Loading…
Eye-mounting goggles to bridge the gap between benchtop experiments and in vivo robotic eye surgery
A variety of robot-assisted surgical systems have been proposed to improve the precision of eye surgery. Evaluation of these systems has typically relied on benchtop experiments with artificial or enucleated eyes. However, this does not properly account for the types of head motion that are common a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Scientific reports 2023-09, Vol.13 (1), p.15503-15503, Article 15503 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-87006f815e6561454e521b8dc6f3e9412a3be2583cfab7688f7d860857bba0563 |
container_end_page | 15503 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 15503 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Posselli, Nicholas R. Bernstein, Paul S. Abbott, Jake J. |
description | A variety of robot-assisted surgical systems have been proposed to improve the precision of eye surgery. Evaluation of these systems has typically relied on benchtop experiments with artificial or enucleated eyes. However, this does not properly account for the types of head motion that are common among patients undergoing eye surgery, which a clinical robotic system will encounter. In vivo experiments are clinically realistic, but they are risky and thus require the robotic system to be at a sufficiently mature state of development. In this paper, we describe a low-cost device that enables an artificial or enucleated eye to be mounted to standard swim goggles worn by a human volunteer to enable more realistic evaluation of eye-surgery robots after benchtop studies and prior to in vivo studies. The mounted eye can rotate about its center, with a rotational stiffness matching that of an anesthetized patient’s eye. We describe surgeon feedback and technical analyses to verify that various aspects of the design are sufficient for simulating a patient’s eye during surgery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-023-42561-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0aeb9b371a8243e2b489f3e4a190d355</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0aeb9b371a8243e2b489f3e4a190d355</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2866759973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-87006f815e6561454e521b8dc6f3e9412a3be2583cfab7688f7d860857bba0563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVqV_gAOyxIVLir8_TghVBSpV4gJny04m2ayydrCTpfvvcTdtaTngy1ieN2_eeF5VvSX4gmCmP2ZOhNE1pqzmVEhSmxfVKcVc1JRR-vLJ_aQ6z3mLyxHUcGJeVydMKSoZk6dVc3WAeheXMA-hR33s-xEymiPyaWh7QPMGUO8m5GH-DRBKDM1mjhOC2wnSsIMwZ-RCi4aA9sM-ohR9nIcGwQFQXlIP6fCmetW5McP5fTyrfn65-nH5rb75_vX68vNN3XBD51orjGWniQBZ5uGCg6DE67aRHYMinDrmgQrNms55JbXuVKsl1kJ577CQ7Ky6Xnnb6LZ2KupcOtjoBnt8iKm3LhVtI1jswBvPFHGacgbUc21KF-6IwS0TonB9Wrmmxe-gbcqcyY3PSJ9nwrCxfdxbggU2hNPC8OGeIcVfC-TZ7obcwDi6AHHJlmoplTBGsQJ9_w90G5cUyl8dUVSosrmCoiuqSTHnBN2jGoLtnSfs6glbPGGPnrB3Re-ezvFY8uCAAmArIJdUKOv62_s_tH8A5EPBsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2866257529</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eye-mounting goggles to bridge the gap between benchtop experiments and in vivo robotic eye surgery</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Posselli, Nicholas R. ; Bernstein, Paul S. ; Abbott, Jake J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Posselli, Nicholas R. ; Bernstein, Paul S. ; Abbott, Jake J.</creatorcontrib><description>A variety of robot-assisted surgical systems have been proposed to improve the precision of eye surgery. Evaluation of these systems has typically relied on benchtop experiments with artificial or enucleated eyes. However, this does not properly account for the types of head motion that are common among patients undergoing eye surgery, which a clinical robotic system will encounter. In vivo experiments are clinically realistic, but they are risky and thus require the robotic system to be at a sufficiently mature state of development. In this paper, we describe a low-cost device that enables an artificial or enucleated eye to be mounted to standard swim goggles worn by a human volunteer to enable more realistic evaluation of eye-surgery robots after benchtop studies and prior to in vivo studies. The mounted eye can rotate about its center, with a rotational stiffness matching that of an anesthetized patient’s eye. We describe surgeon feedback and technical analyses to verify that various aspects of the design are sufficient for simulating a patient’s eye during surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42561-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37726336</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>639/166/985 ; 639/166/988 ; 692/308/2778 ; Eye ; Eye Protective Devices ; Eye surgery ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; multidisciplinary ; Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures ; Patients ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Robotics ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2023-09, Vol.13 (1), p.15503-15503, Article 15503</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. Springer Nature Limited.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-87006f815e6561454e521b8dc6f3e9412a3be2583cfab7688f7d860857bba0563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2866257529/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2866257529?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37726336$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Posselli, Nicholas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernstein, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Jake J.