoot abduction and, in theory, also increases the longitudinal arch by plantarflexion of the first ray through tensioning the peroneus longus for patients with stage IIB adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). This procedure utilizes an opening wedge osteotomy of the calcaneus, which is then filled with autograft, allograft, or a porous metal wedge. The primary aim of this study was to compare the radiographic outcomes of these different bone substitutes following LCL for stage IIB AAFD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent LCL from October 2008 until October 2018. Preoperative weightbearing radiographs, initial postoperative radiographs, and 1-year weightbearing radiographs were reviewed. The following radiographic measurements were recorded: incongruency angle, talonavicular coverage angle (TNCA), talar–first metatarsal angle (T-1MT), and calcaneal pitch. Results: A total of 44 patients were included in our study. The mean age of the cohort was 54 (range, 18-74). The study cohort was divided into 2 groups. There were 17 (38.7%) patients who received a titanium metal wedge and 27 (61.5%) that received autograft or allograft. Patients that underwent LCL with the autograft/allograft group were significantly older (59 vs 47 years old, P = .006). Patients who underwent LCL with a titanium wedge had a significantly higher preoperative talonavicular angle (32 vs 27 degrees, P = .013). There were no significant differences in postoperative TNCA, incongruency angle, or calcaneal pitch at 6 months or 1 year. Conclusion: At 6 months and 1 year, no radiographic differences were found between autograft/allograft bone substitutes vs titanium wedge in LCL. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.</description><subject>Titanium</subject><issn>2473-0114</issn><issn>2473-0114</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEolXpD-CCLHHhssVfcZwTWhZaKq1UCZWz5djjrFdJvLWdShV_Hm-3lBbEyZ533nk8Hk1VvSX4jJCm-Uh5wzAhnLISirrmL6rjvbbYiy-f3I-q05S2GGPS1G0r5evqiDWM1qJlx9XP79r60Ee923iDruZswggJBYeufdaTn0e0nPsRpoxuE_ocJkAXUbuM_ITWOkPUA1qFYR5LCFOfNzD5qUcuRLS085AXS3Mz-wgWnQ86uxAy-gIlO_p896Z65fSQ4PThPKl-nH-9Xn1brK8uLlfL9cJwLvmiNW3TaNtZ3WjX1NiAJKYFzlxHZQe6M0J0uLaSg6YcO1OSzEneWUaZpMBOqssD1wa9VbvoRx3vVNBe3Qsh9krH7M0ACmtJrRaU0FZyxkBSJlhnOiuocKKVhfXpwNrN3QjWlMGUETyDPs9MfqP6cKsIpoVBWCF8eCDEcDNDymr0ycAw6AnCnBSVtKE1k1wU6_u_rNswx6nMqriYoLht71siB5eJIaUI7rEbgtV-VdQ_q1Jq3j39xmPF78UohrODIeke_jz7f-IvY5LHLg</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Stamatos, Nicholas J.</creator><creator>Murasko, Marlon J.</creator><creator>Richardson, Kyle</creator><creator>O’Connor, Casey</creator><creator>Anoushiravani, Afshin A.</creator><creator>Adams, Curtis</creator><creator>Rosenbaum, Andrew</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5671-7874</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3459-062X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Radiographic Outcomes of Titanium Augment vs Bone Graft in Lateral Column Lengthening for Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity</title><author>Stamatos, Nicholas J. ; Murasko, Marlon J. ; Richardson, Kyle ; O’Connor, Casey ; Anoushiravani, Afshin A. ; Adams, Curtis ; Rosenbaum, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4484-9c977adbda7af750ce81c9e43fb28beabc66b05d84ea240fcc9e3f84bd32382e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Titanium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stamatos, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murasko, Marlon J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connor, Casey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anoushiravani, Afshin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Curtis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Foot &amp; ankle orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stamatos, Nicholas J.</au><au>Murasko, Marlon J.</au><au>Richardson, Kyle</au><au>O’Connor, Casey</au><au>Anoushiravani, Afshin A.</au><au>Adams, Curtis</au><au>Rosenbaum, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiographic Outcomes of Titanium Augment vs Bone Graft in Lateral Column Lengthening for Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity</atitle><jtitle>Foot &amp; ankle orthopaedics</jtitle><addtitle>Foot Ankle Orthop</addtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>24730114231176554</spage><epage>24730114231176554</epage><pages>24730114231176554-24730114231176554</pages><issn>2473-0114</issn><eissn>2473-0114</eissn><abstract>Background: Lateral column lengthening (LCL) is a surgical procedure used to manage forefoot abduction and, in theory, also increases the longitudinal arch by plantarflexion of the first ray through tensioning the peroneus longus for patients with stage IIB adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). This procedure utilizes an opening wedge osteotomy of the calcaneus, which is then filled with autograft, allograft, or a porous metal wedge. The primary aim of this study was to compare the radiographic outcomes of these different bone substitutes following LCL for stage IIB AAFD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent LCL from October 2008 until October 2018. Preoperative weightbearing radiographs, initial postoperative radiographs, and 1-year weightbearing radiographs were reviewed. The following radiographic measurements were recorded: incongruency angle, talonavicular coverage angle (TNCA), talar–first metatarsal angle (T-1MT), and calcaneal pitch. Results: A total of 44 patients were included in our study. The mean age of the cohort was 54 (range, 18-74). The study cohort was divided into 2 groups. There were 17 (38.7%) patients who received a titanium metal wedge and 27 (61.5%) that received autograft or allograft. Patients that underwent LCL with the autograft/allograft group were significantly older (59 vs 47 years old, P = .006). Patients who underwent LCL with a titanium wedge had a significantly higher preoperative talonavicular angle (32 vs 27 degrees, P = .013). There were no significant differences in postoperative TNCA, incongruency angle, or calcaneal pitch at 6 months or 1 year. Conclusion: At 6 months and 1 year, no radiographic differences were found between autograft/allograft bone substitutes vs titanium wedge in LCL. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>37325693</pmid><doi>10.1177/24730114231176554</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5671-7874</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3459-062X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2473-0114
ispartof Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2023-04, Vol.8 (2), p.24730114231176554-24730114231176554
issn 2473-0114
2473-0114
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0a82da621298433e82363bcbd626f698
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); SAGE Open Access Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Titanium
title Radiographic Outcomes of Titanium Augment vs Bone Graft in Lateral Column Lengthening for Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T10%3A26%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiographic%20Outcomes%20of%20Titanium%20Augment%20vs%20Bone%20Graft%20in%20Lateral%20Column%20Lengthening%20for%20Adult-Acquired%20Flatfoot%20Deformity&rft.jtitle=Foot%20&%20ankle%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Stamatos,%20Nicholas%20J.&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=24730114231176554&rft.epage=24730114231176554&rft.pages=24730114231176554-24730114231176554&rft.issn=2473-0114&rft.eissn=2473-0114&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/24730114231176554&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2827253846%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4484-9c977adbda7af750ce81c9e43fb28beabc66b05d84ea240fcc9e3f84bd32382e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2836209998&rft_id=info:pmid/37325693&rft_sage_id=10.1177_24730114231176554&rfr_iscdi=true