A systematic review on the relationship between socioeconomic conditions and emotional disorder symptoms during Covid-19: unearthing the potential role of economic concerns and financial strain

• Published in: BMC Psychology 2024-04, Vol.12 (1), p.237-237, Article 237
• Main Authors: Chan, Jee Kei, Marzuki, Aleya A, Vafa, Samira, Thanaraju, Arjun, Yap, Jie, Chan, Xiou Wen, Harris, Hanis Atasha, Todi, Khushi, Schaefer, Alexandre
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Anxiety; Anxiety - epidemiology; Anxiety - psychology; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; COVID-19 - economics; COVID-19 - epidemiology; COVID-19 - psychology; Depression; Depression - epidemiology; Depression - psychology; Depression, Mental; Education; Emotional health; Epidemics; Family income; Financial Stress - epidemiology; Financial Stress - psychology; Health aspects; Households; Humans; Investigations; Longitudinal studies; Low income groups; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Mental disorders; Mental health; Mental Health - statistics & numerical data; Pandemics; Psychological aspects; SARS-CoV-2; Social aspects; Social classes; Social determinants; Socioeconomic conditions; Socioeconomic Factors; Stress; Systematic review
• ISSN: 2050-7283; 2050-7283
• DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01715-8

Covid-19 has disrupted the lives of many and resulted in high prevalence rates of mental disorders. Despite a vast amount of research into the social determinants of mental health during Covid-19, little is known about whether the results are consistent with the social gradient in mental health. Here we report a systematic review of studies that investigated how socioeconomic condition (SEC)-a multifaceted construct that measures a person's socioeconomic standing in society, using indicators such as education and income, predicts emotional health (depression and anxiety) risk during the pandemic. Furthermore, we examined which classes of SEC indicators would best predict symptoms of emotional disorders. Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted search over six databases, including Scopus, PubMed, etc., between November 4, 2021 and November 11, 2021 for studies that investigated how SEC indicators predict emotional health risks during Covid-19, after obtaining approval from PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021288508). Using Covidence as the platform, 362 articles (324 cross-sectional/repeated cross-sectional and 38 longitudinal) were included in this review according to the eligibility criteria. We categorized SEC indicators into 'actual versus perceived' and 'static versus fluid' classes to explore their differential effects on emotional health. Out of the 1479 SEC indicators used in these 362 studies, our results showed that 43.68% of the SEC indicators showed 'expected' results (i.e., higher SEC predicting better emotional health outcomes); 51.86% reported non-significant results and 4.46% reported the reverse. Economic concerns (67.16% expected results) and financial strains (64.16%) emerged as the best predictors while education (26.85%) and living conditions (30.14%) were the worst. This review summarizes how different SEC indicators influenced emotional health risks across 98 countries, with a total of 5,677,007 participants, ranging from high to low-income countries. Our findings showed that not all SEC indicators were strongly predictive of emotional health risks. In fact, over half of the SEC indicators studied showed a null effect. We found that perceived and fluid SEC indicators, particularly economic concerns and financial strain could best predict depressive and anxiety symptoms. These findings have implications for policymakers to further understand how different SEC classes affect mental health during a pandemic in order to tackle associated social issues