</creatorcontrib><title>Eye-mounting goggles to bridge the gap between benchtop experiments and in vivo robotic eye surgery</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>A variety of robot-assisted surgical systems have been proposed to improve the precision of eye surgery. Evaluation of these systems has typically relied on benchtop experiments with artificial or enucleated eyes. However, this does not properly account for the types of head motion that are common among patients undergoing eye surgery, which a clinical robotic system will encounter. In vivo experiments are clinically realistic, but they are risky and thus require the robotic system to be at a sufficiently mature state of development. In this paper, we describe a low-cost device that enables an artificial or enucleated eye to be mounted to standard swim goggles worn by a human volunteer to enable more realistic evaluation of eye-surgery robots after benchtop studies and prior to in vivo studies. The mounted eye can rotate about its center, with a rotational stiffness matching that of an anesthetized patient’s eye. We describe surgeon feedback and technical analyses to verify that various aspects of the design are sufficient for simulating a patient’s eye during surgery.</description><subject>639/166/985</subject><subject>639/166/988</subject><subject>692/308/2778</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Eye Protective Devices</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVqV_gAOyxIVLir8_TghVBSpV4gJny04m2ayydrCTpfvvcTdtaTngy1ieN2_eeF5VvSX4gmCmP2ZOhNE1pqzmVEhSmxfVKcVc1JRR-vLJ_aQ6z3mLyxHUcGJeVydMKSoZk6dVc3WAeheXMA-hR33s-xEymiPyaWh7QPMGUO8m5GH-DRBKDM1mjhOC2wnSsIMwZ-RCi4aA9sM-ohR9nIcGwQFQXlIP6fCmetW5McP5fTyrfn65-nH5rb75_vX68vNN3XBD51orjGWniQBZ5uGCg6DE67aRHYMinDrmgQrNms55JbXuVKsl1kJ577CQ7Ky6Xnnb6LZ2KupcOtjoBnt8iKm3LhVtI1jswBvPFHGacgbUc21KF-6IwS0TonB9Wrmmxe-gbcqcyY3PSJ9nwrCxfdxbggU2hNPC8OGeIcVfC-TZ7obcwDi6AHHJlmoplTBGsQJ9_w90G5cUyl8dUVSosrmCoiuqSTHnBN2jGoLtnSfs6glbPGGPnrB3Re-ezvFY8uCAAmArIJdUKOv62_s_tH8A5EPBsQ</recordid><startdate>20230919</startdate><enddate>20230919</enddate><creator>Posselli, Nicholas R.</creator><creator>Bernstein, Paul S.</creator><creator>Abbott, Jake J.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230919</creationdate><title>Eye-mounting goggles to bridge the gap between benchtop experiments and in vivo robotic eye surgery</title><author>Posselli, Nicholas R. ; Bernstein, Paul S. ; Abbott, Jake J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-87006f815e6561454e521b8dc6f3e9412a3be2583cfab7688f7d860857bba0563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>639/166/985</topic><topic>639/166/988</topic><topic>692/308/2778</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Eye Protective Devices</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Posselli, Nicholas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernstein, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Jake J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Posselli, Nicholas R.</au><au>Bernstein, Paul S.</au><au>Abbott, Jake J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eye-mounting goggles to bridge the gap between benchtop experiments and in vivo robotic eye surgery</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2023-09-19</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15503</spage><epage>15503</epage><pages>15503-15503</pages><artnum>15503</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>A variety of robot-assisted surgical systems have been proposed to improve the precision of eye surgery. Evaluation of these systems has typically relied on benchtop experiments with artificial or enucleated eyes. However, this does not properly account for the types of head motion that are common among patients undergoing eye surgery, which a clinical robotic system will encounter. In vivo experiments are clinically realistic, but they are risky and thus require the robotic system to be at a sufficiently mature state of development. In this paper, we describe a low-cost device that enables an artificial or enucleated eye to be mounted to standard swim goggles worn by a human volunteer to enable more realistic evaluation of eye-surgery robots after benchtop studies and prior to in vivo studies. The mounted eye can rotate about its center, with a rotational stiffness matching that of an anesthetized patient’s eye. We describe surgeon feedback and technical analyses to verify that various aspects of the design are sufficient for simulating a patient’s eye during surgery.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>37726336</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-023-42561-9</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2023-09, Vol.13 (1), p.15503-15503, Article 15503 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0aeb9b371a8243e2b489f3e4a190d355 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access |
subjects | 639/166/985 639/166/988 692/308/2778 Eye Eye Protective Devices Eye surgery Humanities and Social Sciences Humans multidisciplinary Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures Patients Robotic surgery Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotics Science Science (multidisciplinary) |
title | Eye-mounting goggles to bridge the gap between benchtop experiments and in vivo robotic eye surgery |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T02%3A02%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eye-mounting%20goggles%20to%20bridge%20the%20gap%20between%20benchtop%20experiments%20and%20in%20vivo%20robotic%20eye%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Posselli,%20Nicholas%20R.&rft.date=2023-09-19&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15503&rft.epage=15503&rft.pages=15503-15503&rft.artnum=15503&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-023-42561-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2866759973%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-87006f815e6561454e521b8dc6f3e9412a3be2583cfab7688f7d860857bba0563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2866257529&rft_id=info:pmid/37726336&rfr_iscdi=true |