Loading…

Eye-mounting goggles to bridge the gap between benchtop experiments and in vivo robotic eye surgery

A variety of robot-assisted surgical systems have been proposed to improve the precision of eye surgery. Evaluation of these systems has typically relied on benchtop experiments with artificial or enucleated eyes. However, this does not properly account for the types of head motion that are common a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2023-09, Vol.13 (1), p.15503-15503, Article 15503
Main Authors: Posselli, Nicholas R., Bernstein, Paul S., Abbott, Jake J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-87006f815e6561454e521b8dc6f3e9412a3be2583cfab7688f7d860857bba0563
container_end_page 15503
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15503
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 13
creator Posselli, Nicholas R.
Bernstein, Paul S.
Abbott, Jake J.
description A variety of robot-assisted surgical systems have been proposed to improve the precision of eye surgery. Evaluation of these systems has typically relied on benchtop experiments with artificial or enucleated eyes. However, this does not properly account for the types of head motion that are common among patients undergoing eye surgery, which a clinical robotic system will encounter. In vivo experiments are clinically realistic, but they are risky and thus require the robotic system to be at a sufficiently mature state of development. In this paper, we describe a low-cost device that enables an artificial or enucleated eye to be mounted to standard swim goggles worn by a human volunteer to enable more realistic evaluation of eye-surgery robots after benchtop studies and prior to in vivo studies. The mounted eye can rotate about its center, with a rotational stiffness matching that of an anesthetized patient’s eye. We describe surgeon feedback and technical analyses to verify that various aspects of the design are sufficient for simulating a patient’s eye during surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41598-023-42561-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0aeb9b371a8243e2b489f3e4a190d355</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0aeb9b371a8243e2b489f3e4a190d355</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2866759973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-87006f815e6561454e521b8dc6f3e9412a3be2583cfab7688f7d860857bba0563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVqV_gAOyxIVLir8_TghVBSpV4gJny04m2ayydrCTpfvvcTdtaTngy1ieN2_eeF5VvSX4gmCmP2ZOhNE1pqzmVEhSmxfVKcVc1JRR-vLJ_aQ6z3mLyxHUcGJeVydMKSoZk6dVc3WAeheXMA-hR33s-xEymiPyaWh7QPMGUO8m5GH-DRBKDM1mjhOC2wnSsIMwZ-RCi4aA9sM-ohR9nIcGwQFQXlIP6fCmetW5McP5fTyrfn65-nH5rb75_vX68vNN3XBD51orjGWniQBZ5uGCg6DE67aRHYMinDrmgQrNms55JbXuVKsl1kJ577CQ7Ky6Xnnb6LZ2KupcOtjoBnt8iKm3LhVtI1jswBvPFHGacgbUc21KF-6IwS0TonB9Wrmmxe-gbcqcyY3PSJ9nwrCxfdxbggU2hNPC8OGeIcVfC-TZ7obcwDi6AHHJlmoplTBGsQJ9_w90G5cUyl8dUVSosrmCoiuqSTHnBN2jGoLtnSfs6glbPGGPnrB3Re-ezvFY8uCAAmArIJdUKOv62_s_tH8A5EPBsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2866257529</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eye-mounting goggles to bridge the gap between benchtop experiments and in vivo robotic eye surgery</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Posselli, Nicholas R. ; Bernstein, Paul S. ; Abbott, Jake J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Posselli, Nicholas R. ; Bernstein, Paul S. ; Abbott, Jake J.</creatorcontrib><description>A variety of robot-assisted surgical systems have been proposed to improve the precision of eye surgery. Evaluation of these systems has typically relied on benchtop experiments with artificial or enucleated eyes. However, this does not properly account for the types of head motion that are common among patients undergoing eye surgery, which a clinical robotic system will encounter. In vivo experiments are clinically realistic, but they are risky and thus require the robotic system to be at a sufficiently mature state of development. In this paper, we describe a low-cost device that enables an artificial or enucleated eye to be mounted to standard swim goggles worn by a human volunteer to enable more realistic evaluation of eye-surgery robots after benchtop studies and prior to in vivo studies. The mounted eye can rotate about its center, with a rotational stiffness matching that of an anesthetized patient’s eye. We describe surgeon feedback and technical analyses to verify that various aspects of the design are sufficient for simulating a patient’s eye during surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42561-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37726336</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>639/166/985 ; 639/166/988 ; 692/308/2778 ; Eye ; Eye Protective Devices ; Eye surgery ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; multidisciplinary ; Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures ; Patients ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Robotics ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2023-09, Vol.13 (1), p.15503-15503, Article 15503</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. Springer Nature Limited.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-87006f815e6561454e521b8dc6f3e9412a3be2583cfab7688f7d860857bba0563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2866257529/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2866257529?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37726336$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Posselli, Nicholas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernstein, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Jake J.</creatorcontrib><title>Eye-mounting goggles to bridge the gap between benchtop experiments and in vivo robotic eye surgery</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>A variety of robot-assisted surgical systems have been proposed to improve the precision of eye surgery. Evaluation of these systems has typically relied on benchtop experiments with artificial or enucleated eyes. However, this does not properly account for the types of head motion that are common among patients undergoing eye surgery, which a clinical robotic system will encounter. In vivo experiments are clinically realistic, but they are risky and thus require the robotic system to be at a sufficiently mature state of development. In this paper, we describe a low-cost device that enables an artificial or enucleated eye to be mounted to standard swim goggles worn by a human volunteer to enable more realistic evaluation of eye-surgery robots after benchtop studies and prior to in vivo studies. The mounted eye can rotate about its center, with a rotational stiffness matching that of an anesthetized patient’s eye. We describe surgeon feedback and technical analyses to verify that various aspects of the design are sufficient for simulating a patient’s eye during surgery.</description><subject>639/166/985</subject><subject>639/166/988</subject><subject>692/308/2778</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Eye Protective Devices</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVqV_gAOyxIVLir8_TghVBSpV4gJny04m2ayydrCTpfvvcTdtaTngy1ieN2_eeF5VvSX4gmCmP2ZOhNE1pqzmVEhSmxfVKcVc1JRR-vLJ_aQ6z3mLyxHUcGJeVydMKSoZk6dVc3WAeheXMA-hR33s-xEymiPyaWh7QPMGUO8m5GH-DRBKDM1mjhOC2wnSsIMwZ-RCi4aA9sM-ohR9nIcGwQFQXlIP6fCmetW5McP5fTyrfn65-nH5rb75_vX68vNN3XBD51orjGWniQBZ5uGCg6DE67aRHYMinDrmgQrNms55JbXuVKsl1kJ577CQ7Ky6Xnnb6LZ2KupcOtjoBnt8iKm3LhVtI1jswBvPFHGacgbUc21KF-6IwS0TonB9Wrmmxe-gbcqcyY3PSJ9nwrCxfdxbggU2hNPC8OGeIcVfC-TZ7obcwDi6AHHJlmoplTBGsQJ9_w90G5cUyl8dUVSosrmCoiuqSTHnBN2jGoLtnSfs6glbPGGPnrB3Re-ezvFY8uCAAmArIJdUKOv62_s_tH8A5EPBsQ</recordid><startdate>20230919</startdate><enddate>20230919</enddate><creator>Posselli, Nicholas R.</creator><creator>Bernstein, Paul S.</creator><creator>Abbott, Jake J.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230919</creationdate><title>Eye-mounting goggles to bridge the gap between benchtop experiments and in vivo robotic eye surgery</title><author>Posselli, Nicholas R. ; Bernstein, Paul S. ; Abbott, Jake J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-87006f815e6561454e521b8dc6f3e9412a3be2583cfab7688f7d860857bba0563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>639/166/985</topic><topic>639/166/988</topic><topic>692/308/2778</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Eye Protective Devices</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Posselli, Nicholas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernstein, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Jake J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Posselli, Nicholas R.</au><au>Bernstein, Paul S.</au><au>Abbott, Jake J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eye-mounting goggles to bridge the gap between benchtop experiments and in vivo robotic eye surgery</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2023-09-19</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15503</spage><epage>15503</epage><pages>15503-15503</pages><artnum>15503</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>A variety of robot-assisted surgical systems have been proposed to improve the precision of eye surgery. Evaluation of these systems has typically relied on benchtop experiments with artificial or enucleated eyes. However, this does not properly account for the types of head motion that are common among patients undergoing eye surgery, which a clinical robotic system will encounter. In vivo experiments are clinically realistic, but they are risky and thus require the robotic system to be at a sufficiently mature state of development. In this paper, we describe a low-cost device that enables an artificial or enucleated eye to be mounted to standard swim goggles worn by a human volunteer to enable more realistic evaluation of eye-surgery robots after benchtop studies and prior to in vivo studies. The mounted eye can rotate about its center, with a rotational stiffness matching that of an anesthetized patient’s eye. We describe surgeon feedback and technical analyses to verify that various aspects of the design are sufficient for simulating a patient’s eye during surgery.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>37726336</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-023-42561-9</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2023-09, Vol.13 (1), p.15503-15503, Article 15503
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0aeb9b371a8243e2b489f3e4a190d355
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access
subjects 639/166/985
639/166/988
692/308/2778
Eye
Eye Protective Devices
Eye surgery
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
multidisciplinary
Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures
Patients
Robotic surgery
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Robotics
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
title Eye-mounting goggles to bridge the gap between benchtop experiments and in vivo robotic eye surgery
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T02%3A02%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eye-mounting%20goggles%20to%20bridge%20the%20gap%20between%20benchtop%20experiments%20and%20in%20vivo%20robotic%20eye%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Posselli,%20Nicholas%20R.&rft.date=2023-09-19&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15503&rft.epage=15503&rft.pages=15503-15503&rft.artnum=15503&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-023-42561-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2866759973%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-87006f815e6561454e521b8dc6f3e9412a3be2583cfab7688f7d860857bba0563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2866257529&rft_id=info:pmid/37726336&rfr_iscdi=true